Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05NEWDELHI1113
2005-02-11 13:22:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:
NATWAR SINGH TO RESTART INDO-PAK DIALOGUE IN ISLAMABAD
how-toThis record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 001113
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/10/2015
TAGS: PREL PGOV PTER IN PK INDO PAK
SUBJECT: NATWAR SINGH TO RESTART INDO-PAK DIALOGUE IN ISLAMABAD
REF: A. NEW DELHI 909
B. NEW DELHI 586
C. 04 NEW DELHI 7494
Classified By: DCM Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 001113
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/10/2015
TAGS: PREL PGOV PTER IN PK INDO PAK
SUBJECT: NATWAR SINGH TO RESTART INDO-PAK DIALOGUE IN ISLAMABAD
REF: A. NEW DELHI 909
B. NEW DELHI 586
C. 04 NEW DELHI 7494
Classified By: DCM Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)
1. (C) Summary: FM Natwar Singh's February 15-17 trip to Islamabad will be an opportunity for the two governments to re-engage at a high level after a hiatus of nearly two months, during which the most important bilateral stories -- Islamabad's request for World Bank assistance to resolve the Baglihar Dam impasse and the January LOC shelling incidents
-- were largely negative, and when even the Pakistani cricket team's much-heralded February 25-April 18 tour of India has run into political hiccups. For New Delhi, Pakistan has taken a back seat to other regional crises in the past month: the Tsunami, Nepal, the SAARC summit postponement, and resulting tensions with Bangladesh. Although Mission contacts expect no major breakthroughs from Natwar's visit, they are upbeat about the resumption of high-level dialogue, given the opportunities the two sides lost to engage in Dhaka and the interregnum of the back-channel after NSA JN Dixit's death. In addition to setting dates for Composite Dialogue (CD) and technical meetings through the summer, the Foreign Minister will likely take up concessions the GOI has made regarding the proposed Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. We also continue to hear rumors of an accord on the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad bus. End Summary.
Overcoming Recent Setbacks on LOC, Baglihar
--------------
2. (C) Natwar Singh's February 15-17 trip to Islamabad -- the first senior bilateral interaction since the December 27-28 Foreign Secretaries meeting -- will occur after several setbacks in the Indo-Pak relationship. Islamabad's request to the World Bank for a neutral arbiter to resolve the Baglihar Dam impasse (Ref A) and the January 18 and 20 cross-LOC shelling incidents (Ref B) have receded into the background, but in the absence of the vigorous diplomatic activity of last fall, these negative episodes have introduced a note of pessimism into the commentary here on the Indo-Pak relationship.
3. (C) Now that the GOP has initiated the dispute resolution process to address the Baglihar Dam impasse, Mission contacts agree that New Delhi and Islamabad should let the process play itself out. Former Director of the Observer Research Foundation's (ORF) Pakistan Centre Sushant Sareen explained that Baglihar could be addressed on its technical aspects, unlike the majority of bilateral issues that would require political compromise to resolve. Commodore Uday Bhaskar, Deputy Director of the MOD-affiliated Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis, agreed with this perspective, as did International Centre for Peace Initiatives Director Karan Sawhny.
4. (C) Senior GOI officials seem willing to continue to give Islamabad the benefit of the doubt regarding the recent shelling incidents. ORF Senior Pakistan Fellow Wilson John, usually a hawk on Musharraf, speculated to Poloff that the shelling was probably not an ""official"" act, but more likely the work of ""spoilers"" carried out either by Kashmir-focused terrorists or by low-ranking officers of the Pakistan Army acting unilaterally. IDSA's Bhaskar added that India could ""absorb"" such incidents ""to a point,"" and at the current time the GOI valued the peace process far more than retaliation.
5. (C) It is reflective of the current Indo-Pak malaise that even the much-awaited India tour of the Pakistani cricket team has become bogged down in wrangling over one of the proposed match sites, with Islamabad objecting to playing in Ahmedabad for ""security reasons,"" which has been read here as a slap at the 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Indian observers expect the tour to go on, but the politicization of South Asia's most popular sport -- which last year played such an important role in fomenting mutual goodwill -- has cast a small shadow over the generally upbeat atmosphere around Indo-Pak people-to-people ties.
Opportunity for the GOI to Refocus on Pakistan
-------------- -
6. (C) Natwar's trip comes after the GOI has directed much of its foreign policy focus elsewhere for the past several weeks. Several regional crises -- the December Tsunami and its aftermath, the constitutional coup in Nepal, the deteriorating security situation in Bangladesh, and the GOI decision to pull the plug on the SAARC summit -- have diverted attention away from Pakistan. ORF's Wilson John joked to Poloff that, ""For once, the border with Pakistan is among India's least concerns."" An MEA Joint Secretary echoed this perspective, quipping that India's deteriorating relations elsewhere in South Asia have made Indo-Pak issues look good. It took only days for the LOC shelling incidents and the Baglihar Dam impasse to disappear from India's major daily newspapers. Against this background, Natwar's high-profile trip is expected to generate the momentum needed to begin the next round of CD talks.
Prospect for Manmohan Trip in March
--------------
7. (C) One agenda item certain to be on the Islamabad agenda will be the GOP's invitation to PM Manmohan Singh to visit Pakistan in March. Coming on the heels of Natwar's trip, and given the positive read-out of PM Singh's meeting with Pakistani PM Shaukat Aziz in November (Ref C),we expect a PM Singh visit would be well received in both countries. That being said, our MEA interlocutors have carefully stuck to a ""one step at a time"" approach to their bilateral engagements, and have not committed either way on the PM's travel. The outcome of ongoing state elections and the status of economic reform efforts in the budget session of Parliament could be a factor here.
Clearing the Way for Pipeline Discussions
--------------
8. (C) The Indian Cabinet on February 9 authorized Petroleum Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar to pursue energy deals with Burma, Bangladesh, Iran and Pakistan. This announcement represents a GOI climb-down from the MEA's prior insistence on Pakistan extending MFN to India and/or providing transit rights for Indian trade to Afghanistan as a prerequisite to the pipeline. In a short conversation looking ahead to Natwar's trip, MEA Joint Secretary (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran) Arun K. Singh indicated to PolCouns that this pipeline breakthrough would be a deliverable for the Foreign Minister's trip to Islamabad. On February 11, Petroleum Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar told the Ambassador that an agreement was ""not going to happen easily, quickly, or smoothly."" The Energy and Resources Institute's (TERI) RK Batra indicated to us that numerous pipeline issues remain, including financing, physical protection, and possible ILSA restrictions.
Future of Composite and Technical Talks
--------------
9. (C) Natwar's trip should yield a schedule for this Spring's round of bilateral talks, although it would be too soon to expect an announcement of an accord on any of the Composite Dialogue agenda items (Wullar Barrage, Siachen Glacier, Promotion of Friendly Exchanges, Terrorism and Drug Trafficking, Sir Creek, and Confidence Building Measures in Jammu and Kashmir) or the bilateral technical talks (nuclear CBMs, conventional military CBMs, and the Khokhrapar-Munnabao rail link). One major issue that may be ripe for a breakthrough is the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad bus route.
10. (C) J/S Singh told us on February 10 that negotiations are continuing, and remarked that ""we're close but not quite there."" Veteran journalist and Track-Two practitioner Kuldip Nayyar was convinced the bus service would begin within the year. Likewise, the ""Hindustan Times's"" Pramit Pal Chaudhuri told us that MEA sources have been promising ""something big"" for the Natwar trip, and suggested that the bus was it.
International Centre for Peace Initiatives Director Karan Sawhny suggested that even incremental movement in any bilateral discussions would be critical, to ensure that Islamabad continued to find value in ongoing engagement. A more detailed examination of Indian predictions for Indo-Pak relations in 2005 follows septel.
Next Up: Trade Talks
--------------
11. (C) In the next scheduled major bilateral interaction, New Delhi will host expert-level trade talks on February 22.
There are a host of bilateral trade issues, including normalizing the trade flows that now transit third-countries, intellectual copyright issues, and preparations for the South Asia Free Trade Area that is to begin next year. Further details on this event will be addressed septel.
Comment
--------------
12. (C) Several recent opportunities have passed for Indian and Pakistani officials to interact since the Foreign Secretaries met last December, including the postponed SAARC
SIPDIS summit, and much of the news in the meantime has been unhelpful to the peace process. If Natwar's trip takes place as scheduled and both capitals see it as successful, that could herald another 6-9 months of diplomatic engagement which would be as important as the continued LOC cease-fire and possible further reduction in Kashmir-oriented terrorism.
The fact that his trip is being heralded as ""the first bilateral visit of an Indian Foreign Minister to Pakistan in 17 years"" demonstrates the difficulty the Indian media has in accurately describing so-called milestones in Indo-Pak diplomacy, given last year's hectic calendar of meetings.
However, the run-up to Natwar's trip is demonstrating the new, positive dynamic of Indo-Pak relations, with each senior level encounter creating pressure on the bureaucracy to generate deliverables of some sort -- and that in turn helping to ratchet the two sides further away from conflict.
MULFORD
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/10/2015
TAGS: PREL PGOV PTER IN PK INDO PAK
SUBJECT: NATWAR SINGH TO RESTART INDO-PAK DIALOGUE IN ISLAMABAD
REF: A. NEW DELHI 909
B. NEW DELHI 586
C. 04 NEW DELHI 7494
Classified By: DCM Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)
1. (C) Summary: FM Natwar Singh's February 15-17 trip to Islamabad will be an opportunity for the two governments to re-engage at a high level after a hiatus of nearly two months, during which the most important bilateral stories -- Islamabad's request for World Bank assistance to resolve the Baglihar Dam impasse and the January LOC shelling incidents
-- were largely negative, and when even the Pakistani cricket team's much-heralded February 25-April 18 tour of India has run into political hiccups. For New Delhi, Pakistan has taken a back seat to other regional crises in the past month: the Tsunami, Nepal, the SAARC summit postponement, and resulting tensions with Bangladesh. Although Mission contacts expect no major breakthroughs from Natwar's visit, they are upbeat about the resumption of high-level dialogue, given the opportunities the two sides lost to engage in Dhaka and the interregnum of the back-channel after NSA JN Dixit's death. In addition to setting dates for Composite Dialogue (CD) and technical meetings through the summer, the Foreign Minister will likely take up concessions the GOI has made regarding the proposed Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. We also continue to hear rumors of an accord on the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad bus. End Summary.
Overcoming Recent Setbacks on LOC, Baglihar
--------------
2. (C) Natwar Singh's February 15-17 trip to Islamabad -- the first senior bilateral interaction since the December 27-28 Foreign Secretaries meeting -- will occur after several setbacks in the Indo-Pak relationship. Islamabad's request to the World Bank for a neutral arbiter to resolve the Baglihar Dam impasse (Ref A) and the January 18 and 20 cross-LOC shelling incidents (Ref B) have receded into the background, but in the absence of the vigorous diplomatic activity of last fall, these negative episodes have introduced a note of pessimism into the commentary here on the Indo-Pak relationship.
3. (C) Now that the GOP has initiated the dispute resolution process to address the Baglihar Dam impasse, Mission contacts agree that New Delhi and Islamabad should let the process play itself out. Former Director of the Observer Research Foundation's (ORF) Pakistan Centre Sushant Sareen explained that Baglihar could be addressed on its technical aspects, unlike the majority of bilateral issues that would require political compromise to resolve. Commodore Uday Bhaskar, Deputy Director of the MOD-affiliated Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis, agreed with this perspective, as did International Centre for Peace Initiatives Director Karan Sawhny.
4. (C) Senior GOI officials seem willing to continue to give Islamabad the benefit of the doubt regarding the recent shelling incidents. ORF Senior Pakistan Fellow Wilson John, usually a hawk on Musharraf, speculated to Poloff that the shelling was probably not an ""official"" act, but more likely the work of ""spoilers"" carried out either by Kashmir-focused terrorists or by low-ranking officers of the Pakistan Army acting unilaterally. IDSA's Bhaskar added that India could ""absorb"" such incidents ""to a point,"" and at the current time the GOI valued the peace process far more than retaliation.
5. (C) It is reflective of the current Indo-Pak malaise that even the much-awaited India tour of the Pakistani cricket team has become bogged down in wrangling over one of the proposed match sites, with Islamabad objecting to playing in Ahmedabad for ""security reasons,"" which has been read here as a slap at the 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Indian observers expect the tour to go on, but the politicization of South Asia's most popular sport -- which last year played such an important role in fomenting mutual goodwill -- has cast a small shadow over the generally upbeat atmosphere around Indo-Pak people-to-people ties.
Opportunity for the GOI to Refocus on Pakistan
-------------- -
6. (C) Natwar's trip comes after the GOI has directed much of its foreign policy focus elsewhere for the past several weeks. Several regional crises -- the December Tsunami and its aftermath, the constitutional coup in Nepal, the deteriorating security situation in Bangladesh, and the GOI decision to pull the plug on the SAARC summit -- have diverted attention away from Pakistan. ORF's Wilson John joked to Poloff that, ""For once, the border with Pakistan is among India's least concerns."" An MEA Joint Secretary echoed this perspective, quipping that India's deteriorating relations elsewhere in South Asia have made Indo-Pak issues look good. It took only days for the LOC shelling incidents and the Baglihar Dam impasse to disappear from India's major daily newspapers. Against this background, Natwar's high-profile trip is expected to generate the momentum needed to begin the next round of CD talks.
Prospect for Manmohan Trip in March
--------------
7. (C) One agenda item certain to be on the Islamabad agenda will be the GOP's invitation to PM Manmohan Singh to visit Pakistan in March. Coming on the heels of Natwar's trip, and given the positive read-out of PM Singh's meeting with Pakistani PM Shaukat Aziz in November (Ref C),we expect a PM Singh visit would be well received in both countries. That being said, our MEA interlocutors have carefully stuck to a ""one step at a time"" approach to their bilateral engagements, and have not committed either way on the PM's travel. The outcome of ongoing state elections and the status of economic reform efforts in the budget session of Parliament could be a factor here.
Clearing the Way for Pipeline Discussions
--------------
8. (C) The Indian Cabinet on February 9 authorized Petroleum Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar to pursue energy deals with Burma, Bangladesh, Iran and Pakistan. This announcement represents a GOI climb-down from the MEA's prior insistence on Pakistan extending MFN to India and/or providing transit rights for Indian trade to Afghanistan as a prerequisite to the pipeline. In a short conversation looking ahead to Natwar's trip, MEA Joint Secretary (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran) Arun K. Singh indicated to PolCouns that this pipeline breakthrough would be a deliverable for the Foreign Minister's trip to Islamabad. On February 11, Petroleum Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar told the Ambassador that an agreement was ""not going to happen easily, quickly, or smoothly."" The Energy and Resources Institute's (TERI) RK Batra indicated to us that numerous pipeline issues remain, including financing, physical protection, and possible ILSA restrictions.
Future of Composite and Technical Talks
--------------
9. (C) Natwar's trip should yield a schedule for this Spring's round of bilateral talks, although it would be too soon to expect an announcement of an accord on any of the Composite Dialogue agenda items (Wullar Barrage, Siachen Glacier, Promotion of Friendly Exchanges, Terrorism and Drug Trafficking, Sir Creek, and Confidence Building Measures in Jammu and Kashmir) or the bilateral technical talks (nuclear CBMs, conventional military CBMs, and the Khokhrapar-Munnabao rail link). One major issue that may be ripe for a breakthrough is the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad bus route.
10. (C) J/S Singh told us on February 10 that negotiations are continuing, and remarked that ""we're close but not quite there."" Veteran journalist and Track-Two practitioner Kuldip Nayyar was convinced the bus service would begin within the year. Likewise, the ""Hindustan Times's"" Pramit Pal Chaudhuri told us that MEA sources have been promising ""something big"" for the Natwar trip, and suggested that the bus was it.
International Centre for Peace Initiatives Director Karan Sawhny suggested that even incremental movement in any bilateral discussions would be critical, to ensure that Islamabad continued to find value in ongoing engagement. A more detailed examination of Indian predictions for Indo-Pak relations in 2005 follows septel.
Next Up: Trade Talks
--------------
11. (C) In the next scheduled major bilateral interaction, New Delhi will host expert-level trade talks on February 22.
There are a host of bilateral trade issues, including normalizing the trade flows that now transit third-countries, intellectual copyright issues, and preparations for the South Asia Free Trade Area that is to begin next year. Further details on this event will be addressed septel.
Comment
--------------
12. (C) Several recent opportunities have passed for Indian and Pakistani officials to interact since the Foreign Secretaries met last December, including the postponed SAARC
SIPDIS summit, and much of the news in the meantime has been unhelpful to the peace process. If Natwar's trip takes place as scheduled and both capitals see it as successful, that could herald another 6-9 months of diplomatic engagement which would be as important as the continued LOC cease-fire and possible further reduction in Kashmir-oriented terrorism.
The fact that his trip is being heralded as ""the first bilateral visit of an Indian Foreign Minister to Pakistan in 17 years"" demonstrates the difficulty the Indian media has in accurately describing so-called milestones in Indo-Pak diplomacy, given last year's hectic calendar of meetings.
However, the run-up to Natwar's trip is demonstrating the new, positive dynamic of Indo-Pak relations, with each senior level encounter creating pressure on the bureaucracy to generate deliverables of some sort -- and that in turn helping to ratchet the two sides further away from conflict.
MULFORD