Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
05TAIPEI2732 | 2005-06-23 08:32:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. |
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 TAIPEI 002732 |
1. (C) On June 13, Taiwan Premier Frank Hsieh announced that the Taipei Airlines Association (TAA) and the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TaiTRA) could lead delegations on behalf of the Taiwan government in cross- Strait negotiations on direct charter flights and fruit trade, respectively. Taiwan has not yet identified an organization to discuss tourism issues, but media speculation has identified the Taiwan Visitors Association (TVA) as a possible candidate. In discussions with AIT/T the leaders of these three organizations indicated that they have not yet been given specific instructions to initiate discussions. However, each is prepared to act when instructed. Despite some discouraging comments from TAA's chairman, the two sides seem closest to negotiations on charter flights. End Summary Taipei Airlines Association -------------------------- 2. (C) Premier Frank Hsieh on June 13 designated the Taipei Airlines Association as the Taiwan organization authorized to lead discussions with the PRC on cross-Strait charter flights. On June 20, TAA Chairman Tony C.C. Fan told AIT/T that TAA was prepared to lead such discussions, but the Taiwan government had not yet given TAA any instructions. In addition, Fan had to cancel a previously scheduled trip to the Mainland the same week, because, as Fan put it "the timing was too sensitive." He said that to date, TAA had not been contacted by PRC counterparts to arrange discussions, nor had it been engaged in any sort of informal contacts with PRC aviation authorities. Fan also informed us that he had signed a non-disclosure agreement regarding matters related cross-Strait charter negotiations at the request of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). 3. (SBU) As in an earlier discussion with AIT/T (reported ref A), Fan is relatively pessimistic about prospects for cross-Strait charter flights because of different priorities on the two sides. He emphasized that cargo flights are clearly the first priority of the Taiwan government, which has indicated that it has not yet received a clear enough response from the PRC on its willingness to proceed with cargo discussions. Fan reiterated that Taiwan airlines' interest in passenger charters is not high because their flights are already fully booked during holiday periods that some have proposed for passenger charters. He also underscored cargo capacity shortages among PRC carriers that limit PRC interest in cargo charter flights. Taiwan External Trade Development Council -------------------------- 4. (U) Premier Hsieh also designated the Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TaiTRA) as the Taiwan organization authorized to lead discussions with the PRC on fruit export issues. However, according to press reports, the KMT-controlled Taiwan Provincial Farmers Association (TPFA) sent a delegation to Beijing on June 22 where it discussed some fruit export issues with the PRC's Cross- Strait Association on Trade Exchanges. MAC officials have publicly warned the TPFA that its leaders could face heavy fines and jail sentences of up to 5 years if found guilty of negotiating an agreement with the PRC without proper authorization. TPFA officials have indicated to the press that TPFA would not sign any sort of agreement with PRC counterparts. 5. (C) On June 21, TaiTRA President Chao Yuen-chuan told AIT/T that his organization is also prepared to lead cross- Strait discussions on behalf of Taiwan. He reported that PRC authorities had indicated earlier the same day to TaiTRA's Beijing representative that they would respond to the proposal of fruit trade discussions with TaiTRA within two weeks. Some observers have questioned whether Beijing would accept TaiTRA as an interlocutor because of its former semi-official status. Chao emphasized to AIT/T that TaiTRA was a completely non-governmental organization and that this issue should not prevent discussions. 