Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09ZAGREB175
2009-03-30 15:11:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Zagreb
Cable title:  

CROATIA-SLOVENIA BORDER DISPUTE: CROATIAN VIEWS

Tags:  PREL PGOV HR NATO EU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4044
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHVB #0175 0891511
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 301511Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY ZAGREB
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9116
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L ZAGREB 000175 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/31/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV HR NATO EU
SUBJECT: CROATIA-SLOVENIA BORDER DISPUTE: CROATIAN VIEWS
ON LATEST REHN PROPOSAL

Classified By: Ambassador Robert A. Bradtke for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L ZAGREB 000175

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/31/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV HR NATO EU
SUBJECT: CROATIA-SLOVENIA BORDER DISPUTE: CROATIAN VIEWS
ON LATEST REHN PROPOSAL

Classified By: Ambassador Robert A. Bradtke for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (C) Summary. In a March 30 conversation, Croatian Prime
Minister Sanader told the Ambassador that Croatia would
continue to insist that the final arbitration of the disputed
border with Slovenia could only be done by an international
court. All other outstanding issues, including the right of
passage, could be mediated in the process proposed by EC
Commissioner for Enlargement Rehn. Sanader believes that he
has the backing of key EU member states for his position.
The EC Rep in Zagreb, however, maintains that the Rehn
proposal is "the only game in town," and that the Croatians
need to respond positively to it. End Summary.


2. (C) After several rounds of meetings between the
Croatian and Slovene Foreign Ministers and EC Commissioner
for Enlargement Ollie Rehn, Croatian Prime Minister Sanader
told the Ambassador March 30 that the Croatian position
remains essentially unchanged. Croatia continues to insist
that only an international court, preferably the
International Court of Justice, can do the final arbitration
on the disputed Croatian-Slovene border. Croatia would,
however, be prepared to accept mediation of all other issues
relating to the border and the Bay of Piran, including
guaranteeing Slovenia the right of passage through Croatian
waters to the international waters, provided that Slovenia
lifted its blockade of the Croatian accession talks with the
EU.


3. (C) Saying that he was speaking in strict confidence,
Sanader maintained that Rehn's efforts did not have the
support of a number of key member states. According to
Sanader, French Minister for Europe LeMaire, who visited
Zagreb last week, advanced a proposal for splitting the
border dispute from the "regime" for dealing with issues such
as transit and fisheries in the Bay of Piran. The French
were also in favor of expanding the trilateral Rehn meetings
with the Slovene and Croatian Foreign Ministers to include
representatives of the EU Troika, France, the Czech Republic,
and Sweden. Sanader said that French President Sarkozy was
prepared to engage more actively in resolving the dispute.


4. (C) As further evidence for his view on the lack of EU
member support for the Rehn proposal, Sanader cited
statements made following the EU foreign ministers' meeting
on March 27. Austrian Foreign Minister Spindelegger, he
noted, had supported publicly the idea of separating the
legal determination of the border from other issues, and
other Ministers, including Swedish Foreign Minister Bildt and
UK Foreign Minister Miliband had said that bilateral issues
should not be used to block the process of integration.
Sanader also claimed that in his recent conversations with
leaders of the European Peoples Parties, they had encouraged
him to hold out against the current version of the Rehn
proposal because of their own concerns about using a
"political process" to draw international borders. As an
example, he referred to the comments of Romanian President
Basescu, who voiced concern that the Rehn proposal ran
contrary to the use of the ICJ to arbitrate in the recent
border dispute with Ukraine. The Prime Minister concluded
that despite its opposition to the Rehn proposal as it now
stands, Croatia would continue to engage with Rehn.


5. (C) While acknowledging that some member states have
their own ideas on how to resolve the Croatian-Slovene
dispute, EC Commission Representative in Zagreb Vincent
Degert told the Ambassador the same day that EU member states
back the Rehn proposal. The proposal, he said, had moved
somewhat in the direction of the Croatian position by
strengthening language on the need for the dispute to be
settled in the framework of international law. The Rehn
proposal, however, remained the "only game in town," and
Croatia needed to take a more positive attitude towards it.
Echoing this point, the Czech Ambassador here stressed that
there was growing frustration within the EU directed at both
Slovenia and Croatia, but that the consequences would be
greater for Croatia, since Slovenia could use its position as
an EU member.


6. (C) COMMENT: The disconnect between the views of the EC
Rep and Sanader on the way ahead will likely mean that the
border issue will continue to defy a quick solution. While
the GoC will want to be seen as cooperating with the Rehn
process, Zagreb's belief key European players will eventually
support settlement of the border issue by an international
court means that it will likely play for time to press its
proposals.
BRADTKE