Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MINSK458
2006-04-27 10:13:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Minsk
Cable title:  

LUKASHENKO BOTCHES POTASH EXPORTS

Tags:  ECON PGOV EMIN ETRD EAGR BI 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSK #0458/01 1171013
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 271013Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY MINSK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4307
INFO RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KIEV 3276
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 3448
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA 1668
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS 3672
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 3322
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 1115
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK
C O N F I D E N T I A L MINSK 000458 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/27/2016
TAGS: ECON PGOV EMIN ETRD EAGR BI
SUBJECT: LUKASHENKO BOTCHES POTASH EXPORTS


Classified By: Classified by Ambassador George Krol for Reasons 1.4(B,D
)

C O N F I D E N T I A L MINSK 000458 SIPDIS SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/27/2016 TAGS: ECON PGOV EMIN ETRD EAGR BI SUBJECT: LUKASHENKO BOTCHES POTASH EXPORTS Classified By: Classified by Ambassador George Krol for Reasons 1.4(B,D ) ¶1. (U) Summary: Potash is Belarus' second largest export commodity, earning the country USD 609 million in 2005. Most of this revenue went to the GOB, which owns the sole potash producer. In order to squeeze more money from this valuable export, last year Lukashenko created a potash exporting company and ordered a vast increase in production and prices. Unfortunately for the regime, China, Belarus' main potash customer, refused to pay higher prices and is now buying potash elsewhere. Potash stockpiles grew until the GOB closed the mines in April. The officials in Belarus' potash company now fear being sent to jail over their failure to meet Lukashenko's unrealistic targets. End summary. Potash: Belarus' Primary Natural Resource -------------- ¶2. (U) The GOB previously exported potash (used primarily for fertilizer) under the auspices of the International Potassium Company (IPC),a joint venture between Belarus' Belaruskaly (state-owned) and Russia's Silvinit and Uralkaly. In April 2005 Lukashenko announced that Belarus was pulling out of IPC and creating its own potash export company, the Belarusian Potassium Company (BPC),so as to remove all middlemen and maximize profits. BPC was created as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the GOB petroleum concern Belneftekhim, but Russia's Uralkaly subsequently bought a 50% share. In September 2005 BPC made its first sale, 25,000 tons of potash to the Philippines. ¶3. (U) Potash is the only natural resource Belarus has in quantity. Belarus exported 4.3 millio ton of potash in 205, of which 2.1 million tons went to China. Potah exports earned the country USD 609 million in 205 (at an average price of USD 141.7/ton). Lukahenko ordered Belaruskaly and BPC to boost expors to 7.3 million tons for 2006 and earn at leastUSD one billion, even though Belaruskaly stated ublicly its maximum annual capacity is 5.5 millio tons. This amount reportedly represents 14.85%of world potash production. Potash is Belarus' seond largest export (after oil, which is imported from Russia and re-expoted),and Belaruskaly is the country's third larget exporter (after the two oil refineries). Blarus' Command Economy Runs Afoul of China's Marke -------------- -------------- ¶4. (U) In late 2
005 BPC commenced annual ngotiations with Belaruskaly's largest customer, hina. According to several contacts and press surces, Lukashenko personally ordered BPC's managment to ensure that Belarus received an additiona USD 40 per ton of potash from China in its 2006 contract. When negotiations began, China on the contrary insisted that Belarus cut its prices by USD 20/ton. BPC and China have undergone several rounds of negotiations, but BPC negotiators have no room to compromise and no deal has been signed. Belarusian press reports China is now buying potash from two Russian companies. ¶5. (U) Because of a lack of a deal with China, BPC's exports fell 33% in January and February, costing Belarus an estimated USD 50 to 60 million in lost profits. A Belaruskaly spokesman reported in early April the company's exports for the year were down 40%, therefore Belaruskaly was shutting two of its four mine groups for unscheduled maintenance. Attributing the drop in sales to the lack of a deal with China, the spokesman added that Belaruskaly had fully supplied the domestic market and did not want to put any excess production into storage. Faced with increased supply, the Ministry of Agriculture announced in mid-April that the GOB would increase the domestic use of potash fertilizer by 60% this year to 1.298 million tons. Belaruskaly in Desperate Straits -------------- ¶6. (C) Independent journalist Roman Yakovlevsky reported in late April that all four of Belaruskaly's mine groups were closed for lack of demand. While the company anounced the mines are shut for unscheduled maintenance, Yakovlevsky claimed the company's warehouses are filled with unsold potash. On April 7, independent trade union leader Aleksandr Yarushuk, whose BCDTU has a branch at Belaruskaly, told Poloff the company has 500,000 tons of unsold potash in storage as a result of the failure to sell to China. Economic journalist Tatyana Manenok told Econoff on April 4 that she interviewed several senior officials at BPC and Belaruskaly. They claimed Lukashenko threatened them with jail if the company did not meet the unrealistic demands he set, and these officials are afraid the regime will blame them for Belarus losing a major source of export revenue. (Note: Belarus earned USD 300 million selling potash to China alone in 2005.) ¶7. (C) Independent economist Jaroslav Romanchuk told Econoff April 17 that the director of Belaruskaly is not free to set prices, but rather must accept the decisions of the Presidential Administration, which bear no relation to market forces. As a result of Lukashenko's unrealistic demand to increase prices, Russian companies underbid Belarus and secured contracts with China. Romanchuk claimed it was current Head of the Security Council Viktor Sheyman's idea to create BPC, and that Sheyman is losing favor with Lukashenko as a result of this debacle. Comment -------------- ¶8. (C) Many people, both in the opposition and out, have told us in recent months that the Lukashenko regime will not fall because of the actions of the opposition, but because of its own economic ineptitude and possibly pressure from Russia. This example, where Belarus lost a significant source of GOB revenue because Lukashenko ignored market realities, certainly buttresses such an opinion. However, as long as Minsk continues to receive natural gas and oil from Russia at heavy discounts, the regime will retain a strong, if shrinking, economic cushion to cover its mistakes. Krol

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -