Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10BEIJING325
2010-02-08 06:24:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Beijing
Cable title:  

CONVENTION ON SUPPLEMENTARY COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR

Tags:  ENRG ECON ETTC TRGY KNNP IAEA KTIA CVIS CH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0817
PP RUEHAST RUEHDH RUEHHM RUEHLN RUEHMA RUEHPB RUEHPOD RUEHSL RUEHTRO
DE RUEHBJ #0325/01 0390624
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 080624Z FEB 10 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7999
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI 0005
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 1890
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 9807
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 2048
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR 2689
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 3674
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 9473
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0045
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 4680
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE 0902
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 0544
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1466
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 1690
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE 1440
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0196
RUEHUM/AMEMBASSY ULAANBAATAR 3666
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1435
RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE
RUEAEPA/HQ EPA WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 BEIJING 000325 

STATE FOR EAP/CM-BRAUNOHLER, EAP/CM
STATE FOR ISN/NESS
USDOC FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT/ LOPP
USDOE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY/ MCGINNIS/
USDOE FOR NNSA/ D'AGOSTINO/ AOKI/ KROL/ MCCLELLAND/ WHITNEY
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL/YOSHIDA, BISCONTI, HUANGFU
STATE PASS TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (DOANE)
NSC FOR HOLGATE

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG ECON ETTC TRGY KNNP IAEA KTIA CVIS CH

SUBJECT: CONVENTION ON SUPPLEMENTARY COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR
DAMAGE: SAUNDERS DELEGATION VISITS BEIJING TO DISCUSS RATIFICATION
WITH CHINESE GOVERNMENT

BEIJING 00000325 001.2 OF 004


Sensitive but unclassified - please protect accordingly.

REF: A. 08 STATE 54213

B. 08 BEIJING 3625

C. STATE 008775

SUMMARY
-------
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 BEIJING 000325

STATE FOR EAP/CM-BRAUNOHLER, EAP/CM
STATE FOR ISN/NESS
USDOC FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT/ LOPP
USDOE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY/ MCGINNIS/
USDOE FOR NNSA/ D'AGOSTINO/ AOKI/ KROL/ MCCLELLAND/ WHITNEY
USDOE FOR INTERNATIONAL/YOSHIDA, BISCONTI, HUANGFU
STATE PASS TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (DOANE)
NSC FOR HOLGATE

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG ECON ETTC TRGY KNNP IAEA KTIA CVIS CH

SUBJECT: CONVENTION ON SUPPLEMENTARY COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR
DAMAGE: SAUNDERS DELEGATION VISITS BEIJING TO DISCUSS RATIFICATION
WITH CHINESE GOVERNMENT

BEIJING 00000325 001.2 OF 004


Sensitive but unclassified - please protect accordingly.

REF: A. 08 STATE 54213

B. 08 BEIJING 3625

C. STATE 008775

SUMMARY
--------------

1. (SBU) Acting Assistant Commerce Secretary Mary Saunders on
January 14 led a delegation made up of USG officers from Commerce,
Energy, and State, and U.S. nuclear industry representatives to
discuss the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear
Damage (CSC) with China's National Energy Administration (NEA) and
the China Atomic Energy Authority (CAEA). NEA and CAEA officials
acknowledged that joining the CSC would likely benefit China's
nuclear industry and also noted that the CSC provides a good legal
basis for Japan and Korea--both of which appear to be moving towards
CSC ratification. Chinese officials reacted positively to a Korean
offer to host a tri-lateral conference designed to raise awareness
of the CSC, but cautioned that they were not as far along in their
evaluation of CSC and were not yet ready to commit to attending such
a conference. Chinese officials also noted that CSC ratification
would likely require a lengthy interagency coordination period and
some modifications to China's existing nuclear liability legal
regimes. END SUMMARY.


2. (SBU) BACKGROUND: Per Ref. A, the CSC was drafted under the
aegis of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and intended
to become the global nuclear liability regime. The CSC was drafted
to address shortcomings in the extant nuclear liability regimes and
provide for prompt and fair compensation to victims of nuclear

accidents. The CSC was finalized in 1997, and the U.S. deposited
its instrument of ratification with the IAEA in May, 2008. At
present, four nations have ratified the CSC. It will enter into
force when at least five nations with a minimum of 400,000 megawatts
thermal generated from nuclear power plants have ratified the
Convention. Establishing this regime is crucial to achieving the
important and complementary U.S. objectives of (1) promoting the use
of nuclear power in a safe and secure manner that minimizes
proliferation risks and (2) eliminating concerns over liability that
currently hampers the ability of U.S. nuclear suppliers to compete
for nuclear projects. The focus of USG efforts has now shifted to
the international arena, and we are urging other nations to join the
CSC. The liability protections offered by the CSC to U.S. nuclear
suppliers with regard to a potential customer nation will not be
available unless that nation is a member of the CSC. END
BACKGROUND.

NEA PROGRESSING WITH CSC IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS...
-------------- --------------

3. (SBU) CAO Shudong, the Deputy Director General (DDG) of NEA's
Department of Electric Power (the entity responsible for oversight
of China's nuclear power industry),led off the discussion by noting
that cooperation with the U.S. on the Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear
reactor program should stand as an example of how two countries can

BEIJING 00000325 002 OF 004


work together. Cao said that in comparison, the European Pressurized
Reactor (EPR) project with France was not going smoothly. [NOTE:
Cao did not elaborate on EPR-related problems, but may have been
referring to recent press reports, which speculate that senior
Chinese nuclear officials took bribes from French nuclear power
giant and EPR-builder AREVA to win a contract for a project in
China's southern Guangdong province. END NOTE.]


4. (SBU) During meetings in 2008, NEA officials stated that China's
accession to the CSC would need to follow implementation of a new
Atomic Energy Law (AEL),which would not be addressed until after
China's new Energy Law is passed (REF B). DDG Cao said this is no
longer the case, noting that CSC ratification efforts/studies could
go forward in parallel with AEL formulation and that CSC could be
adopted prior to AEL passage, which according to Cao may not be for
another two years. Cao said China is interested in exporting nuclear
technology (jointly with the United States) to developing countries;
therefore, the CSC would be advantageous to China. To that end, NEA
already has formed a team to evaluate the impacts of CSC. The team
is expected to issue its report and recommendations to other
government entities in the second half of 2010. Cao also noted that
A/S Secretary Saunders' visit had given this effort a boost.

...BUT PROGRESS IS SLOW
--------------

5. (SBU) NEA officials agreed with U.S. nuclear industry experts
that China's existing nuclear liability law as spelled out in Guo
Han 64 is very similar to CSC, therefore only minor changes would be
required. Nevertheless, this process will probably not occur as fast
as the USG hopes, according to Cao. In addition to China's nuclear
bureaucracy, there are a number of other interests involved, and
development of a domestic liability law consistent with CSC will
require coordination with many organizations, including the Ministry
of Finance and Chinese insurance companies. Moreover, subsidiaries
under NEA are still being created and responsibilities for the AEL
have not been assigned yet, said Cao. [NOTE: Guo Han 64, an
official regulation from China's State Council, was drafted with
input from Westinghouse and the State Nuclear Power Technology
Corporation (SNPTC) prior to the signing of the Westinghouse AP1000
contract in July 2007. It includes some stipulations that coincide
with the CSC, such as channeling liability to the operator and
putting civil claims under the jurisdiction of a single court
system. Guo Han 64 also stipulates that the nuclear liability issue
will be included in the new Atomic Energy Law when it is concluded.
END NOTE.]


6. (SBU) NEA officials were anxious to know where Korea and Japan
stood in the ratification process. Following the U.S. briefing, NEA
acknowledged that it was not as far along in analyzing the impacts
of CSC ratification. A/S Saunders highlighted Korea's offer to host
a trilateral forum to raise awareness of the CSC, noting that this
could help speed the interagency coordination process (REF C).
Participants would include government and industry representatives
from Korea, Japan, and China, while the U.S. would participate in an
advisory role. DDG Cao said that although the idea was a good one,

BEIJING 00000325 003 OF 004


NEA would have to coordinate with leaders at the National
Development and Reform Commission (NEA's parent organization) before
committing.


7. (SBU) DDG Cao commented on a recent article in the New York
Times that raised concerns about the safety of China's ambitious
nuclear power program. He said that the article had gotten the
attention of China's senior leaders. He added that the Government
placed great importance on nuclear safety; safety is paramount over
development. Regarding the supervisory capacity of China's nuclear
regulator, the Ministry of Environmental Protection's National
Nuclear Safety Administration (MEP/NNSA),Cao said China has
adequate oversight capabilities for the present, but not for future
growth in the number of nuclear facilities. However, that
deficiency is currently being addressed through an enormous influx
of personnel and additional training, according to Cao.

CAEA DELIVERS NEARLY IDENTICAL MESSAGE ON CSC
--------------

8. (SBU) In a separate meeting with the China Atomic Energy
Authority (CAEA),Systems Engineering Director General (DG),TONG
Baotong and Deputy Director of CAEA's International Cooperation
Department, SONG Gongbao, delivered a similar message to that of
NEA. Tong said that although China participated in drafting the CSC
and he himself is on the IAEA CSC working group, China has yet to
join. The major reason for this is the gap, albeit small, between
existing domestic legislation and CSC and the significant
interagency coordination required. Tong said that Premier WEN
Jiaobao had raised a number of difficult questions regarding nuclear
liability during the discussion leading up to Guo Han 64 (see para
5),and that explaining CSC to China's leaders will be even more
challenging and will likely require the help of U.S. officials.
Therefore, the Korean proposal to hold an information forum on CSC
is very positive, according to Tong. He also noted that such a
meeting would benefit the bulk of China's nuclear power plant
operators and national insurance companies, which also are not
familiar with CSC.


9. (SBU) DG Tong said that no timetable exists for joining the CSC
but he concurred with NEA that waiting for domestic legislation such
as the AEL would take far too long and CSC accession should be
promoted first and new domestic legislation can then be formulated
around the CSC. This year two tasks are critical to moving CSC
forward, according to Tong. The first is to hold the trilateral
forum as proposed by Korea and the second is for CAEA to inspect
China's operational nuclear power plants to deduce their compliance
with Guo Han 64 and CSC, respectively. Finally, Tong asked about
lessons learned during the eleven-year period it took the U.S. to
ratify CSC. Beyond issues that were unique to the U.S. system of
government, A/S Saunders said that getting insurance companies and
plant operators involved as early as possible is crucial to an
efficient and speedy evaluation process.


10. (U) This cable was cleared by DOC Acting Assistant Secretary
Saunder's delegation.

BEIJING 00000325 004 OF 004



HUNTSMAN