ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 TEL AVIV 003727 SIPDIS STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM NSC FOR NEA STAFF JERUSALEM ALSO FOR ICD LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL PARIS ALSO FOR POL ROME FOR MFO E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: IS KMDR MEDIA REACTION REPORT SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION -------------- SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: -------------- ¶1. U.S. Israel Security Exports Crisis ¶2. Mideast -------------- Key stories in the media: -------------- Israel Radio reported that Deputy Chief of Staff Moshe Kaplinsky clarified to Palestinian Deputy Interior Minister Jamal Abu Zayd Tuesday that there will be no disengagement under fire, that if IDF troops are shot at, the IDF will tackle the sources of possible fire and that only then will disengagement proceed. Later this morning, the radio reported on substantive progress in the Kaplinsky-Abu Zayd talks. Yediot reported that President Bush assessed, at his meeting with British PM Tony Blair in Washington a few days ago, that the implementation of the disengagement plan would cause a political trauma in Israel, which will lead to elections within 12 months of the withdrawal. The newspaper says that Blair expressed a similar opinion. Jerusalem Post reported that Deputy National Security Advisor Elliott Abrams and A/S David Welch are expected to focus on how to improve disengagement coordination between the two sides in their talks with both Israeli and Palestinian officials on Wednesday, ahead of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's visit to the SIPDIS region. Hamodi'a quoted a senior IDF source as saying that the IDF is prepared to send entire divisions to the Gaza Strip "if the terrorists open fire during the evacuation." Israel Radio quoted Palestinian sources as saying that the IDF will hand over security responsibility over Jenin to the Palestinians before the disengagement. The radio cited a response by Israeli sources that such a development depended on calm being achieved in the area. Israel Radio quoted Israel's Ambassador to Egypt Shalom Cohen as saying that the disengagement is not linked to an agreement with Egypt regarding the Philadelphi Route, and that it will take place even without a border arrangement with Egypt. The radio also quoted Cohen as saying that Israel will withdraw from the Gaza Strip, but that its presence along the Philadelphi Route will continue until it is certain that smuggling has ceased. Both Ha'aretz and Yediot bannered remarks by IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz on Tuesday that the IDF will not let its soldiers be sitting ducks if right-wing extremists open fire during the disengagement. Leading media reported that a "city of tents" has been erected in Sa-Nur, one of the northern West Bank settlements. Yediot reported that the settlers are "promising" that 200 additional youths from the extremist "hill youth" will move to Sa-Nur. The newspaper cited IDF concerns that that Sa-Nur will be one of the most difficult places to evacuate. Jerusalem Post cited a claim made by the PA Tuesday that Israel has been flooding the Palestinian market with carcinogenic juice and "suspicious" computers used by its Defense Ministry. The newspaper notes that such allegations, which were common under Yasser Arafat's rule, have resurfaced in recent weeks in the Palestinian media. Jerusalem Post quoted Halutz as saying Tuesday that the deepening crisis between Israel and the U.S. regarding the sale of advanced weapons to China would be settled quietly. Yuval Steinitz, chairman of the Knesset's Defense and Foreign Affairs Committee, was quoted as saying, in an interview from Paris with Israel Radio Tuesday that the demand by the U.S. to oust senior Israeli defense figures is "illegitimate" and has an "element of humiliation." Steinitz also dubbed the United States' expansion of the ban of Israeli weapons sales to India and Singapore "illegitimate." Transportation Minister Meir Sheetrit was quoted as saying, in an interview from Paris with Israel Radio, that the argument with the U.S. over security exports stems from U.S. considerations -- aiming to prevent competition with U.S. manufacturers. A headline in Yated Ne'eman calls the U.S. "friendly but hostile." Yediot notes that representatives of Israeli companies showing their products at Le Bourget air show near Paris are careful not to meet openly with Chinese representatives, which they used to do openly before the crisis with the U.S. Jerusalem Post reported that, "under international pressure this week to open up its nuclear inspections," Saudi Arabia pointed the finger at Israel and insisted on Monday that it sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and open its nuclear facilities to international inspectors. Maariv cited the Egyptian weekly Al-Ousbou as saying that the Mossad and elite IDF units are behind the terrorist attacks in Iraq and assassinations of Iraqi nuclear scientists. -------------- ¶1. U.S. Israel Security Exports Crisis: -------------- Summary: -------------- Independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized: "Israel can continue to wage a war of attrition with America; but can only come out the loser in such a battle." Block Quotes: -------------- "Time To Make Peace With the U.S." Independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized (June 15): "Israel has sinned over the years in creating negative sentiment among the American security and intelligence community. The sense conveyed from Jerusalem, and even more so from the Kirya [Defense Ministry compound] in Tel Aviv, is that Israel has no qualms about putting one over on its benefactors in Washington, as a supplement to the generous aid heaped upon it. Just as Israel customarily objects to American initiatives to sell -- as a superpower and out of economic considerations -- sophisticated weaponry to moderate Arab states that could endanger Israel, so too is the United States disgruntled about the export of arms and technology from Israel to countries that are viewed as a threat to American interests. For a year or so, Israel hoped the conflict would die down with time. It appears there is no chance of this happening. The Prime Minister and Defense Minister must intervene directly and put an end to the affair -- both its institutional and personal aspects -- as soon as possible. For their part, the Americans must make haste in formulating their position in the joint memorandum. Israel can continue to wage a war of attrition with America; but can only come out the loser in such a battle." -------------- ¶2. Mideast: -------------- Summary: -------------- Conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized: "The appointment of Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman as one of 21 vice presidents of the UN General Assembly is a symbolic advance for Israel, and an equally small step in the rehabilitation of the UN." Liberal columnist B. Michael wrote in mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "There is no reason in the world for the Palestinian Authority not to declare