Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TASHKENT440
2006-03-03 13:14:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

WHAT IS EU IDENTITY IN UZBEKISTAN?

Tags:  EU PGOV PREL UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8570
PP RUEHDBU
DE RUEHNT #0440 0621314
ZNY CCCCC ZZH ZDK
P 031314Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5277
INFO RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ALMATY 7678
RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 1784
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 2308
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 2201
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 1307
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0192
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
C O N F I D E N T I A L TASHKENT 000440 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/02/2016
TAGS: EU PGOV PREL UZ
SUBJECT: WHAT IS EU IDENTITY IN UZBEKISTAN?

Classified By: CLASSIFIED BY AMB JON R. PURNELL FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L TASHKENT 000440 SIPDIS SIPDIS DEPT FOR SCA/CEN E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/02/2016 TAGS: EU PGOV PREL UZ SUBJECT: WHAT IS EU IDENTITY IN UZBEKISTAN? Classified By: CLASSIFIED BY AMB JON R. PURNELL FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D). ¶1. (C) Summary: The French Embassy, current EU chair in Tashkent, has started a campaign to inform Uzbek students about the EU. However, at a round-table discussion, EU diplomats failed to convey a concept of EU identity that satisfied their audience. The Uzbek students attending the roundtable, who appeared largely uninformed about the EU, generally repeated what has become the standard rhetoric on the importance of Russia in Uzbek foreign relations. End summary. ¶2. (C) Approximately 50 university-age students filled the French Culture Center to capacity to discuss EU identity. Members of the official panel included diplomats from Britain, Germany, Poland, France, Latvia and Turkey. Throughout the evening, the panelists failed to relay a concept of EU identity that satisfied the young people. A number of confused students repeatedly asked for clarification, but the diplomats simply repeated their personal notions of identity, including geography, art, democracy, religion and language. One male student asked how religion played an identifying factor in light of EU opposition (sic) to Turkey,s accession. The panel avoided answering the question. (Note: The Turkish diplomat had specifically requested before the meeting that Turkey,s EU accession bid not be discussed. End note). ¶3. (C) Poloff asked the audience if they thought an EU-type structure possible for Central Asia. The students were skeptical. Some said the region lacks a common, practical goal, such as recovering from a world war, to encourage regional cooperation. Other students said regional presidents are too selfish and hold too different opinions to work towards a customs or political union. Two female students mentioned Russia,s importance in Uzbekistan,s foreign relations. They said that, apart from a few members of the Uzbek elite with ties to the U.S., Uzbeks and Russians share a similar non-European, Soviet past and therefore only Russia can help Uzbekistan challenge the &economic, political and security threats of the U.S. and China.8 ¶4. (C) Comment: The students were very curious to know what European identity is, but were frustrated by the EU,s inability to define itm to their satisfaction. Uzbekistan,s recent accession to EurAsEC is widely-reported in the Uzbek and Russian press. However, the students did not mention the organization, and even failed to respond when the Turkish diplomat chided them for this lapse. End comment. PURNELL

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -