Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PRETORIA4593
2006-11-06 13:01:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Pretoria
Cable title:
SHAIK APPEALS UNANIMOUSLY DISMISSED
how-toVZCZCXRO0488 PP RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHJO RUEHMR RUEHRN DE RUEHSA #4593 3101301 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 061301Z NOV 06 FM AMEMBASSY PRETORIA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6749 INFO RUCNSAD/SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1069 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0958 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS PRETORIA 004593
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR AF, AF/S
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR KJUS SF
SUBJECT: SHAIK APPEALS UNANIMOUSLY DISMISSED
REF: A. PRETORIA 4489 AND PREVIOUS
B. 05 PRETORIA 2176
This message is Sensitive But Unclassified. Not for Internet
distribution.
UNCLAS PRETORIA 004593
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR AF, AF/S
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR KJUS SF
SUBJECT: SHAIK APPEALS UNANIMOUSLY DISMISSED
REF: A. PRETORIA 4489 AND PREVIOUS
B. 05 PRETORIA 2176
This message is Sensitive But Unclassified. Not for Internet
distribution.
1. (SBU) On 6 November, the Supreme Court of Appeal
unanimously rejected Schabir Shaik's appeals against his June
2005 fraud and corruption charges, almost guaranteeing that
Shaik will begin his 15-year prison term within the next 72
hours. (Note: Shaik was sentenced to 15 years in prison on
each of two corruption counts, and another three years for
fraud, all of which will be served concurrently.) On 3
November, Shaik told a Johannesburg radio station that he was
ready to face jail. Shaik's only remaining option is to
appeal to the Constitutional Court, which is unlikely given
that no constitutional issue has been raised in any of the
legal disputes to date.
2. (U) Judge Craig Howie, President of the Court, announced
that on the first corruption count which involved a
"generally corrupt relationship" with former Deputy President
Jacob Zuma, the court found that "in light of the
evidence...we find the payments were corrupting money to
influence Mr. Zuma to act in conflict with his Constitutional
duties and thereby advance Mr. Shaik's and his group's
interest." On the second charge of corruption, Judge Howie
announced that Shaik's conviction stands since the damaging
encrypted fax was in fact admissable. As for the fraud
charges, which relate to Shaik's elaborate attempts to hide
payments to Zuma, Judge Howie only said that Shaik was
correctly convicted. The full text of the Court's judgment
is expected to be released shortly.
3. (SBU) COMMENT: Shaik's failure to win any of his appeals
opens the door for the National Prosecuting Authority to
refile corruption charges against Zuma (Ref A). Even if
charges are filed in the coming weeks, it is unlikely the
trial could commence prior to the High Court's
December-January holiday recess. Zuma therefore faces a
strong probability that both his corruption trial and the ANC
Presidential succession race will unfold simultaneously. END
COMMENT.
BOST
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
DEPT FOR AF, AF/S
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINR KJUS SF
SUBJECT: SHAIK APPEALS UNANIMOUSLY DISMISSED
REF: A. PRETORIA 4489 AND PREVIOUS
B. 05 PRETORIA 2176
This message is Sensitive But Unclassified. Not for Internet
distribution.
1. (SBU) On 6 November, the Supreme Court of Appeal
unanimously rejected Schabir Shaik's appeals against his June
2005 fraud and corruption charges, almost guaranteeing that
Shaik will begin his 15-year prison term within the next 72
hours. (Note: Shaik was sentenced to 15 years in prison on
each of two corruption counts, and another three years for
fraud, all of which will be served concurrently.) On 3
November, Shaik told a Johannesburg radio station that he was
ready to face jail. Shaik's only remaining option is to
appeal to the Constitutional Court, which is unlikely given
that no constitutional issue has been raised in any of the
legal disputes to date.
2. (U) Judge Craig Howie, President of the Court, announced
that on the first corruption count which involved a
"generally corrupt relationship" with former Deputy President
Jacob Zuma, the court found that "in light of the
evidence...we find the payments were corrupting money to
influence Mr. Zuma to act in conflict with his Constitutional
duties and thereby advance Mr. Shaik's and his group's
interest." On the second charge of corruption, Judge Howie
announced that Shaik's conviction stands since the damaging
encrypted fax was in fact admissable. As for the fraud
charges, which relate to Shaik's elaborate attempts to hide
payments to Zuma, Judge Howie only said that Shaik was
correctly convicted. The full text of the Court's judgment
is expected to be released shortly.
3. (SBU) COMMENT: Shaik's failure to win any of his appeals
opens the door for the National Prosecuting Authority to
refile corruption charges against Zuma (Ref A). Even if
charges are filed in the coming weeks, it is unlikely the
trial could commence prior to the High Court's
December-January holiday recess. Zuma therefore faces a
strong probability that both his corruption trial and the ANC
Presidential succession race will unfold simultaneously. END
COMMENT.
BOST