Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09USUNNEWYORK345
2009-04-02 00:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
USUN New York
Cable title:  

UNGA: UNSC REFORM: INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATIONS

Tags:  PREL KUNR UNGA UNSC GE JA BR IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0345/01 0920052
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 020052Z APR 09
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6242
INFO RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN IMMEDIATE 1033
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE 1083
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD IMMEDIATE 2231
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 6353
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI IMMEDIATE 2525
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME IMMEDIATE 1065
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 1022
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 8665
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000345 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR USUN/W AND IO/UNP; NSC FOR POWER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KUNR UNGA UNSC GE JA BR IN
SUBJECT: UNGA: UNSC REFORM: INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATIONS
ON REGIONAL REPRESENTATION - CONSENSUS BUILDING ON NEED FOR
GREATER EQUITABLE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

REF: A. USUN NEW YORK 289

B. USUN NEW YORK 230

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 000345

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR USUN/W AND IO/UNP; NSC FOR POWER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KUNR UNGA UNSC GE JA BR IN
SUBJECT: UNGA: UNSC REFORM: INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATIONS
ON REGIONAL REPRESENTATION - CONSENSUS BUILDING ON NEED FOR
GREATER EQUITABLE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

REF: A. USUN NEW YORK 289

B. USUN NEW YORK 230


1. (SBU) Summary: The informal plenary of the General
Assembly met March 24 and March 31 for intergovernmental
negotiations on Security Council expansion focusing on
regional representation. 68 delegations spoke during the
day-and-a-half discussion with most focusing on Article 23(1)
of the UN Charter and the need to enhance "equitable
geographical distribution" given current realities. Most
called for greater representation for Africa, Asia, Latin
America/Caribbean, with some adding Eastern Europe. The
Uniting for Consensus (UFC) bloc was firmly against new
additional permanent seats saying they would not enhance
regional representation, while the African Group reiterated
their demand for two African permanent seats with veto
rights. A number of small states called for a separate
non-permanent seat for small-sized states, as did others for
a seat for medium-sized states. Singapore raised whether it
was time to take a closer look at the composition of regional
groups upon which the "equitable geographical distribution"
formulas are based. Liechtenstein said such an effort would
be impossible. Italy suggested a non-permanent seat for the
European Union, but nine delegations spoke forcefully against
the concept. Brazil said that until regional sovereignty is
commensurate with member state sovereignty such a discussion
is meaningless. The next session is scheduled for April 7 on
the size of an enlarged Council and Council working methods.
End summary.


2. (SBU) Comment: Given member states' uncertainty over the
exact definition of the topic of "regional representation,"
this was the least productive intergovernmental negotiating
session to date. In addition, the African Group's
reiteration, without deviation, of its Ezulwini Consensus
position through 19 separate speakers also resulted in a
substantial stifling of discussion. Though the Italian and
Indian Perm Reps traded barbs at the end of the March 24th
session, the March 31 interactive session was tame. End
comment.



3. (SBU) Intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council
expansion continued on March 24 and March 31 with meetings of
the informal plenary on the third of five key issues --
"regional representation." 68 countries spoke during the
three sessions and a further eight took the floor for a
second time during the interactive portion of the final
session on March 31. Afghan Perm Rep and Chairman of the
Intergovernmental Negotiations Zahir Tanin circulated a
letter to the membership on March 20, as he did before debate
on the two previous issues (see reftels). His letter
included an extensive excerpt on the topic from the
Open-ended Working Group's 61st session report (A/61/47).
(Note: USUN e-mailed a copy of the letter to IO/UNP. End
note.)

"Equitable Geographical
Representation"
--------------


4. (SBU) A number of delegations commented on the lack of
clarity on the actual topic "regional representation." Most
delegations focused their interventions on Article 23(1) of
the UN Charter and the issue of "equitable geographical
distribution" and how to interpret that to better reflect
current realities. Most delegations called for greater
representation on the Council from Africa, Asia, and Latin
America/Caribbean, with some adding Eastern Europe. Some
delegations clarified that there should be additional
permanent member seats for Africa, Asia, and Latin America
and additional non-permanent member seats for all of the
previously-mentioned regions and Eastern Europe. The
Brazilian Deputy Perm Rep called for an improvement in
equitable geographical distribution in both categories.


5. (SBU) All UFC members reiterated their opposition to an
increase in permanent seats, said that new permanent seats
should not be denoted as enhancing equitable geographical
distribution, and called for an improvement in the equitable



geographical distribution of non-permanent seats. The
Italian Perm Rep said he doubted the "dogma of
representation" put forth by the G4 that a regional group
would feel more represented if a member from that same
regional group obtained a permanent seat. The Mexican Perm
Rep specifically asked how regional representation would be
enhanced by having a new permanent member from an area
already over-represented (i.e. Germany). The Turkish
representative said that additional permanent seats would be
to the detriment of greater regional representation and noted
that adding four new permanent members would mean that 20 new
non-permanent members would not be able to serve in their
stead.


6. (SBU) G4 supporter and African Group member Mauritius, on
the other hand, asked if the intent of Security Council
reform was to get more members to serve on the Security
Council or to make the Security Council more effective and
efficient. G4 member Japan said that new permanent members
should provide "exceptional contributions to the maintenance
of international peace and security" and then there should be
equitable geographical distribution. He also stressed that
new non-permanent members should be elected by the entire
membership but did note that each regional group uses a
different set of criteria to choose its candidates for the
non-permanent seats.


7. (SBU) 19 African states, with Sierra Leone again in the
lead for the African Group, each uniformly reiterated the
need to right the historical injustice of Africa's
under-representation on the Council through two permanent
seats with veto and five non-permanent seats.


8. (SBU) Jamaica, representing CARICOM, suggested a
non-permanent seat for small island developing states in
Africa, GRULAC, and Asia and a separate non-permanent seat
for developing or medium-sized states. The St. Vincent & the
Grenadines Perm Rep suggested that this be a "small island
developing state" (SIDS) seat and noted there are 37 such
states as designated by ECOSOC. A number of states voiced
support for both the small and medium-sized state proposals,
including Mauritius, Pakistan, El Salvador, Kazakhstan,
Liechtenstein, Malta, Mexico, Nicaragua, the Philippines, the
Solomon Islands, and Tonga.


9. (SBU) Nine Eastern European states, including Armenia,
Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech
Republic, Romania, Slovakia, and the Ukraine, called for an
additional non-permanent seat for Eastern Europe.

P-5
---


10. (SBU) The French representative reiterated France's
support for an expansion of both categories of membership,
its support of the G4 for permanent seats, and for an African
presence among the permanent members. He raised the
possibility of an Arab permanent member and reiterated the
intermediate option. The Chinese representative stressed the
need to make the Council more representative by addressing
the under representation of African states and the access of
other small and medium-sized states to the Council. The UK
representative stressed the need for broad geographic
representation and reiterated the UK's support for the G4's
quest for permanent seats and an African seat.

Time to change regional groups?
--------------


11. (SBU) The Singapore Perm Rep noted that none of the
current proposals on the table (G4, UFC, African Group) will
result in an improvement in equitable geographical
distribution. He proposed looking at the current regional
groups and seeing if they truly represent current realities.
For example, is the distinction between the Western European
and Others Group (WEOG) and the Eastern European Group (EEG)
still valid post-Cold War? (Note: The Liechtenstein
representative later responded that WEOG is over-represented
in the Council. End note.) In the Asian Group, the



Singaporean continues, there is a member who is also part of
the EU. He suggested re-examining our basic assumptions
regarding the concept of "region." The Liechtenstein
representative in the interactive portion responded to
Singapore's statement and said that it would be almost
impossible to revise regional configurations at this time.

A role for regional
organizations? No.
--------------


12. (SBU) A number of other delegations also commented on
whether there was a role for regional organizations on the
Council. The Italian Perm Rep later suggested that a seat
for the European Union be alternated between WEOG and EEG
since there is a "big gap between what the EU does and what
it could do in the Security Council." He noted that a
Charter amendment would be needed to allow for a regional
organization to participate with full member privileges at
the UN. (Comment: USUN viewed Italy's EU seat proposal as
clearly meant to complicate the debate, given that it had
little support from other EU member states. End comment.)
The Singapore Perm Rep noted that it is likely premature to
discuss regional seats since even bodies like the EU which
are suppose to have a common foreign and security policy
remain divided on the issue of regional representation.


13. (SBU) Nine delegations spoke out against a role for
regional organizations in the United Nations, with most
saying such a discussion was premature since few regional
organizations had common political policies. The UK
representative stated that individual member states serve on
the Council and the UK does not support regional seats on the
Council as it would not enhance the Council's efficiency.
Spain cited Chapter II of the UN Charter which only refers to
states as members and said the UN should not be opened up to
regional organizations. The Brazilian Deputy Perm Rep said
that regions could play a role when regional sovereignty is
commensurate with member state sovereignty. Until that
becomes the case, he said, a discussion of seats for regional
organizations is meaningless. Others suggested saving this
topic for a future review conference.

Suggestions on working methods
--------------


14. (SBU) Canada suggested some improvements to working
methods to improve representation, including a return to the
more obligatory nature of Article 35 of the UN Charter which
states that any member "may bring any dispute" to the
attention of the Council. He compared the language of
Article 35 to Rule 37 of the Provisional Rules of Procedure
of the Security Council which only states that a member "may
be invited, as the result of a decision of the Security
Council, to participate, without vote, in the discussion of
any question brought before the Security Council." He also
proposed that parties to a dispute be regularly included in
Council discussions, as well as troop contributing countries
(TCCs),especially during Council discussions of peacekeeping
mandates (Article 44). India later referred to this and
commended Canada for raising it.

Upcoming meetings
--------------


15. (SBU) The Chair announced that the next meeting will be
April 7 on the "size of an enlarged Council and working
methods of the Security Council" and then the last of the
five key issues, "the relationship between the Council and
the General Assembly," will be discussed on April 20.
Rice