Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09USNATO199
2009-05-19 11:51:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Mission USNATO
Cable title:
RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR ROGOZIN CONTINUES HIS ATTEMPTS
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHNO #0199/01 1391151 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 191151Z MAY 09 FM USMISSION USNATO TO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2984 INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0612 RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0775 RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 1210 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 6372 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 0787 RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI PRIORITY 5764 RUEHBS/USNMR BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0903 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEPGBA/CDR USEUCOM INTEL VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L USNATO 000199
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/18/2019
TAGS: NATO PREL PGOV RS GG TU GM
SUBJECT: RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR ROGOZIN CONTINUES HIS ATTEMPTS
TO DIVIDE NATO
REF: 2000 USMISSION USUN 002474
Classified By: A/DCM Kate M. Byrnes for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L USNATO 000199
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/18/2019
TAGS: NATO PREL PGOV RS GG TU GM
SUBJECT: RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR ROGOZIN CONTINUES HIS ATTEMPTS
TO DIVIDE NATO
REF: 2000 USMISSION USUN 002474
Classified By: A/DCM Kate M. Byrnes for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (C/NF) SUMMARY: Responding to presentations on Provincial
Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) at the May 13 meeting of the
Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC),Russian Ambassador
Dmitry Rogozin criticized NATO's efforts in Afghanistan as
both repeating the Soviet Union's earlier mistakes and
inventing new ones. Seeking to further divide NATO Allies
and Partners, he cited an interview with German Foreign
Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier in which Steinmeier
supposedly questioned the decision to hold Partnership for
Peace (PfP) exercises COOPERATIVE LONGBOW and COOPERATIVE
LANCER in Georgia. Allies and Partners largely brushed off
Rogozin's rants, and he was specifically rebuked by Germany
for wrongly interpreting Steinmeier's remarks. The exchanges
illustrate that Rogozin continues to use every opportunity to
cause discord amongst NATO nations. END SUMMARY.
--------------
The showdown over Afghanistan
--------------
2. (C/NF) At the EAPC meeting on May 13, former heads of the
Turkish and Swedish PRTs in Afghanistan briefed EAPC
Ambassadors on their experiences in Afghanistan and
specifically addressed efforts to increase civilian aspects
of PRTs. The Swedish leader of the study on the
implementation of UNSCR 1325, which seeks to minimize the
effects of war on women and maximize their contributions to
conflict resolution, briefed Ambassadors on the policy
recommendations of the study. The recommendations include
using a comprehensive strategy to implement UNSCR 1325 in
NATO operations and missions, holding commanders accountable
for implementation progress, and establishing expert
functions (i.e. gender advisors) to enhance the resolution's
effectiveness. Ambassadors applauded the recommendations,
but voiced the need to implement them in a measured approach
appropriate to local conditions.
3. (C/NF) Seeking to disrupt the positive momentum of the
room, Rogozin took nations to task for not only repeating the
mistakes of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, but "inventing a
few" of their own, which further pushed back prospects of
resolving Afghanistan's issues. Rogozin stated that he
accepted the findings of the UNSCR 1325 study -- and
Ambassadors' comments about it -- with skepticism (commenting
that Russian reporting out of Kabul indicates implementation
of the recommendations will be unlikely). He argued that
NATO can not impose "white Caucasian culture" on that part of
the world. Continuing his tirade, Rogozin said that civilian
projects will not compensate for "ISAF's high-altitude
bombing of villages." Stating that the election of a
"legitimate president" would be "awesome," he asked what NATO
was doing to prepare the Afghan citizens for peaceful
elections.
--------------
Rogozin aims at Georgia
--------------
4. (C/NF) Rogozin also complained about the ongoing PfP
exercises in Georgia, COOPERATIVE LONGBOW and COOPERATIVE
LANCER. He quoted a recent interview with German Foreign
Minister Steinmeier, in which Rogozin alleged that Steinmeier
said NATO should have reevaluated whether the exercise should
be held in Georgia. Rogozin characterized the exercises as
NATO's effort to extinguish a fire using kerosene, and he
thanked those nations who "weighed the pros and cons" and
decided to opt out of the exercises. The Georgian
Ambassador, who recalled that Russia continues to illegally
occupy its territory, stated that the exercise was of great
importance, that Georgia highly valued the spirit of
cooperation evident in the exercise, and that Georgia had
been ready to receive Russian observers to the exercises had
Moscow accepted the invitation to do so. The German
representative strongly rejected Rogozin's argument, rebuking
Rogozin for quoting Steinmeier out of context and adding that
those excerpted remarks were part of a much larger interview.
--------------
Comment
--------------
5. (C/NF) The EAPC, with a membership running from Ireland to
Kyrgyzstan, often finds it difficult to identify topics of
common interest for discussion at a political level. The
discussion of UNSCR 1325 was a topic in which most Allies and
Partners expressed an interest, especially given their
engagement in International Security Assistance Force
operations in Afghanistan. In the not-too-distant past,
Russia largely ignored the EAPC, attending but saying little.
More recently, however, Russia has actively sought to sow
seeds of dissention in EAPC discussions. Ambassador Rogozin
seems to relish playing the proverbial "skunk at the garden
party.
DAALDER
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/18/2019
TAGS: NATO PREL PGOV RS GG TU GM
SUBJECT: RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR ROGOZIN CONTINUES HIS ATTEMPTS
TO DIVIDE NATO
REF: 2000 USMISSION USUN 002474
Classified By: A/DCM Kate M. Byrnes for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (C/NF) SUMMARY: Responding to presentations on Provincial
Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) at the May 13 meeting of the
Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC),Russian Ambassador
Dmitry Rogozin criticized NATO's efforts in Afghanistan as
both repeating the Soviet Union's earlier mistakes and
inventing new ones. Seeking to further divide NATO Allies
and Partners, he cited an interview with German Foreign
Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier in which Steinmeier
supposedly questioned the decision to hold Partnership for
Peace (PfP) exercises COOPERATIVE LONGBOW and COOPERATIVE
LANCER in Georgia. Allies and Partners largely brushed off
Rogozin's rants, and he was specifically rebuked by Germany
for wrongly interpreting Steinmeier's remarks. The exchanges
illustrate that Rogozin continues to use every opportunity to
cause discord amongst NATO nations. END SUMMARY.
--------------
The showdown over Afghanistan
--------------
2. (C/NF) At the EAPC meeting on May 13, former heads of the
Turkish and Swedish PRTs in Afghanistan briefed EAPC
Ambassadors on their experiences in Afghanistan and
specifically addressed efforts to increase civilian aspects
of PRTs. The Swedish leader of the study on the
implementation of UNSCR 1325, which seeks to minimize the
effects of war on women and maximize their contributions to
conflict resolution, briefed Ambassadors on the policy
recommendations of the study. The recommendations include
using a comprehensive strategy to implement UNSCR 1325 in
NATO operations and missions, holding commanders accountable
for implementation progress, and establishing expert
functions (i.e. gender advisors) to enhance the resolution's
effectiveness. Ambassadors applauded the recommendations,
but voiced the need to implement them in a measured approach
appropriate to local conditions.
3. (C/NF) Seeking to disrupt the positive momentum of the
room, Rogozin took nations to task for not only repeating the
mistakes of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, but "inventing a
few" of their own, which further pushed back prospects of
resolving Afghanistan's issues. Rogozin stated that he
accepted the findings of the UNSCR 1325 study -- and
Ambassadors' comments about it -- with skepticism (commenting
that Russian reporting out of Kabul indicates implementation
of the recommendations will be unlikely). He argued that
NATO can not impose "white Caucasian culture" on that part of
the world. Continuing his tirade, Rogozin said that civilian
projects will not compensate for "ISAF's high-altitude
bombing of villages." Stating that the election of a
"legitimate president" would be "awesome," he asked what NATO
was doing to prepare the Afghan citizens for peaceful
elections.
--------------
Rogozin aims at Georgia
--------------
4. (C/NF) Rogozin also complained about the ongoing PfP
exercises in Georgia, COOPERATIVE LONGBOW and COOPERATIVE
LANCER. He quoted a recent interview with German Foreign
Minister Steinmeier, in which Rogozin alleged that Steinmeier
said NATO should have reevaluated whether the exercise should
be held in Georgia. Rogozin characterized the exercises as
NATO's effort to extinguish a fire using kerosene, and he
thanked those nations who "weighed the pros and cons" and
decided to opt out of the exercises. The Georgian
Ambassador, who recalled that Russia continues to illegally
occupy its territory, stated that the exercise was of great
importance, that Georgia highly valued the spirit of
cooperation evident in the exercise, and that Georgia had
been ready to receive Russian observers to the exercises had
Moscow accepted the invitation to do so. The German
representative strongly rejected Rogozin's argument, rebuking
Rogozin for quoting Steinmeier out of context and adding that
those excerpted remarks were part of a much larger interview.
--------------
Comment
--------------
5. (C/NF) The EAPC, with a membership running from Ireland to
Kyrgyzstan, often finds it difficult to identify topics of
common interest for discussion at a political level. The
discussion of UNSCR 1325 was a topic in which most Allies and
Partners expressed an interest, especially given their
engagement in International Security Assistance Force
operations in Afghanistan. In the not-too-distant past,
Russia largely ignored the EAPC, attending but saying little.
More recently, however, Russia has actively sought to sow
seeds of dissention in EAPC discussions. Ambassador Rogozin
seems to relish playing the proverbial "skunk at the garden
party.
DAALDER