Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09UNVIEVIENNA160
2009-04-10 06:43:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNVIE
Cable title:
CTITF: IAEA HQ ON PROPOSED WMD TERRORIST ATTACK
how-toVZCZCXRO5028 PP RUEHTRO DE RUEHUNV #0160 1000643 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 100643Z APR 09 FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9293 INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 1585 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1137 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 0992 RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0141 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0827 RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 0052 RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA PRIORITY 0013 RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO PRIORITY 0201 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 0883 RUEHOU/AMEMBASSY OUAGADOUGOU PRIORITY 0013 RUEHSJ/AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE PRIORITY 0006 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0682 RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 1339 RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB PRIORITY 0040 RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI PRIORITY 0047 RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE PRIORITY 0284 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 0092
UNCLAS UNVIE VIENNA 000160
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC PTER PARM PREL UNSC IAEA
SUBJECT: CTITF: IAEA HQ ON PROPOSED WMD TERRORIST ATTACK
COORDINATION
STATE FOR ISN/CPI WUCHTE
REF: STATE 26339
UNCLAS UNVIE VIENNA 000160
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC PTER PARM PREL UNSC IAEA
SUBJECT: CTITF: IAEA HQ ON PROPOSED WMD TERRORIST ATTACK
COORDINATION
STATE FOR ISN/CPI WUCHTE
REF: STATE 26339
1. (U) Upon receipt of reftel Mission queried the IAEA office of
External Relations and Policy Coordination (EXPO) about the
post-incident response exercise proposed in New York and draft paper
on "preventing and responding to WMD terrorist attacks." We asked
how the initiative relates to the IAEA's broader role in supporting
member states in their compliance with UNSCR 1540. Our IAEA
interlocutors, EXPO chief Vilmos Cserveny and deputy Tariq Rauf,
made clear the initiative comes from the UN Counter Terrorism
Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Working Group and not from the
IAEA Secretariat; IAEA New York Representative Zlauvinen is involved
with the work of the CTITF and chairs a working group. The Working
Group is being led, as we understand, by the IAEA, the OPCW, UNODA,
and the UNICRI, and supported by the WHO, INTERPOL, IMO, ICAO and
the Experts assisting the 1540 Committee. EXPO chief Cserveny added
that the IAEA's only significant interest in this undertaking is to
ensure that entities in the UN system are aware of the IAEA's
Incident and Emergency Center
(http://www-ns.iaea.org/tech-areas/emergency/
incident-emergency-centre.htm ) and have factored the IAEA role into
their emergency planning.
2. (U) Rauf informed us that for several months now the Working
Group has been developing a work plan for 2009 that might contain
three briefing or preparatory meetings in Vienna, The Hague and
Turin, where the main organizations (IAEA, OPCW, WHO, INTERPOL)
would provide technical and legal presentations on their respective
emergency systems to cope with nuclear, radiological, chemical or
biological emergencies, including those resulting from terrorist
acts. Based on these meetings, the working group might decide to
conduct a tabletop exercise to see how the UN system and relevant
international organizations would coordinate in a possible scenario
of a WMD terrorist attack. Conduct of the tabletop exercise has not
yet been decided, and if and when it were to take place, it would
most likely use a biological or chemical attack scenario rather than
a radiological or nuclear attack scenario.
3. (SBU) Rauf stated further that for fundraising purposes, UN
Assistant SYG Orr decided (1) to "minimize" the uncertainty about
conducting the tabletop exercise (in the belief that most donors do
not like funding either travel expenses or related travel costs, but
rather "real" projects like the tabletop itself) and (2) to "share"
with all member states the funding proposals of all nine working
groups of the CTITF. This was done, Rauf said, during the briefing
to the UNGA March 3, 2009. We understand A/SYG Orr asked each
chairman of the working groups to follow up on the proposals with
interested delegations.
-
4. (U) As IAEA HQ understands, Gustavo Zlauvinen was approached by
the U.S., EC, German and French delegations and explained the goal
of the work plan and the modalities for its implementation,
particularly that the tabletop exercise was not a "given" but would
be decided upon based on the result of the three
briefing/preparatory meetings. Some of these New York missions,
particularly the EC, showed interest in the work plan. Per Rauf, it
is Zlauvinen's understanding that the EC would be ready to provide
up to EUR 140,000, but only to help organize the tabletop exercise.
Zlauvinen will have to call for another meeting of the working group
to see how the group wants to proceed with the work plan.
5. (U) Rauf provided UNVIE the latest draft funding proposal for
the working group, which we conveyed by email to 1540 Coordinator
Wuchte.
SCHULTE
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC PTER PARM PREL UNSC IAEA
SUBJECT: CTITF: IAEA HQ ON PROPOSED WMD TERRORIST ATTACK
COORDINATION
STATE FOR ISN/CPI WUCHTE
REF: STATE 26339
1. (U) Upon receipt of reftel Mission queried the IAEA office of
External Relations and Policy Coordination (EXPO) about the
post-incident response exercise proposed in New York and draft paper
on "preventing and responding to WMD terrorist attacks." We asked
how the initiative relates to the IAEA's broader role in supporting
member states in their compliance with UNSCR 1540. Our IAEA
interlocutors, EXPO chief Vilmos Cserveny and deputy Tariq Rauf,
made clear the initiative comes from the UN Counter Terrorism
Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Working Group and not from the
IAEA Secretariat; IAEA New York Representative Zlauvinen is involved
with the work of the CTITF and chairs a working group. The Working
Group is being led, as we understand, by the IAEA, the OPCW, UNODA,
and the UNICRI, and supported by the WHO, INTERPOL, IMO, ICAO and
the Experts assisting the 1540 Committee. EXPO chief Cserveny added
that the IAEA's only significant interest in this undertaking is to
ensure that entities in the UN system are aware of the IAEA's
Incident and Emergency Center
(http://www-ns.iaea.org/tech-areas/emergency/
incident-emergency-centre.htm ) and have factored the IAEA role into
their emergency planning.
2. (U) Rauf informed us that for several months now the Working
Group has been developing a work plan for 2009 that might contain
three briefing or preparatory meetings in Vienna, The Hague and
Turin, where the main organizations (IAEA, OPCW, WHO, INTERPOL)
would provide technical and legal presentations on their respective
emergency systems to cope with nuclear, radiological, chemical or
biological emergencies, including those resulting from terrorist
acts. Based on these meetings, the working group might decide to
conduct a tabletop exercise to see how the UN system and relevant
international organizations would coordinate in a possible scenario
of a WMD terrorist attack. Conduct of the tabletop exercise has not
yet been decided, and if and when it were to take place, it would
most likely use a biological or chemical attack scenario rather than
a radiological or nuclear attack scenario.
3. (SBU) Rauf stated further that for fundraising purposes, UN
Assistant SYG Orr decided (1) to "minimize" the uncertainty about
conducting the tabletop exercise (in the belief that most donors do
not like funding either travel expenses or related travel costs, but
rather "real" projects like the tabletop itself) and (2) to "share"
with all member states the funding proposals of all nine working
groups of the CTITF. This was done, Rauf said, during the briefing
to the UNGA March 3, 2009. We understand A/SYG Orr asked each
chairman of the working groups to follow up on the proposals with
interested delegations.
-
4. (U) As IAEA HQ understands, Gustavo Zlauvinen was approached by
the U.S., EC, German and French delegations and explained the goal
of the work plan and the modalities for its implementation,
particularly that the tabletop exercise was not a "given" but would
be decided upon based on the result of the three
briefing/preparatory meetings. Some of these New York missions,
particularly the EC, showed interest in the work plan. Per Rauf, it
is Zlauvinen's understanding that the EC would be ready to provide
up to EUR 140,000, but only to help organize the tabletop exercise.
Zlauvinen will have to call for another meeting of the working group
to see how the group wants to proceed with the work plan.
5. (U) Rauf provided UNVIE the latest draft funding proposal for
the working group, which we conveyed by email to 1540 Coordinator
Wuchte.
SCHULTE