NETANYAHU ANNOUNCES MAJOR TAX REDUCTION PROGRAM

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 TEL AVIV 002067

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/05/2014
TAGS: ECON EFIN IS ECONOMY AND FINANCE ISRAEL RELATIONS
SUBJECT: NETANYAHU ANNOUNCES MAJOR TAX REDUCTION PROGRAM
AND HIS DG ASKS FOR CORRESPONDING CHANGES TO LOAN GUARANTEE
AGREEMENT 2004 TERMS SHEET


--------------
Summary:
--------------


1. (U) On Sunday, April 4th, Finance Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu held a press conference at which he announced the
third major tax reduction initiative of his tenure. It
foresees the following changes in tax and investment laws:
-- personal income taxes, primarily for low-income workers,
would fall significantly by July 2004;
-- corporate income taxes would fall from 36% to 30% by 2007;
-- taxes on construction materials such as steel, iron and
bathroom fixtures would fall, a move aimed to stimulate this
lagging sector of the economy;
-- industrial investments would be encouraged through tax
code changes.


2. (C) Netanyahu estimated the cost of these changes at NIS
1.2 billion in 2004 and NIS 2.3 billion in 2005, which he
said would be more than offset by tax revenue surpluses in
both years. Netanyahu's political opponents say the move is
purely political in nature and sets the stage for a potential
race for the Prime Minister's job, should PM Sharon falter in
his Gaza disengagement plan moves. Most aspects of
Netanyahu's initiative require government and Knesset
approval: at the earliest the income tax and corporate tax
cuts would not go into effect before the second half of 2004.
Although most press reaction to the plan has been positive,
our contacts at the Bank of Israel expressed concern that
Netanyahu is taking a risk in spending revenues that have not
yet been booked.


3. (C) The plan also appears to run counter to
understandings reached at the 2004 Joint Economic Development
Group meeting, in which Netanyahu promised U.S. officials
(including Under Secretary Larson and Treasury Under
Secretary Taylor) to use extra revenues both to reduce taxes

SIPDIS
and also to reduce Israel's significant debt levels, which
have reached 105% of GDP. This supposition is supported by
new changes requested by the MoF to the Loan Guarantee
Agreement (LGA) 2004 Terms Sheet, outlined in paragraph 13.
End Summary.

--------------
The Plan
--------------


4. (U) Netanyahu's tax reduction plan is the third since he
became Finance Minister a year ago. The first was contained
in his economic reform plan of March 2003, and accelerated
the provisions of the Rabinovitch Tax Reform Plan that cut
upper bracket marginal income tax rates. The second, which
was announced February 11, 2004, reduced VAT by 1% from 18%
to 17%, reduced purchase taxes on consumer durables, and
eliminated customs on certain food items.


5. (U) The April 4 plan, according to Netanyahu, is
primarily intended to put more money in the pockets of wage
earners in the NIS 4,000 to NIS 10,000 gross salary level, as
well as bring down corporate taxes over a four year period.
The main aspects of the plan are:

- Reduction in income tax. Wage earners earning NIS 4,000 a
month will receive an additional NIS 59 a month, or NIS 708
per year. Those earning NIS 7,000 would receive an
additional NIS 180 a month, resulting in NIS 2,160 a year,
and those earning NIS 10,000 would receive an additional NIS
70, equal to an additional NIS 840 a year. This part of the
plan requires Cabinet and Knesset approval. Netanyahu
nonetheless said he hoped implementation could go into effect
by July, 2004.

- Gradual reduction in corporate income tax from 36% today to
30% in 2007. Netanyahu said he was aiming to bring corporate
tax rates more into line with OECD countries. Taxes would
decline by 1% in 2004 to 35%, another 1% in 2005 to 34%, and
2% each year in 2006, and 2007, reaching 30% in 2007. This
also requires Government and Knesset approval.

- Cancellation of purchase taxes on construction-related raw
materials, including steel, iron, and equipment for bathrooms
and kitchens. This move is meant to stimulate the building
and construction sector. Netanyahu announced that this step
would go into effect immediately.

- Reforms in Investment Encouragement Law. These measures
would aim to make industrial investments more attractive, and
would include tax benefits totaling NIS one billion for
investments in periphery areas. The new law would require
new legislation.

-------------- --------------
How He Did It: Excess Revenues Continue Pouring In
-------------- --------------


6. (SBU) How could Netanyahu afford to take this expensive
step? The Minister estimated at his press conference that
GOI tax revenues are likely to be NIS 2 billion higher than
originally forecast for 2004. This follows an April 2 MOF
report on first quarter 2004 tax revenues showing that March
receipts totaled NIS 13.7 billion, a real increase of 11%
from March 2003. Tax revenues for the first quarter of 2004
totaled NIS 38.6 billion, a real increase of about 12% over
the NIS 35.2 billion in revenues in the first quarter of

2003. This windfall, Netanyahu said, would more than cover
the costs of the plan, which he estimated at NIS 1.2 billion
in 2004, and approximately NIS 2.3 billion in 2005. He broke
down the 2004 costs as follows:
-- income tax cut: NIS 650 million;
-- decline in company tax: NIS 400 million;
-- construction encouragement: NIS 150 million.

-------------- --------------
Netanyahu's Economic Worldview versus David Klein's
-------------- --------------


7. (SBU) Netanyahu's philosophy of using additional tax
revenue to finance tax reductions is not universally accepted
in Israel. Although BOI Governor Klein agrees with Netanyahu
that additional tax revenues should not be used to increase
government expenditures, he has repeatedly noted that this
money should be used to reduce Israel's high level of public
debt, which totaled 105 percent of GDP in 2003. This is
significantly higher than the 78 percent average of OECD
countries and 73 percent of EU countries. The BOI expressed
this sentiment most clearly in a March 4 press release,
noting that the debt/GDP ratio is one of the key indicators
of an economy's stability in the eyes of foreign investors.
Klein followed this on March 30 in his cover letter to the
BOI's 2003 annual report, in which he wrote that additional
tax revenues should be used to repay debt rather than further
reducing taxes, as Israel's tax burden is approximately 39%,
similar to OECD levels. In Klein's view, reducing the debt
burden would result in lower interest payments, enabling
lower interest, which would encourage investment, and support
growth. In addition, Klein said that reduced debt servicing
would allow for more money to be used for social-economic
purposes.

--------------
Reaction: Politics, or Good Economics?
--------------


8. (SBU) The political opposition was quick to criticize
Netanyahu's proposal. Avraham "Beiga" Shochat, former
Labor-party Finance Minister, said in a radio interview April
4 that, although tax cuts are a good thing, the tax windfall
should have been used to pay salaries to local authority
workers who have not received salaries in months, as well as
using it for education, health, and welfare. This was a
reflection of the plan's political nature. Shochat's views
were echoed by a number of other commentators.


9. (SBU) Yosi Bachar, Director General of the Finance
Ministry argued in an April 5 radio interview that the
measure is intended to help lower wage earners. He said that
it is MOF policy to return extra tax revenues to Israeli
citizens. He said the GOI's policy is consistent and clear )
to encourage people to go to work, so that they will have
more assets in their hands, not to increase public
expenditures.

--------------
Bank of Israel Reaction to Plan: It's a Risk
MOF Responds: No It's Not
--------------


10. (C) The BOI's Research Division Chief, Karnit Flug, spoke
to us April 4 about the new plan. On the one hand, she said
that it followed "a legitimate path," particularly in view of
the tendency of "political systems to spend revenue
surpluses." She nonetheless highlighted three dangers: the
GOI would be spending revenues that have not yet been booked;
the plan precludes needed reductions in GOI debt levels; it
does not help the very poor, who work but do not pay taxes.
Although Flug thought the GOI could still meet its 2004
deficit target of 4% under the new plan, she believed that
meeting the 2005 deficit target of 3% was a "big problem."


11. (C) In a subsequent conversation with MoF DG Bachar, who
called Deputy ECON Counselor to discuss changes to the Loan
Guarantee Agreement 2004 Terms Sheet (see para. 13) related
to the new plan, Bachar argued that the plan was necessary
and timely. "Our highest priority is to make certain that
politicians will not spend without control." He noted that
the USG and the GOI were "coming from the same place" in
efforts to reduce taxes. He also stressed that the
additional growth resulting from the new tax regime would
lead to significant additional growth that would do more to
reduce debt reduction than any other GOI step. (Note:
presumably including direct debt reduction). As for 2005,
Bachar said that the GOI remains committed to attaining its
deficit target that year, although he admitted doing so would
require "major expenditure cuts."

--------------
Comment
--------------


12. (C) Neither Netanyahu nor his MoF staff provided the
Embassy advance notice of his tax reduction plan, which
appears to run counter to promises the MoF made to Under
Secretaries Larson and Taylor at the recently concluded 2004

SIPDIS
Joint Economic Development Group meetings in Jerusalem. At
the meetings, both the Minister and his DG agreed to use
additional revenues to achieve two goals, tax reduction and
debt reduction. Netanyahu's plan appears to run counter to
that understanding. In an April 4 conversation with Embassy
economic staff, MoF DG Bachar said the MoF desired to make
more significant changes to the draft 2004 LGA terms sheet to
take account of the new Netanyahu plan. He requested that
Washington approve these changes as soon as possible, as the
GOI wishes to go to market April 19. Embassy Economic
Section staff, which has sent the text of the requested
changes to Washington for review, noted the extent of the
changes, and the fact that the language in question had been
directly negotiated with the Under Secretaries during the
recent JEDG. Bachar said he understood and looked forward to
Washington's reaction to the changes. He noted that he could
be contacted until the evening of April 6, at which point he
would go on leave until April 20. Bachar noted he was
designating Budget Director Yuri Yogev to act in his stead
with regard to the Terms Sheet during Bachar's absence.

-------------- --------------
Bachar's Requested Loan Guarantee Agreement Changes
-------------- --------------


13. (C) On April 4, DG Bachar sent Deputy Economic Counselor
his edits to the LGA 2004 Terms Sheet. We have forwarded
these edits by e-mail to both State/IPA and to Treasury.
(Note: These are in addition to one change made earlier in
the month by Minister Netanyahu to the third tic in the first
section of Appendix 4 referring to reducing the GOI's wage
bill). The GOI's proposed Terms Sheet, including Bachar's
changes, is included below. Bachar made three changes to the
Terms Sheet; they are

1. Appendix 4, Section 2, Third Tic: Delete second sentence,
"Due emphasis should be given to deficit reduction."

2. Appendix 5, Section 1, Table 1, Defense Consumption:
Replace NIS 48.1 billion with 48 billion.

3. Appendix 5, Section 2, Second Tic, Number 2: Replace
phrase "forecasted expenditure growth and to actual
expenditure outturn" with "original budget plan to the
previous year."

-------------- --------------
Text of Appendices 4 and 5, as Amended by MoF DG Bachar
-------------- --------------

(SBU) Begin Text of Appendix 4

Modifications to and Determinations of Specific Reforms
Details in Annex II of the Loan Guarantee Commitment Agreement

The Joint Economic Development Group (JEDG),as the joint
consultative mechanism referred to in Section 5.03 of the
Loan Guarantee Commitment Agreement, and proceeding under
Section 4.02 of the Loan Guarantee Commitment Agreement,
determines and modifies the specific reforms referred to in
Section 4.02 by appending the following as Appendices 4 and 5
of Annex II.


CONDITIONS FOR DISBURSEMENT OF THE SECOND TRANCHE OF
SUPPLEMENTAL ASSISTANCE

The second tranche of bond guarantees in the amount of up to
$3.0 billion will be released on determination of completion
of the following:


1. Progress on Reform Plan: Progress on the main measures of
the GOI economic reform plan. This plan includes, among
other things, reforms related to:

-- Acceleration of tax reform: Continued progress on final
implementation of tax reforms (legislated in the Knesset in
2002) by January, 2006;
-- Pension Reform: Continued long-term reduction in issuance
of special government bonds for pension funds;
-- Continued reduction of public sector,s budgetary expense
on the wage bill as a percentage of GDP, to be achieved
mainly by reducing public sector employees.


2. Meet Spending and Budget Deficit Targets.
-- Commit to expenditures (defined in Appendix 5) in 2004 of
no more than 226.1 billion New Israeli Shekels, with the firm
goal of keeping the budget deficit to 4.0 percent of GDP or
less.

-- Public dissemination and GOI commitment to a detailed,
multi-year fiscal plan, including a commitment to limit real
expenditure growth (defined in Appendix 5) to 1 percent per
year from 2005 to 2010. Furthermore, commitment to maintain
budget deficits to a level of less than 3 percent of GDP and
aim to implement further reductions in the operational
deficit of at least 0.5 percent of GDP every year until the
deficit reaches 1 percent of GDP.

-- Any revenues in excess of those foreseen in the 2004
budget would be allocated to deficit and tax reduction.


3. Proceed with Privatization Plan
-- Further progress on the main measures of the Israeli
government,s privatization plan. Future privatization steps
should focus on the twin goals of increasing competition as
well as reducing government involvement in the economy.


4. Implement Structural Reforms:
-- Increase competition in the economy by:
-- Implementing liberalization of the domestic
telecommunications market through a regulatory environment
that facilitates the introduction of competitive local
landline services within the timeframe of this agreement;
-- Working to increase competition within the ports,
financial markets, and electricity sectors;
-- Reduce governmental regulation with the aim of
promoting economic growth.
-- Continue efforts to further strengthen IPR protection
in Israel.


5. Undertake Infrastructure Investments
-- Commitment to, and progress on $1 billion in
infrastructure spending as discussed in the GOI,s economic
reform plan.


6. Other
-- The amount of guarantees that may be issued shall be
reduced by an amount equal to the amount extended or
estimated to have been extended by the GOI during the period
from the last deduction to the date of issue of the 2004
guarantee, for activities which the President determines are
inconsistent with the objectives and understandings reached
between the United States and the Government of Israel
regarding implementation of the loan guarantee program.
-- Commit to working with the U.S. Government to resolve
outstanding procurement issues.

SUBSEQUENT DISBURSEMENTS

Subsequent disbursements of bond guarantees will be
conditioned upon determination and implementation of the
GOI,s macroeconomic, structural and other targets developed
through the USG-GOI joint consultative mechanism. Fiscal
targets and implementation of the reform plan will be the
main foci. In particular, disbursements of the third tranche
of bond guarantees will be conditioned on achievement of the
spending and budget deficit targets for 2004 and 2005. The
extent to which other commitments made for the 2004
disbursement are met will also be an important consideration.

End Text of Appendix 4

Begin Text of Appendix 5

DEFINITION OF 2004 EXPENDITURES TARGET


1. Definition of 2004 expenditures target
-- For the purpose of releasing the second tranche of bond
guarantees, as described in Appendix 4 Annex II (as amended)
of the Loan Guarantee Commitment Agreement, the 2004
expenditures target of 226.1 billion New Israeli Shekels
shall be defined as:

GOI gross expenditures, as set forth in the annual budget
law, less the repayment of principal on debt (except for the
repayment of principal on debt related to social security),
plus expenditures on government hospitals. (Footnote 1: In
terms of expenditure classification, a corresponding
definition of the 2004 expenditures target comprises of
Total Expenditures and Credit Granted as defined in the
GOI,s Gross Expenditures by Economic Classification plus
expenditures on government hospitals.)

-- Based on this definition, the projected 2004 expenditures
target is outlined below:

Table 1: Composition of 2004 expenditures target (by
expenditure category)

2004 Expenditures Target 226.1


1. Total Expenditures and Credit 221.1
Civilian Consumption 42.6
Defense consumption 48.0
Transfers and subsidies 68.6
Investments and credit 14.7
- Direct investment 8.7
- Credit 6.0
Interest payments 35.7
Payback of principal to NII 6.4
Change in Contingency Reserves 5.1


2. Government Hospitals 5.0

Source: Ministry of Finance


2. Definition of real expenditures growth. In accordance
with Appendix 4 Annex II (as amended):
-- The increase in the sum of the government,s expenditures,
excluding hospitals, in every year between 2005 and 2010,
shall not exceed 1% in real terms relative to the sum of
government expenditure in the preceding year.
-- Calculation of real expenditure growth for this purpose
shall be based on the following parameters and assumptions:
1.Nominal Expenditure shall be defined in accordance with the
definition set out in Appendix 5 section 1.
2.The 1% real expenditure growth limit shall apply to
original budget plan to the previous year.
3.Calculation of forecasted real expenditures growth shall be
based the annual average CPI forecast as established in the
GOI budget.
4.Calculation of actual real expenditures growth shall be
based on the annual average CPI published by the Central
Bureau of Statistics. For this purpose the GOI will provide
actual budget results.


3. Forecasted indicative expenditures targets
-- Below are the forecasted expenditures targets for 2005 and
2006, based on the expenditures target definition as above.

Table 2: Forecasted indicative expenditure targets for
FY05-06 ( current NIS million)

2004 2005 2006
(original budget) (forecast) (forecast)
Expenditures 226.1 234.6 243.1

1. Total Expenditures and 221.1 229.4 237.7
Credit granted
Thereof: Credit granted 6.0 6.2 6.5
Revenue-dependent 12.3 12.7 13.2
Net expenditure without 202.8 210.4 218.0
credit
Interest 42.1 43.7 45.2
Ministries 160.7 166.7 172.8

2. Gov. Hospitals 5.0 5.2 5.4
Forecast of CPI Changes 2.7% 2.6%

Source: Ministry of Finance estimates

End Text of Appendix 5

********************************************* ********************
Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv

You can also access this site through the State Department's
Classified SIPRNET website.
********************************************* ********************
LeBaron