Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07KIGALI110
2007-02-05 06:56:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Kigali
Cable title:
GACACA PROBLEMS, GACACA REFORMS
VZCZCXYZ0000 RR RUEHWEB DE RUEHLGB #0110/01 0360656 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 050656Z FEB 07 FM AMEMBASSY KIGALI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3720 INFO RUEHJB/AMEMBASSY BUJUMBURA 0005 RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM 0816 RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA 1528 RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA 0173 RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI 0749 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0199
UNCLAS KIGALI 000110
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM RW
SUBJECT: GACACA PROBLEMS, GACACA REFORMS
REF: KIGALI 1090
Summary
-------
UNCLAS KIGALI 000110
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM RW
SUBJECT: GACACA PROBLEMS, GACACA REFORMS
REF: KIGALI 1090
Summary
--------------
1. (SBU) The GOR seeks to streamline its gacaca system,
lowering penalties for those convicted of genocide crimes,
narrowing the jurisdiction of regular courts over genocide
suspects, and reducing the numbers of judges per gacaca
court. A new prisoner release is also soon to occur. By
these reforms, the GOR intends to quicken adjudication and
lessen the burdens on the nation's prisons, whose populations
are growing rapidly. At the same time, security forces seek
to buttress protections for survivors and witnesses. Gacaca
trials continue with generally broad support by Rwandans,
although procedural errors continue. The prospect of true
reconciliation amongst Tutsi and Hutu populations through the
gacaca process appears unlikely. Efforts to effect such
reconciliation will be the work of many years. End summary.
Legislation to Reduce Sentences, Quicken Adjudication
-------------- --------------
2. (U) In draft legislation just approved by the House of
Deputies and now before the Senate, the GOR will narrow
regular court jurisdiction over "category one" suspects to
national leaders, organizers and inciters of the killings,
and those who committed rape and sexual torture. The rest
(those who desecrated bodies, or were "distinguished"
killers, or committed non-sexual torture) will be relegated
to "category two" status, and be tried by the gacaca courts
along with other category two offenders (those who killed or
injured or aided the killers). The third category, those who
committed offenses against property, remains the same.
3. (U) Penalties will also be somewhat lessened, with
mandated prison terms reduced by several years for each
sub-category, and with the previous condition that half of
the formal sentence be spent in custody, and the rest in
community service, reduced to one-third custodial time, one
sixth suspended sentence, and one half community service.
The net result, if the current draft is ultimately passed
into law, will be shorter sentences across the board, and a
quicker return by convicts to their communities. The number
of judges per gacaca court will be reduced from 14 to 9
(including alternates). Surplus judges will hear cases as
additional "benches" in each court. This should result in a
quickened pace of adjudication.
Nearly One-Third of Caseload Completed, But Many Tough Cases
Remain
-------------- --------------
4. (U) In a January 31 meeting, gacaca courts Executive
Secretary Domitilla Mukantaganzwa told emboffs that by the
SIPDIS
end of 2006, some 51,000 persons had had their cases heard by
the gacaca courts (including appeals). The number of gacaca
suspects had risen to 818,564 (often as a result of
denunciation during gacaca proceedings),including 77,269
category one files, 432,557 category two files, and 308,738
category three files. She anticipated that about 60,000
category one files would be transferred from the regular
courts to gacaca courts after the new legislation took
effect.
5. (U) Fully sixty-eight percent of category three property
cases had been processed by the cell-level courts, she said,
entirely by accepting settlements among the parties (category
three property cases do not result in jail terms, and gacaca
procedures explicitly encourage private settlements). In
sum, of the 818,564 cases mentioned above, approximately
260,000 had been completed by the end of 2006, or nearly
one-third of the caseload. Mukantaganzwa commented that,
while the remaining category two cases, just under 500,000,
would be a significant challenge, she believed that the
gacaca courts would complete their caseloads in 2008.
Prison Population Rising, Prison Releases in Store
-------------- --------------
6. (SBU) This effort to reduce prison terms across the board
comes at a time when the prison population, according to
local contacts at the International Commission for Red Cross
(ICRC),is growing by one thousand prisoners a month, nearly
all the result of gacaca convictions. The total number of
prisoners nationwide is now greater than 87,000
(approximately 71,000 genocide prisoners, and 16,000
non-genocide). The pressure on the government prison budget,
now no longer receiving food assistance from ICRC, is severe.
In recent days, the GOR has also announced in various venues
the coming release of another 8,000 genocide suspects,
another effort to reduce the size of the prison population.
With National Expansion, Number of Attacks Are Up, Protective
Measures Enhanced
-------------- --------------
7. (SBU) The GOR is also wrestling with recent criticism of
its handling of attacks on genocide survivors, witnesses and
judges. Human Rights Watch in particular in its recent
report on two gruesome incidents in November drew attention
to what it considered a worrisome potential trend of revenge
killings by survivors on suspected attackers (in one of the
cases, survivors murdered innocent Hutu villagers uninvolved
in the prior killing of the nephew of a gacaca judge). The
GOR in its National Dialogue in December extensively
discussed these attacks, and President Kagame pledged renewed
efforts to safeguard the gacaca system and its participants.
At a discussion organized by the Great Lakes Human Rights
League (GLHRL) in late January, Internal Security Secretary
General Joseph Mutaboba reviewed GOR efforts at enhanced
protective measures.
8. (SBU) According to Mutaboba, measures include intensive
review by local authorities of survivors most at risk and
accused considered most dangerous, and surveillance of both
categories. Preventive detention would be employed for
high-risk suspects. Survivors and local authorities would
put in place regular patrols in areas where tensions ran
high. Gacaca courts would also seek to try first those cases
involving suspects considered likely to intimidate or attack
gacaca participants. Mutobaba also mentioned that the
Protective Service for Survivors and Witnesses, established
in June 2006 at the office of the Prosecutor General, and its
hotline services would be extended to local levels.
Separately, gacaca Executive Secretary Mukantaganzwa told us
that her office is expanding its own hotline services (which
are offered free of charge by mobile phone giant MTN).
9. (U) At this GLHRL meeting, police and survivor
organization Ibuka representatives presented figures for
attacks on survivors for the past two years. According to
their figures, 223 attacks (8 murders) occurred in 2005, and
328 attacks (11 murders) in 2006. (In a separate meeting
with emboff, the Justice Ministry's Protective Service for
Survivors and Witnesses offered a somewhat lower figure of
311 attacks in 2006). These "attacks" included acts of
physical injury, intimidation, and destruction of crops and
herd animals. Participants noted that the rise in attacks
from 2005 to 2006 coincided with the expansion of gacaca from
118 pilot courts to 1545 courts nationwide.
Good Faith Effort At Adjudication, But No Real Reconciliation
Occurring
-------------- --------------
10. (U) Lawyers Without Borders (LWB) has conducted
extensive sampling of gacaca trials across the nation, and
produced near-verbatim accounts of hundreds of trials. In a
recent public overview of its monitoring efforts LWB reported
that while many gacaca courts, following expansion of the
pilot program to nation-wide coverage last July, continued to
commit procedural errors, the courts by and large exhibited
good-faith efforts to examine events with care and reach the
truth. Of the original 118 pilot gacaca courts, most now
operated at an appreciably higher level of performance.
LWB's implicit finding: the 1427 new gacaca courts in
operation since July would improve their performance over
time as well.
11. (SBU) However, several continuing failures reduce the
prospect for true reconciliation between the Tutsi and Hutu
populations. First and foremost, according to LWB, the
trials so far consisted of mass attendance by local
inhabitants rather than mass participation. Assembled
village populations at gacaca trials rarely contributed, but
rather stood mute before the judges, as the courts attempted
with varying success to examine cases and assess
responsibility (see reftel for similar observations by
mission personnel). Further, LWB found that many gacaca
courts did a poor job of articulating their decisions, often
simply announcing the prison terms assessed for various
offenses. In effect, not much give and take occurred at
trials, and not much justification of sentences was offered.
The attending villagers did not reach any perceptible
accommodation as a result of the proceedings, but simply
dispersed in silence.
Comment
--------------
12. (SBU) The gacaca courts are a breathtakingly ambitious
attempt at mass justice and truth-telling that has its share
of procedural and administrative teething problems, and
good-faith attempts to address them. Tens of thousands of
cases have been heard and judged without incident. We see
worrisome and sometimes quite disturbing acts of violence,
intimidation and revenge, but in numbers that represent less
than one half of one tenth of one percent of the caseload.
Recent national polling finds generally broad support for the
gacaca process, while Hutus and Tutsi populations worry over
the respective consequences for their friends and family
members (prison time, for Hutus, and lack of full accounting
for their losses, for Tutsi survivors). Justice seems
within reach, as courts adjudicate cases and assess penalties
for the many violent and sordid acts committed during the
genocide. Reconciliation, however, seems beyond the capacity
of this traditional justice system, modernized and expanded,
but unable to change deep-seated animosities. Efforts to
change the attitudes of Rwandans on ethnic issues, such as
those by the National Unity and Reconciliation Commission,
will be the work of many years. End Comment.
ARIETTI
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PHUM RW
SUBJECT: GACACA PROBLEMS, GACACA REFORMS
REF: KIGALI 1090
Summary
--------------
1. (SBU) The GOR seeks to streamline its gacaca system,
lowering penalties for those convicted of genocide crimes,
narrowing the jurisdiction of regular courts over genocide
suspects, and reducing the numbers of judges per gacaca
court. A new prisoner release is also soon to occur. By
these reforms, the GOR intends to quicken adjudication and
lessen the burdens on the nation's prisons, whose populations
are growing rapidly. At the same time, security forces seek
to buttress protections for survivors and witnesses. Gacaca
trials continue with generally broad support by Rwandans,
although procedural errors continue. The prospect of true
reconciliation amongst Tutsi and Hutu populations through the
gacaca process appears unlikely. Efforts to effect such
reconciliation will be the work of many years. End summary.
Legislation to Reduce Sentences, Quicken Adjudication
-------------- --------------
2. (U) In draft legislation just approved by the House of
Deputies and now before the Senate, the GOR will narrow
regular court jurisdiction over "category one" suspects to
national leaders, organizers and inciters of the killings,
and those who committed rape and sexual torture. The rest
(those who desecrated bodies, or were "distinguished"
killers, or committed non-sexual torture) will be relegated
to "category two" status, and be tried by the gacaca courts
along with other category two offenders (those who killed or
injured or aided the killers). The third category, those who
committed offenses against property, remains the same.
3. (U) Penalties will also be somewhat lessened, with
mandated prison terms reduced by several years for each
sub-category, and with the previous condition that half of
the formal sentence be spent in custody, and the rest in
community service, reduced to one-third custodial time, one
sixth suspended sentence, and one half community service.
The net result, if the current draft is ultimately passed
into law, will be shorter sentences across the board, and a
quicker return by convicts to their communities. The number
of judges per gacaca court will be reduced from 14 to 9
(including alternates). Surplus judges will hear cases as
additional "benches" in each court. This should result in a
quickened pace of adjudication.
Nearly One-Third of Caseload Completed, But Many Tough Cases
Remain
-------------- --------------
4. (U) In a January 31 meeting, gacaca courts Executive
Secretary Domitilla Mukantaganzwa told emboffs that by the
SIPDIS
end of 2006, some 51,000 persons had had their cases heard by
the gacaca courts (including appeals). The number of gacaca
suspects had risen to 818,564 (often as a result of
denunciation during gacaca proceedings),including 77,269
category one files, 432,557 category two files, and 308,738
category three files. She anticipated that about 60,000
category one files would be transferred from the regular
courts to gacaca courts after the new legislation took
effect.
5. (U) Fully sixty-eight percent of category three property
cases had been processed by the cell-level courts, she said,
entirely by accepting settlements among the parties (category
three property cases do not result in jail terms, and gacaca
procedures explicitly encourage private settlements). In
sum, of the 818,564 cases mentioned above, approximately
260,000 had been completed by the end of 2006, or nearly
one-third of the caseload. Mukantaganzwa commented that,
while the remaining category two cases, just under 500,000,
would be a significant challenge, she believed that the
gacaca courts would complete their caseloads in 2008.
Prison Population Rising, Prison Releases in Store
-------------- --------------
6. (SBU) This effort to reduce prison terms across the board
comes at a time when the prison population, according to
local contacts at the International Commission for Red Cross
(ICRC),is growing by one thousand prisoners a month, nearly
all the result of gacaca convictions. The total number of
prisoners nationwide is now greater than 87,000
(approximately 71,000 genocide prisoners, and 16,000
non-genocide). The pressure on the government prison budget,
now no longer receiving food assistance from ICRC, is severe.
In recent days, the GOR has also announced in various venues
the coming release of another 8,000 genocide suspects,
another effort to reduce the size of the prison population.
