Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10TASHKENT19
2010-01-14 13:10:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

Uzbekistan: GOU Proposals for ABC Follow-on

Tags:  PREL PGOV PHUM MARR UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7958
OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHPW RUEHSL
DE RUEHNT #0019/01 0141311
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 141310Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1746
INFO AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
CIS COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/CDR USTRANSCOM SCOTT AFB IL IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 TASHKENT 000019 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/14
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM MARR UZ
SUBJECT: Uzbekistan: GOU Proposals for ABC Follow-on

CLASSIFIED BY: Nicholas Berliner, Pol-Econ Chief; REASON: 1.4(A),
(B),(D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 TASHKENT 000019

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/14
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHUM MARR UZ
SUBJECT: Uzbekistan: GOU Proposals for ABC Follow-on

CLASSIFIED BY: Nicholas Berliner, Pol-Econ Chief; REASON: 1.4(A),
(B),(D)


1. (C) Summary: The Uzbek MFA provided the Embassy with the GOU's
proposed follow-on to the Annual Bilateral Consultations (ABC) on
January 12. Although there are several differences in their
document (particularly in the Human Dimension),it represents a
serious response conveyed with the message that, at the highest
levels, Tashkent wants to take this process forward. Despite having
deleted several U.S. proposals on human rights issues, the MFA
pointed out that such issues could nevertheless be discussed, as
they had been in Washington in December. Most importantly, there is
a clearly communicated expectation that the ABC process should soon
begin to produce tangible results, both in the form of follow
through to the GOU's request for "military-technical cooperation"
and in the form of a high-level visit. The Uzbek leadership is
likely amenable to expanded cooperation on Afghanistan, including
measures to support the "plus up" in forces, but is seeking
confirmation that the relationship with the U.S. has moved beyond
sanctions. End Summary.




2. (C) The Uzbek Foreign Ministry convoked DCM and Pol-Econ Chief
on January 12 to share the text of the GOU's formal response to our
proposed ABC follow-on agenda. Americas Division Chief Bakhtiyor
Ibragimov made a point of noting that the agenda had been approved
by President Karimov himself (a point also noted in the diplomatic
note conveying the text). He said that the GOU was very happy with
the December 17-18 talks in Washington and is eager to move forward
across the full range of the agenda. Ibragimov emphasized that
Karimov has taken a personal interest in this process and that
tangible results will be needed to move from dialogue to action. He
noted that there are still skeptics in the Uzbek bureaucracy who
will only be convinced by deeds.




3. (C) In spelling out what the GOU would take as evidence of U.S.
sincerity, Ibragimov noted that a visit by Secretary Clinton to
Tashkent would be taken as a very constructive gesture that could
go a long way towards opening up greater cooperation across a range
of issues. (Note: This request is the first item in the document
the GOU produced - attached at Para 6. There is also a mention of a
visit by SRAP Holbrooke to Tashkent, which the GOU appears to
expect. End Note.) He also noted the pending request for
"military-technical cooperation" and the need to follow through
with the visit of the Special Working Group (SWG) to Tashkent in
the first quarter of this year to assess the needs and capabilities
of Uzbekistan's armed forces. The GOU expects a serious dialogue
on this issue and a professional team that can go back with
specific recommendations, rather than a promise to "explore the
issue further."




4. (C) Overall, the document the GOU produced represents a serious
response to our proposals with few surprises. Apart from the
predictable inclusion of references to Karimov's "6 plus 3"
proposal for Afghanistan, the most significant GOU changes come in
the Human Dimension, where the Uzbeks removed references to
religious freedom, child labor and reviewing human rights cases.
Ibragimov said that, while the MFA understood that these questions
would be discussed, as they were in Washington, it was impossible
to agree to their inclusion in a document. (Note: This has been a
consistent position on the part of the GOU, reflecting President
Karimov's neuralgia at any hint of criticism or "grading" of
Uzbekistan. The MFA knows they will not avoid discussions of these
issues, but cannot openly contradict Karimov. The fact that FM
Norov sent a thank you letter to A/S Posner is an indication of
openness to discuss human rights and of the fact that, despite
eliminating these references from the initial ABC agenda, Norov did
not feel "ambushed" by the fact that such a discussion took place
in Washington. End Note.)




5. (C) Comment: Our engagement with Uzbekistan is very quickly

TASHKENT 00000019 002 OF 005


reaching the point where we will have to make some hard decisions.
There is a critical need to maintain momentum. We expect that
further enhancements to NDN, such as approval to ship armored M-ATV
vehicles and refrigerated cargo will be approved without further
"signals." However, to sustain this level of cooperation, even as
we consider other options to support the Afghanistan "plus up," we
will need to be able to respond tangibly to the Uzbeks' request on
"military-technical cooperation" and be prepared for the type of
high-level engagement they are seeking. We do not believe that
closer cooperation on Afghanistan must come at the price of
lessening the emphasis we place on human rights. In fact,
independent of this, experience on the ground has shown that the
only way to move forward with the Uzbeks is through principled
engagement. Closer cooperation could produce "forcing events" for
progress on human rights and lessen GOU suspicion of U.S. motives,
thus allowing the regime to loosen its vise on civil society.




6. (SBU) Text of Uzbek MFA Diplomatic Note on ABC Follow-on:



THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

N 20/1016



The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan
presents its compliments to the Embassy of the United States of
America in Tashkent and in reply to the diplomatic note number
2013, dated December 30, 2009, has the honor to inform that, with a
view to further development and strengthening of
mutually-beneficial Uzbek-American relations, consistent
implementation of provisions of the Declaration on Strategic
Partnership and Cooperation Framework Between the Republic of
Uzbekistan and the United States of America signed in 2002, as well
as implementation of other bilateral intergovernmental and
interagency agreements in political, trade, economic and
humanitarian areas, a Resolution of the President of the Republic
of Uzbekistan was adopted in January 11, 2010 with an approved 2010
Action Plan on strengthening bilateral cooperation between the
Republic of Uzbekistan and the United States of America.



The Uzbek Side positively assesses the results of the First Round
of Annual Political Consultations that took place in Washington,
DC, on December 17-18, 2009, and notes significant practical
importance of proposals made by the American Side on the further
development of bilateral relations in political, security,
economic, and human dimension areas, as well as in the achievement
of peace and stability in Afghanistan, which were considered in the
Action Plan. The Ministry hopes to have constructive cooperation of
the American Side in joint implementation of the action Plan.

The Ministry avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the
Embassy the assurances of its highest consideration.



Tashkent, January 12, 2010.

The Embassy Of the United States of America

Tashkent



Action Plan on Strengthening Bilateral Cooperation between the
Republic of Uzbekistan and the United States of America for 2010

TASHKENT 00000019 003 OF 005



I. In the Political Area

- Organization of U.S. Secretary Hillary Clinton's visit to
Uzbekistan (first half-year period);

- Organization of the visit to Uzbekistan for a group of U.S.
Congressman - members of Central Asia Caucus (first half-year
period);

- Uzbekistan's assistance in the organization of participation of
U.S. representatives at SCO summit in Tashkent, with the consent of
SCO member-states (first half-year period);

- Conduct the Second Round of Uzbek-American Political
Consultations in Tashkent in the second half of the year (first
half-year period).



II. In the Area of Security

- Visit to Uzbekistan by a Special Working Group of the U.S.
Department of State and U.S. Department of Defense assess the
requirements of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan in
particular types of military equipment and ammunition, and for
organization of their supply under the framework of the FMF and EDA
programs (first quarter);

- Organization of training and continuing education for Uzbek
officers (education sessions and trainings) in leading
military-training institutions of the United States, including
under the IMET program framework (first half-year period);

- Allotment of a representative of the Republic of Uzbekistan to
the Headquarters of U.S. Central Command in Tampa (Florida) in
order to increase coordination efficiency of military and
military-technical cooperation (first quarter);

- Cooperation in the area of border security and nonproliferation,
realization of U.S. technical assistance programs in this area
(second half-year period);

