Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09USUNNEWYORK1053
2009-11-18 17:00:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
USUN New York
Cable title:  

UNGA DISCUSSES UNSC REPORT: MEMBER STATES CONTINUE

Tags:  PREL KUNR UNSC UNGA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0006
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #1053/01 3221700
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 181700Z NOV 09
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7664
INFO RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001053 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR IO/UNP AND USUN/W.

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KUNR UNSC UNGA
SUBJECT: UNGA DISCUSSES UNSC REPORT: MEMBER STATES CONTINUE
TO CALL FOR MORE ANALYSIS

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001053

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR IO/UNP AND USUN/W.

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL KUNR UNSC UNGA
SUBJECT: UNGA DISCUSSES UNSC REPORT: MEMBER STATES CONTINUE
TO CALL FOR MORE ANALYSIS


1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The General assembly met on November 12 -
13 for a joint plenary debate on the annual Report of the
Security Council (SC) as well as Security Council expansion
(septel). The United States and more than 70 delegations
delivered statements, with some noting improvements in the
report, but many more calling for more analysis and
qualitative information. The U.S. statement delivered by
Ambassador Wolff called the report transparent and
comprehensive, and took note of the Council's efforts to hold
more formal meetings which provide an excellent way for
non-Council members to follow the Council's work first-hand
without relying primarily on an annual report. Many states
noted the current report was little more than a list of
meetings held and actions taken, and expressed their desire
for a more analytical report that would explain the reasons
behind the Council's decision-making, as well as its lack of
agreement on key issues. A number of countries, usually
within the framework of offering some additional suggestion
or improvement, noted that the report had improved in
substance and even transparency over previous years. Some
delegations called for more frequent reporting on the
Security Council's work, either periodically or thematically.
As in the past, many member states continued to call for
greater participation and transparency; however, their
representation at open meetings of the SC - as pointed out in
the U.S. statement - has not reflected a comparable level of
interest. Some countries called on the UN to reform its
working methods in such a way as to enhance transparency and
accountability. END SUMMARY.


2. (U) PGA CALLS FOR MORE ANALYSIS: President of the General
Assembly (PGA) Ali Treki introduced the joint plenary debate
and stated that discussion continued to strengthen the
cooperation between the Assembly and the Security Council.
Treki noted that it was a provision of the Charter for the
Security Council to provide an annual report but that there
is a widely shared view among member states that the
Assembly's consideration of the report would be more
meaningful if the report were substantive and "more
analytical in terms of providing (a) better understanding of
the dynamics of discussion and decision making in the
Council." He noted that the report outlined the wide range

of issues on the Council's agenda and, given the crucial
nature of its work, scrutiny of its performance was intense.


3. (U) PSC NOTES GREATER TRANSPARENCY, URGES DELEGATES NOT TO
UNDERESTIMATE REPORT'S VALUE: President of the Security
Council (PSC) for the month of November, Austrian Perm Rep
Thomas Mayr-Harting, presented the Council's annual report to
the General Assembly noting that the Council had faced a
challenging and complex set of situations and issues
throughout the year. Mayr-Harting listed the countries,
regions and issues that the Security Council dealt with in
its meetings. He noted the increase in open debates and open
briefings from previous years. The President recognized that
"there will always be scope to improve further the analytical
depth" of the report, but urged delegations to "remind
ourselves that the annual report in its entirety constitutes
an important reference document for our work in the medium
and long term. This should not be underestimated."


4. (U) U.S. STATEMENT NOTES EFFORTS TO CREATE A TRANSPARENT
SECURITY COUNCIL: Ambassador Wolff delivered the U.S.
statement and noted that the SC report "provides non-Council
members with a transparent and comprehensive review of the
intensive work of the Security Council." He added that "the
United States takes seriously the importance of making sure
that all member states are informed of and appropriately
involved in the Council's work." He underscored that, in the
spirit of transparency, the Security Council has held "more
formal meeting of the Council which are open to the full
membership, as the report highlights." He noted that
"regrettably, however, these meetings are not always attended
by more than a small percentage of member states" and urged
member states to "follow the Council's work first hand on
such occasions rather than relying primarily on an annual
report." Full text of the statement can be found at:
http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/200 9/131936.htm


5. (U) DELEGATIONS DEMAND ANALYSIS AND SUBSTANCE: Egypt,
speaking on behalf of the Non-aligned Movement, expressed
regret that the SC annual report lacked depth and was
therefore less useful to the broader membership of the UN,
and called specifically for the inclusion of further details
on the Council's efforts made to maintain global peace and
security. Belarus called the report informative, but said it
lacked analytical depth. Algeria complained that the SC
report did not explain cases where the Council was unable to
reach a decision on an issue. (Comment: The Algerian


representative failed to appreciate how difficult it would be
for the 15 members of the Security Council to ever reach
consensus on a text discussing the source of their
disagreement or reason for inaction. This was a common
failure of most of the comments calling for greater
analytical depth. End comment.) Cuba and Peru both called the
report a mere description or listing of what the Security
Council has done, and called for more substance to be
included in the future. The Cuban representative even called
for a separate plenary debate next year to only discuss the
SC report and not to have a joint debate also covering SC
reform since he said there was too much to cover on each
topic. Tunisia said that the report is a compendium of
decisions and resolutions and therefore takes away from the
only chance for in-depth study of the Council's activity by
non-members. Lichtenstein called the Security Council report
central to the communications between the Security Council
and the General Assembly and added that the report does not
fulfill the goal of accountability in its current form and
offered his country's support, working with other delegations
and SC members, to exchange views on how to best improve the
document. (Comment: The Charter does not/not state that the
Council is accountable to the General Assembly, only that the
Security Council should submit annual, and when necessary,
special reports to the General Assembly for its
consideration. End Comment.)


6. (U) SOME IMPROVEMENTS NOTED, MOSTLY BY CURRENT OR FORMER
SECURITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: SC permanent member Russia defended
the report as reflecting the dynamics of the SC's work and
fulfilling its purpose, which is to give an accurate account
of its actions over the previous year, but also noted that it
is "well aware of the difficulties of discussing the report
in the GA" and called for "greater interaction between the GA
and the SC." Former SC member (2007-2009) Indonesia praised
the Security Council for compiling a more analytical report,
but noted there is room for improvement, and suggested that a
discussion of its implementation efforts would be helpful.
Current SC member Japan welcomed the report and offered to
work towards improving its quality, noting that it is "long
overdue." Pakistan referred to the report as a comprehensive
compendium of decisions and meetings that has reference
value, but noted that analysis is needed in order to
strengthen it, and also contended that more information on
its decision making process (much of it occurring behind
closed-doors) would be helpful in boosting its transparency.
Current SC member Mexico noted that more transparency and
analysis can be seen in this year's report, but urged
delegations to continue fine-tuning the document. Current SC
member Vietnam noted an improvement in the format and content
of the SC report, but said more could always be done in order
to better grasp the SC's role. The Congo noted it is grateful
for the report, but said the purely factual approach limits
the understanding of the challenges facing the SC. Paraguay
called the report substantive.


7. (U) IMPROVEMENT: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?: The Swiss
representative noted a lack of "highlighting the linkages
between thematic, regional and country-specific issues" and
also cited summaries as "often incomplete" and not accurately
reflecting the discussions. He went on to suggest that the
report include analytical summaries by each of the 12 monthly
Council Presidents and considered adding a "lessons learned"
chapter. SC permanent member the United Kingdom stressed its
support for ensuring that the Security Council report be as
transparent as possible and commended Vietnam and Uganda's
efforts to convene an informal meeting to discuss the report
and added that "we hope that more Member States will take
advantage of such opportunities in the future." Belarus
suggested that one way to improve communications between the
Security Council and the General Assembly would be to shift
towards monthly reports prepared by a member of the Security
Council. (Note: Each Security Council President prepares a
monthly assessment of the work of the Council which is posted
on the Council's website and is used to prepare the Council's
annual report. End note.)Numerous countries called for the
General Assembly to improve upon its own working methods.
Egypt noted that "reform of the working methods of the
Security Council is also an important aspect of the council's
reform. It should be based on enhancing transparency and
accountability."


8. (U) REPORT NOTES A BUSY AND CHALLENGING TIME FOR THE
SECURITY COUNCIL: Several delegations cited the report as
evidence of the challenges faced by the Security Council in
recent years. Current SC member Mexico commented that the
"Security Council agenda has been very substantial, as seen
in this report." Tunisia said that the report shows the great
amount of work down by the Council over the last year and


stated that the it had acted with determination in examining
many conflicts. The Republic of Korea said it was grateful
for the hard work in compiling the report, noting that it
shows that the Council dealt with multi-faceted issues
throughout the world.
Wolff