Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07KHARTOUM1848
2007-11-26 08:47:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Khartoum
Cable title:
IN "HISTORIC SHIFT", SUDAN AGREES TO ATTEND
how-toVZCZCXRO5073 OO RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHKUK RUEHROV DE RUEHKH #1848 3300847 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 260847Z NOV 07 FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9297 INFO RUEHEE/ARAB LEAGUE COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L KHARTOUM 001848
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR AF/SPG, NEA/RA, NEA/IPA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/26/2017
TAGS: AMGT KPAL KWBG PGOV PREL IS SU
SUBJECT: IN "HISTORIC SHIFT", SUDAN AGREES TO ATTEND
ANNAPOLIS CONFERENCE
REF: A. KHARTOUM 1827
B. STATE 158852
Classified By: CDA Alberto M. Fernandez, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
1 (C) Presidential Advisor Dr. Mustafa Othman Ismail
notified CDA Fernandez on November 26 that Sudan, in a
historic policy shift, has agreed to attend the Annapolis
Conference. MFA Protocol subsequently confirmed to Charge
that the Foreign Ministry was accepting the State
Department's suggestion and instructing their Charge in
Washington, Ambassador John Ukec Lueth Ukec, to represent
Sudan since time would not allow a more senior official to be
present.
2. (C) Ismail noted that this decision was "a historic policy
shift" for Sudan since the country has steadfastly refused to
ever attend any international meeting with Israel. He added
that the decision will make some hardliners in the country
very unhappy, even if it is only a symbolic presence. CDA
noted that with Syria and Saudi Arabia attending, perhaps
this would be less of a problem for Sudan. Ismail responded
that Sudan was taking this step to show that it wants to be
considered a responsible partner with the international
community, and especially the United States, for peace and
stability. CDA Fernandez responded that we were appreciative
of this decision, but that, in the Sudanese context, progress
on Darfur and CPA implementation were even more important.
3. (C) Comment: While this is a small positive step (which
may indeed loom large in some radical Sudanese minds),this
decision shows a common disconnect in Sudanese strategic
thinking that believes that "progress" on some issues such as
peace in the Middle East or counter-terrorism somehow
obviates the need for greater Sudanese Government action on
issues where they are indeed central players, such as ending
the crisis in Darfur or full implementation of the fragile
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between North and South.
End comment.
FERNANDEZ
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR AF/SPG, NEA/RA, NEA/IPA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/26/2017
TAGS: AMGT KPAL KWBG PGOV PREL IS SU
SUBJECT: IN "HISTORIC SHIFT", SUDAN AGREES TO ATTEND
ANNAPOLIS CONFERENCE
REF: A. KHARTOUM 1827
B. STATE 158852
Classified By: CDA Alberto M. Fernandez, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
1 (C) Presidential Advisor Dr. Mustafa Othman Ismail
notified CDA Fernandez on November 26 that Sudan, in a
historic policy shift, has agreed to attend the Annapolis
Conference. MFA Protocol subsequently confirmed to Charge
that the Foreign Ministry was accepting the State
Department's suggestion and instructing their Charge in
Washington, Ambassador John Ukec Lueth Ukec, to represent
Sudan since time would not allow a more senior official to be
present.
2. (C) Ismail noted that this decision was "a historic policy
shift" for Sudan since the country has steadfastly refused to
ever attend any international meeting with Israel. He added
that the decision will make some hardliners in the country
very unhappy, even if it is only a symbolic presence. CDA
noted that with Syria and Saudi Arabia attending, perhaps
this would be less of a problem for Sudan. Ismail responded
that Sudan was taking this step to show that it wants to be
considered a responsible partner with the international
community, and especially the United States, for peace and
stability. CDA Fernandez responded that we were appreciative
of this decision, but that, in the Sudanese context, progress
on Darfur and CPA implementation were even more important.
3. (C) Comment: While this is a small positive step (which
may indeed loom large in some radical Sudanese minds),this
decision shows a common disconnect in Sudanese strategic
thinking that believes that "progress" on some issues such as
peace in the Middle East or counter-terrorism somehow
obviates the need for greater Sudanese Government action on
issues where they are indeed central players, such as ending
the crisis in Darfur or full implementation of the fragile
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between North and South.
End comment.
FERNANDEZ