- Organization of the visit to Uzbekistan by D. Benjamin,
Coordinator of the U.S. Department of State Counterterrorism Office
for discussion of bilateral cooperation issues in the area of
antiterrorism efforts (first half-year period);



III. In the Area of Economic Development

- Organization of a roundtable on attracting American investments
and advanced technologies to the Republic of Uzbekistan, including
to the Free Industrial Economic Zone "Navoi" (first half-year
period);

- Holding consultations on the completion by the American Side of
all internal procedures within USG to ratify the intergovernmental
agreement signed in December 1994 on "Encouragement and mutual
protection of foreign investment" (first half-year period);

- Assistance in participation of U.S. companies at the meeting of
the Council of Governors of Asian Development Bank (ADB) in
Tashkent (first half-year period);

- Organization of visit of business representatives of the republic
to the U.S. within the framework of SABIT program to familiarize
with American experience in such areas as food processing and
renewable energy (first half-year period);

- Creation of a Joint Forum for U.S. and Uzbek farmers to exchange
know-how on farming practices (second half-year period);

- Increase of U.S. assistance in implementation of projects in
Uzbekistan aimed at the modernization of irrigation systems, land

TASHKENT 00000019 004 OF 005


reclamation and restoration of degenerated land, and attracting new
technology for improvement of agricultural yields (February);

- Organization of consultations on the matter of cancelling the
Jackson-Vanik Amendment in regard to the Republic of Uzbekistan
(first half-year period);

- Holding the next meeting of the Trade and Investment Framework
Agreement (TIFA) in Tashkent, with the participation of Afghanistan
(first half-year period);



IV. In the Area of the Human Dimension.

- Completion of approval and signing of the Agreement between the
Government of Uzbekistan and Government of United States of
American on Science and Technology (first quarter);

- Organization of a meeting between experts of both countries on
issues of expanding the contacts between U.S. and Uzbekistan
scientific organizations and attracting grants to development of
scientific researches in priority directions of modern science and
technology (first quarter);

- Implementation of joint academic and educational programs (first
quarter);

- Identification of a higher educational institution (University)
in the USA that would open its branch in Uzbekistan (second
half-year period);

- Creation of scientific and cultural contacts between appropriate
bodies in the U.S. and Uzbekistan for the wider familiarization of
American society with rich historical and cultural heritage of
Uzbekistan (first quarter);

- Providing assistance to strengthen the material-technical base of
Uzbek organizations dealing with issues of historical and cultural
heritage preservation by attracting financing from the U.S.
Ambassador's Fund for Cultural Preservation and other American
funds (second half-year period);

- Development of cooperation in the area of healthcare under USAID
programs (first quarter);

- Organization of trainings for employees of Uzbek law-enforcement
agencies on methods and tactics used in fighting against human
trafficking, learning preventative measures and assisting the
victims of human trafficking, as well as providing the rights and
interest of defendants during investigations of such criminal cases
(third quarter);

- Hosting roundtables and seminars on improvement of national
legislation related to habeas corpus, rights of defendants and
court procedures (third quarter);

- Organization of orientation trips for Uzbek media representatives
to the U.S. to exchange experiences (first quarter).




V. In the Area of Providing Peace and Stability in Afghanistan

- Organization of the visit to Uzbekistan for R. Holbrook, U.S.
Special Envoy on Afghanistan and Pakistan (February);

- Conducting jointly with Atlantic Council a special event,
dedicated to the implementation of Uzbek initiative in the area of
regional security, creation of a 6+3Contact Group on Afghanistan
under the aegis of the U.N. (second half-year period);

- Exchange of information about the threats and measures to prevent
them, related to the transit of non-military cargo via the Northern
Distribution Network to Afghanistan, including within the framework

TASHKENT 00000019 005.2 OF 005


of Khayraton-Mazari-Sharif railroad construction project
implementation (first quarter);

- Expansion of U.S. local procurements of goods for supplying to
the IRoA through the Northern Distribution Network (first quarter).



End Text Diplomatic Note
NORLAND