Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10ANKARA25
2010-01-07 12:58:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ankara
Cable title:  

TURKEY-ESDP CONFERENCE GENERATES HEAT, NOT LIGHT

Tags:  PREL NATO EU TR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2456
PP RUEHSL
DE RUEHAK #0025/01 0071258
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 071258Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1624
INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JCS WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU PRIORITY
RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 000025 

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE, EUR/RPM, EUR/ERA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/06/2020
TAGS: PREL NATO EU TR
SUBJECT: TURKEY-ESDP CONFERENCE GENERATES HEAT, NOT LIGHT

REF: 09 ANKARA 147 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Pol-Mil Counselor Anthony Godfrey, Reasons 1.4 (b,d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 000025

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE, EUR/RPM, EUR/ERA

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/06/2020
TAGS: PREL NATO EU TR
SUBJECT: TURKEY-ESDP CONFERENCE GENERATES HEAT, NOT LIGHT

REF: 09 ANKARA 147 AND PREVIOUS

Classified By: Pol-Mil Counselor Anthony Godfrey, Reasons 1.4 (b,d)


1. (C) Summary: Turkey pushed for regular consultations with
and better treatment by the EU in matters related to European
Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) during a conference
jointly hosted by the EU Institute for Security Studies (EU
ISS) and the Turkish MFA in mid-December, but achieved no
progress. MFA contacts told us that they had pushed to
include representatives from the U.S. and Canada at the
event, but relented when the EU ISS threatened to call off
the event if the MFA insisted. A follow-on event is
scheduled to take place in Paris during the Spanish EU
Presidency. Comment: The conference did little to advance
EU-Turkey dialogue on security issues. If anything, it only
served to reinforce the MFA's belief that the EU
underestimates Turkey's value as a contributor to ESDP, and
is incapable of overcoming Cypriot objections for closer
Turkey-ESDP ties. Turkey continues to assert that the US is
a key ally in its effort to press the EU for better treatment
of non-EU NATO Allies. In the absence of tangible
improvements in EU treatment of non-EU NATO Allies, Turkey
will likely view with suspicion U.S. efforts to deepen our
bilateral security dialogue with the EU. End Summary and
comment.

Airing of Grievances
--------------


2. (C) MFA Section Head for Euro-Atlantic Security Esra Dogan
provided polmiloff with a readout of the December 11
conference entitled "Turkey and the ESDP: Towards an Enhanced
Partnership?" The event, which took place in Istanbul, was
co-sponsored by the European Union Institute for Security
Studies (EU ISS),the Middle East Technical University
(METU),the Center for Economic and Foreign Policy Analysis
(an Istanbul-based think tank and the Turkish MFA. MFA
Deputy Undersecretary Unal Cevikoz was the senior Turkish
representative at the conference, and MFA International
Security Affairs Director General (and former Turkish Permrep
to NATO) Tacan Ildem, his deputy Gulhan Ulutekin, and Dogan
each delivered remarks during the conference.


3. (C) According to Dogan, who was the MFA coordinator for
the event, the MFA was relieved that the event ultimately

took place and served as an opportunity for Turkey to
reiterate its support for ESDP and highlight Turkey's value
as a vital security partner for the EU. Yet, she said the
MFA was disappointed that the conference amounted to little
more than a venue to revisit old grievances, and that the
event fell short of Turkey's hope to make more progress on
its relationship with ESDP under Sweden's EU presidency.



4. (C) Dogan shared with us the speaking notes used by
Turkish officials at the meeting, and noted that every
Turkish official highlighted the strong overlap between
Turkey and the EU's strategic outlook and security strategy,
and emphasized how Turkey is a natural asset for the EU's
ambition to be a global security actor and has already been a
strong contributor in every ESDP operation to which it has
been invited to participate. MFA DG Ildem, in his remarks,
said "Ankara's stronger ties to her neighborhood and her vast
experiences in these regions are an asset for the West and
for the EU in particular."


5. (C) MFA Deputy DG Ulutekin went further and said there is
"strategic convergence" between Turkey and the EU and
highlighted as potential areas for cooperation the Caucasus,
the Middle East, the Balkans, energy, defense industry,
terrorism, inter-cultural dialogue, and counter-piracy.
Given Turkey's status as the largest non-EU contributor to
ESDP operations, however, Ulutekin stated that it is
reasonable for Turkey to expect the EU to treat non-EU
contributors in a fashion similar to NATO's treatment of
non-NATO contributors through NATO's Politico-Military
Framework (PMF) and asked the EU to offer "PMF-like"
arrangements to non-EU contributors. The MFA officials all
pushed the EU to establish regular security consultations
with Turkey, akin to EU talks with Russia and the U.S., and
called the EU's refusal to engage in such a dialogue with
Turkey -- an EU candidate country -- a "contradiction."

ANKARA 00000025 002 OF 003


Turkish officials also expressed disappointment with the EU
not living up to its commitments to non-EU European Allies,
as outlined in the "Nice Implementation Document" of 2002.

The Knives Come Out Early
--------------


6. (C) The harshest critique of the EU's treatment of Turkey
under ESDP came from Dogan during her presentation in the
opening panel entitled "ESDP Missions: Lessons Learned and
Challenges." Dogan reportedly said "On operational fronts,
there have been serious frustrations on the part of Turkey
when she was not consulted before the launch of ESDP missions
in Georgia, Iraq and in the Middle East, all in her immediate
vicinity." Calling the EU's failure to consult Turkey a
"bitter lessons learned," Dogan dismissed the EU's
explanation that the obligation to consult with non-EU NATO
Allies only applied to ESDP military operations, and argued
that the EU should be more flexible in responding to Turkey's
desire to consult with the EU in a 27 Plus 1 format or EU
Troika Plus One format.


7. (C) Dogan also criticized the EU's refusal to engage in an
informal exchange of views following the release of Turkey's
December 2008 "food for thought" non-paper on improving
NATO-EU relations, asking rhetorically whether the EU's
inability to engage even informally with Turkey can be of
benefit to ESDP in the long run. Finally, she called on the
EU to conclude a security agreement with Turkey and allow
Turkey to participate in the European Defense Agency, both
long-standing requests, in order to strengthen Turkey-ESDP
cooperation. She noted that the EU's inability to agree to
these steps is an illustration of how Europe's security
relationship with important partners could be held hostage by
one of more member states. This, she concluded, was a key
weakness in Europe's security policy.

EU Response
--------------


8. (C) EU ISS director Alvaro de Vasconcelos, according to
Dogan, responded by urging Turkey to "forget about the past"
and to "not be too focused on perceived wrongs." Dogan said
she also found some of Vasconcelos' other statements during
the conference "shocking," including his alleged assertion
that "Turkey is a candidate country, not a partner of the EU"
and should not expect "special treatment" and that given
Turkey's "long history as an empire, even fifty years (to
attain EU membership) is not a very long time." In response
to Turkey's complaint of the EU's failure to consult Ankara
on ESDP missions in Turkey's neighborhood, Vasconcelos said
consultations should be a two-way street and chided Turkey
for launching the Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform
(ref a) following the Georgia crisis without consulting the
EU first, even though the EU was already active in the
Caucasus. (Comment: We have not been able to confirm the
accuracy of these statements attributed to Vasconcelos. End
Comment.)


9. (C) Swedish Embassy in Ankara poloff Helena Storm said
Sweden provided "behind-the-scenes" support for the event,
including funding, but decided not to give the conference a
higher profile as Stockholm was focused on preventing a
"train-wreck" on the EU progress report on Turkey's accession
process. Given well-known sensitivities concerning ESDP
among certain member states, Storm told us, the Swedish
Foreign Ministry wanted to distance itself from the
conference, sending only a working level official (deputy
director level) to the event. Swedish Parliament Foreign
Affairs Committee Chair Goran Lennmarker did attend the
conference.

Europeans-Only Affair, Contrary to Turkey's Wishes
-------------- --------------


10. (C) Dogan claimed that the MFA had pushed to invite
participants from other non-EU NATO Allies, particularly the
U.S. and Canada, to provide a "transatlantic perspective" to
the discussion. The EU ISS initially suggested RAND's
Stephen Larrabee as a possible speaker, but this was rejected
by Turkey due to Larrabee's supposed "anti-Turkey" bias. The
MFA, according to Dogan, had indirectly floated inviting US
NATO PermRep Ambassador Ivo Daalder to the conference, but

ANKARA 00000025 003 OF 003


the EU ISS rejected the proposal. Due to the inability to
agree on a suitable U.S. speaker, the EU ISS threatened to
cancel the event altogether. Turkey ultimately relented, but
in his opening remarks at the conference, Turkish MFA Deputy
U/S Cevikoz laid down a marker that Turkey expected U.S. and
Canadian speakers to participate at the next conference to be
hosted by the EU ISS in Paris in the first half of 2010.

Comment
--------------


11. (C) The exchanges at the conference, as reported by the
MFA, struck us as even more acrimonious than the usual bitter
refrain we hear from Turkish officials on this issue. MFA
officials clearly remain frustrated with the EU's treatment
of non-EU NATO Allies in general and of Turkey in particular,
and are pessimistic about a breakthrough given, from their
perspective, the EU's unwillingness to show flexibility,
particularly regarding Turkey's involvement in EDA and
concluding a security agreement with Turkey. The MFA's
strong desire for U.S. participation in these discussions is
a reflection of its belief that the US remains Turkey's
indispensable ally in pushing the EU to improve its treatment
of non-EU NATO Allies. In the absence of tangible
improvements in how the EU deals with non-EU Allies, Turkey
will likely view with suspicion efforts to deepen our
security dialogue with the EU.

SILLIMAN

"Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at http://www.intelink.s
gov.gov/wiki/Portal:Turkey"