Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06KUALALUMPUR744
2006-04-25 10:05:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Cable title:
NO CHANGE IN MALAYSIAN POSITION ON HCOC
how-toVZCZCXYZ0012 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHKL #0744 1151005 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 251005Z APR 06 FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6486 INFO RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 0050 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0945 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1374 RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0085
C O N F I D E N T I A L KUALA LUMPUR 000744
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/MTR, EAP/MTS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/25/2016
TAGS: PREL MNUC KSCA ETTC TSPA MTRCE MY
SUBJECT: NO CHANGE IN MALAYSIAN POSITION ON HCOC
REF: STATE 64554
Classified By: Political Counselor Thomas F. Daughton for
reasons 1.4 b, d.
(C) MFA Principal Assistant Secretary for Disarmament Nur
Izzah Wong Mee Choo gave no indication that Malaysia's
position on the Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic
Missile Proliferation (HCOC) would change in the near future.
She told us April 25 that recent checks with "other
agencies" in the Malaysian government had revealed that their
longstanding opposition to the HCOC was unchanged. We asked
if the current GOM policy was under current interagency or
other review and she replied that it was not. We encouraged
her to consider the demarche carefully and share our points
and papers with her colleagues. She undertook to do so.
(NOTE: Malaysia was one of the eleven nations that abstained
on GA Resolution 60/62.)
LAFLEUR
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/MTR, EAP/MTS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/25/2016
TAGS: PREL MNUC KSCA ETTC TSPA MTRCE MY
SUBJECT: NO CHANGE IN MALAYSIAN POSITION ON HCOC
REF: STATE 64554
Classified By: Political Counselor Thomas F. Daughton for
reasons 1.4 b, d.
(C) MFA Principal Assistant Secretary for Disarmament Nur
Izzah Wong Mee Choo gave no indication that Malaysia's
position on the Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic
Missile Proliferation (HCOC) would change in the near future.
She told us April 25 that recent checks with "other
agencies" in the Malaysian government had revealed that their
longstanding opposition to the HCOC was unchanged. We asked
if the current GOM policy was under current interagency or
other review and she replied that it was not. We encouraged
her to consider the demarche carefully and share our points
and papers with her colleagues. She undertook to do so.
(NOTE: Malaysia was one of the eleven nations that abstained
on GA Resolution 60/62.)
LAFLEUR