Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06SANTIAGO614
2006-03-23 22:05:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Santiago
Cable title:  

BRITISH EMBASSY REPORTS CHILEAN CONCERNS OVER

Tags:  PREL PGOV UNSC CI VZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSG #0614 0822205
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 232205Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8731
INFO RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0124
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 3119
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 0176
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES PRIORITY 2959
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 0902
RUEHGT/AMEMBASSY GUATEMALA PRIORITY 0209
RUEHKG/AMEMBASSY KINGSTON PRIORITY 0094
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA PRIORITY 4503
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0136
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 0812
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 0191
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY 0171
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0147
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SANTIAGO 000614 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/22/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV UNSC CI VZ
SUBJECT: BRITISH EMBASSY REPORTS CHILEAN CONCERNS OVER
VENEZUELA SECURITY COUNCIL VOTE

REF: A. SANTIAGO 0577

B. SANTIAGO 0561

C. SANTIAGO 0516

D. SANTIAGO 0514

E. SANTIAGO 0488

F. SANTIAGO 0447

G. SANTIAGO 0429

H. SANTIAGO 0384

Classified By: Charge d' Affaires Emi L. Yamauchi for reasons 1.4(b) an
d (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SANTIAGO 000614 SIPDIS SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/22/2016 TAGS: PREL PGOV UNSC CI VZ SUBJECT: BRITISH EMBASSY REPORTS CHILEAN CONCERNS OVER VENEZUELA SECURITY COUNCIL VOTE REF: A. SANTIAGO 0577 ¶B. SANTIAGO 0561 ¶C. SANTIAGO 0516 ¶D. SANTIAGO 0514 ¶E. SANTIAGO 0488 ¶F. SANTIAGO 0447 ¶G. SANTIAGO 0429 ¶H. SANTIAGO 0384 Classified By: Charge d' Affaires Emi L. Yamauchi for reasons 1.4(b) an d (d). ¶1. (C) A British Embassy colleague told EPOL Counselor on March 22 that a British contact at the Chilean Foreign Ministry (who we suspect is a senior official in the Multilateral Affairs Directorate) appeared increasingly worried about negative U.S. reaction if Chile were to support Venezuela for the GRULAC Security Council seat. The British Embassy officer did not/not have instructions from London to talk to the Chileans about the Venezuela candidacy, but had raised the matter on his own account, to sound out the Chilean position. His Chilean contact delivered the expected explanations -- namely gratitude for Venezuela's support for Jose Insulza's OAS SecGen candidacy and Venezuela's ability to cause problems with Chile's neighbors. The Chilean official reportedly added, "Do you know what you get for voting with the Americans? Just a 'thank you'." The British officer noted that his most telling point with the Chileans seemed to be, "Do you think electing Chavez will actually buy you more stability in the region?" No instructions from EU on GRULAC seat -------------- ¶2. (C) The British diplomat said he did not expect the EU to arrive at a consensus position on the GRULAC seat, in large part because the Spanish were too involved with "selling things" to Chavez. To his knowledge, none of his European colleagues had received instructions from their capitals to talk to the Chileans, to CARICOM, or to African nations where had influence. He did not believe a British demarche alone would be very effective, because "we (the British) are viewed as U.S. lapdogs in any event." He suggested the Dutch would be easy to enlist, given their concern over the Netherlands Antilles. He was not aware of any French inclination to get involved, one way or the other. ¶3. (C) Comment: Our British colleague said it appeared to him that the Chileans were concerned by the strength of U.S. opposition, and were thinking more seriously about the potential consequences of a vote for Venezuela. We will continue to push on this issue at all levels with the new Chilean government (reftels). YAMAUCHI

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -