DAILY IRAQI WEBSITE MONITORING - September 21, 2005

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BAGHDAD 003906 SIPDIS STATE FOR INR/R/MR, NEA/PPD, NEA/PPA, NEA/AGS, INR/IZ, INR/P E.0. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO IZ SUBJECT: DAILY IRAQI WEBSITE MONITORING - September 21, 2005 SUMMARY: Discussion on Sunni political representation, terrorism, and American culpability were the major editorial themes of Iraqi, Arabic language websites on September 21, ¶2005. END SUMMARY. -------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS -------------- ¶A. "The National Sunni Majority Is Marginalized; Saleh Al- Mutlag Represents the Ba'ath Party" (Al-Rafidain, 9/21) ¶B. "Who Is Behind Terror in Iraq?" (Summereon, 9/21) ¶C. "When Will the American Mind Think in the Iraqi Style?" (Al-Nahrain, 9/21) -------------- SELECTED COMMENTARIES ¶A. "The National Sunni Majority Is Marginalized; Saleh Al- Mutlag Represents the Ba'ath Party" (Editorial by Hamed Al-Hamadani-Ar- Rafidain-http://www.alrafidayn.com/index.html ) "As Iraq passes through these difficult times, we notice the absence of the Sunni majority from the Iraqi political scene. Terrorist groups forced them to boycott the January 30th election and they lost their right to participate. Saleh Al-Mutlag and a few of his relatives were selected to represent the majority of Sunnis in the permanent constitutional committee. We have the right to ask the following questions: How were Saleh Al-Mutlag and his friends selected to represent the Sunnis? On what basis were they selected? Who is responsible for the decision? What is the negative impact on Sunnis that has resulted from this choice? "We have to find answers to reveal the true reason for this his choice and who stood behind it. Saleh Al-Mutlag represents the toppled Ba'ath party's opinions and reflects its ideas; he declared his attitude publicly when he defended his Ba'athist comrades and called for annulling the draft constitution's article on deba'athification. "It seems that the American embassy in Baghdad selected Al- Mutlag and his group to balance the Shiite political faction that now controls the government, and the Ba'athists who claim to be secular. I think the U.S. did this to prevent the establishment of a religious and sectarian Shiite government in Iraq. But we are curious as to why the U.S. was unable to find genuine, national, patriotic, and faithful Sunni members to represent the Sunnis in the political process. Is the U.S. not serious about establishing a democratic government in our country? Does it want to create an Iraqi government that implements the American planned agenda in the entire Middle East? "This is dangerous for Iraq's future and dangerous for democracy in our country because Ba'athists do not believe in democracy; they want to make use of democracy to practice dictatorship. The Sunnis and all other Iraqi sects have rejected Saleh Al-Mutlag because he is not representative of the Sunnis. Choosing Al-Mutlag to represent the Sunnis is a big mistake because it has created sectarian hatred between the Shiites and the Sunnis, hatred that will destroy our efforts to build a democratic and free Iraq." ¶B. "Who Is Behind Terror in Iraq?" (Editorial by Ala'a Al-Rifaei - Summereon - http://www.summereon.net/583.html) "The Iraqi arena has witnessed a lot of terror, murder, and explosions since the fall of the Ba'athist regime. The increase in the number of operations and subsequent increase in the number of victims has become a key roadblock in establishing the new Iraq state. Who is behind these terrorist attacks? "I think there are a lot of parties inside and outside of Iraq that are directly and indirectly involved in the current Iraqi situation. One of these terrorists is [Abu Musab] Al-Zarqawi, who took the reigns from the Ba'athists/Aflaqist trend, or we can say that the remaining Ba'athists enlisted in Islamic groups that, in the end, are all part of the Al-Qaeda organization. "There are terrorist groups composed of those who benefited under the former regime. They hide under religion but do not have any links to Al-Qaeda. These groups maintain strong links with the irresponsible media, who label their actions with different names such as `Jihad' and `honest resistance'; these misleading media outlets, such as Al- Jazeera, Al-Sharqiya, and dishonest writers, recruit young men from outside of Iraq. "Additionally, some neighboring countries disguise their acts behind their official statements claiming they are fighting terror, but we know some of these countries maintain terrorist training camps. "Another cause of these terrorist attacks is the American administration and its regional policy. The U.S. dissolved the Iraqi army and opened the borders so that terrorists groups could make Iraq a multi-national war zone. "Then there are domestic conditions that contribute to terror, such as unemployment and administrative corruption, which entice young men to execute terror attacks for financial profit. Most of these people have college degrees and qualifications, but they are unable to pay a bribe for employment, and sometimes they have specific allegiances to one party or another. Wouldn't it have been better for the government if these people were watching the borders instead of spending large amounts of money on corrupt projects? "The government should select a well qualified, reputed and non-sectarian party to share power and assign them to sensitive government posts so the future government will not be accused of corruption as the current one is. "These are some of the problems. Maybe we will have another discussion if the government finds solutions." ¶C. "When Will the American Mind Think in the Iraqi Style?" (Editorial by Wesam Al-Said Taher - Al-Nahrain - http://www.nahrainnet.net/news/51/ARTICLE/463 9/2005-09- 21.html ) "Anyone who follows the American mindset will discover that Iraq is still an unknown and incomprehensible world for him. If we take what the American media writes, it indicates that the elite journalists are primarily concerned with politics. At least they know that most Americans are ignorant about Iraq's location on the globe, and that they don't know who the rat is, Saddam or Iraq. We notice they form an image of Iraq similar to a crossword puzzle. They fill in these puzzles in every stage with temporary words, only to be erased and filled in with new terms after conditions change. "If Arabs say: `He who lives with a certain group for forty days will become one of them,' then Americans either do not want to understand the reality (and this is the stronger possibility) or they have a proverb that states the period is forty years-not forty days! "Although they are in Iraq, they still believe what their leaders in Washington provide; their viewpoints are imported and, in most cases, old-fashioned and nave. "They deal with everyone present as a representative or leader without researching the capability of his leadership. A simple example is the confusion you sense in the American media when they deal with an Iraqi issue. Many of the articles consist of contradictory parts, giving the impression that the writer is conflicted between the information he has and the reality of the situation. "And they are dealing with some leaders who have kidnapped the voice of `Sunni Arabs,' demonstrating their ignorance of Iraqi realities. Their luck is represented by their ability to access American factions and not share authority with others. "They use whatever they want to gain concessions; it is a sign that they lack the hope to pressure those who steal their voices in order to vote against the constitution. Will the Americans learn the lesson .." SATTERFIELD