Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ANKARA343
2007-02-16 12:43:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

TURKS ASK FOR MORE JUSTIFICATION FOR WMD TASK

Tags:  KNNP PREL PTER TU 
pdf how-to read a cable
null
Tim W Hayes 03/02/2007 04:22:03 PM From DB/Inbox: Tim W Hayes

Cable 
Text: 
 
 
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 00343

SIPDIS
CX:
 ACTION: PMA
 INFO: POL DCM DAO RAO ECON TSR FCS CONS AMB PA

DISSEMINATION: PMA /1
CHARGE: PROG

APPROVED: PMA:CSEIBENTRITT
DRAFTED: PMA:CERICH
CLEARED: LEGATT- DGUERRERO

VZCZCAYI497
PP RUEHC RHMCSUU
DE RUEHAK #0343 0471243
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 161243Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0993
INFO RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 000343 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/15/2017
TAGS: KNNP PREL PTER TU
SUBJECT: TURKS ASK FOR MORE JUSTIFICATION FOR WMD TASK
FORCE MOU

REF: STATE 17741

Classified By: Pol-Mil Counselor Carl Siebentritt, reasons 1.4 (b/d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 000343

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/15/2017
TAGS: KNNP PREL PTER TU
SUBJECT: TURKS ASK FOR MORE JUSTIFICATION FOR WMD TASK
FORCE MOU

REF: STATE 17741

Classified By: Pol-Mil Counselor Carl Siebentritt, reasons 1.4 (b/d)


1. (C) Summary: ISN/WMD Office Director Thomas Lehrman
presented a draft MOU on the creation of a bilateral Weapons
of Mass Destruction (WMD) Terrorism Enforcement Task Force to
Serhan Yigit, Head of Section, MFA Department of Arms Control
and Disarmament on February 13 on the margins of the Ankara
meeting of the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism.
Yigit requested any additional points we could provide on
the benefits to the GOT of such an MOU. He cautioned that
GOT agreement would take time because other agencies'
approval would be required. End summary.


2. (C) Lehrman, who was joined by FBI WMD Countermeasures
Unit Chief Jeff Muller and EMBASSY LEGATT, stressed that the
proposed MOU would benefit Turkey by fostering faster
communication and enhanced cooperation with the U.S. on
potential WMD terrorism. Lehrman noted that this was a pilot
proposal, contained no fixed term, and that GOT comments on
the draft would be welcome.


3. (C) Yigit initially questioned why such an MOU was
necessary when current bilateral cooperative agreements
including a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) were
already in place. He asked if the U.S. was experiencing
difficulties in communication with Turkish authorities on
terrorism-related law enforcement matters. Yigit requested
more specific points on what the MOU would accomplish and why
it would be beneficial to Turkey. With a more focused
justification, he said, he could better make the case for the
agreement outside the MFA. Yigit explained that because the
MFA would have to present the MOU draft to several other GOT
agencies, time would be required to receive approval.


4. (C) LEGATT replied that bilateral cooperation was very
good and that the U.S. was not currently experiencing
difficulties communicating with Turkish authorities on
terrorism enforcement issues. However, the nature and scope
WMD terrorism required a new kind of bilateral cooperation,
he said. Lehrman emphasized that cooperation with the GOT on
terrorism was excellent, but underscored that WMD threats
required taking our communication "to the next level."
Lehrman agreed that ISN/WMD would provide additional points
on the benefits of the MOU to MFA for its use in seeking
interagency agreement within the GOT, and that these points
would be transmitted to MFA via the Embassy.

Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/

WILSON

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -