Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TOKYO4500
2006-08-10 05:47:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:
DEFENSE WHITE PAPER: ROK GETS GREATER, BUT
how-toVZCZCXRO6414 PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHNH RUEHPB DE RUEHKO #4500 2220547 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 100547Z AUG 06 FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5214 INFO RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 1729 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9837 RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC RUEHMS/COMMARFORPAC RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L TOKYO 004500
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/08/2016
TAGS: MARR PREL JA
SUBJECT: DEFENSE WHITE PAPER: ROK GETS GREATER, BUT
NEUTRAL, TREATMENT
REF: TOKYO 4365 (030811Z AUG 06)
Classified By: AMBASSADOR J. THOMAS SCHIEFFER. REASON: 1.4(B)(D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L TOKYO 004500
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/08/2016
TAGS: MARR PREL JA
SUBJECT: DEFENSE WHITE PAPER: ROK GETS GREATER, BUT
NEUTRAL, TREATMENT
REF: TOKYO 4365 (030811Z AUG 06)
Classified By: AMBASSADOR J. THOMAS SCHIEFFER. REASON: 1.4(B)(D)
1. (SBU) The Japan Defense Agency (JDA) 2006 White Paper
(reftel) devotes much more attention than last year to the
security situation on the Korean Peninsula, and in
particular, the Republic of Korea's defense policy. In 2005,
the White Paper's section on South Korea was limited to a
mere ten lines; its main substantive observation was that, in
line with the ROK's policy of engagement with the DPRK, the
ROK Ministry of National Defense ceased describing North
Korea as the "main enemy" in 2004.
2. (SBU) This year's JDA White Paper, by comparison, is two
pages long. It describes in some detail the stationing of
U.S. forces in Korea, including adjustments in force size and
disposition agreed to during the Future of the Alliance
(FOTA) process and the successor Security Policy Initiative
(SPI),as well as joint exercises "Foal Eagle" and "RSOI"
(Reception, Staging, Onward Movement and Integration). The
White Paper for the first time also reports on reciprocal
defense minister visits and other military-to-military
cooperation between the ROK and China, and between the ROK
and Russia.
3. (SBU) In its treatment of South Korea's defense policy,
the White Paper gives considerable attention to the ROK
"Defense Reform 2020" plan, followed by two full paragraphs
describing ROK force modernization, citing acquisition of
submarines, multi-role helicopters, F-15Ks, AWACS procurement
planned for 2012, and AEGIS-equiped destroyers. The report
also notes that "the ROK is believed to be trying to realize
the domestic production of missiles."
4. (C) Comment: Except perhaps for the above wording on
missiles, the White Paper's description of ROK defense policy
and force modernization is cast in neutral terms, unlike the
critical commentary used in the report's section on China
(septel). On August 8, Korea expert Narushige Michishita of
JDA's National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS),told us
it was high time for JDA to assess in more depth ROK security
policy, both "the good and bad," as he put it. The 2006
Defense White Paper is a step in that direction.
SCHIEFFER
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/08/2016
TAGS: MARR PREL JA
SUBJECT: DEFENSE WHITE PAPER: ROK GETS GREATER, BUT
NEUTRAL, TREATMENT
REF: TOKYO 4365 (030811Z AUG 06)
Classified By: AMBASSADOR J. THOMAS SCHIEFFER. REASON: 1.4(B)(D)
1. (SBU) The Japan Defense Agency (JDA) 2006 White Paper
(reftel) devotes much more attention than last year to the
security situation on the Korean Peninsula, and in
particular, the Republic of Korea's defense policy. In 2005,
the White Paper's section on South Korea was limited to a
mere ten lines; its main substantive observation was that, in
line with the ROK's policy of engagement with the DPRK, the
ROK Ministry of National Defense ceased describing North
Korea as the "main enemy" in 2004.
2. (SBU) This year's JDA White Paper, by comparison, is two
pages long. It describes in some detail the stationing of
U.S. forces in Korea, including adjustments in force size and
disposition agreed to during the Future of the Alliance
(FOTA) process and the successor Security Policy Initiative
(SPI),as well as joint exercises "Foal Eagle" and "RSOI"
(Reception, Staging, Onward Movement and Integration). The
White Paper for the first time also reports on reciprocal
defense minister visits and other military-to-military
cooperation between the ROK and China, and between the ROK
and Russia.
3. (SBU) In its treatment of South Korea's defense policy,
the White Paper gives considerable attention to the ROK
"Defense Reform 2020" plan, followed by two full paragraphs
describing ROK force modernization, citing acquisition of
submarines, multi-role helicopters, F-15Ks, AWACS procurement
planned for 2012, and AEGIS-equiped destroyers. The report
also notes that "the ROK is believed to be trying to realize
the domestic production of missiles."
4. (C) Comment: Except perhaps for the above wording on
missiles, the White Paper's description of ROK defense policy
and force modernization is cast in neutral terms, unlike the
critical commentary used in the report's section on China
(septel). On August 8, Korea expert Narushige Michishita of
JDA's National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS),told us
it was high time for JDA to assess in more depth ROK security
policy, both "the good and bad," as he put it. The 2006
Defense White Paper is a step in that direction.
SCHIEFFER