Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
04ZAGREB1678 | 2004-09-21 11:47:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Zagreb |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. |
UNCLAS ZAGREB 001678 |
1. (SBU) President Bush's widely publicized written reply to Ambassador Neven Jurica on Jurica's presentation of credentials has united and solidified Croatia's diverse political parties in opposition to sending troops to Iraq or signing an Article 98 agreement with us. Although some commentators have emphasized the strong message in the letter on the GoC's responsibility to ensure ICTY fugitive Ante Gotovina is apprehended and transferred to The Hague, the bulk of the reaction has been against the letter's call to send troops to Iraq. Public comment has ignored the letter's welcoming tone toward Croatia's Euro-Atlantic integration. Given the Croatian public's broad opposition to the war in Iraq and President Mesic's long-standing position of seeking a UN mandate, such a response is hardly surprising. One respected commentator, Bruno Lopandic, perhaps captured the mood in Zagreb best in his editorial when he noted that President Bush's letter had shown that Gotovina, troops to Iraq, and Article 98 remain central to the U.S. agenda with Croatia and that it was time to end the self-deception of some Croatian politicians that these issues would fade in importance with a Republican Administration. END SUMMARY AND COMMENT. 2. (U) The reaction to President Bush's letter to new Croatian Ambassador to the U.S. Neven Jurica on Jurica's presentation of credentials was quick and uniform across the Croatian political spectrum. In broadly replayed comments to the media, President Mesic repeated his standard comment that he would only support a Croatian troop contribution under a UN mandate and UN command. However, Mesic refused to support UNSG Annan's charge that the Iraq operation was "illegal," commenting that, "Military operations in Iraq, carried out by the United States and its allies, have certainly helped to topple the dictatorial regime and establish peace in that part of the world which must be democratized. It is not up to me to judge how the operation has been conducted and whether it was launched prematurely." 3. (U) Opposition parties from the left, center and right have all endorsed president Mesic's position that a UN mandate is required before Croatia would contribute troops. The chief foreign policy advisor of the SDP, the main left-center opposition party, Zoran Milanovic commented that Croatia should be cautious even about sending instructors to the NATO-run military training academy when NATO itself cannot agree on a position. Even the ruling HDZ was very non-committal following the release of the letter. Kresimir Cosic, the HDZ parliamentarian and chief of the Croatian delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, commented that, "I think that involvement of Croatia in such an unsettled situation in Iraq would be a very sensitive issue." 4. (U) Some press reports noted the mention of Article 98 in the President's letter, reporting that the GoC has been polling the opposition parties to gauge support for signing a non-surrender agreement. According to these reports, all political parties are firmly against signing such an agreement with the U.S., with one report quoting sources in President Mesic's office that there would be no Article 98 agreement as long as Croatia was sending indictees to The Hague. FRANK NNNN |