Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09UNROME59
2009-10-07 18:46:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UN Rome
Cable title:
COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY: FINAL DRAFT TEXT FOR
how-toVZCZCXRO4734 PP RUEHRN DE RUEHRN #0059/01 2801846 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P R 071846Z OCT 09 FM USMISSION UN ROME TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1158 INFO RUEHC/USAID WASHDC RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0372 RUEHRN/USMISSION UN ROME 1232
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 13 UN ROME 000059
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
NSC FOR PRATT, USDA FOR DOUVELIS, USUN NY FOR SNOWDEN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR EAID PREL UN FAO
SUBJECT: COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY: FINAL DRAFT TEXT FOR
NEGOTIATIONS IN OCTOBER 14-17 PLENARY SESSION
REF: A. USUN Rome 55
B. USUN Rome 49
C. USUN Rome 41 and previous
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 13 UN ROME 000059
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
NSC FOR PRATT, USDA FOR DOUVELIS, USUN NY FOR SNOWDEN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR EAID PREL UN FAO
SUBJECT: COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY: FINAL DRAFT TEXT FOR
NEGOTIATIONS IN OCTOBER 14-17 PLENARY SESSION
REF: A. USUN Rome 55
B. USUN Rome 49
C. USUN Rome 41 and previous
1. This message is sensitive but unclassified. Please handle
accordingly.
2. (SBU) Summary and Action Request. Pursuant to an agreement
of the 34th Session of the Committee on World Food Security
(CFS),members have been engaged in a year-long process to
reform the CFS. The focus of the October 14-17 35th Session of
the CFS will be a discussion of the document resulting from this
process. The below text, "Reform of the Committee on World Food
Security," (see paragraph 11),is a near final draft document
leading into the CFS meeting. While considerable progress has
been achieved, substantial disagreement remains on the exact
role and status of the CFS and the Rome-based agencies in
general, and FAO in particular, versus other entities concerned
with food security. Mission offers suggestions on text and
strategy below, and welcomes guidance for the October 14-17
session by October 13. End Summary and Action Request.
3. (U) The General Rules of FAO (GRO, XXXIII, para 6) designate
the CFS as "a forum in the United Nations system for review and
follow-up of policies concerning world food security." The
reform document seeks to upgrade this role, designating it as
"the cornerstone for international coordination" (paragraph 2 of
the Context section) and "the foremost inclusive international
and intergovernmental platform for a broad range of committed
stakeholders to work together in support of country led
processes" ( paragraph 4 in the Vision and Role section).
4. (SBU) There is considerable support for a central position
for Rome and the CFS not only among the G-77, but also among a
number of European countries (Netherlands, France, Germany,
Russia) and other signatories of the L'Aquila G-8 declaration
(Brazil). While it is likely that compromise can be reached on
individual phrases, such as replacing "cornerstone" with the
less ambitious "vital role" (paragraph 2 of CFS text),the
description of the "role" of the CFS under Phase 1 of the reform
(paragraph 5) could be interpreted too broadly and therefore
lead to activities that should only be considered during Phase 2
of the reform. Mission therefore recommends:
- paragraph 5i be entitled "Discussion at the National and
Global Level" rather than "Coordination at the Global Level" and
the phrase "coordination, alignment and collaborative action" be
deleted from the paragraph.
- Similarly, in paragraph 5ii the following language be deleted:
"and coordination through the development and approval of
international strategies or guidelines."
- The entire paragraph 5iii be moved to paragraph 6 as it
involves activities that should only be considered as part of
the second phase of reform and that the beginning of the
paragraph be worded: "At country request, promote and seek to
support and guide, where appropriate, the development and
implementation of nationally and regionally owned plans of
action~"
5. (SBU) The roles under Phase II of the CFS Vision and Role
(paragraph 6) go further in prescribing a more top-down role for
the CFS than preferable. Disagreement among members also
remains on introductory wording of Phase II and whether the
additional roles for CFS "would" or "could" include the areas
outlined in paragraph 6. Mission recommends strong advocacy for
"could" so that the roles outlined in Phase II are conditional
upon demonstrated reform. We also see value in stressing at
least two or three years before Phase II commences.
UN ROME 00000059 002 OF 013
6. (SBU) Coordination at national and regional levels (
paragraph 6, i): Mission suggests moving up within the
paragraph the final line noting the work of the Secretary's High
Level Task Force (HLTF) and the possibility for the CFS to build
upon this role. In addition, we propose to emphasize that
FAO/CFS coordinating role must be at the request of individual
countries and regions and in accordance with national food
security strategy and plans.
7. (SBU) Promote accountability and share best practices
(paragraph 6, ii): A number of developing countries,
particularly Egypt and China, have expressed unease with the
concept of monitoring. Mission believes we can build upon their
reservations to redirect CFS to focus more on a sharing and
analysis of best practices and that efforts should be made to
reassess what type of monitoring would support the new process.
8. (SBU) There appears to be strong support and poor
understanding of what is meant by "Develop a Global Strategic
Framework" (paragraph 6, iii). Such a Framework could be
anything from a general outline of the range of options
available in the development of a country plan to a prescriptive
listing of how a plan must be articulated and implemented.
Mission believes the first option, with an analysis of the
effectiveness of certain programs under a range of
circumstances, could be helpful to countries as they develop and
fine-tune their country strategies. Other outstanding issues
include the size of the Bureau and the possibility of rotating
the Secretary position among the three Rome-based agencies.
9. (SBU) There are also a number of structural changes to the
CFS that, unchecked, could have management and budget
implications. The new CFS anticipates an enlarged Bureau, a
Secretariat, and a High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) comprised
of a Steering Committee and project teams. Mission supports
expanding the Bureau from the current five members to eight or
fourteen, allowing for representation from all regions. Members
have also been assured the Secretariat will remain essentially
the same in size and cost and that this Secretariat could also
serve as the Secretariat for the HLPE. A draft budget presented
by the Secretariat shows a flat budget in nominal terms for the
CFS bureau and Secretariat for next year and establishes a trust
fund to support activities of the HLPE. Thus far, only France
has contributed to the trust fund with USD 700,000.
10. (SBU) Our in-depth discussions with some supporters of a
stronger role for the CFS indicates there may be room for
movement toward our objectives. A clear statement from the U.S.
at the CFS on how to operationalize the Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security, and the role we envision for Rome
and the CFS within that partnership, will help persuade others.
11. (U) Begin text of draft CFS reform document (internal
numbering):
I. CONTEXT
1. The rise in food prices in 2007-08, followed by the financial
and economic crisis in
2009, has highlighted the unacceptable levels of structural
poverty and hunger around the world. The food and financial
crisis threatens global food security and nutrition and the
achievement of the 1996 World Food Summit target and the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for reducing hunger and
malnutrition. It is now estimated that more than a billion
people, one in every six human beings may be suffering from
under-nourishment. These are mainly small holder food producers,
particularly women, and other rural inhabitants.
2. Faced with rising hunger and a weak performing Committee on
World Food Security
UN ROME 00000059 003 OF 013
(CFS),Member nations agreed at the 34th Session of CFS in
October 2008 to embark on a reform of the CFS so that it can
fully play its [vital role/as the cornerstone] for international
coordination in the area of food security and nutrition. The
reforms are designed to redefine the CFS' vision and role to
focus on the key challenges of eradicating hunger; expanding
participation in CFS to ensure that voices of all relevant
stakeholders are heard in the policy debate on food and
agriculture; adapt its rules and procedures with the aim to
become the central United Nations political platform dealing
with food security and nutrition; strengthening its linkages
with regional, national and local levels; and supporting CFS
discussions with structured expertise through the creation of a
High Level Panel of Experts so that decisions taken by the CFS
are based on hard evidence and state of the art knowledge. FAO
Council considered "the CFS reform to be crucial to the
governance of world food security, with a view toward exploring
synergies with the emerging Global Partnership for Agriculture,
Food Security and Nutrition" (CL 136/REP, paragraph 29). CFS
reform has been a topic of discussion in several fora including
G8, G20 and the UN General Assembly and is on the agenda for the
World Summit on Food Security 2009.
