Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10OSLO32
2010-01-21 16:05:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:  

PROGRESS TOWARD A NEW AMERICAN EMBASSY IN OSLO

Tags:  ABLD AMGT NO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0015
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNY #0032 0211605
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 211605Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 8123
UNCLAS OSLO 000032 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ABLD AMGT NO
SUBJECT: PROGRESS TOWARD A NEW AMERICAN EMBASSY IN OSLO

UNCLAS OSLO 000032

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ABLD AMGT NO
SUBJECT: PROGRESS TOWARD A NEW AMERICAN EMBASSY IN OSLO


1. (U) Summary: Meetings with the city planning agency, local
architects, and the public have put Oslo on a clear path toward
receiving its first building permit. The redesigned chancery has
won plaudits from city planners; their verbal approval and generally
favorable comments from Oslo's Architectural Review Board have given
us the green light to proceed with the formal process of requesting
a frame permit. While our prospective neighbors have not embraced
the new embassy with open enthusiasm, many are willing to dialogue
on issues of mutual concern. End Summary.


2. (U) Post participated in a round of largely successful meetings
this month that significantly advanced our eight-year-long quest for
a new embassy. The first set of meetings took place with the Oslo
Planning and Building Authority (OPBA) on January 7-8. For the
first time since OBO and post began meeting with the OPBA in 2005,
we received verbal approval for the design of the new chancery.
This marked a complete turn-around from the OPBA's former position,
once shared injudiciously with the media, that the chancery design
was too industrial in appearance.


3. (SBU) A second meeting took place on January 19 with Oslo's
Architectural Review Board, an advisory body that ensures that all
new construction meets prevailing architectural standards. OPBA
reported afterward that the Board had made recommendations
concerning the stream bisecting our property and on some of the
building materials we were planning to use. Neither, said OPBA,
would pose any obstacle to its processing of our first building
permit.


4. (U) As a courtesy, we scheduled an informational meeting with
our prospective neighbors on the evening of January 19. Some 200
mostly elderly residents of the Huseby area crowded into a meeting
hall to listen to briefings by our architects, OBO, OPBA, and the
Ministry of Defense, which is responsible for several improvements,
including a new athletic field and pedestrian bridge. As expected,
residents asked about lighting, security guards, traffic, and
parking. A few wanted us to start over with a higher building on a
smaller plot of land, but we explained that the city's approved
building plan did not allow us to build higher than three stories.
Privately, some residents discreetly expressed admiration for the
new chancery design.


5. (U) Public Affairs sent out a press release with OBO-provided
images of the new embassy for inclusion in press reports. Media
reaction has varied. A few stories carried only the residents'
point of view, while other media commented on the "softer" embassy
redesign that was more sensitive to the surrounding environment.
For example, on January 20, the Oslo paper Aften (circulation
125,000) included a two-page spread featuring three large pictures
and favorable comments about the new design from the head of the
OPBA.


6. (SBU) Comment: OPBA's verbal approval of the embassy redesign
represented a major breakthrough after five years of ongoing
negotiations. The result is a unique structure incorporating the
best of Norwegian and American design elements. Our local
architects have begun the formal process of requesting our first
building permit, which we are now confident of receiving within the
next three months.

WHITE