Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07PODGORICA32
2007-02-12 13:56:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Podgorica
Cable title:
MONTENEGRO DEBATES NEW CONSTITUTION
VZCZCXRO4896 RR RUEHPOD DE RUEHPOD #6501 0431335 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 121356Z FEB 07 FM AMEMBASSY PODGORICA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO RUEHPOD/AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PODGORICA 000032
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL MW
SUBJECT: MONTENEGRO DEBATES NEW CONSTITUTION
PODGORICA 00000032 001.3 OF 002
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PODGORICA 000032
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL MW
SUBJECT: MONTENEGRO DEBATES NEW CONSTITUTION
PODGORICA 00000032 001.3 OF 002
1. SUMMARY: THE GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT OF MONTENEGRO ARE
SEIZED WITH THE NECESSITY OF DRAFTING AND ADOPTING A NEW
CONSTITUTION, FOLLOWING MONTENEGRO'S RE-EMERGENCE AS AN
INDEPENDENT STATE LAST JUNE. THE GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION ALIKE
ARE AIMING AT A "CONSENSUS" TEXT WHICH COULD GAIN AT LEAST 2/3
SUPPORT IN THE 81 SEAT PARLIAMENT, IN A VOTE POSSIBLY LATER THIS
SPRING. THE COUNCIL OF EUROPES VENICE COMMISSION IS PROVIDING
SIGNIFICANT OUTSIDE EXPERTISE ON THE TEXT. KEY POINTS OF
CONTENTION ARE TREATMENT OF NATIONALITY, LANGUAGE, AND RELIGION.
END SUMMARY.
LEGITIMACY OF CONSTITUTIONAL ADOPTION PROCESS
--------------
2. AFTER INDEPENDENCE ON JUNE 3, 2006, MONTENEGRO BEGAN TO
CONSIDER A NEW CONSTITUTION TO REPLACE THE 1992 "MILOSEVIC-ERA"
CONSTITUTION. AN "EXPERT" DRAFT PRESENTED ON SEPTEMBER 8 HAS
BEEN USED AS THE STARTING POINT BY THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE
ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT REJECTED
MOTIONS LODGED BY OPPOSITION PARTIES CHALLENGING BOTH THE STATUS
OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY (NOTE: UNDER A LAW PASSED AFTER
INDEPENDENCE, THE REPRESENTATIVES ELECTED ON SEPTEMBER 10 WERE
ELECTED TO COMPRISE BOTH A CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY AND A REGULAR
PARLIAMENT. END NOTE.) AND THE LAW ON PROCEDURE FOR ADOPTION AND
PROCLAMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION, SO THE PARLIAMENT'S FULL
CAPACITY TO ADOPT THE NEW CONSTITUTION IS NO LONGER IN DISPUTE.
THE LAW STIPULATES THAT IF LESS THAN 2/3 OF PARLIAMENT VOTE FOR
THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION, IT MUST BE PUT FORWARD IN A REFERENDUM
WITH A 50 PERCENT VOTE NEEDED FOR ADOPTION.
CURRENT DISCUSSIONS AND CONTENTIOUS ISSUES
--------------
3. FOLLOWING REJECTION OF THEIR MOTIONS BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT, OPPOSITION PARTIES IN MID-JANUARY ENDED THEIR BOYCOTT OF
THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS. THE
COMMITTEE AGREED ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE FUTURE CONSTITUTION:
1) SEPARATION OF POWERS AND ORGANISATION OF THE STATE;
2) HUMAN AND MINORITY RIGHTS; AND
3) ECONOMIC SYSTEM AND FINANCE.
VERY POSTIVELY, NO PARTY OR FACTION IS SEEKING TO USE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE TO RE-OPEN LAST MAY'S DECISION BY THE
MONTENEGRIN ELECTORATE TO DECLARE INDEPENDENCE. THERE IS ALSO A
BROAD CONSENSUS ON KEY CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES SUCH AS THE FORM OF
GOVERNMENT, SEPARATION OF POWERS, PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS,
AND TREATMENT OF MINORITIES. CONSEQUENTLY, MOST POLITICAL
LEADERS HAVE TOLD POST THAT THEY SEE THE CONSTITUTION AS 80
PERCENT (THE VIEW OF THE OPPOSITION SOCIALIST PEOPLES PARTY) TO
EVEN 95 PERCENT (SPEAKER KRIVOKAPIC) COMPLETE, LEAVING ONLY A
FEW MATTERS OF CONTENTION.
4. UNFORTUNATELY, THE MOST CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN THE NEW
CONSTITUTION TOUCH ON ETHNIC IDENTITY AND SYMBOLISM -- INCLUDING
LANGUAGE, RELIGION, STATE FLAG AND ANTHEM -- WITH THE KEY
DICHOTOMY BEING SERBIAN AND MONTENEGRIN. THERE IS NO DEBATE TO
DATE OVER THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE ALBANIAN ETHNICITY AND LANGUAGE.
SEVEN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE PARLIAMENTARY
ASSEMBLY (COE/PACE -- SEE LIST PARA 5),INCLUDING ONE TO HAVE
THE CONSTITUTION DEFINE MONTENEGRO AS A "CIVIC STATE" (I.E., NOT
ONE FORMED OF "CONSTITUENT PEOPLES" -- MONTENEGRINS, SERBS,
ALBANIANS, BOSNIACS, CROATS, ETC.) WERE ADOPTED BY MOST
PARLIAMENTARY PARTIES ON FEBRUARY 8. HOWEVER, REJECTION OF THE
"CIVIC" PROPOSAL BY THE "SERBIAN LIST" - HEADED BY ANDRIJA
MANDIC, THE INFORMAL LEADER OF THE PARLIAMENTARY OPPOSITION, AND
THE BY THE SMALL "BOSNIAC PARTY", POINT TO FURTHER DISPUTES
BASED IN HOW THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD ACCOUNT FOR ETHNICITY.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE RECOMMENDATIONS
PODGORICA 00000032 002.5 OF 002
--------------
5. ON JANUARY 23, 2007, THE POLITICAL COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL
OF EUROPE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY DELIVERED A LIST OF MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE NEW CONSTITUTION IN
ORDER FOR MONTENEGRO TO BECOME A MEMBER STATE OF THE COUNCIL OF
EUROPE. THE REQUIRED ARTICLES ARE:
1) CIVIC STRUCTURE OF THE STATE;
2) ELIMINATION OF THE DECISIVE ROLE OF POLITICIANS IN THE
PROCESS OF APPOINTING JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS;
3) PROSECUTORS SHOULD NOT REPRESENT THE STATE IN CIVIL CASES;
4) PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TO BE GUARANTEED AT A LEVEL NO
LESS THAN THAT IN THE "SMALL CHARTER" OF THE FORMER STATE UNION
OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO;
5) TERMINATION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT;
6) REGULATING THE STATUS OF ARMED/SECURITY FORCES AND
INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AND THEIR PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT; AND 7)
CIVILIAN COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF MILITARY FORCES.
THE COE'S VENICE COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM WILL REMAIN
ENGAGED IN THE PROCESS AS WELL, AND HAS APPOINTED TWO
RAPPORTEURS TO WORK WITH THE PARLIAMENT ON THE TEXT.
6. COMMENT. DISAPPOINTINGLY BUT NOT SURPRISINGLY, MONTENEGRIN
POLITICIANS ARE FOCUSING DEBATE ON ISSUES OF TIMES PAST. THE
GOOD NEWS IS THAT REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF INTEGRATION INTO
EURO-ATLANTIC STRUCTURES ARE, FOR THE MOST PART,
NON-CONTROVERSIAL. THE "CIVIC STATE" ISSUE IS ONE THAT
MONTENEGRO'S SERB NATIONALISTS - A FAIRLY PLACID BUNCH BY
REGIONAL STANDARDS - HAVE STAKED OUT. HOWEVER, IT IS ALMOST
CERTAINLY NOT A DEAL BREAKER EVEN IF THEY FAIL TO BACK DOWN,
SINCE IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET A 2/3 MAJORITY IN THE 81-SEAT
PARLIAMENT WITHOUT THE SERBIAN LIST'S 12 VOTES; E.G., THE
PARTIES ADOPTING THE COE REQUIREMENTS REPRESENTED 67 MPS -
ALMOST 83 PERCENT OF THE ASSEMBLY. ISSUES RELATED TO THE
JUDICIARY HAVE SO FAR NOT BEEN A MAJOR STICKING POINT, BUT MAY
PROVE MORE DIFFICULT TO RESOLVE AS THE PROCESS CONTINUES. END
COMMENT.
BARNES
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL MW
SUBJECT: MONTENEGRO DEBATES NEW CONSTITUTION
PODGORICA 00000032 001.3 OF 002
1. SUMMARY: THE GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT OF MONTENEGRO ARE
SEIZED WITH THE NECESSITY OF DRAFTING AND ADOPTING A NEW
CONSTITUTION, FOLLOWING MONTENEGRO'S RE-EMERGENCE AS AN
INDEPENDENT STATE LAST JUNE. THE GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION ALIKE
ARE AIMING AT A "CONSENSUS" TEXT WHICH COULD GAIN AT LEAST 2/3
SUPPORT IN THE 81 SEAT PARLIAMENT, IN A VOTE POSSIBLY LATER THIS
SPRING. THE COUNCIL OF EUROPES VENICE COMMISSION IS PROVIDING
SIGNIFICANT OUTSIDE EXPERTISE ON THE TEXT. KEY POINTS OF
CONTENTION ARE TREATMENT OF NATIONALITY, LANGUAGE, AND RELIGION.
END SUMMARY.
LEGITIMACY OF CONSTITUTIONAL ADOPTION PROCESS
--------------
2. AFTER INDEPENDENCE ON JUNE 3, 2006, MONTENEGRO BEGAN TO
CONSIDER A NEW CONSTITUTION TO REPLACE THE 1992 "MILOSEVIC-ERA"
CONSTITUTION. AN "EXPERT" DRAFT PRESENTED ON SEPTEMBER 8 HAS
BEEN USED AS THE STARTING POINT BY THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE
ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT REJECTED
MOTIONS LODGED BY OPPOSITION PARTIES CHALLENGING BOTH THE STATUS
OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY (NOTE: UNDER A LAW PASSED AFTER
INDEPENDENCE, THE REPRESENTATIVES ELECTED ON SEPTEMBER 10 WERE
ELECTED TO COMPRISE BOTH A CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY AND A REGULAR
PARLIAMENT. END NOTE.) AND THE LAW ON PROCEDURE FOR ADOPTION AND
PROCLAMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION, SO THE PARLIAMENT'S FULL
CAPACITY TO ADOPT THE NEW CONSTITUTION IS NO LONGER IN DISPUTE.
THE LAW STIPULATES THAT IF LESS THAN 2/3 OF PARLIAMENT VOTE FOR
THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION, IT MUST BE PUT FORWARD IN A REFERENDUM
WITH A 50 PERCENT VOTE NEEDED FOR ADOPTION.
CURRENT DISCUSSIONS AND CONTENTIOUS ISSUES
--------------
3. FOLLOWING REJECTION OF THEIR MOTIONS BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT, OPPOSITION PARTIES IN MID-JANUARY ENDED THEIR BOYCOTT OF
THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS. THE
COMMITTEE AGREED ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE FUTURE CONSTITUTION:
1) SEPARATION OF POWERS AND ORGANISATION OF THE STATE;
2) HUMAN AND MINORITY RIGHTS; AND
3) ECONOMIC SYSTEM AND FINANCE.
VERY POSTIVELY, NO PARTY OR FACTION IS SEEKING TO USE THE
CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE TO RE-OPEN LAST MAY'S DECISION BY THE
MONTENEGRIN ELECTORATE TO DECLARE INDEPENDENCE. THERE IS ALSO A
BROAD CONSENSUS ON KEY CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES SUCH AS THE FORM OF
GOVERNMENT, SEPARATION OF POWERS, PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS,
AND TREATMENT OF MINORITIES. CONSEQUENTLY, MOST POLITICAL
LEADERS HAVE TOLD POST THAT THEY SEE THE CONSTITUTION AS 80
PERCENT (THE VIEW OF THE OPPOSITION SOCIALIST PEOPLES PARTY) TO
EVEN 95 PERCENT (SPEAKER KRIVOKAPIC) COMPLETE, LEAVING ONLY A
FEW MATTERS OF CONTENTION.
