Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
02KATHMANDU1036 | 2002-05-24 12:41:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Kathmandu |
1. (C) Summary. Three Ministers resigned May 23 because the Prime Minister had not consulted them on the decision to suspend Parliament, Finance Minister Mahat told Ambassador May 24. Even so, Mahat said he was prepared to stay in the Cabinet under the right conditions. Mahat was especially bitter because of his efforts in support of the PM's policies. The rift in the Nepali Congress Party (NCP) would have to be mended, but antipathy between Deuba and a faction opposed to him would make this difficult. Holding elections would be a challenge under current security conditions, Mahat added. In the past Deuba had had difficulty fighting an entrenched and corrupt party machine. Things seemed to be going Deuba's way May 24 as 33 Ministers came out with a statement of support and senior stateman K.P. Bhattarai indicated he would work to heal the ruling party rift. A split in the NCP would almost certainly mean a loss to the main opposition party in the next election. End Summary. FinMin Bitter About Not Being Consulted -------------------------- 2. (C) Although he blamed former Prime Minister G.P. Koirala for precipitating the crisis, Finance Minister Mahat decided to resign because Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba had not consulted him on the decision to dissolve Parliament, Mahat told Ambassador May 24. Mahat called the Embassy to speak to the Ambassador the day after he and two other Ministers tendered their resignations. (Note: As of COB May 24 the King had not yet accepted their resignations and thus they remained as Ministers. According to an aide to the PM, Deuba himself had not yet officially accepted the offers to resign, and was holding them in his pocket. End Note.) The PM had not consulted Parliament either on the decision to dissolve, Mahat noted. Mahat indicated that he would be willing to stay in the cabinet provided that the other Ministers were "serious people" and he got party permission, as he would lose his party ticket without it. This Is How You Repay Me? -------------------------- 3. (C) As a member of the NPC Central Working Committee (CWC), Mahat had supported Deuba against Koirala in that body. Then he joined Deuba when the Cabinet had backed the PM's recommendation to extend the state of emergency. Mahat was bitter that - after supporting Deuba to such a degree - he had not been consulted on the decision to dissolve Parliament. (Note: One news report on the press conference where Mahat announced his resignation said he was in "an aggressive mood." End Note.) Mahat was not aware of any analysis or consultations done beforehand on the subject of dissolving Parliament. (Note: Post caught wind of Deuba's musings about whether to dissolve Parliament six weeks ago (Ref C). Note.) The main problem was that Deuba tried to please everyone, Mahat judged. The PM was sincere, but had a "weak temperament." In passing, the FinMin also expressed bitterness about Deuba's failure to support his proposals in Parliament and about instances when the PM overruled him. Mahat: Patch Up Ruling Party Rift -------------------------- 4. (C) The rift in the Nepali Congress Party would have to be patched up, Mahat believed. If Deuba were removed from the NCP, he would have no locus of power within it and no power base. Deuba could try to form an alternative party, but constitutional and regulatory obstacles made it difficult to create a new national party. Furthermore, Deuba was not the charismatic type who could pull it off. Party history and symbolism was very important in Nepal, Mahat concluded. (Note: Party symbols are especially important in a society where nearly half the population is illiterate. End Note.) Efforts to mend fences would be hampered by an element within the NCP who were set on destroying him, Mahat went on. Even so, Mahat felt that Koriala's image had been "sullied" because people blame him for forcing the PM's decision to dissolve Parliament. Elections a Question Mark -------------------------- 5. (C) The PM's desire to extend the emergency due to security reasons contradicted his claim that elections could be held within six months, Mahat said. Mahat noted that local-body elections could not even be held, even though the terms of local officials expire in about a month. Mahat mused about possible fears that the military and/or palace, in league with the Deuba faction, could try to manipulate the elections. A System Hard to Fight -------------------------- 6. (C) Mahat agreed that Nepal's political system was flawed in that the parties played too great a role in dictating policy and - more egregiously - in forcing the government to dispense patronage. Unfortunately that was the reality in Nepal, Mahat added. He judged that PM Deuba was not an effective leader and thus could not stand up to the party machine. For example, although Deuba was decidedly opposed to corruption, Mahat watched as time and again he gave in to party pressure to appoint people to high office who were either novices or corrupt. On the corruption count, Mahat mentioned the new Chief Secretary, most public corporation heads and the Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation (RNAC) Chairman as examples. Going Deuba's Way -------------------------- 7. (C) After Mahat's morning call, signs began to appear that things may be starting to shift Deuba's way. In the afternoon Nepal's state radio reported that 33 out of 41 Ministers had signed a letter to the PM saying they "fully supported" him. Former Prime Minister and current MP Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, the only surviving founding member of the NCP, returned to the capital from medical treatment abroad and said he would participate in the new elections. This was widely viewed as a statement of support for Deuba. Bhattarai planned to meet separately with Deuba and Koirala May 25, and, according to a close advisor, would ask Koirala to withdraw Deuba's suspension from the party. (Note: On May 23 the NCP CWC suspended Deuba's party membership and asked him to provide, within three days, an explanation of his decision to dissolve Parliament. Deuba was not, however, thrown out of the party, as erroneously reported in Ref B. End Note.) One member of Nepal's upper house viewed with significance the fact that no other Ministers had resigned despite Koirala's calls that they do so. Comment -------------------------- 8. (C) The situtation in Nepal remains extremely fluid but it is now clear that Deuba has managed to raise a counter-attack. Events on May 24 seemed to be going his way. Comments by elder statesman K.P. Bhattarai - a long-time Koirala rival - were especially helpful to Deuba. The cost of a split within the NCP will likely be a certain loss in the elections to the leading opposition party. With Bhattarai standing by to mend fences, the NCP may yet be able to resurrect itself. MALINOWSKI |