Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06THEHAGUE1924
2006-08-31 14:37:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

NETHERLANDS/IRAN: DUTCH WANT MORE INFORMATION ON

Tags:  PARM EU KNNP PGOV PREL UN IR NL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTC #1924 2431437
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 311437Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6697
INFO RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS 0276
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 1623
RUEHSL/AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA 0198
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 8992
RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST 0170
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 6615
RUEHDL/AMEMBASSY DUBLIN 0215
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 1855
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON 0494
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA 0258
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1578
RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG 5177
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 5008
RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA 0663
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 1302
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE 1109
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA 0168
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 2004
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 4654
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN 0171
RUEHVT/AMEMBASSY VALLETTA 0260
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA 0662
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS 0183
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 1997
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 1953
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1671
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS 0372
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4154
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 001924 

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/31/2016
TAGS: PARM EU KNNP PGOV PREL UN IR NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/IRAN: DUTCH WANT MORE INFORMATION ON
IRANIAN RESPONSE

REF: STATE 143323

Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew J. Schofer; reasons
1.4 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 001924 SIPDIS NOFORN SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/31/2016 TAGS: PARM EU KNNP PGOV PREL UN IR NL SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/IRAN: DUTCH WANT MORE INFORMATION ON IRANIAN RESPONSE REF: STATE 143323 Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew J. Schofer; reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). ¶1. (C/NF) Summary: The Dutch are frustrated at the lack of information sharing on Iran within the EU, and do not believe a discussion of sanctions is appropriate at Gymnich absent more details of the Iranian response to the P5 1 proposals. Without having seen the response directly, the Dutch understand that it is "complicated, ambiguous" and "not what we wanted." End summary. ¶2. (C/NF) Poloff delivered reftel demarche August 31 to Pim Dumore, Director of the Political Affairs Department at the Dutch MFA. Dumore said the Dutch have no intention of pushing a discussion of sanctions at the Gymnich without more information. He understood the Iranian response was inadequate but said that the question of sanctions was too serious to broach without a full picture. ¶3. (C/NF) Dumore said the GONL would push at Gymnich, to ensure that member states involved in the negotiations keep other member states (i.e., the Dutch) better informed. "We want more information," said Dumore. He added that, ideally, the GONL could discretely review the Iranian response - which he understood would violate Iran's demands that the document be kept confidential. ¶4. (C/NF) Poloff asked whether an IAEA report confirming Iranian non-compliance would be enough for the GONL. Dumore said it would not. Sanctions, he said, are a very serious step. "It's just the EU and the U.S." pushing Iran, he said, and EU member countries need to be fully informed before proceeding. While he did not expect sanctions to be discussed substantively at the September 1 Gymnich, Dumore thought the issue could be on the agenda for the upcoming GAERC -- provided members had enough information. ¶5. (C/NF) Comment: This is not the first time the Dutch have complained about the perceived lack of information sharing on Iran between the EU-3 (or, in this case, P5 1) and other EU members. While the Dutch share our concerns about Iran's nuclear program, they are also worried about the consequences of proceeding to sanctions or other steps without exhausting other channels. Some of Dumore's comments, therefore, probably reflect a Dutch desire to play for time in the hope that an international consensus will develop. End Comment. ARNALL

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -