Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10STATE15722
2010-02-22 00:27:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

GOLDSTONE FOLLOW-UP ACTION

Tags:  IO PHUM UNGA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4969
OO RUEHAP RUEHKN RUEHKR RUEHMJ RUEHPA
DE RUEHC #5722/01 0580834
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 220040Z FEB 10
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA IMMEDIATE 1578-1585
RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA IMMEDIATE 0344-0351
RUEHLGB/AMEMBASSY KIGALI IMMEDIATE 8049-8056
RUEHKN/AMEMBASSY KOLONIA IMMEDIATE 2303-2310
RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR IMMEDIATE 1804-1811
RUEHLU/AMEMBASSY LUANDA IMMEDIATE 1459-1466
RUEHMJ/AMEMBASSY MAJURO IMMEDIATE 7057-7064
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO IMMEDIATE 0825-0832
RUEHMV/AMEMBASSY MONROVIA IMMEDIATE 0108-0115
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI IMMEDIATE 0695-0702
RUEHOU/AMEMBASSY OUAGADOUGOU IMMEDIATE 9511-9518
RUEHPL/AMEMBASSY PORT LOUIS IMMEDIATE 3547-3554
RUEHPA/AMEMBASSY PRAIA IMMEDIATE 5228-5235
RUEHSJ/AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE IMMEDIATE 0565-0572
RUEHSV/AMEMBASSY SUVA IMMEDIATE 8714-8721
RUEHYD/AMEMBASSY YAOUNDE 0146-0153
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 STATE 015722 

SENSITIVE

C O R R E C T E D COPY (SENSITIVE CAPTION ADDED
UNCLAS STATE 015722

SIPDIS

FOLLOWING STATE 015722 DATED 22 FEB 10 BEING REPEATED FOR YOUR
ACTION;

DUE TO EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF ADDRESSEES ON THE ORIGINAL TRANSMISSION
OF STATE 015722 THE ABOVE POSTS WERE OMITTED.

QUOTE




E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: IO PHUM UNGA
SUBJECT: GOLDSTONE FOLLOW-UP ACTION

STATE 00015722 001.3 OF 017


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 STATE 015722

SENSITIVE

C O R R E C T E D COPY (SENSITIVE CAPTION ADDED
UNCLAS STATE 015722

SIPDIS

FOLLOWING STATE 015722 DATED 22 FEB 10 BEING REPEATED FOR YOUR
ACTION;

DUE TO EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF ADDRESSEES ON THE ORIGINAL TRANSMISSION
OF STATE 015722 THE ABOVE POSTS WERE OMITTED.

QUOTE




E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: IO PHUM UNGA
SUBJECT: GOLDSTONE FOLLOW-UP ACTION

STATE 00015722 001.3 OF 017



1. (SBU) This is an action request. Please see paragraph

3. Embassy Suva for Fiji, Tonga, Nauru, Kiribati and
Tuvalu. Embassy Libreville for Gabon and Sao Tome.
Embassy Port Moresby for Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu.
Embassy Port Louis for Seychelles only. Embassy Koror for
Palau only. Embassy Bridgetown for St. Kitts and Nevis
only. Embassy Bern for Liechtenstein only. U.S.
Consultate General Florence for San Marino. U.S.
Consulate General Marseille for Monaco. U.S. Consulate
General Barcelona for Andorra.


2. (SBU) Summary: We expect a vote on Friday, February 26
on a Palestinian-drafted resolution in the UN General
Assembly to follow up on the Report of the United Nations
Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict led by Justice
Goldstone (the so-called Goldstone Report),which was
commissioned by the UN Human Rights Council in January
2009 and issued in September 2009. The Report alleges
human rights abuses, including alleged war crimes
committed by Israel during the Gaza conflict in the winter
of 2008-2009, although it also alleges some violations by
Hamas, Palestinian armed groups and the Palestinian
Authority (PA) in the West Bank. The report has already
given rise to two UN resolutions to date, one in the Human
Rights Council and one in the UN General Assembly
(UNGA). The UNGA resolution of November 5, 2009 called
for Israel and the Palestinians to undertake
investigations into the Report's allegations and requested
the Secretary-General to report within three months on the
status of those investigations. The Government of Israel
submitted a report to the UN Secretary-General detailing
their investigations process and reported that all
allegations in the Goldstone Report are being investigated
and reviewed; it is also considering establishing an
independent inquiry. The PA submitted a Presidential
Decree establishing an Independent Investigations
Commission to follow up on the implementation of the
recommendations made in the Goldstone Report with respect
to the Palestinians, and a report on the first meeting of

the Commission. The Secretary-General's report, which was
issued on February 4, 2010, notes that the parties?
investigations are, with regard to Israel, ongoing, and in
the case of the Palestinian side, only recently initiated,
and therefore concludes that it is too early to evaluate
their efforts. In addition to the expected UNGA vote on
February 26, we will face another round on Goldstone at
the 13th session of the Human Rights Council (beginning
March 1). Since the Goldstone Report was released, the
United States has sought to minimize its negative fallout
for Arab-Israeli peacemaking and to avoid having it
increase tensions in the region. As we head into new
rounds of Goldstone voting in New York and Geneva, we will
aim to continue to limit damage to Special Envoy Mitchell?
s peace efforts, contain other potential negative fallout
from the Report, limit our isolation to the extent
possible, and limit follow-up action. Our emphasis at
this point is that the parties are taking steps to fulfill
their respective obligations to investigate, and those

STATE 00015722 002.3 OF 017


domestic processes must be allowed to play out. We are
requesting posts? support to this end. End summary.


3. (SBU) Action Request: Drawing on the points in
paragraph 14, and paragraphs 15 through 17, as
appropriate, action addressees are requested to demarche
host governments regarding the impending UNGA resolution
and Israel-related resolutions at senior level and as soon
as possible. For EU posts: European Ministers are
reportedly meeting in Brussels on Monday February 22 to
discuss Goldstone. EU posts are requested to deliver
demarche prior to that event. Host countries should be
encouraged to: (i) vote no (or abstain) on the draft
resolution tabled in the UNGA if they voted thus in
November 2009; (ii) avoid supporting one-sided or
otherwise counterproductive resolutions on this issue at
the UN General Assembly and the Human Rights Council;
(iii) keep the issue out of the UN Security Council; (iv)
urge Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) to continue
to pursue domestic accountability. USUN New York, U.S.
Mission Geneva and U.S. Mission EU should reinforce the
message to delegations of countries included here as
action addressees and may use their discretion to demarche
other country delegations, as appropriate. Information
addressees may draw on points as they deem appropriate.

BACKGROUND


4. (SBU) The Goldstone Report was commissioned by the
Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva to investigate
Israeli violations of international humanitarian and human
rights law during the 2008 ? 2009 conflict in Gaza. The
original HRC mandate was blatantly unbalanced, focusing on
Israel, and did not call for investigation of Hamas'
actions. The fact-finding mission was led by Justice
Richard Goldstone of South Africa, who sought in practice
to broaden his terms of reference to include Hamas and
Palestinian Authority actions. Although the Human Rights
Council never amended the formal mandate, the President of
the HRC agreed to make this change. Most of the resultant
report's 575 pages focus on alleged Israeli violations,
although several allegations against the Palestinian side
are discussed. The U.S. Government has serious concerns
about the report, including its disproportionate focus on
Israel, the overly broad scope of its recommendations, the
negative inferences it draws about Israel's intentions and
actions, its failure to assign appropriate responsibility
to Hamas for its practice of basing operations in
civilian-populated urban areas, and, as a result, a number
of its sweeping conclusions of law. See Statement by A/S
Posner at 12th Session of the Human Rights Council (
http://geneva.usmission.gov/2009/09/29/gaza-c onflict/) for
more details. The report also fails to acknowledge
sufficiently Israel's ongoing internal investigations and
its efforts to protect Palestinian civilians. The report?
s recommendations are particularly problematic, as they
call for possible referral of alleged Israeli war crimes
to the International Criminal Court (ICC) if Israel does
not undertake adequate internal investigations as well as
for the assertion of universal jurisdiction by countries
not party to the conflict over grave breaches of the
Geneva Conventions. It also calls for the UN Security
Council and UN General Assembly to consider and take
action based on the report.


5. (SBU) The Goldstone Report was formally transmitted to
the Human Rights Council at its 12th session in September

2009. The Palestinians, OIC and Arab group initially
agreed to defer HRC action on the report, but in
mid-October, after this decision prompted widespread Arab
and domestic criticism of PA President Abbas, the
Palestinian Authority and its allies reversed course and
called for a Special Session of the Human Rights Council
to consider the report. On 16 October, the Human Rights
Council special session passed a resolution endorsing the
recommendations of the Goldstone Report (25 in favor, 6
opposed (U.S.),11 abstentions and 5 absentees).


STATE 00015722 003.3 OF 017



6. (SBU) In October 2009, the Goldstone Report was also
taken up by the UN General Assembly, where a
Palestinian-drafted resolution endorsing the HRC
resolution on Goldstone passed on November 5, 2009 (114 in
favor, 18 opposed (U.S.),44 abstentions and 16 absentees)
calling on each side to ?undertake investigations that are
independent, credible and in conformity with international
standards.? The UN Secretary General was requested to
report within a period of three months on the resolution's
implementation. This resolution also called for the
Goldstone Report to be referred to the UN Security Council
and had other problematic aspects. See reftel State

112828.


7. (SBU) The United States has engaged closely with Israel
on the Goldstone Report. Ambassador Rice discussed the
Report with senior Israeli and Palestinian officials,
including Prime Ministers Netanyahu and Fayyad, on her
October 2009 visit to the region. From January 5-9, a
U.S. delegation headed by DRL Assistant Secretary Posner,
visited Israel and met with senior government and IDF
officials, Israeli non-governmental organizations and
resident international organizations to discuss the status
of Israeli investigations, learn more about possible
changes to GOI military doctrine, the March Human Rights
Council session and the formal Israeli response to the
Goldstone Report (Reftel 10 TELAVIV184, 10TELAVIV183 and
10TELAVIV182). On January 20, a high-level Israeli MFA
delegation came to Washington to discuss follow-up to the
Goldstone Report as part of a bi-lateral dialogue with IO
and other bureaus. On February 2, DRL, IO, L and NEA
staff met at the working level with the GOI to discuss
their recent report to the UN Secretary-General.

UN Secretary-General's report


8. (SBU) As requested in the November 5 UNGA resolution,
on February 4 the UN Secretary-General filed a progress
report on the parties? follow-up activities to the
Goldstone Report. The Secretary-General's report appended
the full text of submissions by Israel and the Palestinian
Authority on the status of their respective
investigations, as well as a short submission from
Switzerland (as depository of the Geneva Conventions of
1949) on the progress of its consultations to determine
whether to convene a conference of High Contracting
Parties to the Geneva Conventions. Israel's 46-page
submission outlined its domestic investigations process
into alleged violations during the Gaza conflict. The
Israelis are currently investigating and reviewing more
than 150 separate incidents, including all 34 allegations
in the Goldstone Report. While the Israeli investigations
are based on domestic processes that they say are not
directly connected to the Goldstone report, in submitting
this update for the Secretary-General's report, Israel
came a long way from its initial refusal to engage at any
level with UN discussions on Goldstone. We strongly
support the need for accountability for violations by any
party that may have occurred during the Gaza conflict. We
continue to have consultations with the GOI on the status
of its domestic accountability process.


9. (SBU) The Palestinian Authority's submission
transmitted a January 25 Presidential Decree establishing
an Independent Investigation Commission to follow up on
the implementation of the Goldstone Report and a report of
the Commission's first meeting which took place on January

28. The Secretary-General observed that the processes
that had been initiated by Israel and the Palestinian
Authority were ongoing and concluded that it was too early
to evaluate the parties? efforts. Switzerland reported to
the Secretary-General that its first round of
consultations ?did not reveal a dominant trend for or
against the holding of a Conference of High Contracting
Parties? and indicated its intention to conduct a second
round of consultations in the near future. The U.S.
opposes the convening of such a conference as it will
likely be a forum for politicized and unhelpful finger

STATE 00015722 004.3 OF 017


pointing.

