ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 TEL AVIV 002242 SIPDIS STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM NSC FOR NEA STAFF JERUSALEM ALSO FOR ICD LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL PARIS ALSO FOR POL ROME FOR MFO E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: IS KMDR MEDIA REACTION REPORT SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION -------------- SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: -------------- ¶1. Mideast ¶2. Iraq -------------- Key stories in the media: -------------- All media reported on Holocaust Memorial Day events, which started last night and will continue through tonight. Sunday, all media led with the assassination of Hamas leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi in an IAF helicopter strike Saturday evening. Shortly after the assassination, Khaled Mashal, the head of the movement's political bureau, who operates from Damascus, announced that the identity of the new Hamas leader in Gaza would not be disclosed. Today, Ha'aretz reported that Israel will consider attacking Hamas's compound in Damascus should the organization move its main power base to Syria. The media pitted strong responses to the killing around the world against mild responses in the U.S. Leading media quoted National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice as saying in an interview on the Fox network that the U.S. did not have advance information about Israel's intention to kill Rantisi. Rice called on Israel to "consider the implications of the actions it carries out," but she stressed that Israel has a right to defend itself, and that Hamas is a terror organization. The media also quoted Democratic presidential contender Sen. John Kerry as saying on NBC: "I believe that Israel has every right to respond to terror threats against it." Kerry also said that he supports Sharon's disengagement plan, and that if elected he will appoint a high-level Middle East mediator acceptable to the international community and Israel. Israel Radio reported that the Islamic Movement in Israel intends to demonstrate this week opposite the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv. All media reported that Sunday PM Sharon won a cabinet majority for his disengagement plan, when Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Education Minister Limor Livnat, and Minister-without-Portfolio Meir Sheetrit decided to back it. Netanyahu was quoted as saying in an interview with Yediot that he "obtained the maximum for the settlers." FM Silvan Shalom is still undecided. The media quoted Sharon as saying at the cabinet meeting: "The U.S. believes that settlement blocs will remain in Israel's hands in any case and that will be outside future negotiations with the Palestinians." Yediot sums up seven achievements reached by Sharon during his visit to the U.S., which he detailed at the cabinet meeting: the U.S. pledged not to adopt another plan than the road map; there will be no diplomatic negotiations before terrorism ends, terrorist groups are dismantled and comprehensive reforms are made [in the PA]; the U.S. recognizes Israel's need for defensible borders, and accepts Israel's right to defend itself everywhere --including in areas it has evacuated and will evacuate; there will be no return of refugees to Israel; there will be no return to the 1967 borders, because the settlement blocs will remain in Israel's hands, and because of Israel's right to defensible borders; not only will settlement blocs remain in Israel's hands, but also Israel will be able to build in them in a scope to be jointly determined with the U.S.; and the security fence will be built along the complete route that was decided upon by the government, including the erection of a continuous fence around the settlement blocs. The government will complete the fence before the beginning of the evacuation of settlements. Jerusalem Post reported that Sharon told his cabinet Sunday that an Israeli team will meet in the next few days with U.S. Ambassador Dan Kurtzer to define where construction will be allowed in the settlements. Sunday, leading media quoted British PM Tony Blair as saying in an interview with BBC Radio from Washington Saturday that Israel's plan to withdraw from Gaza and part of the West Bank will reinvigorate rather than destroy the road map. There were contradictory media reports regarding the EU's position in the matter. Jerusalem Post quoted a PA source as saying that Palestinian FM Nabil Shaath canceled his trip to the U.S., which was planned for next month, because the PA wants to reconsider its acceptance of Sharon's Gaza withdrawal plan and its relations with the U.S. Administration. Yediot and Maariv excerpted an interview with nuclear whistleblower Mordecai Vanunu, who will be released Wednesday. In the interview, which was conducted by the defense establishment and which will be broadcast tonight on Channel 10-TV, Vanunu is alleged to say: "The Dimona nuclear reactor should be destroyed as the Iraqi reactor was." He reportedly said he will have a computer with access to the Internet and that nobody will be able to do anything against him, and that "billions" of people in the world consider him a hero. All media reported that Saturday afternoon a border policeman was killed and that three other Israelis were wounded when a suicide bomber blew himself up at the Erez crossing. The electronic gate did not detect the explosive charge. Ha'aretz and other media reported that a Palestinian youth was killed near Ramallah Friday, and that two Palestinians were killed in Gaza Sunday. All media reported on a shooting incident on a Galilee road Sunday: Ha'aretz and Israel Radio reported that border policemen killed an Israeli Arab and wounded another. They had attempted to shoot at border police vehicles on a Galilee road. Sunday, the media reported that Israel's embassy in Australia has dispatched a diplomat to New Zealand with the arrests of two Israelis allegedly trying to obtain a fake New Zealand passport. The media reported on allegations in New Zealand that the two men could be Mossad agents. Sunday, Jerusalem Post reported that the U.S. State Department has suggested in recent days that Syria may be able to avoid imposition of fresh U.S. sanctions, under the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Restoration Act, if it soon shows it has taken some of the steps required by the law. Leading media reported Sunday that two weeks ago Giora Eiland, the coordinator of the Gaza withdrawal plan, drafted a document criticizing the Geneva Accord for being a "dangerous sleight of hand" regarding the right of return for Palestinian refugees. The media cited a response by the Geneva Accord team, that the understandings in the agreement do not include recognition or materialization of the right of return. Leading media reported that, in a groundbreaking move, Israir Airlines is to launch direct charter flight service between Israel and the U.S. (on the Tel Aviv- New-York line),starting in June. -------------- ¶1. Mideast: -------------- Summary: -------------- Independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized: "Even if it is possible to identify substantive arguments to justify the Rantisi assassination, the timing of the act raises skepticism about the motives of those who decided to carry it out." Conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized: "Will the British Foreign Minister explain why the killing of Uday and Qusay Hussein was justified and 'productive,' but the killing of Abdel Aziz Rantisi was not?" Military correspondent Alex Fishman wrote on page one of mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "Rantisi needed to disappear quickly if only because he threw the gates of Gaza wide open to direct Iranian influence." Political commentator Shalom Yerushalmi wrote in popular, pluralist Maariv: "The serial killing of Sheikh Yassin and Rantisi is turning Sharon into a national hero within the ranks of the Likud." Chief Economic Editor and senior columnist Sever Plotker wrote in the editorial of Yediot Aharonot: "Ultimately, Palestinian society is going to have to be the one to root out Hamas from its midst, if it ever wants to live as a normal society." Ha'aretz editorialized: "Sharon's plan should be supported, but without illusions of any real American guarantees." Nationalist, Orthodox Hatzofe editorialized: "The U.S. President is now being swept into helping Sharon." Arab affairs commentator Danny Rubinstein wrote in Ha'aretz: "If in previous years there was talk of Hamas joining Arafat's regime, it appears now in Gaza that the talk is more to do with the PA joining Hamas." Block Quotes: -------------- ¶I. "The Motivation Behind the Missile" Independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized (April 19): "Knocking off Hamas leaders is not, in itself, policy. If these acts aggravate risks faced by Israel and its citizens, they are wrong. Conversely, if they are likely to restrain Hamas and lead it toward the route of a cease-fire (which disappeared rapidly last summer) and encourage the organization to work out practical arrangements with the Palestinian Authority prior to the withdrawal of IDF troops and settlements from Gaza -- then the assassinations should not be ruled out. An echo of this approach can be heard in the White House.... Even if it is possible to identify substantive arguments to justify the Rantisi assassination, the timing of the act raises skepticism about the motives of those who decided to carry it out. Sharon was eager to arrive at Sunday's cabinet meeting -- and to influence whether top Likud ministers who have expressed reservations about his disengagement plan will join active opponents of the plan or be content to issue vacuous statements -- with a military success under his belt." II. "Justified and Productive" Conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized (April 19): "Will the British Foreign Minister explain why the killing of Uday and Qusay Hussein was justified and 'productive,' but the killing of Abdel Aziz Rantisi was not? All three are, or were, leaders of what the British government defines as terrorist organizations.... To follow the minister's pronouncements to their logical conclusion, Israel may take no measure in its self-defense except to arrest suicide bombers when they reach Israeli soil, which is as good as no defense at all. Alternatively, he believes Israel must resume negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, notwithstanding the failure of the PA to take steps against terrorist organizations and the evidence that it is deeply implicated in terrorist activity." III. "Assassination for Disengagement Purposes" Military correspondent Alex Fishman wrote on page one of mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (April 18): "If any such thing as a 'positive assassination' exists, then Abdel Aziz Rantisi's assassination warrants that term. That is because the removal of Rantisi from the arena is likely to produce a far more substantial change in the performance of Hamas in Gaza than the assassination of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. Rantisi needed to disappear quickly if only because he threw the gates of Gaza wide open to direct Iranian influence.... Assassinating leaders on its own serves no purpose, unless the weakening of the organization they headed is exploited to promote political goals. Should the Palestinian Authority rise to the occasion and take responsibility in the Gaza Strip as a result of Hamas's weakened state, should Egypt, Jordan and other moderate Arab countries encourage and bolster constructive elements in the Gaza Strip to take responsibility and to rehabilitate life there after the Israeli withdrawal, should Israel rise to the occasion to strengthen those elements in the Gaza Strip that have the ability to assume responsibility -- then these assassinations will prove to have been efficacious. Rantisi's assassination does not change Hamas's desire for revenge in the least." IV. "Targeted Assassination of the Objection" Political commentator Shalom Yerushalmi wrote in popular, pluralist Maariv (April 19): "The serial killing of Sheikh Yassin and Rantisi is turning Sharon into a national hero within the ranks of the Likud, a leader whom one must now join, and not place obstacles on his way.... The recent developments are placing the Likud opponents of disengagement in a very difficult predicament.... Sharon's achievements in the U.S., Rantisi's assassination and the defection of [hard-line Likud ministers] Netanyahu and Livnat to the ranks of the supporters isolate them and leave them without a leader endowed with a stature to continue the struggle." ¶V. "A Foreknown Scenario" Chief Economic Editor and senior columnist Sever Plotker wrote in the editorial of Yediot Aharonot (April 18): "The Israeli government does not hide behind an anonymous hand. It announces to all and sundry that it intends to kill the people who lead, initiate and organize the terrorist campaign against it. That is where the strategic novelty lies. The issue of the open and foreknown assassinations raises a large number of legal, moral, military and humanitarian questions. Not all of them either can or should be answered. It is true that Israel has enormously expanded the definition of the ticking bomb, which it used to justify assassinations early on. With that having been said, one thing is clear: it is inconceivable that the people who send others to commit suicide bombing attacks should be able to sleep soundly in their beds. If there is justification for killing a terrorist on his way to commit a terror attack, there is far more justification for killing the commander and preacher who sent the terrorist on his way.... Israel currently stands at the vanguard of the war on terror. It has taken the initiative, and the results are impressive. But we should not delude ourselves. Dismantling Hamas's spinal cord and killing its leadership will not erase the burning hatred for Israel but rather will intensify it -- at least in the short run. Ultimately, Palestinian society is going to have to be the one to root out Hamas from its midst, if it ever wants to live as a normal society." VI. "The Bush Wrapping" Ha'aretz editorialized (April 18): "As the clouds of celebration dissipate from around the White House, it becomes clear that Sharon has provided a solid commitment to implement practical steps, while Bush offered a statement and an atmosphere, 'a sober evaluation,' with no American commitment regarding opposition to the Palestinian right of return or recognition of the reality of large blocs of settlement in the West Bank that will require adjustment through exchanges of territory. This mysterious American policy leaves it to the sides to bargain over the final agreement. As expected, in the wake of Arab and European criticism of the plan, the U.S. Administration peeled off the plan's wrapping and went back to focusing on its immediate benefit to the Palestinians - - withdrawal. In order not to delay the fulfillment of the promises until 2005, or the next prime minister, Sharon gave in to the demand to immediately dismantle the illegal outposts, under close American supervision. Under the conditions that have been created, and in spite of the real concern over the chaos that will roil in the territories, all in all, the removal of settlements is of supreme significance as a precedent. For this reason, Sharon's plan should be supported, but without illusions of any real American guarantees." VII. "Bush Enlisting For the Corrupt One" Nationalist, Orthodox Hatzofe editorialized (April 18): "The President of the U.S. has done something that is a bit startling: if the plan he supports doesn't win a majority, he could find himself in additional trouble on the eve of the presidential race. Is it possible that President Bush is interested in strengthening the image that U.S. night talk show hosts have nurtured regarding his judgment?.... The U.S. President is now being swept into helping Sharon. He could find out that this cost him his second term. It is doubtful that as far as Israel is concerned, Kerry is better than Bush as president. But, should that happen, Sharon could well succeed in causing more damage to Israel. On the other hand, how important is this? The important thing is that the Sharon family survives the corruption investigations." VIII. "The Victory of the Hamas Way" Arab affairs commentator Danny Rubinstein wrote in Ha'aretz (April 19): "The Gaza Strip appears ... to be heading toward a new regime, which won't exactly be a continuation of the Palestinian Authority, but rather 'an action committee under the auspices of the PA,' as Muhammad Dahlan has suggested. If in previous years there was talk of Hamas joining Arafat's regime, it appears now in Gaza that the talk is more to do with the PA joining Hamas. In any event, the Hamas way has emerged victorious: there is no political process; the armed struggle has returned; the fight is against 'the Zionist entity'; and the issue of the right of return has once again been brought to the fore." -------------- ¶2. Iraq: -------------- Summary: -------------- Nachman Shai, who was the IDF spokesman during the 1991 Gulf War, wrote in conservative, independent Jerusalem Post: "Israel is rightfully concerned that American determination could flag.... An American withdrawal would leave us alone in an already hostile environment that would only, in such circumstances, become even more violent and cruel." Block Quotes: -------------- "Rooting For America" Nachman Shai, who was the IDF spokesman during the 1991 Gulf War, wrote in conservative, independent Jerusalem Post (April 18): "Since the allies occupied Iraq more than a year ago, Israel has kept a 'low profile'.... Last week things changed when Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz said, 'We are crossing our fingers for the Americans... If the U.S. wins in Iraq it will have a positive effect on the whole Middle East. If it is forced out due to the pressure of terrorism, it will create a new and dangerous model of Arab rule'.... I suggest everyone wait and see. The U.S. is not stupid, and the move it initiated in Iraq was justified and correct.... Anyone who opts for a policy of surrender and appeasement, as recently exhibited by the new Spanish government's rush to withdraw its forces from Iraq, is only inviting global terror to continue.... John Kerry has to be very careful when he criticizes matters that lie at the core of the ethos of the American nation. In times of war the Americans rally around the flag and postpone their criticism for 'the day after.' That day has yet to come. Israel is rightfully concerned that American determination could flag.... An American withdrawal would leave us alone in an already hostile environment that would only, in such circumstances, become even more violent and cruel." KURTZER