Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DUBLIN314
2006-03-28 11:19:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Dublin
Cable title:
IRELAND SUPPORTS VISA BAN ON LUKASHENKA
how-toVZCZCXRO4027 RR RUEHFL RUEHLA RUEHMRE RUEHROV RUEHSR DE RUEHDL #0314 0871119 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 281119Z MAR 06 FM AMEMBASSY DUBLIN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6682 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES RUCNOSC/OSCE POST COLLECTIVE RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST 0089 RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 0036 RUEHBL/AMCONSUL BELFAST 0331 RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 0206 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 0068
C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBLIN 000314
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM CVIS EUN BO EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND SUPPORTS VISA BAN ON LUKASHENKA
REF: STATE 46976
Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Mary E. Daly; Reasons 1.4 (
B) and (D).
C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBLIN 000314
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM CVIS EUN BO EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND SUPPORTS VISA BAN ON LUKASHENKA
REF: STATE 46976
Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Mary E. Daly; Reasons 1.4 (
B) and (D).
1. (C) Ireland supports an extended visa/travel ban on
Lukashenka and other officials associated with the fraudulent
March 19 Belarusian elections, in line with discussions at
the March 24 EU leaders meeting, according to Conleth Brady,
acting Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) Desk Officer for
Russia and Eastern Europe, to whom emboff delivered reftel
demarche on March 27. Brady said that the Irish Government
agreed with the logic of reftel points that a widened travel
ban should include Lukashenka himself, as the principal
orchestrator of civil rights violations before and during the
elections. Brady noted, however, that three Member States,
which he declined to name, might oppose extending the travel
ban when the GAERC meets on April 10 to decide the issue. He
added that Ireland, and most Member States would not favor a
visa ban covering key family members of culpable Belarusian
officials, unless these relatives likewise bore
responsibility for electoral abuses.
2. (C) Brady remarked that Ireland had reservations about
the use of financial sanctions against Belarus, and he cited
past disagreement among Member States regarding this option.
Ireland's concerns were two-fold, he elaborated. First,
economic sanctions ran the risk of harming the Belarusian
people at precisely the moment when support for, and contact
with, civil society groups should be maximized. Second,
sanctions could play into the hands of the Belarusian
government in its attempts to vilify U.S. and European
"interference" in the country's affairs. Brady clarified,
however, that Ireland supported freezing the personal assets
of Lukashenka and other ranking Belarusian officials if it
were feasible to identify their holdings in Member States'
financial institutions.
KENNY
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/2015
TAGS: PREL PHUM CVIS EUN BO EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND SUPPORTS VISA BAN ON LUKASHENKA
REF: STATE 46976
Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Mary E. Daly; Reasons 1.4 (
B) and (D).
1. (C) Ireland supports an extended visa/travel ban on
Lukashenka and other officials associated with the fraudulent
March 19 Belarusian elections, in line with discussions at
the March 24 EU leaders meeting, according to Conleth Brady,
acting Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) Desk Officer for
Russia and Eastern Europe, to whom emboff delivered reftel
demarche on March 27. Brady said that the Irish Government
agreed with the logic of reftel points that a widened travel
ban should include Lukashenka himself, as the principal
orchestrator of civil rights violations before and during the
elections. Brady noted, however, that three Member States,
which he declined to name, might oppose extending the travel
ban when the GAERC meets on April 10 to decide the issue. He
added that Ireland, and most Member States would not favor a
visa ban covering key family members of culpable Belarusian
officials, unless these relatives likewise bore
responsibility for electoral abuses.
2. (C) Brady remarked that Ireland had reservations about
the use of financial sanctions against Belarus, and he cited
past disagreement among Member States regarding this option.
Ireland's concerns were two-fold, he elaborated. First,
economic sanctions ran the risk of harming the Belarusian
people at precisely the moment when support for, and contact
with, civil society groups should be maximized. Second,
sanctions could play into the hands of the Belarusian
government in its attempts to vilify U.S. and European
"interference" in the country's affairs. Brady clarified,
however, that Ireland supported freezing the personal assets
of Lukashenka and other ranking Belarusian officials if it
were feasible to identify their holdings in Member States'
financial institutions.
KENNY