Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10ALGIERS104
2010-02-04 18:01:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Algiers
Cable title:  

ANADARKO VS. SONATRACH -- UPDATE ON THEIR

Tags:  PGOV PREL ECON EPTE ENRG EINV AGAO US 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0002
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHAS #0104/01 0351801
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 041801Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY ALGIERS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8394
INFO RUCNMGH/MAGHREB COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L ALGIERS 000104 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR NEA/MAG - MNARDI AND JPATTERSON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/04/2020
TAGS: PGOV PREL ECON EPTE ENRG EINV AGAO US
SUBJECT: ANADARKO VS. SONATRACH -- UPDATE ON THEIR
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASE

Classified By: Ambassador David D. Pearce. Reasons 1.4(b),(d)

Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L ALGIERS 000104

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR NEA/MAG - MNARDI AND JPATTERSON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/04/2020
TAGS: PGOV PREL ECON EPTE ENRG EINV AGAO US
SUBJECT: ANADARKO VS. SONATRACH -- UPDATE ON THEIR
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASE

Classified By: Ambassador David D. Pearce. Reasons 1.4(b),(d)

Summary
--------------


1. (C) The head of Algerian operations of the U.S. oil
company Anadarko told the Ambassador this week that his
company's dispute continues with the state oil company
Sonatrach over the government's application of the windfall
profit tax provision of the 2006 Hydrocarbons Law to
Anadarko's operations, in violation of provisions in the
company's production sharing agreement. Anadarko took the
case to international arbitration, after the GOA abruptly
pulled out of negotiations late last year. Anadarko doesn't
expect a decision before 2012. Its claims amount to over USD
3 billion. Company attorneys are confident they will win.
At the same time, highly-placed GOA officials have strongly
hinted the government will not pay if it loses. If the GOA
does not pay, Anadarko may move to seize Sonatrach assets
abroad. The case is symptomatic of the Algerian government's
penchant to change the rules of the game for foreign business
without warning or consultation, often in violation of
internationally-accepted norms. END SUMMARY.

Anadarko/Sonatrach Dispute
--------------


2. (C) Anadarko Algeria President Dick Holmes updated the
Ambassador January 27 on the status of Anadarko's
longstanding tax dispute with the Algerian government.
Ambassador was accompanied by Pol-Econ Chief and Econoff.
Holmes recalled that amendments to the Hydrocarbons Law
adopted in 2006 included the Tax on Exceptional Profits (TPE
-- a windfall profit tax),which imposed a steep levy on all
production revenue when the price of oil exceeded USD 30 per
barrel -- not just the revenue gained in the margin between
current price and the USD 30 threshold. Anadarko says it and
several European companies were hit the hardest, because
their concessions were granted before standard contract

language incorporating the higher tax rates mandated by the
2006 law. The Ministry of Energy and Mines, Holmes
continued, believes that the mere attractiveness of Algerian
fields will draw companies to continue making bids even under
these burdensome tax provisions.


4. (C) During a meeting last year, Holmes explained that
Anadarko faced a USD 450-million annual tax liability under
this new provision. At that meeting, he related that the
company decided to invoke the arbitration clause in its
contract. Anadarko opened the arbitration case while
simultaneously offering a compromise tax plan to Sonatrach
and the Ministry of Energy and Mines. Negotiations appeared
to be going well, and Anadarko believed it was close to a
deal. Then, in the course of a meeting with Sonatrach
officials last June, at which Holmes was present, the senior
Sonatrach VP was called out of the room to receive a phone
call. When he returned, he told Anadarko that a negotiated
solution was not possible and that Sonatrach was breaking off
negotiations.


5. (C) Holmes explained that a preliminary arbitration
hearing ("conciliation") was held in Geneva last year. On
February 12, Anadarko will submit a "memorial" laying out its
claim. Sonatrach is then expected to submit its response by
July. The actual decision-making session is scheduled for
June 24, 2011 in Paris and will last two weeks. Anadarko
expects a decision not before 2012. Holmes told us that,
over the course of the last year, Sonatrach had dismissed its
lawyers and hired a New York-based attorney whose firm has
defended the Venezuelan national oil company PDVSA against
foreign producers. Holmes said that the amount being claimed
will be at least USD 3 billion.


6. (C) Holmes affirmed that Anadarko's attorneys are
confident they have a winnable case and are determined to
pursue it to a decision. He said that senior Sonatrach
officials are aware they could lose the case, but they have
hinted to Anadarko that "it could win the battle but lose the
war," meaning that it is unlikely that the Government of
Algeria will actually pay. Even if does, it can extract
equivalent costs from Anadarko by other means, up to and
including nationalization. Holmes says the attorneys are
certain that the decision will be enforceable, if not in
Algeria then through the seizure of Sonatrach assets abroad.
According to Holmes, Minister of Energy and Mines Chekib
Khelil told Anadarko's chairman that even if he wanted to
resolve the dispute, he would not be able to do so and that
this action was taken when he was out of the country.

No USG Intervention Desired

--------------


7. (C) Holmes said the Anadarko lawyers had explicitly
instructed company officials not to request USG assistance.
However, Holmes considered it in his company's interest to
keep the Embassy appraised of the progress of the case.
Anadarko's management has instructed him not to approach
Sonatrach on this issue again and to re-engage only if
Sonatrach approaches him. Holmes told us that the Sonatrach
corruption scandal has paralyzed most of that company's
high-level decision-making and hit the very Sonatrach VP with
whom Anadarko had been trying to reach a settlement outside
of court.

Comment
--------------


8. (C) Anadarko lifts more oil than any foreign company
operating in Algeria and worked here throughout the darkest
years of Algeria's fight against terrorism. Its production
sharing agreement (PSA) predates the 2006 reform to the
Hydrocarbons Law, which mandated majority Algerian
participation in all new hydrocarbon investment and imposed
steep taxes on oil profits whenever the price of oil exceeded
USD 30/bbl. Anadarko thinks international law and practice
is on its side and that new legislation should not preempt
its PSA. The GOA, by contrast, firmly believes that national
political sovereignty trumps international law. This case is
symptomatic of Algerian government willingness to change the
rules of the game to the detriment of private business,
particularly with foreign companies. If Sonatrach loses the
case, we believe it is highly unlikely it will pay. Anadarko
would then have to consider whether to move against Sonatrach
assets abroad.
PEARCE