Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PRAGUE343
2006-04-05 05:41:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Prague
Cable title:
CZECHS SUPPORT NATO INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE WITH
how-toVZCZCXRO2501 OO RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR DE RUEHPG #0343 0950541 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 050541Z APR 06 FM AMEMBASSY PRAGUE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7162 INFO RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI IMMEDIATE 0099 RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM INTEL VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 1712 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0116 RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L PRAGUE 000343
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/NCE, PM/RSAT FOR DOWLEY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/16/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL GG EZ
SUBJECT: CZECHS SUPPORT NATO INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE WITH
GEORGIA
REF: STATE 51994
Classified By: Acting DCM Michael Dodman for reasons
1.4 (b) & (d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L PRAGUE 000343
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/NCE, PM/RSAT FOR DOWLEY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/16/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL GG EZ
SUBJECT: CZECHS SUPPORT NATO INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE WITH
GEORGIA
REF: STATE 51994
Classified By: Acting DCM Michael Dodman for reasons
1.4 (b) & (d)
1. (C) POLOFF April 04 discussed reftel demarche concerning
NATO "Intensified Dialogue on Membership Questions" with
Vaclav Balek, Deputy Director of the MFA's Security Policy
Department. Balek said the Czech Republic welcomed the idea
of Intensified Dialogue for Georgia with a single caveat --
that the process should not proceed as if membership for
Georgia will be guaranteed.
2. (C) Comment: Pragmatism rules in Prague on this issue and
many others. Based on previous discussions we predict that
the GOCR will neither block nor encourage NATO membership for
Georgia or Ukraine in the future. The Czechs have not adopted
a formal position on NATO membership issues for either
country, but their preferences are clear. The Czechs view the
most fundamental base of NATO to be Article 5, and believe
any discussion of admitting Georgia or Ukraine would have to
include a frank examination of the Article 5 implications for
new members (Would NATO be able to defend the new member, and
would it be willing to do so?). The GOCR knows that it could
not successfully oppose membership for Georgia or Ukraine.
However the Czechs will not be in the front row of NATO
members pushing for either country to join NATO. The
psychology of the Cold War is still a factor here. Many
Czechs believe the primary benefit of joining NATO was the
guarantee of allied support should Russia again become
belligerent. Local experience during the last century has
kept this concern in the forefront of Czech thinking, to a
degree that is not common further west. The Czechs feel that
several of the new NATO members also see NATO as their
Article 5 guardian, and would therefore have similar
concerns. End Comment.
CABANISS
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/NCE, PM/RSAT FOR DOWLEY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/16/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL GG EZ
SUBJECT: CZECHS SUPPORT NATO INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE WITH
GEORGIA
REF: STATE 51994
Classified By: Acting DCM Michael Dodman for reasons
1.4 (b) & (d)
1. (C) POLOFF April 04 discussed reftel demarche concerning
NATO "Intensified Dialogue on Membership Questions" with
Vaclav Balek, Deputy Director of the MFA's Security Policy
Department. Balek said the Czech Republic welcomed the idea
of Intensified Dialogue for Georgia with a single caveat --
that the process should not proceed as if membership for
Georgia will be guaranteed.
2. (C) Comment: Pragmatism rules in Prague on this issue and
many others. Based on previous discussions we predict that
the GOCR will neither block nor encourage NATO membership for
Georgia or Ukraine in the future. The Czechs have not adopted
a formal position on NATO membership issues for either
country, but their preferences are clear. The Czechs view the
most fundamental base of NATO to be Article 5, and believe
any discussion of admitting Georgia or Ukraine would have to
include a frank examination of the Article 5 implications for
new members (Would NATO be able to defend the new member, and
would it be willing to do so?). The GOCR knows that it could
not successfully oppose membership for Georgia or Ukraine.
However the Czechs will not be in the front row of NATO
members pushing for either country to join NATO. The
psychology of the Cold War is still a factor here. Many
Czechs believe the primary benefit of joining NATO was the
guarantee of allied support should Russia again become
belligerent. Local experience during the last century has
kept this concern in the forefront of Czech thinking, to a
degree that is not common further west. The Czechs feel that
several of the new NATO members also see NATO as their
Article 5 guardian, and would therefore have similar
concerns. End Comment.
CABANISS