4. UNFORTUNATELY, THE MOST CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN THE NEW
CONSTITUTION TOUCH ON ETHNIC IDENTITY AND SYMBOLISM -- INCLUDING
LANGUAGE, RELIGION, STATE FLAG AND ANTHEM -- WITH THE KEY
DICHOTOMY BEING SERBIAN AND MONTENEGRIN. THERE IS NO DEBATE TO
DATE OVER THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE ALBANIAN ETHNICITY AND LANGUAGE.
SEVEN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE PARLIAMENTARY
ASSEMBLY (COE/PACE -- SEE LIST PARA 5),INCLUDING ONE TO HAVE
THE CONSTITUTION DEFINE MONTENEGRO AS A "CIVIC STATE" (I.E., NOT
ONE FORMED OF "CONSTITUENT PEOPLES" -- MONTENEGRINS, SERBS,
ALBANIANS, BOSNIACS, CROATS, ETC.) WERE ADOPTED BY MOST
PARLIAMENTARY PARTIES ON FEBRUARY 8. HOWEVER, REJECTION OF THE
"CIVIC" PROPOSAL BY THE "SERBIAN LIST" - HEADED BY ANDRIJA
MANDIC, THE INFORMAL LEADER OF THE PARLIAMENTARY OPPOSITION, AND
THE BY THE SMALL "BOSNIAC PARTY", POINT TO FURTHER DISPUTES
BASED IN HOW THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD ACCOUNT FOR ETHNICITY.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE RECOMMENDATIONS
PODGORICA 00000032 002.5 OF 002
--------------
5. ON JANUARY 23, 2007, THE POLITICAL COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL
OF EUROPE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY DELIVERED A LIST OF MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE NEW CONSTITUTION IN
ORDER FOR MONTENEGRO TO BECOME A MEMBER STATE OF THE COUNCIL OF
EUROPE. THE REQUIRED ARTICLES ARE:
1) CIVIC STRUCTURE OF THE STATE;
2) ELIMINATION OF THE DECISIVE ROLE OF POLITICIANS IN THE
PROCESS OF APPOINTING JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS;
3) PROSECUTORS SHOULD NOT REPRESENT THE STATE IN CIVIL CASES;
4) PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TO BE GUARANTEED AT A LEVEL NO
LESS THAN THAT IN THE "SMALL CHARTER" OF THE FORMER STATE UNION
OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO;
5) TERMINATION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT;
6) REGULATING THE STATUS OF ARMED/SECURITY FORCES AND
INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AND THEIR PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT; AND 7)
CIVILIAN COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF MILITARY FORCES.
THE COE'S VENICE COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM WILL REMAIN
ENGAGED IN THE PROCESS AS WELL, AND HAS APPOINTED TWO
RAPPORTEURS TO WORK WITH THE PARLIAMENT ON THE TEXT.
6. COMMENT. DISAPPOINTINGLY BUT NOT SURPRISINGLY, MONTENEGRIN
POLITICIANS ARE FOCUSING DEBATE ON ISSUES OF TIMES PAST. THE
GOOD NEWS IS THAT REQUIREMENTS IN SUPPORT OF INTEGRATION INTO
EURO-ATLANTIC STRUCTURES ARE, FOR THE MOST PART,
NON-CONTROVERSIAL. THE "CIVIC STATE" ISSUE IS ONE THAT
MONTENEGRO'S SERB NATIONALISTS - A FAIRLY PLACID BUNCH BY
REGIONAL STANDARDS - HAVE STAKED OUT. HOWEVER, IT IS ALMOST
CERTAINLY NOT A DEAL BREAKER EVEN IF THEY FAIL TO BACK DOWN,
SINCE IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET A 2/3 MAJORITY IN THE 81-SEAT
PARLIAMENT WITHOUT THE SERBIAN LIST'S 12 VOTES; E.G., THE
PARTIES ADOPTING THE COE REQUIREMENTS REPRESENTED 67 MPS -
ALMOST 83 PERCENT OF THE ASSEMBLY. ISSUES RELATED TO THE
JUDICIARY HAVE SO FAR NOT BEEN A MAJOR STICKING POINT, BUT MAY
PROVE MORE DIFFICULT TO RESOLVE AS THE PROCESS CONTINUES. END
COMMENT.
BARNES