Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07MOSCOW1634
2007-04-11 15:17:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Moscow
Cable title:
IRAN: PUTIN FRUSTRATED WITH TEHRAN
how-toVZCZCXRO1479 OO RUEHBC RUEHDBU RUEHDE RUEHDIR RUEHKUK DE RUEHMO #1634 1011517 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 111517Z APR 07 FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9127 INFO RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 001634
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/11/2017
TAGS: PREL PARM UNSC IR RS
SUBJECT: IRAN: PUTIN FRUSTRATED WITH TEHRAN
REF: MOSCOW 1608
Classified By: Ambassador William J. Burns. Reasons: 1.4(B & D).
C O N F I D E N T I A L MOSCOW 001634
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/11/2017
TAGS: PREL PARM UNSC IR RS
SUBJECT: IRAN: PUTIN FRUSTRATED WITH TEHRAN
REF: MOSCOW 1608
Classified By: Ambassador William J. Burns. Reasons: 1.4(B & D).
1. (C) During an April 10 conversation with Russian
Presidential Foreign Affairs Advisor Sergey Prikhodko, the
Ambassador again expressed disappointment with Russia's
receiving Iranian Deputy Interior Minister/IRGC General
Mohammed Zolqadr, a individual designated on the UNSCR 1747
list of key IRGC officials. Prikhodko took on board the
complaint without defending the decision to allow the visit.
Turning to the broader issue of Russian-Iranian relations and
noting Ahmadinejad's announcement of "industrial-scale"
uranium enrichment, Prikhodko said that Putin had become
"quite frustrated" with the Iranian government, including its
failure to respond to Russian and other overtures on the
nuclear issue. According to Prikhodko, he had never seen
Putin so exasperated with the Iranian regime. In an April 10
press appearance, Prikhodko said Russia regretted Tehran's
lack of a response to the offer of negotiations.
2. (SBU) An April 10 article in the leading daily
Kommersant about the Iranian general's visit reflected the
souring mood towards Tehran. After noting the Russian MFA's
defense of the visit as not violating UNSCR 1747, the story
characterized Zolqadr as "malicious," said Tehran had burned
its bridges by not abandoning its nuclear program, and noted
that Russia and China had now been placed in a difficult
position by Iran's failure to respond positively.
3. (U) On April 10, the MFA reacted skeptically to
Ahmadinejad's April 9 announcement, with the spokesman
warning against the media's "sensationalistic" treatment of
Iranian pronouncements on its nuclear capacities. The MFA
went on to note Russia's concern about Iran's latest
announcement, criticized Iranian statements that Tehran might
withdraw from the NPT, and reiterated the EU3 Plus 3's March
24 negotiation offer. FM Lavrov was also dubious about an
Iranian technical "breakthrough" and encouraged verification
by the IAEA.
BURNS
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/11/2017
TAGS: PREL PARM UNSC IR RS
SUBJECT: IRAN: PUTIN FRUSTRATED WITH TEHRAN
REF: MOSCOW 1608
Classified By: Ambassador William J. Burns. Reasons: 1.4(B & D).
1. (C) During an April 10 conversation with Russian
Presidential Foreign Affairs Advisor Sergey Prikhodko, the
Ambassador again expressed disappointment with Russia's
receiving Iranian Deputy Interior Minister/IRGC General
Mohammed Zolqadr, a individual designated on the UNSCR 1747
list of key IRGC officials. Prikhodko took on board the
complaint without defending the decision to allow the visit.
Turning to the broader issue of Russian-Iranian relations and
noting Ahmadinejad's announcement of "industrial-scale"
uranium enrichment, Prikhodko said that Putin had become
"quite frustrated" with the Iranian government, including its
failure to respond to Russian and other overtures on the
nuclear issue. According to Prikhodko, he had never seen
Putin so exasperated with the Iranian regime. In an April 10
press appearance, Prikhodko said Russia regretted Tehran's
lack of a response to the offer of negotiations.
2. (SBU) An April 10 article in the leading daily
Kommersant about the Iranian general's visit reflected the
souring mood towards Tehran. After noting the Russian MFA's
defense of the visit as not violating UNSCR 1747, the story
characterized Zolqadr as "malicious," said Tehran had burned
its bridges by not abandoning its nuclear program, and noted
that Russia and China had now been placed in a difficult
position by Iran's failure to respond positively.
3. (U) On April 10, the MFA reacted skeptically to
Ahmadinejad's April 9 announcement, with the spokesman
warning against the media's "sensationalistic" treatment of
Iranian pronouncements on its nuclear capacities. The MFA
went on to note Russia's concern about Iran's latest
announcement, criticized Iranian statements that Tehran might
withdraw from the NPT, and reiterated the EU3 Plus 3's March
24 negotiation offer. FM Lavrov was also dubious about an
Iranian technical "breakthrough" and encouraged verification
by the IAEA.
BURNS