FOUR OUT OF FIVE KUWAITI LAWYERS AGREE: SYSTEMIC

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 07 KUWAIT 002258

SIPDIS

STATE FOR NEA/ARPI

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/04/2015
TAGS: PGOV KISL PTER KLIG KJUS PHUM ASEC KU ISLAMISTS TERRORISM
SUBJECT: FOUR OUT OF FIVE KUWAITI LAWYERS AGREE: SYSTEMIC
LEGAL FLAWS HAMPER JUSTICE

REF: A. KUWAIT 2174

B. KUWAIT 1908

C. KUWAIT 1308

D. KUWAIT 1299

E. KUWAIT 1192

F. 04 KUWAIT 1600

G. 04 KUWAIT 1042

Classified By: Ambassador Richard LeBaron for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).


1. (C) Summary and Comment: An examination of many recent
legal cases, discussions with Kuwaiti attorneys of all
political stripes, and an overview of basic legal codes and
procedures reveals significant flaws in Kuwait's judicial
system. According to several lawyers, the system suffers
from a combination of inadequate laws, insufficient
enforcement of existing laws, a lack of judicial oversight,
and the societal problem of "wasta" - influence peddling. An
examination of cases in the last year revealed that a
significant number of convicted militants and militant
supporters have received noticeable courtroom leniency, with
few receiving any meaningful jail time. On the other hand,
writers and activists have been treated relatively harshly
for their written or spoken words, although none have been
imprisoned. While there have been enough lenient rulings
favoring Islamic conservatives and extremists to suggest the
existence of a judicial preference for religious and tribal
conservatives, this bias, according to most of the lawyers
with whom PolOff met, owes more to a lack of judicial
oversight and the presence of wasta than a systematic intent
by most magistrates to favor Islamists. Such leniency also
exists, in great part, because Kuwait's legal system does not
adequately address many internationally-recognized crimes
such as membership in a terrorist organization, weapons
trafficking, and violent jihad committed in foreign
countries. For many suspected criminal actions, there is
either no law against these acts or, if one exists,
sentencing standards allow for little more than a legal slap
on the wrist. The current trial of a large number of
jihadists, for which the GOK is requesting harsh sentences,
will test this thesis.


2. (C) Many in Kuwaiti society recognize that the judicial
system is in need of improved laws, training, oversight, and
institutional safeguards against corruption. Because neither
the obstructive National Assembly nor the Al-Sabah-led
government is likely to muster the political will to pursue
serious legal reform, it is unlikely that changes will take
place in the near term. End Summary and Comment.

Overview Of The Judicial System
--------------


3. (U) Kuwait's judicial system is based on a combination of
Islamic law, English common law, and French and Ottoman civil
codes. The current Penal Code was drafted by a group of
judges from Egypt, Sudan, Iraq, and France and is heavily
derived from French civil code. Its criminal law section is
based on Napoleonic law which allows for the loosest
interpretation of a suspect's intent of action, a point upon
which cases are routinely dismissed in Kuwaiti courts when
"intent" to commit a crime is not proven. The Kuwaiti
Constitution provides for an independent judiciary and the
right to a fair trial. Articles 162-173 of the Constitution
outline the general principles of the judiciary. Article 2
of the Kuwaiti Constitution states that "the religion of the
State is Islam and the Islamic Shari'a shall be a main source
of legislation."


4. (U) There are no jury trials in Kuwait and the Amir has
the constitutional authority to pardon or commute any
sentence. There is also no requirement or tradition for
legal precedent on rulings. By law, criminal trials are
public unless the GOK determines that the issue is sensitive
and necessitates a closed trial. Secular courts allow anyone
to testify and the testimony of men and women is considered
equal. In family courts, however, the testimony of a man is
equal to that of two women.

The Kuwaiti Court System
--------------


5. (U) Defendants have the right to confront their accusers
and to appeal verdicts. Defendants in felony cases are
required by law to be represented in court by an attorney,
which the courts provide in criminal cases. Kuwait's Bar
Association is required, upon court request, to appoint an
attorney without charge for indigent defendants in civil,
commercial, and criminal cases. Almost all indigent criminal
defendants ask for and receive free counsel.


6. (U) Although there are several divisions of courts to
adjudicate civil disputes including traffic, family, and
administrative courts, the general Kuwaiti judicial structure
through which all criminal cases must pass is a three-tiered
system that includes at least one Summary Court and, if a
case is contested, up to two levels of appellate courts.
(Note: There are several other special courts including the
Constitutional Court, which, although empowered to, rarely
engages in judicial review. There is also a Martial Court in
the event the Amir declares martial law. End Note.)
- (U) Court of First Instance (Al-Mahkamah Al-Kuliya) - As
the first level or Summary Court in the system, this court
hears all disputes, i.e. all cases examined for the first
time, including civil, commercial, administrative, labor
disputes, as well as all violent criminal and state security
cases. As of October 1995, all judgments were made by a
panel of three judges. Both defendants and plaintiffs may
appeal verdicts to an appellate court.

- (U) Court of Appeals (Mahkamah Al-Istenaf Al-Aliya) - After
a ruling has been made at the first level, any appeal must be
referred to this court. It is composed of a three
judge-panel appointed by the board of the general assembly of
the court. This court may rule not only on whether the law
was applied properly, but also on the guilt or innocence of
the defendant. Appellate rulings may be further appealed to
the Court of Cassation.

- (U) Court of Cassation (Supreme Court of Appeals) (Mahkamah
Al-Tameez) - A final appeal can be made to the Court of
Cassation which is presided over by a five-judge panel. This
court conducts a limited and formal review of cases to
determine only whether the law was applied properly.


7. (U) A panel of judges, not a jury, determines the guilt or
innocence of a defendant. According to Article 163 of the
Constitution, judges are not subject to any authority.
However, the Amir appoints all judges and the GOK must
approve the renewal of all non-citizen judicial appointments.
Kuwaiti judges have lifetime appointments while non-citizen
judges, most of whom are Egyptian, serve one-to three-year
contracts. Post has heard differing accounts regarding the
exact number and citizenship of judges in the Kuwaiti court
system. There are at least several hundred judges and
roughly half are non-citizens.

From Interior to Justice: Misdemeanors and Felonies
-------------- --------------


8. (C) Both misdemeanor and felony cases begin their journey
through the legal system with police officers, followed by
routine involvement of investigators, and finally ending up
in the hands of the prosecutors. Misdemeanors carry a
sentence of less than three years while felonies have a
sentence of more than three years. It is the investigating
police officer taking the complaint who decides whether or
not a case is handled as a misdemeanor or felony according to
sentencing guidelines. Misdemeanor cases are dealt with by
Interior Ministry investigators and felony cases by Justice
Ministry investigators. All investigators and prosecutors
have law degrees and police officers are permitted to seek
their guidance to determine whether or not a case should be
classified as a misdemeanor or felony. When a case reaches
the Public Prosecutor's office, it is then fully under the
control of the Ministry of Justice -- the Public Prosecutor
is an independent agency underneath the Ministry of Justice
and is designed to operate as an autonomous body. (Note:
According to Sahab Abdalrazik Al Daey, Chief Investigator for
the Kuwaiti Police, there can be a problem with corruption
because officers are poorly paid. The resulting graft, he
explained, routinely leads to the "downgrading" of felony
cases to misdemeanor status. End Note.)

Pre-Trial Detention
--------------


9. (SBU) Once arrested for criminal a act, a person can be
detained by the police for 20 days without charge.
Extensions can be granted by the court in two-week
increments, up to a maximum of six months. At most, a
suspect can be held for four days at a police station, but
thereafter must be transferred to the Central Prison for
continued detention and investigation. This scenario applies
to all criminal cases handled by the police. During the
recent terror case investigations related to the January 2005
shoot-outs, the cases were handled directly by Kuwait State
Security (KSS). KSS can hold a suspect for a maximum of four
days. If it cannot make a case against the suspect in four
days, it must pass the case to a separate MOI investigator's
office or release the accused without charge. If KSS does
have sufficient grounds to charge, it then passes the case to
the Public Prosecutor's office for trial. (Note: From 1991
to 1995, KSS had the ability to try state security offenses
but that ability was abolished after international complaints
of unfair trial procedures and standards, particularly as
applied to those accused of collaboration with the Iraqi
invaders. End Note)

Legal Expert: Leniency For Militants Due To Gaps In Law
-------------- --------------


10. (SBU) Dr. Faisal Al-Kandari, Assistant Professor of
Criminal Law and head of the Criminal Law section at Kuwait
University's Faculty of Law Department, told PolOffs that
judges need more training, especially, he said, the judges
serving on the Court of First Instance. Saying that judges
in general need more competency, he remarked "a judge issues
sentences depending on his convictions." As to what training
was needed for judges, he listed understanding the law, how
to consider and arrive at a verdict, comparative law, ethics,
and language. He also recommended that routine judicial
inspections occur to ensure that judges were doing their jobs
properly.


11. (SBU) PolOff raised several examples of recent criminal
cases that had been adjudicated in the Kuwaiti courts whereby
defendants found guilty of insulting or defaming Islam were
sentenced more harshly than defendants found guilty of arms
trafficking, possessing illegal weapons, and belonging to
militant terror organizations. PolOff inquired whether this
perceived imbalance was just a series of discretionary
verdicts by individual judges or whether it was
representative of the judicial system as a whole. Dr. Faisal
remarked that it was an example of the current laws and the
way the system works and did not represent the actions of
individual judges.


12. (SBU) He added that some cases appear to be influenced by
judges, but many are simply revealing the limits of the legal
system. He pointed out that the Kuwaiti militants who
traveled to some foreign countries and committed violent
jihad were not guilty of a violent crime in Kuwait because
Kuwait has no law against committing such an action in a
foreign country. He said that in order for an action
committed in a foreign country to be considered a crime in
Kuwait, it must be illegal both in the country in which it
was committed as well as in Kuwait. He explained that
because there was no legitimate Afghan Government, any
militant who committed violent jihad against U.S. or
coalition forces in Afghanistan in 2001 and early 2002
committed no crime in the eyes of the Kuwaiti legal system.
(Note: Although 20 extremists were convicted on May 8 by the
Criminal Court for entering Iraq to fight U.S.-led forces, or
providing training to others to fight there, they were not
sentenced under a law that bans violent jihad. Five were
sentenced for illegally leaving Kuwait with the intention of
fighting coalition forces in Iraq. The rest were charged
with training others, including teenagers, to use weapons, or
receiving weapons training knowing it would serve an
"illegitimate purpose." The same court sentenced 3 Kuwaitis
to three years in jail for illegally entering Iraq to fight
the US-led forces and "disturbing" the relations between the
State of Kuwait and a friendly country -- i.e. the U.S. (ref
B). End Note.)

No Intent, No Crime
--------------


13. (U) The issue of intent, not to be confused with motive,
is also paramount in many criminal cases because without
proof that a suspect intended to commit a crime, a prosecutor
has little or no case. Examples of the difficulties in
proving intent are:

- (SBU) Two Kuwait artillery officers were released in March
after being detained and arrested for allegedly plotting to
attack U.S. military forces in Kuwait during a military
exercise in December 2004. Although dismissed from military
service, no formal charges were brought against the Kuwaiti
Lieutenant Colonel and Captain, and they were released by KSS
because of insufficient evidence and the prosecution's
inability to prove intent. Despite the fact that the
prosecution had evidence of plans and motive, the case was
unable to proceed to trial. (Note: The Kuwaiti military has
no legal means to try military personnel for crimes and any
criminal suspect must be handed over to civilian courts for
criminal trial. End Note.)

- (SBU) On December 19, 2004, a 34-year-old Egyptian man who
struck and killed with his vehicle two U.S. Army soldiers and
injured two others, was initially accused of involuntary
manslaughter. The four soldiers were part of a military
convoy which stopped in the far right lane of a highway to
repair a flat tire on a military truck. The Egyptian driver
claimed he did not see the soldiers prior to hitting them and
said he fled the scene because he feared being shot by U.S.
soldiers. Although the press released a story earlier this
year stating that all charges had been dismissed against the
driver because he had no intent to hit the soldiers, the
investigation is still ongoing. That said, if no intent is
ultimately proven, the driver will almost certainly be
released without charge.

- (SBU) In February 2004, a Kuwaiti man physically assaulted
and sexually violated his wife with an iron rod. He was
originally sentenced in November 2004 to 15 years on charges
of physical assault, torture, and molestation. An appeals
court overturned the ruling in March 2005 and refrained from
passing a sentence against the man citing an ill-defined
"willingness to withdraw the case," and the possibility of
marital reconciliation. The defendant's lawyer argued,
apparently convincingly, that the man did not intend to
molest his wife when he sexually violated her and that the
charge of molestation means there existed a sexual desire to
molest. Since his client did not have this desire, he
argued, the defendant was merely acting out of anger over
what the defendant claimed was his wife's promiscuous
behavior.

Some Extremists Receive Leniency...
--------------


14. (SBU) While many extremists and suspected militants have
been released on minimal bail, they are all required to
return to court for their trial at a later date. The more
acute examples of judicial leniency, however, come after some
of these militants are sentenced lightly or are permitted to
avoid serving their sentence for serious crimes by paying
only a small fine. It is also the case, in some instances,
that the laws of Kuwait are inadequate to prosecute certain
crimes.

- (U) Twenty Islamic extremists, including 18 Kuwaitis, were
sentenced by the Criminal Court on May 8 in two separate
cases for entering Iraq to fight U.S.-led forces, or
providing training to others to fight there. Almost all
received three-year jail terms and some were only fined. Only
one of those sentenced, Kuwaiti Abdullah Matar Al-Shimmari,
received eight years in prison, including two years for
attempting to enter Kuwait on a forged passport. Most of
those sentenced on May 8 were released last year on KD 300
(USD 1,000) bail after being arrested during Kuwait's July
2004 militant crackdown (ref B). Osama Al-Munawer, attorney
for 14 of those sentenced said he will appeal the verdict,
however he told PolOffs that because sentences for some of
the crimes his clients were accused of committing can be as
much as 25-year prison terms, he remarked that a three-year
sentence compared with a 25-year sentence essentially was an
acquittal (ref A).

- (U) Mohsen Al-Fadhli, Maqbul Al-Maqbul, Adil Yousef
Ibraheem Bu Hammeed, and Mohammed M. Al-Mutairi were
convicted by a Kuwaiti criminal court in February 2003 of
fighting against U.S. troops in Afghanistan and smuggling
money to Yemen and Saudi Arabia to establish jihad camps.
They were sentenced to five years hard labor, a rare
punishment. All four were released when their case was
overturned on appeal in April 2004 because the actions for
which they were tried were committed outside Kuwait and thus
not punishable under Kuwaiti law.

- (SBU) Former Secretary general of the Scientific Salafis
Hamad Abdullah Al-Ali was convicted in June 2004 of
criticizing the Amir of Kuwait, inciting demonstrations, and
founding an internet site with tips for making bombs (ref C).
He was sentenced to two years in jail, however, the court
suspended his sentence and released him after he paid KD
1,000 (approx. USD 3,500). He is currently appealing his
sentence by the lower criminal court. (Comment: Hamad
Al-Ali's "criminal" actions include both an incitement to
violence charge and a written and verbal expression of his
opinion against the Amir. It is interesting to note that, of
his crimes, the more severe punshiment stemmed from his
criticism of the Amir, not his rallying of the extremist
troops. End Comment.)

- (SBU) Amer Khlaif Al-Enezi, the now deceased militant Imam
involved in the January 2005 shoot-outs with Kuwaiti security
forces, was arrested in October 2004 for inciting youth to
jihad but was released after being found innocent based on a
lack of intent to cause harm, despite the existence of a
significant amount of evidence that was ignored.

- (U) October 2002 Failaka attack conspirators Suleiman Jamal
Al-Kandari and Mohammed Asad Al-Kandari were sentenced to
five years in prison for involvement and support to the
shooting, including charges for possession of unlicensed
firearms and ammunition, and joining an illegal organization.
Both sentences were suspended for KD 500 (approx. USD
1,700). Fellow conspirator Ahmed Mohammed Al-Kandari had his
four-year sentence suspended for KD 200 (approx. USD 680) and
Ghazi Faisal Al-Tarrah and Ahmad Jamal Al-Kandari were fined
KD 5000 (approx. USD 17,000) and KD 2000 (approx. USD 6,800)
respectively for their involvement in the attack.

- (U) Ali Abdullah Hamad Al-Hamidi and Khalifa Hilal Hadi
Al-Dihani were sentenced by the criminal court in June 2003
for possessing and trafficking in weapons. Al-Hamidi,s
seven year sentence was suspended after paying a KD 500 fine
(approx. USD 1,700) and Al-Dihani,s three year sentence was
suspended for KD 200 (approx. USD 680). Fellow traffickers
Ibrahim Mubarak Fahad Al-Ghanim and Talal Hamad Mohammed
Al-Faresi were not sentenced but were fined KD 3,000 each
(approx. USD 10,000).

...While Tougher Verdicts For Written And Verbal Expression
-------------- --------------


15. (C) Kuwait's judicial system routinely metes out tough
verdicts against those who insult Islam, the State of Kuwait,
or the senior-most members of the ruling family. If recent
cases are representative, the Kuwaiti judicial system appears
more capable of defending against rhetorical attacks on Sunni
Islam than prosecuting known violent militants. That said,
these defendants have neither spent any time in jail, nor are
there any politial prisoners in Kuwait.

