Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06STATE192971
2006-11-29 21:20:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

DEMARCHE REQUEST - IRAN'S FLAWED ELECTIONS

Tags:  PREL PGOV KDEM IR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1842
PP RUEHDE RUEHROV
DE RUEHC #2971/01 3332126
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 292120Z NOV 06
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS PRIORITY 8435
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 1718
RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 9786
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 3724
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN PRIORITY 5496
RUEHDL/AMEMBASSY DUBLIN PRIORITY 6839
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PRIORITY 7217
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY 2874
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 3389
RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG PRIORITY 3122
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 3916
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 2312
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 2314
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 7267
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE PRIORITY 4375
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK PRIORITY 7060
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA PRIORITY 7507
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 7855
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 1403
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN PRIORITY 3611
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY 5995
RUEHROV/AMEMBASSY VATICAN PRIORITY 0427
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 9021
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW PRIORITY 5952
RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI PRIORITY 5761
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 STATE 192971 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
PLEASE PASS TO IRPO DUBAI

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/22/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV KDEM IR
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST - IRAN'S FLAWED ELECTIONS

REF: RPO DUBAI 011

Classified By: NEA: James Jeffrey, PDAS

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 STATE 192971 SIPDIS SIPDIS PLEASE PASS TO IRPO DUBAI E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/22/2016 TAGS: PREL PGOV KDEM IR SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST - IRAN'S FLAWED ELECTIONS REF: RPO DUBAI 011 Classified By: NEA: James Jeffrey, PDAS ¶1. (U) This is an action request; see paragraph 3. ¶2. (C) Iran will hold elections on December 15 for three institutions: the Assembly of Experts, local municipal councils, and a handful of Majles by-elections. Vetting procedures ensure that these institutions remain biased from the outset toward individuals committed to Iran's Supreme Leader (reftel). ¶3. (C) Action request: The Department requests addressee posts deliver the points in paragraph 4 to senior host country officials. Our objective is to coordinate public statements about Iran's flawed elections process prior to Iran's December 15 Election Day and to enhance our knowledge of election activities on the ground. ¶4. (U) BEGIN TEXT OF TALKING POINTS: -- The Iranian people deserve transparent and participatory elections. This standard includes the freedom to choose candidates from the spectrum of Iranian political views. It means unrestricted access to a free media, freedom of political association and assembly, freedom from intimidation on election day, and non-interference from the military and militia groups in the elections. -- Iranians should know that the international community supports their aspirations for a genuinely democratic system. We hope that in your public and private messages, you will highlight the profound flaws in the current system and press the Iranian government to respect international standards for transparent and participatory elections. -- The United States will be watching these elections closely, and we intend to respond to anticipated developments during the campaign, such as the outcome of the vetting process, as well as the election results themselves. Our public statements will address the following areas of concern: -- The Iranian people deserve to have candidates on the ballot who have a sound plan to fix the dire economy, reduce unemployment, and improve the overall quality of life for the Iranian people. If the Iranian government were truly committed to democracy, its citizens would be able to vote for and against candidates of their choosing. Instead, the unelected few that comprise the Council of Guardians has made that decision for the citizens of Iran. -- Although Iran's Assembly of Experts is elected, it is unrepresentative in composition and accessibility. The Guardian Council has restricted membership in the Assembly of Experts to only those it deems to have met the definition of senior cleric, thus disqualifying two-thirds of the prospective candidates and making the entity undemocratic in its nature. The Guardian Council ignored recent Iranian calls to open up eligibility for the Assembly to women and non-clerics, moves that would have made the body more representative of the Iranian population. -- Moreover, the circular nature of the Iranian system is STATE 00192971 002 OF 002 fundamentally undemocratic: The Assembly chooses the Supreme Leader, who chooses half of the members of the Guardian Council, which in turn vets the candidates for the Assembly. -- We are confident that the Iranian people would make a positive choice for their future IF they had a free choice. Instead, their choice of candidates has been artificially restricted. The Iranian people deserve better. -- We would appreciate any reporting that your diplomatic missions in Iran would be able to share with us regarding illegitimate election activities, including ballot stuffing, voter intimidation, or harassment. END TEXT OF TALKING POINTS. ¶5. (U) Washington appreciates posts' assistance. Please caption replies SIPDIS and use the IR country tag. RICE

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -