Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09YAOUNDE28
2009-01-13 16:34:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Yaounde
Cable title:  

CAMEROON'S ELECAM: VIEWS FROM THE EU,

Tags:  CM PGOV PHUM PREL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5808
OO RUEHBZ RUEHDU RUEHGI RUEHJO RUEHMA RUEHMR RUEHPA RUEHRN RUEHTRO
DE RUEHYD #0028/01 0131634
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 131634Z JAN 09
FM AMEMBASSY YAOUNDE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9567
INFO RUEHZO/AFRICAN UNION COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE 0273
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS IMMEDIATE 0001
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN IMMEDIATE 0063
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA IMMEDIATE 0063
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE IMMEDIATE 0001
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME IMMEDIATE 0251
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 0035
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0428
RHMFISS/HQ USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE IMMEDIATE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 YAOUNDE 000028 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT PASS AF/C

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CM PGOV PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: CAMEROON'S ELECAM: VIEWS FROM THE EU,
COMMONWEALTH, OTHER CHIEFS OF MISSION

REF: 08 YAOUNDE 1257

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 YAOUNDE 000028

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT PASS AF/C

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CM PGOV PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: CAMEROON'S ELECAM: VIEWS FROM THE EU,
COMMONWEALTH, OTHER CHIEFS OF MISSION

REF: 08 YAOUNDE 1257


1. (SBU) Summary: On January 8, Ambassador hosted a meeting
of the "8 6", an informal group of resident Chiefs of Mission
which meets periodically. The group discussed the
implications and possible responses to President Biya's
recent creation of a new Electoral Commission (ELECAM) packed
with ruling party stalwarts. They agreed that ELECAM lacks
credibility but there were different views on whether to
engage with it (despite its flaws) or take a strong stance.
The Canadian High Commissioner thought the Commonwealth would
take a strong stance against ELECAM. The EU faces a decision
in the next month of whether to fund ELECAM in 2010. As an
agreed next step, on January 15 the Ambassador and British
High Commissioner will demarche the Prime Minister on ELECAM,
on behalf of the 8 6, the Commonwealth and the European
Union. On January 13, local media was abuzz with what turned
out to be inaccurate reports of a Commonwealth statement
critical of ELECAM - indicative of the public desire for some
kind of international response. End summary.

The 8 6 and ELECAM
--------------


2. (U) The U.S. has the rotating chairmanship of the "8 6"
from January-June, 2009. Members of the "8 6" include the
Chiefs of Mission from the European Commission, Germany,
France, Greece, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, the United
Kingdom, Japan, United States, Canada the UN, World Bank and
IMF. The January 8 meeting was attended by the Chiefs of
Mission (or Charges) from the EU, France, Germany, UK,
Greece, Italy, UN and World Bank.


3. (U) The only agenda item was Cameroon's recently named
Electoral Commission, Elections Cameroon (ELECAM). As
reported reftel, President Paul Biya created ELECAM on
December 30, two years after it was required under a 2006
law. The membership of this new organization, most of whose
12 members have strong ties to the ruling Cameroon People's
Democratic Movement (CPDM) party, has been highly
controversial. Critics in the media and civil society have
pointed to the lack of diversity or independence in the
membership of ELECAM, questioning its legality and its
ability to run credible elections in 2011 (presidential) and
2012 (parliamentary and municipal).

Views from the Missions

--------------


4. (SBU) The participating Heads of Mission had the
following thoughts:

Canada: The Canadian High Commissioner said there was not
yet an official Commonwealth reaction to ELECAM but he saw
the new Commonwealth Secretary General as more assertive than
his predecessor, frustrated with Cameroon, and likely to have
a strong negative reaction to the ELECAM announcement. The
High Commissioner had contacted a representative of the
Francophonie, who was not aware of ELECAM and, when informed
about it, did not seem inclined to respond to the issue.

The ELECAM decision put the international community in a
"Catch-22 situation," in that they either support ELECAM
(which would be interpreted as acceptance) or they don't
(which would doom it to failure),the High Commissioner said.
He explained that Canada had sponsored Cameroon's membership
in the Commonwealth in 1994 on the condition that it ascribe
to the Harare Declaration which commits members to free and
democratic political processes, including in Cameroon's case
the creation of an independent electoral body. ELECAM does
not separate the functions of an election supervisor and
implementer (as is done in Canada and the UK),raising
serious doubts about its credibility, he said, concluding
that the EU and Commonwealth should be the first to respond
on ELECAM, preferably jointly and quickly.

UN: ELECAM "affects everything we do here," according to the
Acting UN Resident Coordinator. The UN has committed to
supporting ELECAM and electoral processes through its
2008-2012 partnership agreement with the Government of

YAOUNDE 00000028 002 OF 003


Cameroon (GRC). The support is in the preparatory stage of
identifying the needs of ELECAM. The Acting Res Rep
concurred that the membership of ELECAM was not balanced or
independent and noted that the UN was reviewing what to do
with its agreement. She saw reformist "pockets of influence"
within the GRC and argued that it was important to stay
engaged with ELECAM, especially through technical support, in
order to help shape it into something credible. Keeping
ELECAM credible was key to long term stability during and
after an election, she stated.

France: The French Ambassador had spoken to ELECAM Vice
President Justin Ewodo Ebanga, who argued the need to look at
the quality of the nominees to ELECAM, not just their party
affiliation, and to evaluate ELECAM's organizational ability
as it gets of the ground. The Francophonie seemed to be in
a cautious wait-and-see mode, he said. The Ambassador felt
there had been too much focus on the individuals in ELECAM
and not enough on the institution, but conceded that "if the
people aren't serious, it won't work." He argued for a
two-track approach with the GRC: discussion through the
regular EU-GRC dialogue, and a letter from the 8 6 "to go on
record," or a meeting with the Prime Minister. (He added
that the Organization National des Elections (ONEL),ELECAM's
predecessor, was created in 2001 under pressure from the
Francophonie.)

Germany: The German Ambassador argued for a measured
approach to ELECAM, judging it on what it does and
calibrating donor funding accordingly. Germany has "very
difficult" relations with the GRC, which can increasingly go
it alone and appears to care less and less about foreign
reactions.

EU: The EU rep described the ELECAM decision as in a "very
flagrant situation" which was difficult to justify. He noted
that the EU had to decide by February 2009 whether to go
ahead with a planned 2-3 million Euro program of support for
ELECAM in 2010.

World Bank: The World Bank Res Rep affirmed that the GRC has
the funds and could fund ELECAM adequately but appears not to
be making it a priority. While ELECAM is outside the mandate
of the Bank, the ELECAM decision "speaks volumes about the
government's commitment to reform" in all realms, including
economic reform. The GRC listens to the international
community much less than it did even a year ago, she said,
although the government wants foreign recognition of ELECAM
for domestic purposes. If the 8 6 criticizes ELECAM, it
would be domestically difficult for the GRC, she said.

Italy: The Italian Ambassador thought the 8 6 should let the
Commonwealth and EU take the lead in responding. He lamented
that the GRC doesn't care as much as it used to about foreign
pressure and argued that, while disappointed, the
international community now needed to focus on making ELECAM
work, even with its flaws.

UK: UK Charge agreed with the need to express disappointment
with the ELECAM decision but was concerned that any pressure
to change the composition of ELECAM at this point could give
the GRC an excuse for delaying the establishment of a
functioning electoral body.

Greece: The Greek Ambassador questioned whether the
international community should continue to trust the
government following the ELECAM decision.

Next Steps
--------------


5. (SBU) Ambassador Garvey argued that the longer we wait
to react to ELECAM the more the GRC will interpret it as our
acceptance. The GRC wants the legitimacy of an electoral
process the international community recognizes, she argued,
suggesting the group at least press for benchmarks to monitor
the progress of ELECAM. We want to make sure the
international response to ELECAM is used to leverage better
elections in 2011, she said.


YAOUNDE 00000028 003 OF 003



6. (SBU) The Ambassador proposed, and the 8 6 group
endorsed, that she meet soon with Prime Minister Ephriam
Inoni as the rep for the 8 6, accompanied by the Charge of
the British High Commission (representing the Commonwealth
and the EU),to express disappointment with ELECAM and to
point to the need for ELECAM to demonstrate it can function
with independence. (Note: The PM is the designated
interlocutor for the 8 6. End note). This meeting is
scheduled for January 15.

The Statement That Wasn,t
--------------


7. (U) The private Cameroonian press buzzed on January 13
with news of a statement from the Commonwealth condemning the
composition of ELECAM and promising to withhold assistance on
elections and decentralization programs until new ELECAM
leadership is named. Our contacts at the British High
Commission have confirmed these reports to be inaccurate. It
appears the Cameroonian press seized on remarks critical of
ELECAM made on January 12 by a member of the British
Parliament and conflated his remarks into EU and Commonwealth
policy. The EU Ambassadors are meeting in Yaounde on January
13 to discuss a common position, and the Commonwealth is not
expected to make a comment until after a technical visit to
Cameroon scheduled for the end of January.

Comment
--------------


8. (SBU) The ELECAM issue has dominated the local press for
the past week, with media and civil society opinions heavily
critical. Many of our contacts hope the USG and other
foreign partners will openly discredit ELECAM. The headline
attention given to the Commonwealth statement-that-wasn't
reflects the keen public interest in the reaction of the
donor community. The President's decision on ELECAM is a
serious step backward for democracy in Cameroon, raising
questions about future elections and Biya's longer term plans
that we will analyze in greater depth septel. Our reaction
to ELECAM will shape our relationship with the GRC as well as
our reputation with the Cameroonian public. We will weigh
the Commonwealth and EU positions on ELECAM and the outcome
of our upcoming meeting with the PM in coordinating with the
Department on a USG approach at this critical juncture in
Cameroon's political history.






GARVEY