Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TOKYO1301
2006-03-12 23:02:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:
EAST CHINA SEA TALKS DISSOLVE INTO ACRIMONY
how-toVZCZCXRO6133 RR RUEHCN RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNH DE RUEHKO #1301 0712302 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 122302Z MAR 06 FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9635 INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1079 RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 0046 RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5073 RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 1199 RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 5916 RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7704 RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8197 RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6254 RUESLE/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 1998 RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 0296 RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI 5937
C O N F I D E N T I A L TOKYO 001301
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/10/2016
TAGS: ECON ENRG JA
SUBJECT: EAST CHINA SEA TALKS DISSOLVE INTO ACRIMONY
Classified By: Ambassador J.T. Schieffer. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L TOKYO 001301
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/10/2016
TAGS: ECON ENRG JA
SUBJECT: EAST CHINA SEA TALKS DISSOLVE INTO ACRIMONY
Classified By: Ambassador J.T. Schieffer. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).
1. (SBU) SUMMARY. This week,s director general-level
meetings in Beijing failed to bring the two sides any closer
to an agreement on development of oil and natural gas
resources in the East China Sea. Instead, China has provoked
Japan,s ire by suggesting joint development of an area which
Japan claims as its own - the Senkaku islands. End summary.
2. (C) Japan and China are no closer to resolving their
differences over oil and natural gas drilling in the East
China Sea after director general-level meetings in Beijing on
Monday and Tuesday of this week. China appears to have
replaced its conciliatory stance with a provocative one by
introducing a plan to co-develop hydrocarbon deposits near
the the Senkaku islands, an area that Japan strongly defends
as its own. MOFA Director General for Asian and Oceanian
Affairs Bureau Kenichiro Sasae reported to Emboff that the
offer was so bad he told the Chinese he refused to take it
back to Tokyo with him.
3. (SBU) The issue of developing the resources that lie under
the sea between Japan and China is complicated by the fact
that the two countries have never agreed an international
boundary and are using separate international treaties to
justify their claims. Japan relies on the UN Convention on
the Law of the Sea which allows coastal countries to claim an
economic zone extending 200 miles (370 Kilometers) from their
shores. China bases its claim on the 1958 Geneva Convention
of the Continental Shelf that allows coastal countries to
extend their borders to the edge of the undersea continental
shelf, a perimeter that would lie very close to Okinawa.
4. (SBU) This is Japan and China,s fourth attempt to iron
out differences over the oil and natural gas exploitation.
The four meetings have produced several proposals for joint
development but no agreement. In March 2005 Japan turned
down China,s proposal to work together because Japan claimed
it was unclear what China was offering. In May 2005 China
offered joint development on Japan,s side of the median line
but Japan rejected the idea. In late September Japan offered
joint development of the fields on both sides of the
Japan-China median line but China declined.
5. (SBU) Comment. After Koizumi replaced then Trade Minister
Shoichi Nakagawa, who had taken a tough stance toward China,
with Toshihiro Nikai, it appeared that a solution to this
problem might be possible. However, it now appears that this
issue will continue for some time to come. End comment.
SCHIEFFER
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/10/2016
TAGS: ECON ENRG JA
SUBJECT: EAST CHINA SEA TALKS DISSOLVE INTO ACRIMONY
Classified By: Ambassador J.T. Schieffer. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).
1. (SBU) SUMMARY. This week,s director general-level
meetings in Beijing failed to bring the two sides any closer
to an agreement on development of oil and natural gas
resources in the East China Sea. Instead, China has provoked
Japan,s ire by suggesting joint development of an area which
Japan claims as its own - the Senkaku islands. End summary.
2. (C) Japan and China are no closer to resolving their
differences over oil and natural gas drilling in the East
China Sea after director general-level meetings in Beijing on
Monday and Tuesday of this week. China appears to have
replaced its conciliatory stance with a provocative one by
introducing a plan to co-develop hydrocarbon deposits near
the the Senkaku islands, an area that Japan strongly defends
as its own. MOFA Director General for Asian and Oceanian
Affairs Bureau Kenichiro Sasae reported to Emboff that the
offer was so bad he told the Chinese he refused to take it
back to Tokyo with him.
3. (SBU) The issue of developing the resources that lie under
the sea between Japan and China is complicated by the fact
that the two countries have never agreed an international
boundary and are using separate international treaties to
justify their claims. Japan relies on the UN Convention on
the Law of the Sea which allows coastal countries to claim an
economic zone extending 200 miles (370 Kilometers) from their
shores. China bases its claim on the 1958 Geneva Convention
of the Continental Shelf that allows coastal countries to
extend their borders to the edge of the undersea continental
shelf, a perimeter that would lie very close to Okinawa.
4. (SBU) This is Japan and China,s fourth attempt to iron
out differences over the oil and natural gas exploitation.
The four meetings have produced several proposals for joint
development but no agreement. In March 2005 Japan turned
down China,s proposal to work together because Japan claimed
it was unclear what China was offering. In May 2005 China
offered joint development on Japan,s side of the median line
but Japan rejected the idea. In late September Japan offered
joint development of the fields on both sides of the
Japan-China median line but China declined.
5. (SBU) Comment. After Koizumi replaced then Trade Minister
Shoichi Nakagawa, who had taken a tough stance toward China,
with Toshihiro Nikai, it appeared that a solution to this
problem might be possible. However, it now appears that this
issue will continue for some time to come. End comment.
SCHIEFFER