publicly and seriously that it is inviting every settler who so desires to continue to live in his home as a resident with equal rights in the Palestinian state." Gershon Baskin, the co-CEO of the Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information, wrote in Jerusalem Post: "The most essential element of creating the Palestinian state is effective and good governance of Gaza first. It is also essential for the Palestinians to understand that Israel will not make it easy." Gideon Bachar, deputy director of the Foreign Ministry's Jordan, Syria and Lebanon Department, wrote in independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz: "[Israel] should avoid ... the adoption of the anti-Shi'ite Sunni trend that characterizes many Arab states." Block Quotes: -------------- ¶I. "VP Gillerman" Conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized (June 15): "The appointment of Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman as one of 21 vice presidents of the UN General Assembly is a symbolic advance for Israel, and an equally small step in the rehabilitation of the UN as an organization that might positively contribute to peace and security in the world. The fact that this step is imbued with such significance is a sign of how far the UN has to go in treating Israel equally to other nations.... None of this, of course, will matter unless the fundamental political discrimination that Israel suffers from at the UN changes. This discrimination could conceivably continue even if Israel is allowed to fully participate in all UN bodies. Israel's real problem at Turtle Bay is that an organization that is supposed to protect innocent nations against unprovoked aggression has, in the immortal words of then U.S. ambassador to the UN Daniel Patrick Moynihan, 'joined the jackals'.... The continuing Arab refusal to make peace with Israel and accept our existence is an assault on the UN Charter and on the decisions of the League of Nations and the United Nations that affirm our rights in this land and as a member state. On many levels, including its unique definition of refugees in the Palestinian case, to include their descendants, the UN continues to indulge this assault. To the extent that Gillerman's new status marks a changed approach, it is to be welcomed, but it should not be seen as more than a small step toward repairing a record that continues to undermine the prospects for peace, security and freedom in this region." II. "The Palestinian Option" Liberal columnist B. Michael wrote in mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (June 15): "The [disengagement] plan's obdurate unilateralism was born in the framework of its authors' intentions to cause damage.... With that having been said, the Palestinian leadership still has one option available: to take unilateral steps of its own. For instance, with regard to the settlers and their future: the general Palestinian approach towards the settler issue is featured solely by anger, hatred, bitterness and a yearning to see them disappear from view and from the horizon. All those emotions are quite justified, but it would be a good idea to propose, even to demand that the Palestinian leaders formulate a position that is somewhat wiser, somewhat more balanced, somewhat more productive. There is no reason in the world for the Palestinian Authority not to declare publicly and seriously that it is inviting every settler who so desires to continue to live in his home as a resident with equal rights in the Palestinian state. After all, an ethnic or religious minority most certainly can live in their future state just like minorities live in other properly run states. Breaking zealously guarded ethnic purity is one of the best aspirations of peace, coexistence and reconciliation.... There is no point denying that such an invitation has tactical and strategic public relations value as well. Beyond its fundamental human and democratic decency, it will quite effectively dull the impression of the supposedly necessary 'uprooting' of the settlers and will render their evacuation an act of volition. It will create another option in the internal-Israeli debate about the future of all the settlements in their entirety. And, of course, it will at long last put an end to the demagogic chatter about 'judenrein' and other inanities that are argued." III. "Palestinian Opportunity" Gershon Baskin, the co-CEO of the Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information, wrote in Jerusalem Post (June 15): "In projecting 'day after' scenarios, it is essential to conceive of a plan that will ensure that Gaza 'first' will not result in Gaza 'only' -- the biggest Palestinian fear. So something must be done to gain support from both Palestinians and Israelis for a bilateral peace process.... It is time to reverse the strategy, to embrace a plan for reaching Jerusalem, sovereignty and full statehood by working from the bottom up. The foundations for the achievement of the end-game goals can be achieved by accepting the Gaza first plan. If the Palestinians can build the first layer of statehood in Gaza, the other layers will follow with greater ease. The most essential element of creating the Palestinian state is effective and good governance of Gaza first. It is also essential for the Palestinians to understand that Israel will not make it easy.... The Palestinians can issue declarations that the Palestinian state will be within the 1967 Green Line; they can announce their determination that Gaza first will be the first real concrete step toward the establishment of sovereignty and independence for the Palestinian state. I don't think the Palestinians will adopt this strategy. But I believe that if they did, they would be taking their own fate in their own hands, creating a new and more positive reality for themselves." IV. "Not Every Shi'ite Is an Enemy" Gideon Bachar, deputy director of the Foreign Ministry's Jordan, Syria and Lebanon Department, wrote in independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz (June 15): "The Middle East in is the middle of processes of change, the strength of which has recently been growing.... The rising forces include Islamic terrorism and radicalism ... the Kurds, principally in northern Iraq but also increasingly in Syria.... Alongside those forces, U.S. military and diplomatic involvement is increasing.... The declining forces are first and foremost Arab regimes and states ... as evidenced during the latest Arab League [summit]... All this necessitates in Israel new thinking about its geo-strategic place in the region: can it find new allies?.... Among other things, what [Israel] should avoid is the adoption of the anti- Shi'ite, Sunni trend that characterizes many Arab states. Not every Shi'ite is an enemy; there are many moderate Shi'ites who are prepared to engage in dialogue with Israel. Regarding Iran, it is only the activity of the regime, not the people and society that must be fought.... Sensitivity to the changes now taking place in the Middle East also creates a chance of being integrated into it and building a life of peace and prosperity for Israel and its neighbors -- both Arabs and non-Arabs." CRETZ