Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09UNVIEVIENNA431
2009-09-21 13:37:00
UNCLASSIFIED
UNVIE
Cable title:  

IAEA - REPORT ON IAEA CONSULTANTS MEETING ON IAEA MEETING

Tags:  KNNP TRGY ENRG KSTC IAEA PARM AORC 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUNV #0431/01 2641337
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 211337Z SEP 09
FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0062
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0939
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0916
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 0304
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 0318
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0756
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 0271
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1015
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0353
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 1144
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 0318
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0802
RHEBAAA/DOE WASHDC
RUEANFA/NRC WASHDC
UNCLAS UNVIE VIENNA 000431 

SIPDIS

FOR ISN/NESS AND IO/GS
DOE FOR NA-21
NRC FOR THARRIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KNNP TRGY ENRG KSTC IAEA PARM AORC
SUBJECT: IAEA - REPORT ON IAEA CONSULTANTS MEETING ON IAEA MEETING
ON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS AND
ASSOCIATED FACILITIES

REF: STATE 96396

UNCLAS UNVIE VIENNA 000431

SIPDIS

FOR ISN/NESS AND IO/GS
DOE FOR NA-21
NRC FOR THARRIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KNNP TRGY ENRG KSTC IAEA PARM AORC
SUBJECT: IAEA - REPORT ON IAEA CONSULTANTS MEETING ON IAEA MEETING
ON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS AND
ASSOCIATED FACILITIES

REF: STATE 96396


1. SUMMARY: A September 7-11 meeting of consultants from Member
States concluded discussion and drafting of the IAEA document
"Recommendations on the Security of Radioactive Material and
Associated Facilities (RM)". Key points of discussion centered on
scope of the document, boundary with the other Recommendations
documents, document structure, and consistency of terms. The RM
document will be opened to wider scrutiny by Member States through
the Technical Meeting and 120-day review process. The Technical
Meeting is scheduled for the week of February 1, 2010. END SUMMARY.



2. CONSULTANTS' MEETING: Twenty consultants from Australia, Belgium,
Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Russia, Spain, Sweden
and the U.S met 7-11 September 2009 in Vienna to conclude drafting
of the Recommendations on the Security of Radioactive Material and
Associated Facilities (RM document). The UK chaired this fifth and
final consultants' meeting to develop this draft. The U.S.
delegation included three representatives, from State, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, and the National Nuclear Security
Administration. This RM document is one of three Recommendations
documents that fall within the Nuclear Security Fundamentals in the
Nuclear Security Series. Following paragraphs are keyed to the main
issues treated in the consultants' meeting.


3. Boundary between Recommendations documents -- One of the main
issues discussed during the meeting was the scope boundary between
the RM document and the Recommendations for Security of Nuclear
Materials and Facilities (INFCIRC/225/Rev.5, or NM document).
During the fourth consultancy meeting in June, the Reference Group
proposed to change the scope of the RM-document. Until that time,
the scope of the RM-document had included all radioactive material
outside the scope of INFCIRC/225 (i.e., other radioactive material
and nuclear material (NM) below the Category III level). The new

proposal was for the scope to be broadened to include also the
protection of Category I to III nuclear material in one particular
scenario: against malicious acts involving theft of NM and
subsequent dispersal resulting in radiological consequences. The
scenario involving sabotage of NM (also resulting in radiological
consequences) would remain in the scope of the NM-document.


4. The Belgian and Japanese delegations had sent letters prior to
the meeting objecting to this proposed change in scope, and
consultants at the fourth CM had expressed concern with this
proposal at the time. After due consideration during this September
meeting, the participants agreed that the scope of the RM-document
should revert to the scope developed before the fourth consultants
meeting. However, in the interest of addressing the wishes of the
Reference Group and not to leave this scenario as a gap, the
participants included a clause in the scope section of the
RM-document that indicates that "while the document is not intended
for Categories I to III nuclear material, States could apply the
security measures contained within to the prevention of scenarios
involving theft of nuclear material and subsequent dispersal leading
to radiological consequences".


5. Nonetheless, the participants requested that the Reference Group
and NM-document consultants reconsider inclusion of the theft and
dispersal scenario into the NM-document. Many States consider
INFCIRC/225 to be the official and sole guide on the physical
protection of their nuclear materials and facilities; many translate
INFCIRC/225 and adopt it directly into national law. The
participants, as experts on radioactive material protection, did not
see the benefit of including some of the protections for NM Category
I-III materials in another document - particularly one addressed to
the regulators and users of radioactive materials and devices.


6. Structure of Document -- During the meeting, the IAEA Scientific
Secretary pressed hard for the RM-document to be restructured to
parallel the higher-level Fundamentals document. Each of the 12
Essential Elements contained in the Fundamentals would be a
subchapter heading in Chapter 4 of the RM-document. The Secretariat
is also pressing for this in the two parallel Recommendations


documents on Nuclear Materils and on Detection and Response.


7. Meeting participants resisted this change. While the Scientific
Secretary used existing text in the reorganization, it lost much of
the meaning and conceptual flow from the original structure.
Participants agreed that it would require a lot of thought and time
to rework it. In addition, the Reference Group guidance said the
Recommendations documents should "refer to and be consistent with"
the Fundamentals document, not that they should follow its
structure. In order to meet the intent of the Reference Group,
meeting participants added a reference to the Fundamental elements
in the RM-document and reviewed it to be sure it was consistent with
the Fundamentals.


8. Other topics -- Once these issues were resolved, the remainder
of the meeting focused on detailed editing of the document, and
discussions went well. Participants paid special attention to
ensuring a consistent use of terms throughout the document. Terms
included regulatory body, competent authority, management, security
level, and nuclear security event.


9. Next Steps -- The next meeting on the RM Recommendations
document will be a Technical Meeting with broader Member State
participation, scheduled for the week of 1 February, 2010. Before
this time, the two other Recommendations documents are scheduled to
be finalized and the Reference Group will hold another meeting. The
Secretariat indicated that it may be making some changes to the
RM-document before the February meeting depending on the outcome of
these activities and to harmonize the RM-document with the others.


10. This report was prepared and cleared by the USDEL to the
consultancy meeting.


DAVIES







UNCLASSIFIED 4


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED