Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06GUANGZHOU11052
2006-04-11 01:00:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Guangzhou
Cable title:  

Who Let the Dogs Out? Canine Ownership in

Tags:  ECON PGOV SOCI TBIO CH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0130
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHPB
DE RUEHGZ #1052/01 1020355
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 110100Z APR 06 ZDK CTG RUEHTC 6815 1011214
FM AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4438
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEAUSA/DEPT OF HHS WASHDC
RUEHPH/CDC ATLANTA GA
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 GUANGZHOU 011052 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/CM
USDOC FOR 4420/ITA/MAC/MCQUEEN, CELICO, DAS LEVINE
STATE PASS USTR
USPACOM FOR FPA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON PGOV SOCI TBIO CH
SUBJECT: Who Let the Dogs Out? Canine Ownership in
Guangdong on the Rise

GUANGZHOU 00011052 001.2 OF 004


(U) THIS DOCUMENT IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE
PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR RELEASE OUTSIDE U.S.
GOVERNMENT CHANNELS. NOT FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 GUANGZHOU 011052 SIPDIS SENSITIVE SIPDIS STATE FOR EAP/CM USDOC FOR 4420/ITA/MAC/MCQUEEN, CELICO, DAS LEVINE STATE PASS USTR USPACOM FOR FPA E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON PGOV SOCI TBIO CH SUBJECT: Who Let the Dogs Out? Canine Ownership in Guangdong on the Rise GUANGZHOU 00011052 001.2 OF 004 (U) THIS DOCUMENT IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT FOR RELEASE OUTSIDE U.S. GOVERNMENT CHANNELS. NOT FOR INTERNET PUBLICATION. ¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: In a part of China better known for viewing dogs as cuisine rather than as pets, Congenoffs have noticed an increase in dog ownership. Sales of dogs -- and related canine care products -- are up and represent a growing niche in the economy. The reasons for the increase are varied, however, with one-child households, "empty nesters," rising disposable incomes, the desire to own a middle class status symbol, and changing social dynamics probably all playing a part. All dogs are required to have a license, but most do not, leading some to call for a cut in associated fees to encourage owners to "come clean." Guangzhou, however, has yet to lower its fees, although a motion to abolish some fees and reduce others has been tabled -- for the fifth time. Despite a crackdown on unregistered dogs initiated in Guangzhou in the fall of 2005 to counter rabies and dog attacks, local dog owners continue to publicly display their dogs in parks and at public "dog club" meetings. Without overstating the case, it does appear that the increased spending on pets is a clear indicator of the increasing discretionary income some Chinese enjoy and perhaps even growing concern for other living things. END SUMMARY. ¶2. (U) Blame it on it being the Year of the Dog, but it appears an increasing number of Cantonese now own dogs. Dog owners can be seen walking their animals in local parks; several pet markets operate around Guangzhou, with puppies being a favorite item; and Congenoffs have even spotted what appear to be dog social clubs in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Spurred by these trends, we decided to take a closer look at this emerging phenomenon and what it may reveal about South China. From Delicacy to Best Friend -- They've Come a Long Way -------------- -------------- ¶3. (U) The transformation of animals from pests to pets in China cannot be understated. For decades the Chinese have been unreceptive, to say the least, towards the concept of animals as pets. C
onsidering that just a few decades ago Mao encouraged peasants to kill sparrows and pets were seen as a bourgeois decadence, the change is remarkable. While many Chinese came around over time to the idea of keeping fish or pet birds at home, other, more high-maintenance animals -- particularly dogs -- were not as accepted. From the 1950s to the late 1970s, regular dog extermination programs were carried out; dogs were seen as a threat to public hygiene and were routinely executed by mobs. These scenes were recreated during the SARS epidemic of mid-2003, when unsubstantiated fears that dogs and cats may carry the virus led to the extermination of hundreds of animals. Added to these perceptions is South China's long culinary fascination with dogs, which are said to be a "warming" food and good for the body's circulation. Unleashing a Trend: The Numbers Tell the Story -------------- -- ¶4. (U) China's National Kennel Club found that in 2005 there were roughly 150 million pet dogs in China. Research by a global consumer market analysis group found that the percentage of Chinese owning dogs increased from 5% in 1999 to 7% in 2004. These market analysts estimate that sales of dog and cat food in China reached nearly RMB 1.6 billion in 2004 (approximately USD 199 million),up 13% over the previous year. Predictably, pet food sales are mostly generated in large cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, according to industry analysts. In 2004, pets- related businesses in China -- including sales of animals, provision of services, and sales of accessories -- were worth a combined 15 billion RMB (roughly USD 1.88 billion) GUANGZHOU 00011052 002.2 OF 004 annually, according to the People's Daily. Experts predict annual sales of pet food and necessities might top RMB 6 billion (roughly USD 750 million) in 2008, according to Xinhua. Why So Many Doggone Pets All of a Sudden? -------------- ¶5. (U) There are several possible reasons for the increase in dog ownership. First, one-child households are contributing to the demand for pets, which might be regarded as additional members of the family and can become companions to an only child. The one-child policy itself helps by reducing financial obligations on the part of parents at a time when incomes are rising across the nation. Additionally, when the only child eventually leaves home, the pet can continue to provide comfort to the "empty nesters" left behind. Second, many young people, who are also enjoying increasing levels of disposable incomes, view pets as a fashion and identity statement -- a middle class status symbol. The mere fact that they are not saving the money or spending it in more traditional ways may in itself be considered an avant-garde move. Finally, as Chinese society undergoes unparalleled changes, many people rely on pets to relieve the stress, uncertainty, and loneliness associated with these radical changes. For many young people a dog offers the companionship they crave without the heightened responsibilities a child (or a spouse) brings. Beijing Loosens the Collar by Lowering Fees... -------------- - ¶6. (U) Regardless of the reason for the increase, the Chinese are raising more pets -- some legally and others not. All dogs in China must have a license, but because fees tend to be prohibitive, many people do not license their pets. Statistics from the Beijing Public Security Bureau (PSB) reveal that at the end of 2002, there were roughly 1.4 million dogs in Beijing, and only one-tenth of them had been registered. In response to this reality, in late 2003 the capital cut the first-year registration fee for a pet dog from roughly USD 600 to USD 120; the fees for subsequent years dropped from USD 240 a year to USD 60, according to Chinese press reports. More than 40 categories of dogs deemed "dangerous" by city authorities because of their size remain illegal to own, however, and Beijing also imposes a "one-dog policy" that restricts each family to owning only one dog, according to Hong Kong press reports. ...But Guangzhou Fees Remain Doggedly High, So Dogs Remain Unregistered -------------- -------------- ¶7. (U) Guangzhou's "Dog Raising Management Regulations" first came into effect in 1997. Article 10 of these regulations stipulates a fee of RMB 10,000 (approximately USD 1,250) to register a dog, followed by a further annual fee of RMB 6,000 (about USD 750). Probably as a result of these high fees, Guangzhou has only approximately 800 registered dogs, according to a local newspaper. The number of unregistered dogs in Guangzhou, however, is conservatively estimated by the same paper to be between 50,000 to 60,000. There are currently political efforts underway to lower the fees, and by extension, to encourage owners to register their dogs. In March 2006 during the annual Guangzhou CPC and CPPCC meetings, CPPCC delegate and South China Agriculture University professor Zhu Xingquan submitted a motion for pet management that included abolishing registration fees and cutting the annual fee for the first year to RMB 1,000 (about USD 125),and further reducing the fee to RMB 500 (roughly USD 63) in the second year, according to local press reports. He also suggested that annual fees for a dog consecutively registered by the same family for more than three years be progressively reduced. The local press also reported that Shenzhen City's GUANGZHOU 00011052 003.2 OF 004 CPC recently passed a "Draft Regulation of Dog Raising Management," which abolished the original registration fee of RMB 5,000 (approximately USD 625) and cut the annual fee from RMB 2,000 (roughly USD 250) to RMB 300 (about USD 38). But Does the Proposal Stand Only A Dog's Chance of Passing? -------------- -------------- ¶8. (U) While the motion has been submitted and the proposed changes are making their way through the political process, Zhu himself noted, however, that this is the fifth time a proposal of this kind has been raised in recent years -- the previous four efforts were never successful in seeing the motion included in the legislative plan. The draft regulation in Shenzhen, likewise, is also still subject to the Guangdong CPC's final approval. "Cry Havoc and Let Slip the War on Dogs" -------------- ¶9. (U) The proliferation of unregistered dogs in Guangzhou led to a crackdown in the fall of 2005. Local press reports from that time noted that the Guangzhou PSB along with the Guangzhou Administration of Industry and Commerce, Agriculture Bureau, Environment and Sanitation Bureau, and Public Health Bureau, carried out a campaign aimed against: (1) illegal sales and diagnostic treatment of dogs; (2) the raising of large dog breeds; (3) irregularities in dog- walking; and (4) the failure to comply with dog vaccination regulations. (Note: According to Guangzhou's "Dog Raising Management Regulations", pet dogs must measure less than 60 cm in length (roughly 24 inches) and less than 40 cm in height (about 16 inches). End Note.) A Western press report on the crackdown commented that the Guangzhou police conducted house-to-house searches and confiscated unregistered dogs from parks and veterinary clinics. The report also noted that officials said the cull was necessary to counter the spread of rabies given that 244 people died of rabies in Guangdong in 2004, a 41% rise over 2003. Local press reports on the incident included a police explanation that more than 36,000 people in Guangzhou were attacked by dogs in 2004, and between January-July 2005 another 25,000 were attacked. Police officials also said that in recent years Guangzhou authorities have seized and disposed of 14,000 unregistered dogs, according to local press reports. Despite the Crackdown, It's Still the Year of the Dog -------------- -------------- ¶10. (U) So where does this leave Guangzhou's dog owners? The culling incident of last fall appears to have faded from the memories of many dog owners -- if not from various pet- related internet forums where the shock and outrage remains posted for all to see. Around Guangzhou owners can be seen in various parts of town publicly displaying their dogs. Apparently the desire to spend time in the open with their pets or the yearning to show them off overrides the fear of having them confiscated. ¶11. (U) To illustrate the atmosphere of openness, on a recent Sunday morning, Congenoff witnessed a gathering of a local dog club in the relatively affluent neighborhood of Er Sha Island. In an open field, dogs and their owners were gathered into a group, happily mingling with each other. While the dogs were of all types -- golden retrievers, English sheepdogs, King Charles spaniels, and Pekinese -- the owners were mostly all of the "yuppie" type. Many of the dogs sported doggie outfits, and one of them was even dressed to match its owner. An organizer soon arrived, checked off names from a list, and handed out matching yellow hats. Soon after, the dogs and owners departed together on two buses and drove off for an apparent outing. Before the group departed, Congenoff had a chance to ask one of the owners why he was speaking English to his dog? He replied that (naturally!) dogs understand English. GUANGZHOU 00011052 004.2 OF 004 ¶12. (U) An Econoff witnessed a similar scene in an affluent part of Shenzhen. There, the gathered owners were not of the "yuppie" ilk, and were decidedly less enthusiastic about the actual pooches than the Guangzhou crowd. In fact, they seemed mostly interested in interacting with the other owners. Still, it was the dogs that provided the common ground between them. After the meeting dispersed, the owners all went their separate ways, suggesting that their original bond came through their shared dog-ownership. Comment: The End of a Dog Eat Dog World? Not Quite Yet. -------------- -------------- ¶13. (SBU) To say that dog ownership is a mark of a growing middle-class would be somewhat of a stretch. Some of the most notable pet owners we have noticed in Guangzhou are in fact homeless. However, the increased spending on pets is a clear indicator of the growing purchasing power of city residents in China. Where in the recent past every `fen' had to be used to ensure a family's basic needs, now some people have the luxury of spending some of their hard-earned RMB on, well, an animal. Clearly, things are changing for the better for many Chinese. ¶14. (SBU) Meanwhile, the attitude shift that accompanies this increased dog ownership could reflect a larger societal change; after all, some say that a society's treatment of pets also reflects its treatment of humans and other living things. As more and more Chinese -- who no longer must scrape out their own existence -- can afford the costs associated with raising dogs, they can perhaps also afford to care more about their fellow citizens as well as other animals and, by extension, the environment. In the best case scenario, today's pet owners will come to see their neighbors as worthy of at least the same care and attention as Fido, and thus their concern for their own species may increase as well. DONG

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -