Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07NEWDELHI80
2007-01-08 10:48:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:
CONGRESS GOVERNMENT IN HIMACHAL PRADESH PASSES A
how-toVZCZCXRO1747 OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHPW DE RUEHNE #0080 0081048 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 081048Z JAN 07 FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1923 INFO RUEHZJ/HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL COLLECTIVE RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 0610 RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 0709 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4916 RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 0642 RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 8400 RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 8463 RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 0432 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 1586 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 9107 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1015 RUEHNT/AMEMBASSY TASHKENT 0817 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 4286 RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 8059 RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 8249 RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 6464 RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 3448 RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 7432 RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 4054 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 3399 RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 5719 RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI RHMFISS/HQ USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L NEW DELHI 000080
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/08/2017
TAGS: KIRF PGOV PHUM SCUL KDEM IN
SUBJECT: CONGRESS GOVERNMENT IN HIMACHAL PRADESH PASSES A
RELIGIOUS CONVERSION BAN
Classified By: Political Counselor Ted Osius for reasons 1.4 (B,D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L NEW DELHI 000080
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/08/2017
TAGS: KIRF PGOV PHUM SCUL KDEM IN
SUBJECT: CONGRESS GOVERNMENT IN HIMACHAL PRADESH PASSES A
RELIGIOUS CONVERSION BAN
Classified By: Political Counselor Ted Osius for reasons 1.4 (B,D)
1. (U): On December 29, 2006, the legislature of the
Congress run Himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh (HP) passed
an anti-conversion bill during its truncated four day
session. Under the provisions of the bill, any person
convicted of engaging in "forced" conversion will face a two
year jail sentence and a fine of rupees 25,000 (USD 543).
2. (C) Catholic Bishops' Conference Spokesman Dr. Babu
Joseph told us on January 7 that the move caught Christian
organizations completely by surprise and they are still
formulating a response. Joseph opined that the bill, first
proposed in 2005, was passed to humor powerful vested
interests who remain wedded to strong anti-Christian
prejudices. He accused these vested interests of planning to
use the new law to persecute the state's minuscule (between
8-10,000) and weak Christian community. Christian leaders
see no need for such a bill in HP, as there has not been a
single conversion to Christianity in the state in recent
years.
3. (C) The move was a slap in the face to Congress President
Sonia Gandhi, who had earlier assured the state's Christians
that her party would not introduce such a bill. The measure,
which was apparently passed without the consent of the
Congress leadership, undermines repeated Congress claims to
be a secular party that protects religious minorities, has
embarrassed Congress in the run up to elections in Manipur,
Goa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh, and could elicit
a strong response from party headquarters. Anti-conversion
measures were passed in other states (Rajasthan, Chattisgarh,
Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Gujarat) with strong BJP backing,
and the BJP has applauded this latest measure. We will
follow developments in HP closely.
4. (U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website:
(http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/)
MULFORD
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/08/2017
TAGS: KIRF PGOV PHUM SCUL KDEM IN
SUBJECT: CONGRESS GOVERNMENT IN HIMACHAL PRADESH PASSES A
RELIGIOUS CONVERSION BAN
Classified By: Political Counselor Ted Osius for reasons 1.4 (B,D)
1. (U): On December 29, 2006, the legislature of the
Congress run Himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh (HP) passed
an anti-conversion bill during its truncated four day
session. Under the provisions of the bill, any person
convicted of engaging in "forced" conversion will face a two
year jail sentence and a fine of rupees 25,000 (USD 543).
2. (C) Catholic Bishops' Conference Spokesman Dr. Babu
Joseph told us on January 7 that the move caught Christian
organizations completely by surprise and they are still
formulating a response. Joseph opined that the bill, first
proposed in 2005, was passed to humor powerful vested
interests who remain wedded to strong anti-Christian
prejudices. He accused these vested interests of planning to
use the new law to persecute the state's minuscule (between
8-10,000) and weak Christian community. Christian leaders
see no need for such a bill in HP, as there has not been a
single conversion to Christianity in the state in recent
years.
3. (C) The move was a slap in the face to Congress President
Sonia Gandhi, who had earlier assured the state's Christians
that her party would not introduce such a bill. The measure,
which was apparently passed without the consent of the
Congress leadership, undermines repeated Congress claims to
be a secular party that protects religious minorities, has
embarrassed Congress in the run up to elections in Manipur,
Goa, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh, and could elicit
a strong response from party headquarters. Anti-conversion
measures were passed in other states (Rajasthan, Chattisgarh,
Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Gujarat) with strong BJP backing,
and the BJP has applauded this latest measure. We will
follow developments in HP closely.
4. (U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website:
(http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/)
MULFORD