Anticipated Goldstone follow-up in the UN

UN General Assembly

10. (SBU) Following the issuance of the Secretary-General?
s report on February 4, the Palestinian Observer Mission
circulated a new draft General Assembly resolution on
February 18 that the Palestinians hope UNGA will adopt
without a debate on February 26. The U.S. response to the
draft resolution is set out in paragraph 14 below.

Human Rights Council

11. (SBU) We anticipate two reports on the Goldstone
Report from Geneva-based UN offices (to be drafted by the
High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, who
strongly supports the full Goldstone Report and its
recommendations) will be issued at some point during the
March session of the Human Rights Council. These
reports, combined with the arithmetic of the HRC, will
make it almost impossible to stave off a resolution.

UN Security Council

12. (SBU) In accordance with the November 5 UNGA
resolution on Goldstone (64/10),the Secretary General
transmitted a copy of the Goldstone Report to the Security
Council on November 10. Fellow P5 members the UK, France,
Russia, and China have joined us in expressing opposition
to a UNSC session to take up the report. However, 2010
has brought a change in Security Council dynamics.
Whereas three of the five outgoing UNSC members abstained
on the November UNGA Goldstone resolution (Burkina Faso,
Costa Rica, and Croatia),all five incoming members
(Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Gabon, Lebanon, and
Nigeria) voted in favor of the November UNGA resolution.
Maintaining solid opposition to UNSC action on Goldstone
is a high priority.

Previous voting patterns


13. (SBU) Tab 1 below details the voting patterns of all
members of the Human Rights Council, the UN Security
Council and EU member states, as well as Switzerland and
Iceland, on the prior Goldstone resolutions at the Human
Rights Council and the UN General Assembly. All action
addressees are also listed (i.e. countries that voted no,
abstained or were absent on the past Goldstone resolutions
in either UNGA or the HRC).

TALKING POINTS


14. (SBU) Talking points follow:

--The United States is deeply committed to the advancement
of human rights and to principled engagement with our
partners to advance the cause of human rights
internationally. We also remain deeply concerned about
the human suffering that results from the Arab-Israeli
conflict. As we urge the parties to restart permanent
status negotiations, we should all avoid steps that set
back the cause of peace.

--As the United States has consistently stated, we have
serious concerns with the deeply flawed Goldstone Report,
as set out last fall, even as we strongly support
accountability for human rights and humanitarian law
violations in relation to the Gaza conflict. We have
engaged closely with the Government of Israel on these
issues.

--We believe that Israel has the democratic institutions
to ensure domestic accountability. The Government of
Israel is investigating and reviewing all of the
allegations in the Goldstone Report as well as all other
complaints arising out of the fighting in Gaza last winter
and has detailed its domestic investigative process to the
Secretary-General.


STATE 00015722 005.3 OF 017


--We view Israel's decision to submit a detailed 46-page
report to the Secretary-General as a positive sign of its
willingness to provide information in response to the
concerns of the international community, notwithstanding
Israel's objections to the Goldstone Report itself and to
the biased HRC mandate that commissioned it in the first
place.

--We welcome the steps taken by the Palestinian Authority
to establish an Independent Investigation Commission to
follow up on implementation of the recommendations made in
the Goldstone Report with respect to the Palestinian side.

--We note the Secretary-General's observations that
Israeli and Palestinian investigative processes are either
ongoing or were recently initiated. We note his
conclusion that it is too early to evaluate the parties?
efforts. The parties? domestic processes should be given
an opportunity to play out. Further UN action at this
time risks being inappropriate and counterproductive.
However, if there is nevertheless to be further discussion
of the Goldstone Report in the United Nations, it should
be limited to the Human Rights Council, since it was the
body that commissioned the report in the first place.

-- The new draft General Assembly resolution circulated by
the Palestinian Observer Mission on February 18 raises a
number of serious and long-standing concerns for the
United States and reinforces our belief that further UN
action is inappropriate and counterproductive. Our
concerns include:

The use of divisive and unhelpful language [Note: i.e. the
reference in PP2 to East Jerusalem as part of the Occupied
Palestinian Territory. End note], at a particularly
delicate time in the efforts to re-launch peace
negotiations, on issues, such as Jerusalem, that should be
resolved in final status negotiations;
The failure to mention Hamas' role in the Gaza fighting,
particularly its deliberate and repeated violations of
international humanitarian law;
The unnecessary and counterproductive reiteration of the
recommendation to the Government of Switzerland to convene
a conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth
Geneva Convention to single out one country, particularly
in light of the recent Swiss submission on this issue,
which concluded that Switzerland's consultations did not
reveal a dominant trend for or against convening such a
conference;
Attempting, as this resolution does, to press the Security
Council to take this matter up is equally unconstructive.
The Security Council is already seized of the situation in
the Middle East and holds monthly meetings on the topic,
the only subject on the Council's entire agenda that is
discussed with such frequency.

--Ultimately, the best way to address the situation in
Gaza lies in the vigorous and ongoing efforts that the
United States and others are making to bring about a
comprehensive peace in the region, including two states,
Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and
security.

IF RAISED:

--We firmly oppose referral of the allegations in the
Goldstone Report to the International Criminal Court. The
United States would prefer to see the issues raised in the
Goldstone Report resolved not through UN action, but by
thorough and credible domestic investigations and
follow-up.


15. (SBU) For those voting no, abstaining or absenting
themselves on the October 16 Human Rights Council
resolution (See Tab 1):

-- The United States appreciates the position your country
took on the last HRC resolution (October 16, 2009) on this

STATE 00015722 006.3 OF 017


issue. We ask that you issue advance instructions to your
mission in Geneva to take the same action again, in the
event a similar resolution is again offered in the HRC.

-- In addition, we also hope you will work actively within
your regional grouping to convince others to join you in
not supporting a new HRC resolution.


16. (SBU) For those voting no, abstaining or absenting
themselves on the November 5 UNGA resolution (See Tab 1):

-- The United States appreciates the position your country
took on the last UNGA resolution (November 5, 2009) on
this issue. We ask that you issue advance instructions to
your mission in New York to take the same action again on
the basis of the current text of the Palestinian draft
resolution.

--We do not see the need for any additional General
Assembly action on the Goldstone report. If there is to
be any further discussion of the report in the UN system,
it should take place at the Human Rights Council, as the
body that requested the report.


17. (SBU) For UNSC member action addressees only:

-- The United States does not believe any Security Council
action on the Goldstone report is appropriate.

-- If there are to be further discussions of the report in
the UN system, they should take place at the Human Rights
Council, as it is the body that requested the report.

-- Of course, any Council member has the capacity to raise
any issue related to the situation in the Middle East at
the Council's regular monthly meeting on this topic.

POINT OF CONTACT


18. (SBU) Action addresses are requested to report back no
later than 25 February 2010. Responses should be sent by
cable. The Department's point of contact is Courtney
Musser, Human Rights Officer, Bureau of International
Organizations (202-647-0115 or mussercc@state.gov).


TAB 1

Country (vote on Oct. 16 HRC resolution, vote on Nov. 5
UNGA resolution)


Andorra (N/A, A)
Angola (Absent, Y)
Argentina (Y, Y)
Australia (N/A, N)
Austria (N/A, A)
Bahrain (Y, Y)
Bangladesh (Y, Y)
Belgium (A, A)
Bhutan (N/A, Absent)
Bolivia (Y, Y)
Bosnia (A, Y)
Brazil (Y, Y)
Bulgaria (N/A, A)
Burkina Faso (A, A)
Burundi (N/A, A)
Cameroon (A, A)
Canada (N/A, N)
Cape Verde (N/A, Absent)
Chile (Y, Y)
China (Y, Y)
Colombia (N/A, A)
Costa Rica (N/A, A)
Cote d'Ivoire (N/A, Absent)
Croatia (N/A, A)
Cuba (Y, Y)
Cyprus (N/A, Y)

