Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07PRETORIA3474
2007-10-02 15:30:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Pretoria
Cable title:  

ZUMA CO-CONSPIRATOR LOSES LAST APPEAL FOR FREEDOM

Tags:  PGOV KJUS SF 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4526
RR RUEHDU RUEHMR RUEHRN
DE RUEHSA #3474 2751530
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 021530Z OCT 07
FM AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2100
INFO RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE
RUEHTN/AMCONSUL CAPE TOWN 4913
RUEHDU/AMCONSUL DURBAN 9233
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L PRETORIA 003474 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/02/2017
TAGS: PGOV KJUS SF
SUBJECT: ZUMA CO-CONSPIRATOR LOSES LAST APPEAL FOR FREEDOM

REF: PRETORIA 4593

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Don Teitelbaum. Reasons 1.4 (b)
.

C O N F I D E N T I A L PRETORIA 003474 SIPDIS SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/02/2017 TAGS: PGOV KJUS SF SUBJECT: ZUMA CO-CONSPIRATOR LOSES LAST APPEAL FOR FREEDOM REF: PRETORIA 4593 Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Don Teitelbaum. Reasons 1.4 (b) . ¶1. (U) Schabir Shaik's application to appeal his 15-year sentence for corruption and fraud was dismissed on 02 October by the Constitutional Court. In his appeal, Shaik's attorneys argued that the trial was unfair because the State did not charge him together with ANC Deputy President Jacob Zuma, that certain search and seizures were illegal, that the former National Director of Public Prosecutions at the time of his arrest (Bulelani Ncguka) was guilty of misconduct, and that the media had undue influence over the Supreme Court of Appeal's decision to uphold the conviction. (NOTE: In November 2006, Shaik lost his appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (reftel). END NOTE) The Constitutional Court came to a unanimous decision and dismissed all counts, adding that, "the suffering of discrimination is not a general excuse for crime committed after the dawn of democracy." The court also noted that there may be a constitutional issue, but only related to the seizure of Shaik's assets. The court granted permission to appeal on that point. ¶2. (C) COMMENT. Today's court ruling effectively closes the door on the highly publicized case of Schabir Shaik. Shaik's only remaining avenue would be a presidential pardon. ¶3. (C) COMMENT CONT'D: Shaik's defeat today does not necessarily mean the National Prosecuting Authority will automatically prosecute Zuma for related corruption charges. However, it adds some pressure to move forward given what is now indisputable evidence against Zuma's co-conspirator. Such criminal charges may not soften Zuma's support among his core constituents, many of whom believe he has always been a victim of a political conspiracy, nor would they necessarily eliminate Zuma from the ANC succession battle, since a trial could never be concluded before the ANC's national conference in December. However, the potential of electing a party president who may be found guilty of criminal conduct complicates the succession race and may send more ANC elites in search of a compromise candidate. END COMMENT. Bost

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -