Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06DUBLIN270
2006-03-14 15:26:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Dublin
Cable title:
IRELAND: EU COMMON CHARGING SCHEME FOR ANS SHOULD
how-toVZCZCXRO8304 PP RUEHAG RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG DE RUEHDL #0270 0731526 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 141526Z MAR 06 FM AMEMBASSY DUBLIN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6631 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHBL/AMCONSUL BELFAST PRIORITY 0321 RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY RUEAHQA/OSAF WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RUEANHA/FAA NATIONAL HQ WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS DUBLIN 000270
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR MARR MOPS PREL NATO EUN
SUBJECT: IRELAND: EU COMMON CHARGING SCHEME FOR ANS SHOULD
MAINTAIN STATUS QUO
REF: A. STATE 24725
B. YOUNG-HAAS PHONE CALL OF MARCH 10
UNCLAS DUBLIN 000270
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR MARR MOPS PREL NATO EUN
SUBJECT: IRELAND: EU COMMON CHARGING SCHEME FOR ANS SHOULD
MAINTAIN STATUS QUO
REF: A. STATE 24725
B. YOUNG-HAAS PHONE CALL OF MARCH 10
1. The EUROCONTROL draft regulation on the Common Charging
Scheme for Air Navigation Services (ANS) is evolving toward a
version that would protect exemptions of state aircraft from
ANS fees, according to Fintan Towey, Department of Transport
Principal Officer for Aviation Security, to whom emboff
delivered reftel demarche on March 9. Towey noted that the
GOI favored maintenance of the status quo for state aircraft
exemptions and that USG interventions with other Member
States had prompted revisions of the draft regulation in that
direction. He predicted that the revision process would
delay adoption of the regulation for weeks, if not months.
(Notwithstanding Towey's comments, Post understands that
provisions subjecting state aircraft to ANS fees still appear
in the latest version of the draft regulation, per ref B.)
2. Towey pointed out that the GOI, unlike the USG, believed
that state aircraft should be subject to fees associated with
landing and parking services. He stressed, however, that the
GOI saw this difference as a matter of varying
interpretations of relevant ICAO provisions; the issue did
not fall within the purview of the Common Charging Scheme
regulation. When emboff asked whether the GOI intended to
pursue payment for such services, Towey replied that
government discussion had not proceeded to the point of a
decision on the question. (Comment: The Department of
Transport raised this difference of opinion with the Embassy
roughly a year ago in informal communication, but did not
demand payment. Transport officials cited reciprocity
issues, insofar as U.S. military transits at Shannon and
Dublin far outstripped Irish state flights to/through the
United States, with the result that the Irish side was
providing a greater level of landing and parking services to
the U.S. side.) (Further Comment: We do not believe that this
analysis is necessarily true.)
BENTON
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR MARR MOPS PREL NATO EUN
SUBJECT: IRELAND: EU COMMON CHARGING SCHEME FOR ANS SHOULD
MAINTAIN STATUS QUO
REF: A. STATE 24725
B. YOUNG-HAAS PHONE CALL OF MARCH 10
1. The EUROCONTROL draft regulation on the Common Charging
Scheme for Air Navigation Services (ANS) is evolving toward a
version that would protect exemptions of state aircraft from
ANS fees, according to Fintan Towey, Department of Transport
Principal Officer for Aviation Security, to whom emboff
delivered reftel demarche on March 9. Towey noted that the
GOI favored maintenance of the status quo for state aircraft
exemptions and that USG interventions with other Member
States had prompted revisions of the draft regulation in that
direction. He predicted that the revision process would
delay adoption of the regulation for weeks, if not months.
(Notwithstanding Towey's comments, Post understands that
provisions subjecting state aircraft to ANS fees still appear
in the latest version of the draft regulation, per ref B.)
2. Towey pointed out that the GOI, unlike the USG, believed
that state aircraft should be subject to fees associated with
landing and parking services. He stressed, however, that the
GOI saw this difference as a matter of varying
interpretations of relevant ICAO provisions; the issue did
not fall within the purview of the Common Charging Scheme
regulation. When emboff asked whether the GOI intended to
pursue payment for such services, Towey replied that
government discussion had not proceeded to the point of a
decision on the question. (Comment: The Department of
Transport raised this difference of opinion with the Embassy
roughly a year ago in informal communication, but did not
demand payment. Transport officials cited reciprocity
issues, insofar as U.S. military transits at Shannon and
Dublin far outstripped Irish state flights to/through the
United States, with the result that the Irish side was
providing a greater level of landing and parking services to
the U.S. side.) (Further Comment: We do not believe that this
analysis is necessarily true.)
BENTON