STATE 00015722 007.3 OF 017


Czech Republic (N/A, N)
Denmark (N/A, A)
Djibouti (Y, Y)
Egypt (Y, Y)
Estonia (N/A, A)
Equatorial Guinea (N/A, Absent)
Ethiopia (N/A, A)
Fiji (N/A, A)
Finland (N/A, A)
France (Absent, A)
Gabon (A, Y)
Georgia (N/A, A)
Germany (N/A, N)
Ghana (Y, Y)
Greece (N/A, A)
Honduras (N/A, Absent)
Hungary (N, N)
Iceland (N/A, A)
India (Y, Y)
Indonesia (Y, Y)
Ireland (N/A, Y)
Italy (N, N)
Japan (A, A)
Jordan (Y, Y)
Kenya (N/A, A)
Kiribati (N/A, Absent)
Kyrgyzstan (Absent, Absent)
Latvia (N/A, A)
Lebanon (N/A, Y)
Liberia (N/A, A)
Liechtenstein (N/A, A)
Lithuania (N/A, A)
Luxembourg (N/A, A)
Madagascar (Absent, Absent)
Malta (N/A, Y)
Marshall Islands (N/A, N)
Mauritius (Y, Y)
Mexico (A, Y)
Micronesia (N/A, N)
Moldova (N/A, A)
Monaco (N/A, A)
Montenegro (N/A, A)
Nauru (N/A, N)
Netherlands (N, N)
New Zealand (N/A, A)
Nicaragua (Y, Y)
Nigeria (Y, Y)
Norway (A, A)
Pakistan (Y, Y)
Palau (N/A, N)
Panama (N/A, N)
Papua New Guinea (N/A, A)
Philippines (Y, Y)
Poland (N/A, N)
Portugal (N/A, Y)
Qatar (Y, Y)
Republic of Korea (A, A)
Romania (N/A, A)
Russian Federation (Y, A)
Rwanda (N/A, Absent)
Saint Kitts and Nevis (N/A, Absent)
Sao Tome (N/A, Absent)
Saudi Arabia (Y, Y)
Samoa (N/A, A)
San Marino (N/A, A)
Senegal (Y, Y)
Seychelles (N/A, Absent)
Spain (N/A, A)
Slovakia (N, N)
Slovenia (A, Y)
South Africa (Y, Y)
Swaziland (N/A, A)
Sweden EU (N/A, A)
Switzerland (N/A, Y)
TFYR Macedonia (N/A, N)
Togo (N/A, Absent)
Tonga (N/A, A)
Turkey (N/A, Y)

STATE 00015722 008.3 OF 017


Turkmenistan (N/A, Absent)
Tuvalu (N/A, Absent)
Uganda (N/A, A)
Ukraine (N, N)
UK (Absent, A)
U.S. (N, N)
Uruguay (A, A)
Vanuatu (N/A, Absent)
Zambia (Y, Y)
CLINTON UNQUOTE CLINTON

STATE 00015722 009 OF 017


abstained or were absent on the past Goldstone resolutions
in either UNGA or the HRC).

TALKING POINTS


14. (SBU) Talking points follow:

--The United States is deeply committed to the advancement
of human rights and to principled engagement with our
partners to advance the cause of human rights
internationally. We also remain deeply concerned about
the human suffering that results from the Arab-Israeli
conflict. As we urge the parties to restart permanent
status negotiations, we should all avoid steps that set
back the cause of peace.

--As the United States has consistently stated, we have
serious concerns with the deeply flawed Goldstone Report,
as set out last fall, even as we strongly support
accountability for human rights and humanitarian law
violations in relation to the Gaza conflict. We have
engaged closely with the Government of Israel on these
issues.

--We believe that Israel has the democratic institutions
to ensure domestic accountability. The Government of
Israel is investigating and reviewing all of the
allegations in the Goldstone Report as well as all other
complaints arising out of the fighting in Gaza last winter
and has detailed its domestic investigative process to the
Secretary-General.

--We view Israel's decision to submit a detailed 46-page

STATE 00015722 010 OF 017


report to the Secretary-General as a positive sign of its
willingness to provide information in response to the
concerns of the international community, notwithstanding
Israel's objections to the Goldstone Report itself and to
the biased HRC mandate that commissioned it in the first
place.

--We welcome the steps taken by the Palestinian Authority
to establish an Independent Investigation Commission to
follow up on implementation of the recommendations made in
the Goldstone Report with respect to the Palestinian side.

--We note the Secretary-General's observations that
Israeli and Palestinian investigative processes are either
ongoing or were recently initiated. We note his
conclusion that it is too early to evaluate the parties?
efforts. The parties? domestic processes should be given
an opportunity to play out. Further UN action at this
time risks being inappropriate and counterproductive.
However, if there is nevertheless to be further discussion
of the Goldstone Report in the United Nations, it should
be limited to the Human Rights Council, since it was the
body that commissioned the report in the first place.

-- The new draft General Assembly resolution circulated by
the Palestinian Observer Mission on February 18 raises a
number of serious and long-standing concerns for the
United States and reinforces our belief that further UN
action is inappropriate and counterproductive. Our
concerns include:

The use of divisive and unhelpful language [Note: i.e. the
reference in PP2 to East Jerusalem as part of the Occupied

STATE 00015722 011 OF 017


Palestinian Territory. End note], at a particularly
delicate time in the efforts to re-launch peace
negotiations, on issues, such as Jerusalem, that should be
resolved in final status negotiations;
The failure to mention Hamas' role in the Gaza fighting,
particularly its deliberate and repeated violations of
international humanitarian law;
The unnecessary and counterproductive reiteration of the
recommendation to the Government of Switzerland to convene
a conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth
Geneva Convention to single out one country, particularly
in light of the recent Swiss submission on this issue,
which concluded that Switzerland's consultations did not
reveal a dominant trend for or against convening such a
conference;
Attempting, as this resolution does, to press the Security
Council to take this matter up is equally unconstructive.
The Security Council is already seized of the situation in
the Middle East and holds monthly meetings on the topic,
the only subject on the Council's entire agenda that is
discussed with such frequency.

--Ultimately, the best way to address the situation in
Gaza lies in the vigorous and ongoing efforts that the
United States and others are making to bring about a
comprehensive peace in the region, including two states,
Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and
security.

IF RAISED:

--We firmly oppose referral of the allegations in the
Goldstone Report to the International Criminal Court. The

STATE 00015722 012 OF 017


United States would prefer to see the issues raised in the
Goldstone Report resolved not through UN action, but by
thorough and credible domestic investigations and
follow-up.


15. (SBU) For those voting no, abstaining or absenting
themselves on the October 16 Human Rights Council
resolution (See Tab 1):

-- The United States appreciates the position your country
took on the last HRC resolution (October 16, 2009) on this
issue. We ask that you issue advance instructions to your
mission in Geneva to take the same action again, in the
event a similar resolution is again offered in the HRC.

-- In addition, we also hope you will work actively within
your regional grouping to convince others to join you in
not supporting a new HRC resolution.


16. (SBU) For those voting no, abstaining or absenting
themselves on the November 5 UNGA resolution (See Tab 1):

-- The United States appreciates the position your country
took on the last UNGA resolution (November 5, 2009) on
this issue. We ask that you issue advance instructions to
your mission in New York to take the same action again on
the basis of the current text of the Palestinian draft
resolution.

--We do not see the need for any additional General
Assembly action on the Goldstone report. If there is to
be any further discussion of the report in the UN system,
it should take place at the Human Rights Council, as the

STATE 00015722 013 OF 017


body that requested the report.


17. (SBU) For UNSC member action addressees only:

-- The United States does not believe any Security Council
action on the Goldstone report is appropriate.

-- If there are to be further discussions of the report in
the UN system, they should take place at the Human Rights
Council, as it is the body that requested the report.

-- Of course, any Council member has the capacity to raise
any issue related to the situation in the Middle East at
the Council's regular monthly meeting on this topic.