With National Expansion, Number of Attacks Are Up, Protective
Measures Enhanced
-------------- --------------
7. (SBU) The GOR is also wrestling with recent criticism of
its handling of attacks on genocide survivors, witnesses and
judges. Human Rights Watch in particular in its recent
report on two gruesome incidents in November drew attention
to what it considered a worrisome potential trend of revenge
killings by survivors on suspected attackers (in one of the
cases, survivors murdered innocent Hutu villagers uninvolved
in the prior killing of the nephew of a gacaca judge). The
GOR in its National Dialogue in December extensively
discussed these attacks, and President Kagame pledged renewed
efforts to safeguard the gacaca system and its participants.
At a discussion organized by the Great Lakes Human Rights
League (GLHRL) in late January, Internal Security Secretary
General Joseph Mutaboba reviewed GOR efforts at enhanced
protective measures.
8. (SBU) According to Mutaboba, measures include intensive
review by local authorities of survivors most at risk and
accused considered most dangerous, and surveillance of both
categories. Preventive detention would be employed for
high-risk suspects. Survivors and local authorities would
put in place regular patrols in areas where tensions ran
high. Gacaca courts would also seek to try first those cases
involving suspects considered likely to intimidate or attack
gacaca participants. Mutobaba also mentioned that the
Protective Service for Survivors and Witnesses, established
in June 2006 at the office of the Prosecutor General, and its
hotline services would be extended to local levels.
Separately, gacaca Executive Secretary Mukantaganzwa told us
that her office is expanding its own hotline services (which
are offered free of charge by mobile phone giant MTN).
9. (U) At this GLHRL meeting, police and survivor
organization Ibuka representatives presented figures for
attacks on survivors for the past two years. According to
their figures, 223 attacks (8 murders) occurred in 2005, and
328 attacks (11 murders) in 2006. (In a separate meeting
with emboff, the Justice Ministry's Protective Service for
Survivors and Witnesses offered a somewhat lower figure of
311 attacks in 2006). These "attacks" included acts of
physical injury, intimidation, and destruction of crops and
herd animals. Participants noted that the rise in attacks
from 2005 to 2006 coincided with the expansion of gacaca from
118 pilot courts to 1545 courts nationwide.
Good Faith Effort At Adjudication, But No Real Reconciliation
Occurring
-------------- --------------
10. (U) Lawyers Without Borders (LWB) has conducted
extensive sampling of gacaca trials across the nation, and
produced near-verbatim accounts of hundreds of trials. In a
recent public overview of its monitoring efforts LWB reported
that while many gacaca courts, following expansion of the
pilot program to nation-wide coverage last July, continued to
commit procedural errors, the courts by and large exhibited
good-faith efforts to examine events with care and reach the
truth. Of the original 118 pilot gacaca courts, most now
operated at an appreciably higher level of performance.
LWB's implicit finding: the 1427 new gacaca courts in
operation since July would improve their performance over
time as well.
11. (SBU) However, several continuing failures reduce the
prospect for true reconciliation between the Tutsi and Hutu
populations. First and foremost, according to LWB, the
trials so far consisted of mass attendance by local
inhabitants rather than mass participation. Assembled
village populations at gacaca trials rarely contributed, but
rather stood mute before the judges, as the courts attempted
with varying success to examine cases and assess
responsibility (see reftel for similar observations by
mission personnel). Further, LWB found that many gacaca
courts did a poor job of articulating their decisions, often
simply announcing the prison terms assessed for various
offenses. In effect, not much give and take occurred at
trials, and not much justification of sentences was offered.
The attending villagers did not reach any perceptible
accommodation as a result of the proceedings, but simply
dispersed in silence.
Comment
--------------
12. (SBU) The gacaca courts are a breathtakingly ambitious
attempt at mass justice and truth-telling that has its share
of procedural and administrative teething problems, and
good-faith attempts to address them. Tens of thousands of
cases have been heard and judged without incident. We see
worrisome and sometimes quite disturbing acts of violence,
intimidation and revenge, but in numbers that represent less
than one half of one tenth of one percent of the caseload.
Recent national polling finds generally broad support for the
gacaca process, while Hutus and Tutsi populations worry over
the respective consequences for their friends and family
members (prison time, for Hutus, and lack of full accounting
for their losses, for Tutsi survivors). Justice seems
within reach, as courts adjudicate cases and assess penalties
for the many violent and sordid acts committed during the
genocide. Reconciliation, however, seems beyond the capacity
of this traditional justice system, modernized and expanded,
but unable to change deep-seated animosities. Efforts to
change the attitudes of Rwandans on ethnic issues, such as
those by the National Unity and Reconciliation Commission,
will be the work of many years. End Comment.
ARIETTI