Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PARIS2721
2006-04-25 15:45:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Paris
Cable title:
FRANCE HAS A NARROWER PERSPECTIVE FOR GLOBAL
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHFR #2721 1151545 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 251545Z APR 06 FM AMEMBASSY PARIS TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6664 INFO RUEHXP/ALL NATO POST COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 1594 RUEHDL/AMEMBASSY DUBLIN PRIORITY 0513 RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PRIORITY 1175 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 1292 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 1386 RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 1547 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 1611 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 002721
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/25/2016
TAGS: MARR PREL NATO FR
SUBJECT: FRANCE HAS A NARROWER PERSPECTIVE FOR GLOBAL
PARTNERSHIPS
REF: PARIS 2592
Classified By: Acting Political Counselor Bruce Turner, Reasons 1.4 B/D
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 002721
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/25/2016
TAGS: MARR PREL NATO FR
SUBJECT: FRANCE HAS A NARROWER PERSPECTIVE FOR GLOBAL
PARTNERSHIPS
REF: PARIS 2592
Classified By: Acting Political Counselor Bruce Turner, Reasons 1.4 B/D
1. (C) On April 24, in advance of the Informal Ministerial in
Sofia, polmiloff followed up on reftel discussion on Global
Partnerships with Nicolas Niemtchinow, MFA DAS-equivalent
Director for NATO issues. Niemtchinow said France thought it
timely to re-examine NATO's Partnerships, in discussion with
the concerned partners, given the changes that have taken
place in the world since their establishment.
2. (C) In terms of some of the specifics found in our Global
Partnerships paper, Niemtchinow said France understood the
need to discuss security issues and related operations with
like-minded countries, such as Australia and South Korea. He
added that many Europeans, however, favored reaching out to
the former European neutrals first, in particular those, such
as Austria, Finland, Sweden and Ireland, who are members of
the EU but not of NATO. He noted anecdotally that there were
already many more Swedish and Irish, than Australian or South
Korean, troops participating in joint operations with NATO.
Given Europe's small footprint in the Pacific, Europeans felt
a closer strategic link with these former European neutrals
than with countries further afield, he suggested. At a
minimum, it made sense to begin with them first.
3. (C) Turning to the general concept of partnerships,
Niemtchinow emphasized that France fully accepts the
principle of reaching out to new global partners. The GOF,
however, believes that while the Alliance needs to reach out
to others on specific issues, NATO also needs to protect its
stakeholders. Prospective new partners are not allies and
should not be given the same guarantees (Article V) or
decision-making rights, in the NAC for instance.
4. (C) Additionally, Niemtchinow said France would have a
problem with efforts to expand our linkages with new global
partners beyond security issues to the level of a "political
dialogue." By way of example, he stated that the GOF could
not envision discussions on China with NATO's Pacific
"allies," for instance. (Note: This position is likely linked
to France's often-raised concern that NATO should take care
to avoid being misperceived in other regions as a
specifically Western alliance.)
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm
Stapleton
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/25/2016
TAGS: MARR PREL NATO FR
SUBJECT: FRANCE HAS A NARROWER PERSPECTIVE FOR GLOBAL
PARTNERSHIPS
REF: PARIS 2592
Classified By: Acting Political Counselor Bruce Turner, Reasons 1.4 B/D
1. (C) On April 24, in advance of the Informal Ministerial in
Sofia, polmiloff followed up on reftel discussion on Global
Partnerships with Nicolas Niemtchinow, MFA DAS-equivalent
Director for NATO issues. Niemtchinow said France thought it
timely to re-examine NATO's Partnerships, in discussion with
the concerned partners, given the changes that have taken
place in the world since their establishment.
2. (C) In terms of some of the specifics found in our Global
Partnerships paper, Niemtchinow said France understood the
need to discuss security issues and related operations with
like-minded countries, such as Australia and South Korea. He
added that many Europeans, however, favored reaching out to
the former European neutrals first, in particular those, such
as Austria, Finland, Sweden and Ireland, who are members of
the EU but not of NATO. He noted anecdotally that there were
already many more Swedish and Irish, than Australian or South
Korean, troops participating in joint operations with NATO.
Given Europe's small footprint in the Pacific, Europeans felt
a closer strategic link with these former European neutrals
than with countries further afield, he suggested. At a
minimum, it made sense to begin with them first.
3. (C) Turning to the general concept of partnerships,
Niemtchinow emphasized that France fully accepts the
principle of reaching out to new global partners. The GOF,
however, believes that while the Alliance needs to reach out
to others on specific issues, NATO also needs to protect its
stakeholders. Prospective new partners are not allies and
should not be given the same guarantees (Article V) or
decision-making rights, in the NAC for instance.
4. (C) Additionally, Niemtchinow said France would have a
problem with efforts to expand our linkages with new global
partners beyond security issues to the level of a "political
dialogue." By way of example, he stated that the GOF could
not envision discussions on China with NATO's Pacific
"allies," for instance. (Note: This position is likely linked
to France's often-raised concern that NATO should take care
to avoid being misperceived in other regions as a
specifically Western alliance.)
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm
Stapleton