- (U) The Court of Appeals sentenced Professor of Political
Science at Kuwait University Dr. Ahmed Al-Baghdadi to one
year in prison for defamation (ref E); his sentence was
suspended on payment of a KD 2,000 (approx. USD 6,800) fine.
Al-Baghdadi was found guilty of criticizing Education
Ministry plans to increase the amount of Islamic culture
lessons by removing the music curriculum from government and
private schools. The appeals court ruled that he exceeded
the limits of his freedom of speech by making statements such
as "I'm not afraid of religious or bearded people and I think
music is more important than teaching the Holy Qur'an." He
further said that he did not want his son to be a religious
scholar and also did not want him to have a "possible future
in terrorism." Al-Baghdadi claimed that it was the Kuwaiti
judges in the appeals court who overturned his original
acquittal by Egyptian judges in the lower courts.

- (U) In May 2004, Shi'a fugitive Yasser Al-Habib was
sentenced in absentia to ten years in jail for insulting the
"Companions of the Prophet." He produced and distributed an
audio cassette during Ramadan 2003 that, according to the
court, defamed Sunni Islam Caliphs Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq and
Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (refs F and G). Al-Habib, who remains at
large, was originally sentenced to one year in jail and fined
KD 1,000 (approx. $3,400) on misdemeanor charges for the
offense. (Note: Shi'a Muslims accept Ali, the son-in-law of
Prophet Mohammed and the fourth Caliph, as Mohammed's
rightful successor and disregard his predecessors Abu Bakr
and Omar who were the first and second Caliphs after
Mohammed's death. Kuwait's press law specifically prohibits
the publication of any material that serves to "attack
religions" or "incite people to commit crimes, create hatred,
or spread dissension among the public." The penalty imposed
against Al-Habib is consistent with existing Kuwaiti law. End
Note).

- (U) A Kuwaiti women was arrested in March for stepping on
her citizenship papers while protesting her lack of political
rights. Despite making a public apology for her actions, she
has been referred to the general prosecutor who "demanded to
impose severe punishment" because of her alleged defiance of
Articles 25 and 33 of law 31/1970. (Note: Article 25 of law
31 criminalizes public slander or libel against the Amir and
his authority, and disrespect for the Emirate, which is
punishable by up to five years in prison. Article 33 of law
31 criminalizes public disrespect of the national flag or the
flag of a non-enemy state and is punishable by a sentence of
up to three years with a KD 250 fine. The woman's case is
still pending. End Note.)

Kuwaiti Attorneys: The Legal System Is Flawed
--------------


16. (SBU) PolOff met recently with several trial attorneys,
of varying ideological backgrounds, to hear their
professional opinions about the judicial system and recent
high-profile rulings. All stated that the system has
problems, although most did not agree on which elements
needed reforming. Some complained that the current laws are
insufficient to combat extremism and militants, while others
speculated that the judges have too much discretion and too
often favor those with similar political or religious
beliefs. Only one named the prosecutors as the key systemic
flaw.

- (C) Prominent liberal lawyer Imad Al-Saif complained about
the conservative political and religious bias of many Kuwaiti
judges (ref D). While he believes that the legal system is
sufficient, he did stress the need to upgrade some laws to
better combat terror and extremism in the society including
criminalizing foreign violent jihad and the public labeling
of anyone as a 'kafir,' or infidel, because of the
possibility of violence against that person due to some
interpretations of the Qur'an. He is, however, far more
troubled by the power of influence peddling, or wasta, that
is prevalent in the society and the courts and that, in his
view, gives a much greater advantage to those with tribal
ties and a religiously conservative worldview.

- (C) Dr. Bader Al-Yacoub, moderate attorney for the Arabic
news daily Al-Seyassah and for liberal Political Science
Professor Ahmed Al-Baghdadi, said that the Islamist influence
is very strong throughout the society but that he had never
felt an Islamist bias in the courts. He believes there are
safeguards against undue influence in the courts, chief among
them being that 80 percent of the judges were his students.
He told PolOff that the entire legal and judicial system in
Kuwait needs reform. He also said that the system of judicial
promotions needs to be rewritten and that more courses for
public prosecutors awaiting judgeships are needed.

- (C) Dr. Bader also complained that all press-related crimes
are automatically considered felonies and not misdemeanors,
even though sentences are often below the three-year
sentencing guideline the courts use to differentiate the two.
Dr. Bader said that in Al-Baghdadi's case, there were two
Egyptian judges and one Kuwaiti judge who acquitted him of
the charges at the first trial. At the second trial in the
appellate court, it was two Kuwaiti judges and one Egyptian
who reversed the acquittal sentencing Al-Baghdadi to one year
in jail. Dr. Bader, while not necessarily viewing the second
ruling as a matter of a conservative court bias -- as
Al-Baghdadi did -- said he was surprised by the verdict.

- (C) Mubarak Al-Mutawa, Islamist attorney for firebrand
Salafi preacher Hamad Abdullah Al-Ali, was adamant that the
judicial system is in need of reform. In response to a
question about the existence of political bias in the
judiciary he responded that Kuwait is a small country and in
Kuwaiti society, the families are "involved." Al-Mutawa
nodded when asked if this meant the existence of family and
tribal wasta. Al-Mutawa also said he has been the victim of
courtroom bias and explained that when a liberal writes
negatively about Hamad Al-Ali, it resonates in the courts and
can "affect judgments." Regarding the existence of a bias
favoring religious conservatives he said that he could not
talk anymore about the issue because of possible
"consequences." He did stress that reform was needed to
separate judges from outside influences.

- (C) Osama Al-Munawer, Islamist defense attorney for most of
the suspected extremists and violent jihadists now on trial,
told PolOffs that the key problem in the system is the Public
Prosecutor's office. He claimed that the prosecutors are
anti-Islamist and that some prosecutors receive cash awards
for bringing certain cases to trial. He said that while he
could not rule out the presence of a bias among judges, he
has never seen an example of such corruption. When asked
whether he thought the judicial system responds more harshly
to anti-Islamic statements than to weapons trafficking or
terror-related activities, Al-Munawer replied he wasn't sure
but that he does know that in the system there is a
three-year sentence for an illegal weapons offense and a
five-year sentence for "encroaching upon the honor of Prophet
Mohammed."

Societal Denial
--------------


17. (C) Comment: Serious and pragmatic legal reform, which is
not being discussed, could go a long way to ending many of
the systemic and discretionary flaws in the current system.
Unfortunately, another element that is less tangible, but
very present, is the apparent denial throughout the society
that heinous crimes could be perpetrated by Kuwaitis. Until
recently, almost all Kuwaitis considered terrorism "alien" to
Kuwait. Even after the January shoot-outs between militant
extremists and law enforcement officers, many still believed
it stemmed from outside forces and one Kuwaiti contact told
PolOff that he heard those captured were mostly Saudis.
Because there are fewer than one million Kuwaiti citizens,
most of the population is related due to intermarriage, and
nearly everyone, at the very least, knows "of" everyone else,
there is a discernible "small-town" mentality present.
Disbelief that a Kuwaiti could have committed a serious crime
stems from considerations such as "he comes from a good
family" or "he prays five times a day." This mindset often
leads to an attempt to solve problems in extra-judicial ways
that have little or no lasting legal consequences. This
mentality reaches to the senior-most levels of government and
a senior official, in an meeting with EmbOffs, referred to
this approach to handling criminals as "the Kuwaiti way."

18. (C) Accounts of some form of violence against domestic
workers, rape of women and boys, and other abhorrent crimes
fill local newspapers almost every day. PolOffs have rarely
noted cases of this kind finding their way to courtrooms or
into the sustained public spotlight -- unlike cases regarding
verbal and written statements about Islam. Even when such
cases of violence are addressed, they routinely involve at
most, the defendant paying a small fine and signing a pledge
of good conduct. The sheer volume of incidents per capita
compared to the relatively small number that are addressed by
the legal system is alarming and almost certainly speaks to
more than just the involvement of bad judges, inadequate
laws, and wasta. Even reforming the judicial system would
likely do little to change this mentality until there is a
serious effort by this society to legally and publicly
confront violent crimes committed by its citizenry. (Note:
The last Kuwaiti to receive the death penalty was hanged
along with two Saudis in June 2004 for raping and stabbing to
death a six-year old Pakistani girl in 2002. Less than a
handful of Kuwaitis have received capital punishment in the
past five years, despite the occurrence of dozens of murders
and several hundred rapes, all capital cases under Shar'ia
law, during the same time period. End Note.) End Comment.

*********************************************
Visit Embassy Kuwait's Classified Website:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/kuwait/

You can also access this site through the
State Department's Classified SIPRNET website
*********************************************
LEBARON