POINT OF CONTACT


18. (SBU) Action addresses are requested to report back no
later than 25 February 2010. Responses should be sent by
cable. The Department's point of contact is Courtney
Musser, Human Rights Officer, Bureau of International
Organizations (202-647-0115 or mussercc@state.gov).


TAB 1

Country (vote on Oct. 16 HRC resolution, vote on Nov. 5
UNGA resolution)


Andorra (N/A, A)
Angola (Absent, Y)
Argentina (Y, Y)

STATE 00015722 014 OF 017


Australia (N/A, N)
Austria (N/A, A)
Bahrain (Y, Y)
Bangladesh (Y, Y)
Belgium (A, A)
Bhutan (N/A, Absent)
Bolivia (Y, Y)
Bosnia (A, Y)
Brazil (Y, Y)
Bulgaria (N/A, A)
Burkina Faso (A, A)
Burundi (N/A, A)
Cameroon (A, A)
Canada (N/A, N)
Cape Verde (N/A, Absent)
Chile (Y, Y)
China (Y, Y)
Colombia (N/A, A)
Costa Rica (N/A, A)
Cote d'Ivoire (N/A, Absent)
Croatia (N/A, A)
Cuba (Y, Y)
Cyprus (N/A, Y)
Czech Republic (N/A, N)
Denmark (N/A, A)
Djibouti (Y, Y)
Egypt (Y, Y)
Estonia (N/A, A)
Equatorial Guinea (N/A, Absent)
Ethiopia (N/A, A)
Fiji (N/A, A)
Finland (N/A, A)
France (Absent, A)

STATE 00015722 015 OF 017


Gabon (A, Y)
Georgia (N/A, A)
Germany (N/A, N)
Ghana (Y, Y)
Greece (N/A, A)
Honduras (N/A, Absent)
Hungary (N, N)
Iceland (N/A, A)
India (Y, Y)
Indonesia (Y, Y)
Ireland (N/A, Y)
Italy (N, N)
Japan (A, A)
Jordan (Y, Y)
Kenya (N/A, A)
Kiribati (N/A, Absent)
Kyrgyzstan (Absent, Absent)
Latvia (N/A, A)
Lebanon (N/A, Y)
Liberia (N/A, A)
Liechtenstein (N/A, A)
Lithuania (N/A, A)
Luxembourg (N/A, A)
Madagascar (Absent, Absent)
Malta (N/A, Y)
Marshall Islands (N/A, N)
Mauritius (Y, Y)
Mexico (A, Y)
Micronesia (N/A, N)
Moldova (N/A, A)
Monaco (N/A, A)
Montenegro (N/A, A)
Nauru (N/A, N)

STATE 00015722 016 OF 017


Netherlands (N, N)
New Zealand (N/A, A)
Nicaragua (Y, Y)
Nigeria (Y, Y)
Norway (A, A)
Pakistan (Y, Y)
Palau (N/A, N)
Panama (N/A, N)
Papua New Guinea (N/A, A)
Philippines (Y, Y)
Poland (N/A, N)
Portugal (N/A, Y)
Qatar (Y, Y)
Republic of Korea (A, A)
Romania (N/A, A)
Russian Federation (Y, A)
Rwanda (N/A, Absent)
Saint Kitts and Nevis (N/A, Absent)
Sao Tome (N/A, Absent)
Saudi Arabia (Y, Y)
Samoa (N/A, A)
San Marino (N/A, A)
Senegal (Y, Y)
Seychelles (N/A, Absent)
Spain (N/A, A)
Slovakia (N, N)
Slovenia (A, Y)
South Africa (Y, Y)
Swaziland (N/A, A)
Sweden EU (N/A, A)
Switzerland (N/A, Y)
TFYR Macedonia (N/A, N)
Togo (N/A, Absent)

STATE 00015722 017 OF 017


Tonga (N/A, A)
Turkey (N/A, Y)
Turkmenistan (N/A, Absent)
Tuvalu (N/A, Absent)
Uganda (N/A, A)
Ukraine (N, N)
UK (Absent, A)
U.S. (N, N)
Uruguay (A, A)
Vanuatu (N/A, Absent)
Zambia (Y, Y)
CLINTON