Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10STATE10090
2010-02-01 20:40:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

TRILATERAL STRATEGIC DIALOGUE ON

Tags:  PTER PGOV PINS PREL AS JP MY ID BE CB 
pdf how-to read a cable
INFO LOG-00 EEB-00 AF-00 AID-00 ACQ-00 CG-00 CIAE-00 
 INL-00 DNI-00 DODE-00 DOTE-00 WHA-00 PERC-00 DS-00 
 EAP-00 DHSE-00 EUR-00 OIGO-00 FAAE-00 FBIE-00 VCI-00 
 FRB-00 H-00 TEDE-00 INR-00 INSE-00 IO-00 LAB-01 
 L-00 MOFM-00 MOF-00 M-00 VCIE-00 DCP-00 NSAE-00 
 ISN-00 NIMA-00 GIWI-00 DOHS-00 FMPC-00 IRM-00 SS-00 
 TRSE-00 NCTC-00 ASDS-00 CBP-00 BBG-00 SCRS-00 DSCC-00 
 PRM-00 DRL-00 G-00 SCA-00 SAS-00 FA-00 SWCI-00 
 PESU-00 SRND-00 SANA-00 /001R

 
P 012040Z FEB 10
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY JAKARTA PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY MANILA PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY BANGKOK PRIORITY 
AMEMBASSY BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 010090 


KUALA LUMPUR FOR CT COORDINATOR GREG CHAMPMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 1/13/2020
TAGS: PTER PGOV PINS PREL AS JP MY ID BE CB
SUBJECT: TRILATERAL STRATEGIC DIALOGUE ON
COUNTERTERRORISM

Classified by SCT DAS Shari Villarosa, S/CT. Reason: 1.4(b),
(c),(d),and (g)

REF: STATE 122702

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 010090


KUALA LUMPUR FOR CT COORDINATOR GREG CHAMPMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 1/13/2020
TAGS: PTER PGOV PINS PREL AS JP MY ID BE CB
SUBJECT: TRILATERAL STRATEGIC DIALOGUE ON
COUNTERTERRORISM

Classified by SCT DAS Shari Villarosa, S/CT. Reason: 1.4(b),
(c),(d),and (g)

REF: STATE 122702


1. (C) Summary: Officials from the U.S., Japan, and
Australia met in Tokyo on December 14-15 for the fifth
annual Trilateral Strategic Dialogue Counterterrorism
consultations. Four working groups reviewed past
collaboration and laid the groundwork for several joint
projects aimed at bolstering counterterrorism efforts in
Southeast Asia in the near future. Key among future
efforts were: capacity-building projects stemming from
the needs assessment for the Philippines port sector, a
proposed regional forum on biological risk analysis, and
support for a regional law enforcement center for South
Asia similar to the Jakarta Center for Law Enforcement
Cooperation. The participants also discussed prison
reform in Indonesia and countering violent extremism.
All parties agreed that coordination between Embassies in
the region would be key to successful outcomes. End
Summary.

Port, Border and Maritime Security


2. (C)In this working group, the three sides reviewed
existing activities in Southeast Asia and discussed
future opportunities for trilateral action. Australia
proposed that a review be conducted of the original 2007
needs assessment for the Philippines to determine what
has been accomplished, and what gaps remain. Japan and
the U.S. agreed to support this idea. Recognizing the
continuing vulnerability of the aviation sector ,
parties also agreed to request their respective
Embassies in Manila jointly demarche the Philippine
government to support passage of a bill strengthening
the authorities of the Office of Transport Security.
The parties agreed on the importance of improving
interagency coordination between relevant Indonesian
entities responsible for border and maritime security .
The U.S. tabled a proposal to consolidate upcoming
trilateral training efforts in Indonesia, which
Australia and Japan agreed to consider. All sides

agreed that they would determine at a later date if the
aviation security sector offered an opening for
trilateral work. Turning to Malaysia, parties
recommended greater consultation among the Embassies
there on respective working relationships. The
Australian delegation said efforts to assist Cambodia in
taking steps to establish a maritime security authority
have stalled. All parties agreed to ask Embassies in
Phnom Penh to discuss how to galvanize the GoC. Japan
asked for and received support in principle to work out
details of initiating a joint submission on port
facility security plans "best practices" for the APEC
Counter-Terrorism Taskforce. The working group
emphasized the importance of local information sharing
by Embassies in the region as crucial to success.

CBRN


3. (C) Delegates in the CBRN group discussed their
respective countries'CBRN counterterrorism engagement
to Southeast Asia and assessed specific activities,
including the Chemical Safety and Security Workshop held
in Canberra; the Chemical, Biological, Radiological,
Nuclear and Explosives Consequence Seminar in Singapore;
and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) Workshop on
Biological Threat Reduction in Manila. The session
participants also explored how to encourage greater
participation among Southeast Asian nations in the
Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT)
and how to encourage greater International Atomic Energy
Agency outreach on nuclear security to countries in
Southeast Asia. The session concluded with the
panelists agreeing to:

--follow up on the recent Manila ARF bio-threat
reduction workshop with an ARF biological risk analysis
workshop.

--follow up on the June 2009 Canberra chemical safety
and security seminar with a similar one in Manila
focused on small- and medium-sized enterprises in the
Philippines (to include participants from the region).

--discuss how best to raise awareness among Indonesian
business entities of the importance of controlling
access to explosives precursors (possibly holding a
workshop in late 2010-2011).

--explore possible coordination of a workshop on
countering terrorism financing and money laundering
focused on terrorist efforts to fund acquisition of CBRN
materials in South Asia under the GICNT.

--explore the incorporation of improving nuclear
governance, including safety, security, and safeguards,
in the Southeast Asia region as part of the Nuclear
Security Summit discussion, possibly in coordination
with the GICNT.

Legal, Law Enforcement and Terror Finance


4. (C) All parties agreed on the need to strengthen
legal frameworks in Southeast Asia and the importance of
terrorist listings and asset freezing under UN
Resolutions 1267 and 1373. Australia proposed holding a
regional workshop in early 2010 on the implementation of
those two resolutions. The Australian delegation
relayed plans by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime to
hold workshops in the near-term to strengthen legal
frameworks and urged the Trilateral partners to consider
supporting this initiative. Law enforcement assistance
was flowing into the region, but as the Australian
chair of the delegation noted, the needs were "endless".
Some noteworthy examples of the discussion:
--The U.S. delegation noted gaps in prosecutorial
development, which Resident Legal Advisor program
in several countries had been able to address.
-- The Australians noted their continued
involvement in Indonesia and noted the need for
continued prison de-radicalization programs.
-- Australia discussed the creation of a regional
center for law enforcement for South Asia, similar
to the Jakarta Center for Law Enforcement
Cooperation. They said the EU would conduct a
feasibility study, after which the U.S. and
Japanese might consider supporting with the
Australians. The proposed center would most likely
be located in Dhaka.
-- The Japanese reviewed their contribution to a
community policing initiative in Indonesia as well
as a capacity enhancing initiative for firearms
control in the Philippines.

All parties agreed that "a good superstructure" existed
on terror finance, but doubts remained as to the ability
of countries in the region to implement terror finance
measures.

Counter-Radicalization


5. (C) At the closing plenary, the difficult problem of
counter-radicalization resulted in a lively discussion
and areas of noted interest, but fewer suggestions for
concrete joint action. The parties agreed that de-
radicalization remains "the last broken ground"
intellectually. However, in the working group, parties
stressed repeatedly that Embassy-generated on-the-ground
knowledge should be critical in making decisions, and
that "one-size-fits-all" solutions will not work in the
region.


6. (C) Four general pressure points were raised as
useful areas for potential action: prisons, youth and
education, women's groups, and the media/internet. The
Australian delegation said they focus outreach as much
as possible on hard-line entities, but conceded that
those groups often refuse contact. The participants
welcomed the U.S. suggestion for intelligence-generated
community-level micro-focus; the Japanese delegation
head confirmed "providing focused assistance to
communities of our choice makes sense." Outreach to
mainstream communities received mixed reviews. The
parties agreed that supporting moderate schools to
increase educational options was worthwhile. However,
moderate appeals had limitations when hard-line
communities dismiss them as not representative of local
views. Concrete suggestions included:

-- Japan assists ASEAN in developing a database of
radical websites, and urged the others to consider
joining Japan. All parties cited sensitivity about
outright removal of such sites.

-- Prisons and rehabilitation of convicted
terrorists: Australia said supporting Indonesian
prison reform in general has value as "one tide
lifts all boats."

-- Aid organizations should be encouraged to
include counter-radicalization as one criterion in
choosing aid projects.

--Empowering local forces to take on counter-
radicalization "should be a focus for all of us"
emerged as the overarching theme.


7. (C) Comment: The Trilateral partners share common CT
goals. The discussions on CBRN, legal issues and
countering violent extremism should help strengthen
counterterrorism cooperation. The U.S. and Australia
welcomed the more active engagement of Japan in the
process, particularly in considering expanding our
cooperation beyond Southeast Asia. Ultimately success
will depend on the ability of our respective Embassies
on-the-ground to coordinate assistance and development
programs to achieve our common goals. End Comment


8. (U) U.S. delegates to the CT consultations included
Ambassador-at-Large for Counterterrorism Daniel
Benjamin, Deputy Coordinator for Counterterrorism Shari
Villarosa, ISN DAS Eliot Kang, DHS DAS Mariko Silver,
INL Asia Team Leader Amy Carlon, Resident Legal Adviser
(Jakarta) Terry Kinney, FBI Weapons of Mass Destruction
Directorate Adviser Barbara Ditoto, Embassy Manila
Political External Affairs Chief Philip Thompson,
Embassy Jakarta Deputy Political Chief Daniel Rochman,
ISN's Randall Beisecker and Carson Kuo, EXBS' Rachel
Owen, Japan Desk Officer David Jeppesen, DS/ATA
Curriculum Chief Tom Evans, Embassy Tokyo Assistant ICE
Attache Frank Okamura, Embassy Tokyo U.S. Coast Guard
representatives LTCDR Jason Flennoy and Lt. David
Negron-Alicea and S/CT Programs' Dan Rosen.


CLINTON