6. (C) Chao said that TaiTRA had not yet received any formal instructions from the government on how to proceed with fruit export discussions. (Note: Although Chao may not have received instructions, his boss TaiTRA Chairman Hsu Chih-jen, who is a former classmate of President Chen, told AIT/T Commercial Section chief that he had discussed TaiTRA's role in this process with senior administration officials. End note.) Nevertheless, Chao identified certificates of quarantine and certificates of origin as the two main issues that would need to be resolved by cross-Strait discussions on Taiwan fruit exports to the PRC. As a result, he expected that a representative from Taiwan's Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine (BAPHIQ) would need to participate in the negotiations. He also speculated that a MAC representative would participate. (Note: The PRC already informally recognizes BAPHIQ certification for Taiwan agricultural goods. The PRC refused to permit MAC officials to participate in the negotiations that took place in Macao in January to discuss Lunar New Year charter flights. End note.) 7. (C) Chao also downplayed the importance of Taiwan fruit exports to the PRC. He pointed out that Taiwan exported USD 3.5 billion worth of agricultural goods in 2004, but fruit accounted for only USD 86 million and fresh fruit only USD 35 million. Although the PRC proposal could dramatically increase Taiwan's fruit direct exports to the PRC, which amounted to only USD 895,000 last year, the impact on Taiwan's overall agricultural trade would be small, according to Chao. (Note: Chao's figures on fruit exports to the PRC are significantly lower than data in a Council of Agriculture and Ministry of Economic Affairs report to the Legislative Yuan, reported ref B. However, both figures are small compared to Taiwan's overall agricultural exports. End note.) Taiwan Visitors Association -------------------------- 8. (SBU) The Taiwan government has not yet identified an industry organization that would be formally authorized to represent Taiwan in cross-Strait negotiations on removing restrictions on PRC tourist travel to Taiwan. One MAC contact indicated that Taiwan was not yet ready to identify an organization to discuss tourism, because the issue is complicated by security and immigration concerns. In addition to the semi-official Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), which is officially responsible for consular issues related to Taiwan visitors to the PRC, two industry organizations have been named in the press as possible cross-Strait negotiators on tourism - the Taiwan Visitors Association (TVA) and the Travel Agency Association of Taiwan (TAAT). (Note: Ref C reported AIT/T conversation with TAAT. End note.) 9. (C) In a July 16 meeting with AIT/T, TVA Chairman Chang Shuo-lao argued that TVA is well qualified to lead cross- Strait negotiations on tourism. Unlike TAAT, TVA represents a broad range of tourism-related businesses, including hotels, amusement parks, gift shops, and transportation companies. He explained that TVA is a private non-profit organization, but receives funding from the Taiwan government's Tourism Bureau in addition to member contributions. He said that TVA had already established good relations with the PRC's China National Tourism Administration. However, he indicated that TVA would not lobby the government to represent Taiwan. According to Chang, Taiwan officials have not formally contacted TVA to discuss this matter. 10. (C) Chang also emphasized that the issues that would need to be addressed in cross-Strait tourism discussions were related to Taiwan sovereignty and security. He noted that discussion of issues like identity verification, traveler safety, and travel agency regulations would require direct government involvement in the negotiations. Chang believes that MAC and the PRC's Taiwan Affairs Office will have to be directly involved in the discussions. 11. (C) Chang told us that he believed increased tourist travel from the PRC could be a major benefit to Taiwan's economy. He noted that only about half of the almost 3 million foreign visitors to Taiwan last year were true tourists. The other visitors were traveling on business or to visit family. He added that although domestic tourism is high, it is concentrated on the weekends, leaving excess capacity during the week. Chang said that he had recently accompanied tourism-related businesses to visit MAC Vice Chairman You Ying-lung and urge MAC to reduce restrictions on PRC travel to Taiwan. A point they made to MAC was that tourism businesses could not move to the Mainland like many Taiwan factories had. Comment - Charter Flights Most Promising -------------------------- 12. (C) Taiwan industry associations stand ready to negotiate with PRC counterparts on cross-Strait economic initiatives. Despite some discouraging comments from TAA's Fan, the two sides seem closest to negotiations on charter flights (as reported ref G), where negotiations for Lunar New Year passenger charters in January, using the "Macao model," set a clear precedence. Fan is also chairman of one of Taiwan's most successful wireless and cable modem manufacturers. He expressed frustration with the airline industry in his meeting with AIT/T. His own enthusiasm for cross-Strait charter flights may be low, but this will not interfere with negotiations once Taiwan and PRC authorities are ready. End comment. PAAL |