ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 TEL AVIV 002323 SIPDIS STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM NSC FOR NEA STAFF JERUSALEM ALSO FOR ICD LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL PARIS ALSO FOR POL ROME FOR MFO E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: IS KMDR MEDIA REACTION REPORT SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION -------------- SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: -------------- ¶1. Bush-Sharon Meeting ¶2. Mideast ¶3. U.S.-Israeli Relations -------------- Key stories in the media: -------------- Maariv cited Israeli sources from Sharon's entourage as confirming that the crisis in US-Israeli security relations recently reached a new high as Washington suspended Israel's participation in the JSF ("future fighter plane") project, in addition to imposing restrictions on exports of advanced technology to Israel. The tension is seen as related to the Israeli- China drone deal. A senior Israeli source is cited as hoping that "this nightmare" will be over by August, when the Americans are expected to complete their examination. Sharon reportedly raised this issue at the meeting with Paul Wolfowitz, but the Israeli delegation would not confirm that. In a related report, Yediot Aharonot said that in the wake of Sharon's US visit, the US Administration is increasingly concerned that, should Israel become convinced that Iran is continuing to develop its nuclear capability, it might launch a preemptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. On his part, Sharon gave no such indication. The IDF Radio cited a Sharon interview yesterday on the Fox Network, where he said that Israel does not intend to attack Tehran. He said that Israel and the US are sharing intelligence information with regard to Iran's nuclear weapons, and that there is very close cooperation between them. Maariv reported that, following conversations Prime Minister Sharon held in Washington, it appears that the US Administration believes that the Syrian regime is on the verge of collapse and that Syrian President al-Asad will not remain in power after Syrian troops pull out of Lebanon. From those conversations, it appears that the Americans have already "written off" President al- Asad, that he is nonexistent for them, and they are planning for day the after his downfall and the end of the Alawi minority control in Damascus. The Americans are cited as saying that al-Asad is a strange man who cannot be trusted, and that the Syrian nation is ready to start a democratic process. They also worry over a possible collapse in Lebanon after the Syrian pullout. Ha'aretz reported that the Israel Defense Forces plan to build roads parallel to the existing main roads used by Israeli traffic in the Gaza Strip, before the disengagement plan gets underway. The new roads will be used by troops and police during the pullout operations. The media have already been informed that, during the pullout, they will not be able to move around freely and will have to travel on buses provided by the army that will be equipped with communications devices. The police and army will also set up a joint situation room to direct the movement of convoys in the Gaza Strip and at the entrance to the western Negev. Yediot Aharonot reported that after a stormy and charged meeting, the Gaza Coast Regional Council decided to act toward moving the Katif Bloc settlers to Nitzanim and to hold negotiations with the prime minister and the various government offices about inserting substantive changes in the evacuation- compensation law. This is a groundbreaking decision, in which the council -- an official body of Katif Bloc residents -- has decided to address issues that up until now it has avoided on the grounds that as far as it was concerned, "there is no disengagement." This follows the meeting last week of the secretaries of a number of Katif Bloc settlements with the prime minister, a meeting in which the "Nitzanim plan" was raised, and in which the settlers increased pressure on the council to take over responsibility for the future of the settlers. The daily added that 15 Israeli mayors yesterday met 15 Palestinian mayors in Jericho and together called for a truce to stop the violence. Ha'aretz related that Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Moshe Yaalon and Attorney General Meni Mazuz witnessed first hand yesterday the mounting right wing protest of the disengagement plan. After succeeding in circumventing the chief of staff's array of bodyguards, two right wing demonstrators mounted the ceremonial platform, a few meters away from Chief of Staff Yaalon, and tried to raise a sign entitled 'Jews do not expel Jews,' before being removed from the site. While touring Hebron yesterday, Mazuz was surrounded by extreme right wing activists, who shouted at him. The Jerusalem Post reports that amid growing criticism of the PA's continued control over the Palestinian media, the director of Palestinian Satellite TV, Maher al-Rayes, resigned earlier this week, saying he was unable to work under the circumstances. Meanwhile, Palestinian journalists in PA-controlled media on Wednesday threatened to stop covering news about the cabinet unless real reforms are made to make the media independent. -------------- ¶1. Bush-Sharon Meeting: -------------- Summary: -------------- Correspondent Efraim Ganor wrote in popular, pluralist Russian-language Novosty Nedely: "President Bush ... believes that straight after the [Gaza] disengagement, it will be possible to begin implementing the road map.... The conclusion is simple: after the first disengagement, other disengagements will follow." Block Quotes: -------------- "Conclusions" Correspondent Efraim Ganor wrote in popular, pluralist Russian-language Novosty Nedely (April 14): "All that can be done was done in order to create an exceptionally friendly atmosphere [at the Bush-Sharon meeting]. Despite the ... pastoral environment, it was impossible to overlook the discrepancies between the two leaders' [positions], which appeared at the meeting.... It is unlikely that these discrepancies will have a serious influence on the relations between Bush and Sharon, but one shouldn't underestimate them either.... Sharon was trying to convince the President that the Palestinian leader was not fulfilling the obligations he took upon himself and hasn't done anything to eradicate terror organizations.... President Bush ... believes that straight after the [Gaza] disengagement, it will be possible to begin implementing the road map.... The conclusion is simple: after the first disengagement, other disengagements will follow." -------------- ¶2. Mideast: -------------- Summary: -------------- Columnist Nadav Shragay wrote in left-leaning, independent Ha'aretz: "Something bad is happening to the Israeli democracy on the way to the disengagement as more and more lines, differentiating between tyranny and a tolerant and pluralistic regime, are crossed." Middle East affairs commentator Guy Bechor, a lecturer at the Interdisciplinary Center wrote in mass- circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "Hizballah has been at a low for several years, ever since the Israeli 'enemy' pulled out of Lebanon, and has been clearly weakening ever since Syria started pulling out.... The lesson for Israel is clear: We must not fall into the trap. Any military reference to Hizballah's veiled threats will serve them. This might lead to a paradox, so typical of the Middle East, in which the enemy of Hizballah might actually save it from its demise." Block Quotes: -------------- ¶1. "Silence, We're Disengaging." Columnist Nadav Shragay wrote in left-leaning, independent Ha'aretz (April 14): "Something bad is happening to the Israeli democracy on the way to the disengagement as more and more lines, differentiating between tyranny and a tolerant and pluralistic regime, are crossed. The 'commander's spirit' which brutally fired cabinet ministers, cheated its voters, denied its political platform and party institutions, and finally refused to let the people vote on an unprecedented historic move, that spirit is now sipping down to the ground levels.... The media, quick to document and cover every violation of human rights and freedom of speech when they happen to Palestinians or left-wing activists, is denying its duty when the other side protests. Over the past few months, it has even forgot how to ask questions. The prime minister should have been asked many questions these days, but nobody does.. It seems that the disengagement is an end that sanctifies every means. The media are willingly silent, and too many stand idly by and do not react to violence, mouth-gagging, and denying the freedom to speak and demonstrate -- which would have been intolerable any other time. The most important thing is to keep it quiet. We are disengaging." ¶2. "Who's Afraid of Hizballah?" Middle East affairs commentator Guy Bechor, a lecturer at the Interdisciplinary Center wrote in mass- circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (April 14): "Recently, Hizballah and its leader have been often described in Israel as a body that might heat up the northern sector and whose political and military struggle against Israel is at its peak. Last week's launching of the pilotless drone was, therefore, perceived as an escalation that put the military system on the alert. The truth is the exact opposite: Hizballah has been at a low for several years, ever since the Israeli 'enemy' pulled out of Lebanon, and has been clearly weakening ever since Syria started pulling out. Hizballah members know that they would not be able to remain the only armed militia in Lebanon without the Syrian umbrella. The Lebanese public opinion would not tolerate that.... The lesson for Israel is clear: We must not fall into the trap. Any military reference to Hizballah veiled threats will serve them. This might lead to a paradox, so typical of the Middle East, in which the enemy of Hizballah might actually save it from its demise, which is already written on the region's walls in red letters." -------------- ¶3. U.S.-Israeli Relations: -------------- Summary: -------------- Columnist Larry Derfner wrote in conservative, independent Jerusalem Post (April 14): "Why are American taxpayers giving Israel another $2.5 billion this year? Why will they give Israel about the same $2.5 billion next year? And the year after that? And, barring a radical change, indefinitely? Everybody knows why. We get oceans of money from American taxpayers simply because we can get their elected representatives to give it to us.. It is time, it is past time, to stop asking Americans for money. It's time to say thank you -- really -- for the $100 billion you've given us, but we're in good shape now, so please, keep your money, or if you want to give it away, give it to somebody who needs it." Block Quotes: -------------- "Rattling the Cage: Welfare state" Columnist Larry Derfner wrote in conservative, independent Jerusalem Post (April 14): "The recession is over, folks -- Israel is booming. Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu announced it on Sunday, and while he was lying about how good the poor are doing, he was telling the truth about Israelis as a whole (especially, of course, the rich).... So here's my question: Why are American taxpayers giving Israel another $2.5 billion this year? Why will they give Israel about the same $2.5 billion next year? And the year after that? And, barring a radical change, indefinitely? Everybody knows why. We get oceans of money from American taxpayers simply because we can get their elected representatives to give it to us. The Israel lobby in Washington is much too powerful for Congress to turn down, and Israel is, after all, something between an ally and a satellite of America's, so they give us the money, no questions asked. What are they going to do, say no? But when I ask why, I mean how can we -- we Israelis and the American Jews and evangelical Christians who lobby for us -- possibly justify asking for this money anymore...? Now wait, say Israelis and their lobbyists, most of this money we get from the Americans is military aid, and in a few years it'll be strictly military aid, and most of it has to be spent on US-made military goods. So you see, American defense jobs depend on Israel getting this American foreign aid.... The Israel of 2005 can afford its own weapons. It does not need American taxpayers to pay for them -- not anymore, and not in the likely future. Israel has always said that it was only asking for American aid until it became economically independent, until it could stand on its own feet. Well, that day has come. It is time, it is past time, to stop asking Americans for money." CRETZ