Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06AMMAN8495
2006-11-19 15:34:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Amman
Cable title:  

MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL BIOMETRIC CONFERENCE OUTCOMES

Tags:  PTER PREL JO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0018
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHAM #8495/01 3231534
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 191534Z NOV 06
FM AMEMBASSY AMMAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5635
INFO RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 0160
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0462
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 4143
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 2503
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 2749
RUEHDO/AMEMBASSY DOHA PRIORITY 0327
RUEHKU/AMEMBASSY KUWAIT PRIORITY 0692
RUEHMK/AMEMBASSY MANAMA PRIORITY 0581
RUEHMS/AMEMBASSY MUSCAT PRIORITY 0429
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 0343
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 1682
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA PRIORITY 0534
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 0948
C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 008495 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR S/CT, NEA, DS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/18/2016
TAGS: PTER PREL JO
SUBJECT: MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL BIOMETRIC CONFERENCE OUTCOMES

REF: A. STATE 186216

B. STATE 175052

Classified By: Classified by Ambassador David Hale for reasons 1.4 (b)
and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 008495 SIPDIS SIPDIS STATE FOR S/CT, NEA, DS E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/18/2016 TAGS: PTER PREL JO SUBJECT: MIDDLE EAST REGIONAL BIOMETRIC CONFERENCE OUTCOMES REF: A. STATE 186216 ¶B. STATE 175052 Classified By: Classified by Ambassador David Hale for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) ¶1. (C) Summary: The November 7-8 Jordanian-hosted regional biometric conference was a significant success. All fourteen Middle East countries invited by Jordan attended, represented mostly by Interior Ministry officials. A number of participants told the U.S. delegation that this was the first time they discussed regional fingerprint sharing as a way to combat terrorism. Jordanian and USG reps gave formal presentations, but over half of the attendees gave informal presentations on their domestic fingerprint collection capabilities and experiences. Attendees confirmed that all fourteen governments collect fingerprint data for criminals and terrorists, and all maintain automated fingerprint database systems, i.e., AFIS. However, they only share biometric data with each other on an ad hoc basis. Under the strong direction of Jordan's GID Deputy Director, participants agreed to support more formal regional biometric sharing, including creation of a regional database for terrorist fingerprints, and agreed to Jordan,s offer to host a follow-up meeting in 2007. As a more immediate action, Jordan requested USG technical help on how to set up such a database, and advice on what a regional biometric data-sharing MOU should look like. End Summary. ¶2. (C) The GOJ hosted the "Middle East Regional Fingerprint" conference at the Dead Sea November 7-8, intended to spur regional discussion on using fingerprint collection to more effectively target the transit of terrorists and foreign fighters. Jordan's GID hosted the conference on the recommendation of the USG, an initiative that came out of the March 7-8, 2006 conference in Kuwait of U.S. COM's and others convened by Coordinator for Counter Terrorism Ambassador Henry Crumpton. The conference, funded with S/CT,s "CT engagement" funds, was attended primarily by Interior Ministry officials, and in some cases by National Police and border control officials, from Jordan, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, and the UAE, as well as experts from the USG (State/S/CT, DHS, FBI/CJIS, and FBI) and Interpol. A full list of individual attendees is available from Embassy Amman or S/CT.
; ¶3. (SBU) Brigadier General Ahmad Al-Sarayrah, Technical Director of the Jordanian General Intelligence Directorate, opened the conference by laying out explicitly the GOJ's goals for the conference: Not only facilitating informal regional discussion of fingerprint collection techniques and case studies, but seeking support for more formal regional sharing of fingerprints of known and suspected terrorists, based on regionally-agreed collection standards. Al-Sarayrah underscored that such cooperation would contribute directly to improving regional security and stability. Jordanian GID and PSD officials then gave detailed presentations outlining the history of fingerprint collection and identification techniques as a law enforcement tool; describing Jordan's comparatively advanced national fingerprint collection system, capabilities and practices; explaining the recent history of Jordan's cooperation with the EU on fingerprint collection training; offering a case study of how the GOJ used fingerprints to catch the terrorists involved in the November 2005 Amman hotel bombings; calling for standardized regional fingerprint sharing; and offering to host a regional website/database for terrorist fingerprint sharing and cooperation. Note: Post is encouraging the GOJ to circulate to attendees all of the presentation slides. End note. ¶4. (SBU) USG representatives Brad Wing (DHS/US-VISIT) and James Loudermilk (FBI) offered presentations on the history of U.S. fingerprint collection efforts; a briefing on the USG,s current IAFIS system and how it offers an integrated interagency and regional (within the U.S.) access to biometric and border control information; offering a case study of bilateral U.S.-Mexican fingerprint sharing; and suggestions for how to merge and connect existing systems. They were followed by the Head of Interpol's Fingerprint Unit, Mark Branchflower, who explained how Interpol,s fingerprint collection and sharing arrangements work. Interpol is willing to assist member states in seeking fingerprint identification from other member states on an ad hoc basis, and offered technical advice on Interpol's fingerprint collection, storage, and transmission standards, encouraging adoption by countries in the region of current international standards. ¶5. (SBU) At Jordan's request, representatives from Egypt, Algeria, the UAE, Iraq, Lebanon, and Morocco offered informal briefings on their domestic fingerprint collection capabilities and practices. The presentations and follow-up discussions revealed that all participating governments have automated fingerprint identification systems (AFIS),and some degree of capability to send and receive fingerprint information by email or virtual private network. However, there is a wide range of domestic policies and practices among participating governments on whom they collect fingerprints from. Some collect fingerprints from all nationals, some collect fingerprints only from convicted criminals, and most but not all collect from all travelers entering the country. Discussions also revealed a wide range of national collection capabilities, with countries such as Jordan and the UAE implementing advanced systems, while others, such as Yemen, relying on a more rudimentary (and under-funded) system and facing significant gaps in fingerprint coverage at ports of entry. The Jordanian GID Deputy Director proposed that as one aspect of closer regional fingerprint cooperation, the participating states assess what additional training and/or equipment they need to effectively contribute to a regional fingerprint database. ¶6. (SBU) Meeting conclusions: Delegations welcomed the presentations, thanked Jordan for hosting the conference, and agreed in principle on the need for more formal regional fingerprint-sharing mechanisms. Representatives from Iraq, Kuwait, Egypt, Algeria, and Morocco specifically welcomed the GOJ's offer to host a regional database/website for terrorist fingerprint sharing. Delegation representatives welcomed Jordan's offer to host a follow-up conference in six-to-eight months. GOJ officials circulated a proposed summary of conclusions for the meeting, which was adopted by consensus. The text of the summary of conclusions is as follows: -- The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan hosted a conference on November 7-8, 2006, on regional Middle East fingerprint collection and sharing. -- Representatives of the Governments of Jordan, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United States of America, and Yemen, and of Interpol, participated actively. All participants welcomed the Kingdom of Jordan's leadership and hospitality in hosting the conference. -- Participants gave presentations on fingerprint technology, Jordan's national biometric system, U.S., European, and Interpol fingerprint initiatives, merging and connecting existing systems, case studies using fingerprints to capture terrorists, international standards for fingerprint exchange, and Jordan,s collaboration website. -- All participating states have automated fingerprint identification systems (AFIS),and already share fingerprint information on a case-by-case basis with Interpol and with other regional states. -- Participating states agreed that deepening fingerprint-sharing cooperation on a bilateral level and exploring such cooperation on a regional level would help the states of the region combat terrorism and international crime more effectively, and would contribute to more secure borders. -- The Jordanian government has made an initiative for cooperation between the countries of the region to set unified standards for fingerprint data exchange, and the delegates accepted the Jordanian initiative. They agreed to study it and submit their proposals to implement the initiative. -- The Jordanian government has offered to host another conference on fingerprints in the Middle East in 2007. The proposals submitted by countries will be discussed, as well as standards and formats of exchanging fingerprint data between countries, and studying countries' training and system needs. End text. ¶7. (C) Jordanian requests: The GOJ is eager to continue taking the regional lead on this issue, and looks to the USG to continue quietly providing necessary technical, financial, and substantive support to ensure this initiative's success. As four examples of near-term follow-up help requested by the GOJ, the GID Deputy Director asked if the USG could provide the GOJ with (1) a model "regional biometric information-sharing MOU" that Jordan could share with participants, (2) technical assistance (e.g., from FBI) prior to the next biometric conference to help the GOJ set up a website/database, (3) bilateral assistance to those regional countries (e.g., Yemen) most in need of capacity-building to help ensure their effective participation in a future regional database, and (4) consider sharing the USG's own biometric data on regional terrorists, for example on terrorists detained in Iraq, to help populate the future regional database. USG delegation representatives agreed to take the GOJ requests back to Washington for priority consideration. ¶8. (C) Comment: Embassy Amman and the U.S. delegation to the conference agree that the conference exceeded USG expectations, thanks in large part to the GOJ's active leadership. The conference outcomes offer the potential for significant regional cooperation in combating terrorism, as well as a potential template for regional cooperation on other aspects related to the war on terror (e.g., combating extremist ideology). Translating the agreement in principle of the 14 participating states to share terrorist fingerprint data regionally into concrete, effective cooperation will require concerted follow-up, both from Washington and from regional country teams working with participating governments. End comment. Visit Amman's Classified Web Site at http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/amman/ HALE

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -