Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
05ASUNCION511
2005-04-15 15:58:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Asuncion
Cable title:
PARAGUAY SUPPORTS BELARUS RESOLUTION AT UNCHR
how-toThis record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ASUNCION 000511
SIPDIS
STATE WHA/BSC
NSC FOR KIM BREIER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/17/2015
TAGS: PHUM BO PA PDEM
SUBJECT: PARAGUAY SUPPORTS BELARUS RESOLUTION AT UNCHR
REF: STATE 64376
Classified By: Political Chief James P. Merz for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d
).
C O N F I D E N T I A L ASUNCION 000511
SIPDIS
STATE WHA/BSC
NSC FOR KIM BREIER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/17/2015
TAGS: PHUM BO PA PDEM
SUBJECT: PARAGUAY SUPPORTS BELARUS RESOLUTION AT UNCHR
REF: STATE 64376
Classified By: Political Chief James P. Merz for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d
).
1. (U) On 4/13, UK Charge (representing the EU) and PolCoun
met with Acting Foreign Minister Jose Martinez Lezcano urging
Paraguay to vote against the no action motion on Belarus and
in favor of the resolution before the UNCHR conveying
concerns about human rights abuses in Belarus. Martinez
confirmed Paraguay would vote against the no-action motion.
He noted that he had been visited by the Belarusian
Ambassador to Argentina who is accredited to Paraguay and
maintained that the human rights situation was improving.
Martinez also inquired about the position of Russia (Paraguay
announced recently that it intends to open an Embassy in
Moscow and seeks to expand commercial relations with Russia).
2. (U) We reminded Martinez that Paraguay had voted in
support of a similar resolution before the General Assembly
last September and that all reports by independent observers
from both the OSCE and the NGO community indicated that the
human rights situation had only further detoriated since
then. Russia was sensitive about public criticism of Belarus
but privately shared some of the concerns conveyed about
Belarus and were hardly fond of President Lukashenko.
Martinez was not prepared to commit himself on the spot but
signaled Paraguay would likely vote in favor of the
resolution on the Belarus in Geneva on 4/14.
3. (C) On 4/14, Polcoun followed up with MFA Human Rights
Director Julio Duarte who advised that Paraguay had decided
to vote in favor of the resolution on Belarus. Duarte noted
that the decision had been hotly debated within GRULAC and
that Paraguay had come under considerable pressure to abstain
on the resolution by States that had been similarly
approached by the Belarusian delegation. In the end, he
maintained that Paraguay had been swayed by evidence of
serious abuses in Belarus and had decided to buck the
pressure from Belarus and other Latin American states
including Argentina and Brazil.
KEANE
SIPDIS
STATE WHA/BSC
NSC FOR KIM BREIER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/17/2015
TAGS: PHUM BO PA PDEM
SUBJECT: PARAGUAY SUPPORTS BELARUS RESOLUTION AT UNCHR
REF: STATE 64376
Classified By: Political Chief James P. Merz for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d
).
1. (U) On 4/13, UK Charge (representing the EU) and PolCoun
met with Acting Foreign Minister Jose Martinez Lezcano urging
Paraguay to vote against the no action motion on Belarus and
in favor of the resolution before the UNCHR conveying
concerns about human rights abuses in Belarus. Martinez
confirmed Paraguay would vote against the no-action motion.
He noted that he had been visited by the Belarusian
Ambassador to Argentina who is accredited to Paraguay and
maintained that the human rights situation was improving.
Martinez also inquired about the position of Russia (Paraguay
announced recently that it intends to open an Embassy in
Moscow and seeks to expand commercial relations with Russia).
2. (U) We reminded Martinez that Paraguay had voted in
support of a similar resolution before the General Assembly
last September and that all reports by independent observers
from both the OSCE and the NGO community indicated that the
human rights situation had only further detoriated since
then. Russia was sensitive about public criticism of Belarus
but privately shared some of the concerns conveyed about
Belarus and were hardly fond of President Lukashenko.
Martinez was not prepared to commit himself on the spot but
signaled Paraguay would likely vote in favor of the
resolution on the Belarus in Geneva on 4/14.
3. (C) On 4/14, Polcoun followed up with MFA Human Rights
Director Julio Duarte who advised that Paraguay had decided
to vote in favor of the resolution on Belarus. Duarte noted
that the decision had been hotly debated within GRULAC and
that Paraguay had come under considerable pressure to abstain
on the resolution by States that had been similarly
approached by the Belarusian delegation. In the end, he
maintained that Paraguay had been swayed by evidence of
serious abuses in Belarus and had decided to buck the
pressure from Belarus and other Latin American states
including Argentina and Brazil.
KEANE