Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PARIS7104
2006-10-30 11:09:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Paris
Cable title:
AFGHANISTAN, FRANCE AND NATO: EVOLVING FRENCH
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHFR #7104 3031109 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 301109Z OCT 06 FM AMEMBASSY PARIS TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2666 INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0403 RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 007104
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2016
TAGS: MARR MOPS PREL NATO AF FR
SUBJECT: AFGHANISTAN, FRANCE AND NATO: EVOLVING FRENCH
THINKING ON DEPLOYMENTS
Classified By: Political Minister-Counselor Josiah Rosenblatt, Reason 1
.4 B/D
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 007104
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2016
TAGS: MARR MOPS PREL NATO AF FR
SUBJECT: AFGHANISTAN, FRANCE AND NATO: EVOLVING FRENCH
THINKING ON DEPLOYMENTS
Classified By: Political Minister-Counselor Josiah Rosenblatt, Reason 1
.4 B/D
1. (C) In a follow up to the widely-rumored, but not yet
publicly announced, French decision to withdraw its Special
Forces (SOF) contribution to OEF in Afghanistan, we inquired
of MOD and MFA contacts as to France's commitment to ISAF and
OEF. MFA Strategic Affairs Advisor in the Cabinet Francois
Carrel-Billiard and MOD Strategic Affairs DAS-Equivalent
director for NATO Col. Antoine Creux reiterated to us
France's commitment to operations in Afghanistan, but also
confirmed that the SOF deployment was no longer viewed as
essential, since it no longer corresponds to its original
anti-terrorism mission. In terms of the future, Creux added
that France is studying seriously the request made by
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld for France to reassign some SOF
SIPDIS
to train Afghan counterparts, and conveyed to Defense
Minister Alliot-Marie during her October 19 meeting with
Secdef in Washington. (Note: France has been training the
Afghan Army.)
2. (C) Carrel-Billiard and Creux stated that France's
engagement in Afghanistan is clear. It continues to honor
its two-year commitment to ISAF's Kabul region, although
troop levels can be expected to drop in 2007, when France
turns over the command to Turkey. At that time, French
forces would return to their pre-August 2006 levels, Creux
noted. Additionally, to emphasize ongoing French support and
commitment, Creux and Carrel-Billiard separately pointed to
France's recent decision to extend the deployment of its
three Mirage 2000 planes in Tajikistan. "Their deployment
continues to be useful in support of OEF and ISAF
operations," Creux observed.
3. (C) We reinforced NATO's request for France and others to
send additional forces in support of operations in the south
and elsewhere, as called by NATO commanders. Creux and
Carrel-Billiard repeated France's response that its forces
are stretched thin due to commitments in Lebanon, the Balkans
and Africa. Creux further explained France's reluctance by
noting that deployments to ISAF were not unconditional, but
in accordance with the original NATO Oplan. He added that
member countries made specific regional commitments to ISAF,
in accordance with national guidelines. Changes in
deployments need to be revisited at the political level and
in national capitals -- he cited the example of the German
Parliament and its restrictions on German forces.
4. (C) When we pressed further for a French redeployment,
Creux admitted that, given the strain on its forces,
Afghanistan is no longer viewed as France's top priority.
France will continue to participate in Afghanistan and to
demonstrate solidarity, he stated, but its focus is on French
commitments in Lebanon, Africa, and the Balkans. Each
alliance member has to rationalize its commitments based on
its capabilities, with the UK committed to Afghanistan, for
instance, while France is concerned about the Balkan region,
and must also take into account its other non-NATO
deployments, Creux concluded.
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm
HOFMANN
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2016
TAGS: MARR MOPS PREL NATO AF FR
SUBJECT: AFGHANISTAN, FRANCE AND NATO: EVOLVING FRENCH
THINKING ON DEPLOYMENTS
Classified By: Political Minister-Counselor Josiah Rosenblatt, Reason 1
.4 B/D
1. (C) In a follow up to the widely-rumored, but not yet
publicly announced, French decision to withdraw its Special
Forces (SOF) contribution to OEF in Afghanistan, we inquired
of MOD and MFA contacts as to France's commitment to ISAF and
OEF. MFA Strategic Affairs Advisor in the Cabinet Francois
Carrel-Billiard and MOD Strategic Affairs DAS-Equivalent
director for NATO Col. Antoine Creux reiterated to us
France's commitment to operations in Afghanistan, but also
confirmed that the SOF deployment was no longer viewed as
essential, since it no longer corresponds to its original
anti-terrorism mission. In terms of the future, Creux added
that France is studying seriously the request made by
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld for France to reassign some SOF
SIPDIS
to train Afghan counterparts, and conveyed to Defense
Minister Alliot-Marie during her October 19 meeting with
Secdef in Washington. (Note: France has been training the
Afghan Army.)
2. (C) Carrel-Billiard and Creux stated that France's
engagement in Afghanistan is clear. It continues to honor
its two-year commitment to ISAF's Kabul region, although
troop levels can be expected to drop in 2007, when France
turns over the command to Turkey. At that time, French
forces would return to their pre-August 2006 levels, Creux
noted. Additionally, to emphasize ongoing French support and
commitment, Creux and Carrel-Billiard separately pointed to
France's recent decision to extend the deployment of its
three Mirage 2000 planes in Tajikistan. "Their deployment
continues to be useful in support of OEF and ISAF
operations," Creux observed.
3. (C) We reinforced NATO's request for France and others to
send additional forces in support of operations in the south
and elsewhere, as called by NATO commanders. Creux and
Carrel-Billiard repeated France's response that its forces
are stretched thin due to commitments in Lebanon, the Balkans
and Africa. Creux further explained France's reluctance by
noting that deployments to ISAF were not unconditional, but
in accordance with the original NATO Oplan. He added that
member countries made specific regional commitments to ISAF,
in accordance with national guidelines. Changes in
deployments need to be revisited at the political level and
in national capitals -- he cited the example of the German
Parliament and its restrictions on German forces.
4. (C) When we pressed further for a French redeployment,
Creux admitted that, given the strain on its forces,
Afghanistan is no longer viewed as France's top priority.
France will continue to participate in Afghanistan and to
demonstrate solidarity, he stated, but its focus is on French
commitments in Lebanon, Africa, and the Balkans. Each
alliance member has to rationalize its commitments based on
its capabilities, with the UK committed to Afghanistan, for
instance, while France is concerned about the Balkan region,
and must also take into account its other non-NATO
deployments, Creux concluded.
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm
HOFMANN