MEDIA REACTION: KMT CHAIRMAN MA YING-JEOU'S U.S. TRIP

UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001039

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC BARBORIAK
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A


TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: KMT CHAIRMAN MA YING-JEOU'S U.S. TRIP



1. Summary: Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused their
coverage March 28 on a controversial civil lawsuit filed by a local
manpower company against Thai laborers for causing a riot at a
Kaohsiung mass rapid transit construction site; KMT Chairman Ma
Ying-jeou's U.S. trip; and other political and environmental issues.
The pro-independence "Liberty Times," Taiwan's biggest daily, ran
an exclusive news story on its front page with the banner headline:
"[Taiwan's] Navy to Hold Big Exercises Starting Today. Taiwan, the
United States, and Japan Will Link up Their Line of Security
Defense." The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily," on the other hand,
ran a front-page news story that quoted KMT Organizational
Development Committee Chief Liao Feng-teh as saying the pan-Blue
camp will announce its candidate for the 2008 presidential election
by August 2007.

In terms of Ma's U.S. trip, the pro-status quo "China Times" ran a
news story on its page four with the headline: "Ma: Taiwan Will Not
Become a Flash Point in Asia." The "China Times" also spent almost
all of its page four reporting on the last leg of Ma's stay in the
United States and the DPP's comments on Ma's trip.


2. The pro-independence papers, including the "Liberty Times,"
"Taiwan Daily," and limited-circulation, English-language "Taipei
Times," continued to editorialize on Ma's U.S. trip by criticizing
Ma's cross-Strait policy; according to these newspapers' editorials,
Ma's U.S. remarks reveal his pro-China stance and wishful thinking.
A "China Times" commentary also said Ma's cross-Strait policy is
full of uncertainties. An editorial in the limited-circulation,
conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post" said:
"It now requires Beijing's patience and Washington's resolve to rein
in the reckless Chen, who is bent on building a legacy as the leader
of Taiwan independence during his remaining two years in office."
End summary.

A) "[Do We] Still Need to Deify Ma Ying-jeou?"

The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 600,000]
editorialized (3/28):

"... The media were crazy about idolizing Ma Ying-jeou during his
trip to the United States by exaggerating the high-profile treatment
he received. But they overlooked the fact that Ma's free and
unlimited disclosure of his unification complex has led people to
compare him with [South Korean President] Roh Moo-Hyun. It is
indeed a huge irony for those media which uphold globalization all
the time to make a god of Ma behind closed doors. ..."

B) "A Close Look into Ma's Vacillating Ideas of Taiwan's Sovereignty
and His Cross-Strait Policy Will Make the [Taiwan] People Better
Understand His Pro-China Nature"

The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" [circulation: 100,000] said in
an editorial (3/28):

"... During his U.S. trip, Ma Ying-jeou failed to expose to the U.S.
government and the international community China's aggressiveness to
use force against Taiwan and he failed to appeal to them about
China's various attempts to squeeze and suppress Taiwan's room in
the international community. Ma's behaviors clearly indicate that
he does not constantly keep the Taiwan people and Taiwan's
sovereignty in his heart. Ma did not even dare to speak up loudly
about Taiwan's self-defense needs when he talked about the [U.S.]
arms procurement bill. Taiwan people, how can you not be angry with
such a Ma Ying-jeou? How can you feel comfortable about allowing
such a Ma Ying-jeou to become Taiwan's president in 2008?"

C) "Ma Ying-jeou's Wishful Thinking"

The pro-independence, English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation:
30,000] editorialized (3/28):

"During his tour of the US, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman
Ma Ying-jeou finally elaborated to an extent on his future policies
as leader of the KMT. It is now time for US government officials in
charge of East Asian affairs and the Taiwanese public to make an
objective assessment of what Ma said and to see if it stands up to
scrutiny. ... Ma's arguments, along with his oratorical skills, may
make him a much worthier leader of the opposition. The problem is
that Ma's vision of the development of cross-strait relations is
distorted by wishful thinking. For example, he still markets the
'1992 consensus,' which never existed ... Ma must surely be aware
that Beijing's idea of a consensus is that Taiwan accepts China's
position on the issue, no matter what. ... It is unlikely,
therefore, that China is going to accept Ma's standpoint of 'one
China, with each side having its own interpretation.' ...

"When Ma talks of 'one China,' he is referring to the ROC, whose
territory includes the PRC, Inner Mongolia and Taiwan. This not
only goes against international consensus, but also betrays a
stubbornness of which dictator Chiang Kai-shek himself would have
been proud. By raising this idea during his US trip, Ma showed some
political naivete. This probably caused a lot of talk and not a
little mirth amongst government officials in the US, and did little
to impress those in Beijing. It would seem that the new generation
of KMT leaders do not have anything new to say, still fantasizing
that their David can fell China's Goliath, unaware that they are in
constant danger of being flattened. Ma's trip to the US should have
taught him that he still has much to learn about international
politics."

D) "Ma Ying-jeou Should Do More Homework"

Columnist Wang Hsing-ching said in the pro-status quo "China Times"
[circulation: 400,000] (3/28):

"... Evidently, Ma Ying-jeou seems to have passed the 'three-sided
examination' jointly hosted by the U.S. deputy secretary of state,
the deputy national security adviser, and the assistant secretary of
defense. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that TECRO Chief
David Lee was not invited to attend such a meeting. If Lee
participated in the meeting, he would naturally, based on his job
responsibilities, have had to report to President Chen Shui-bian
about the contents of the meeting, but now A-bian has no clue about
the contents of Ma's conversation with the United States. Such a
move was highly symbolic as it indicates that Washington has
deliberately determined to isolate A-bian. Washington's attempt to
'freeze Bian' has proved that it has become a fixed direction of the
United States to 'draw a line to lock Bian in' over the next two
years.

"But Ma's several public remarks made during his U.S. trip indicates
that his cross-Strait policy is indeed full of uncertainties. When
he talked about the '1992 Consensus,' direct transportation across
the Taiwan Strait, the opening of Taiwan investments on the
mainland, or even the 'modus vivendi,' he was obviously reiterating
the KMT's version of its cross-Strait policy. But Ma's logic seemed
to get incoherent when he said 'the ROC is an independent sovereign
state;' 'Taiwan does not need to declare independence twice;' and
when he mentioned the historical development of Taiwan. Somehow,
beneath his Blue skin was revealed some Green bone. ..."

E) "Ma Revising KMT-CCP Race"

The conservative, pro-unification, English-language "China Post"
[circulation: 30,000] said in an editorial (3/28):

"Ma Ying-jeou returns home tomorrow from a nine-day, five-city U.S.
trip aimed at building an image of a cultivated, pragmatic and
trustworthy leader, in contrast with that of Taiwan's present
leader, President Chen Shui-bian. ... If Ma becomes president,
cross-strait relations will be transformed and the long delayed
economic and social integration between the two sides will be
accelerated. In turn, that will unleash a new economic boom in
Taiwan, put China in a more favorable light in Taiwan, and
ultimately promote the 'Taiwan experience' of freedom and democracy
on the mainland. But that is still two years away. The current
administration, which provokes China, will stay on until 2008. It
now requires Beijing's patience and Washington's resolve to rein in
the reckless Chen, who is bent on building a legacy as the leader of
Taiwan independence during his remaining two years in office. ..."

YOUNG