3. In order to realize this goal and ensure better coordination,
CFS Members agreed on
three key guiding principles for the reform - inclusiveness,
strong linkages to the field to
ensure the process is based on the reality on the ground and
flexibility in implementation so that CFS can respond to a
changing external environment and membership needs. Members
agreed that effective implementation of CFS' new roles will be
carried out in phases. Starting after the Committee's meeting in
mid-October 2009, CFS' global activities, particularly in areas
of coordination, policy convergence, support and guidance to
countries will be the first to be implemented. While
implementing Phase I, CFS will work on better defining the
implementation details of other activities. In Phase II CFS will
gradually carry out those additional activities which are
related to coordination at national and regional levels,
promoting accountability and sharing best practices at all
levels, and developing a global strategic framework for food
security and nutrition (see Section V for proposed
implementation plan).
II. VISION AND ROLE
A. VISION
4. The CFS is and remains an intergovernmental Committee. The
CFS [as an important element of the Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security/as the Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security] will constitute the foremost
inclusive international and intergovernmental platform for a
broad range of committed stakeholders to work together in a
coordinated manner and in support of country-led processes
towards the elimination of hunger and ensuring food security and
nutrition for all human beings. The CFS will strive for a world
free from hunger where countries implement the voluntary
guidelines for the progressive realization of the right to
adequate food in the context of national food security.
B. ROLE
5. The roles of the CFS will be:
i. Coordination at global level. Provide a platform for
discussion, coordination, alignment and collaborative action
among governments, regional organizations, international
associations and agencies, NGOs, CSOs, food producers'
organizations, private sector organizations, philanthropic
organizations, and other relevant stakeholders, in a manner that
meets each country's specific context and needs.
UN ROME 00000059 004 OF 013
ii. Policy convergence. Promote greater policy convergence and
coordination through the development and approval of
international strategies or guidelines on food security and
nutrition on the basis of the lessons learned from local
experience,
inputs received from the national and regional levels, and
expert advice and opinions from different stakeholders.
iii. Support and guidance to countries. Promote and seek to
support and guide the development, implementation, monitoring
and evaluation of nationally and regionally owned plans of
action for the elimination of hunger, the achievement of
food security and the practical application of the "Voluntary
Guidelines for the Right to Food" that shall be based on the
principles of participation, transparency and accountability.
6. In Phase II, the CFS will gradually take on additional roles
that would/could include:
i. Coordination at national and regional levels. Serve as a
platform to promote greater coordination and alignment of
actions in the field, encourage more efficient use of resources
and identify resource gaps. One guiding principle to support
this role will be to build on and strengthen existing structures
and linkages with key partners at all levels. Key partners
include national mechanisms and networks for food security and
nutrition, the UN country teams and other coordination
mechanisms such as the International Alliance Against Hunger and
its National Alliances, food security thematic groups, regional
intergovernmental bodies and a large number of civil society
networks and private sector associations operating at the
regional and national levels. In each case, the functional
contributions they could make, as well as how the CFS could
strengthen linkages and enhance synergy with such partners would
have to be established. As the reform progresses, the CFS will
build, as appropriate, on the coordination work of the United
Nation's High Level Task Force (HLTF).
ii. Promote accountability and share best practices at all
levels. One of the main functions of the current CFS is to
"monitor actively the implementation of the 1996 World Food
Summit Plan of Action (WFS-PoA)". However, although countries
are taking measures to address food insecurity, the specific
programs as they are presented do not necessarily help to report
quantitatively on progress towards realizing the WFS PoA
objectives. This role thus needs to be further discussed and
developed in order to address the questions of whether we are
achieving our objectives and how food insecurity and
malnutrition can be reduced more quickly and effectively. This
will entail developing an innovative mechanism to monitor
progress towards these agreed upon objectives and actions taking
into account lessons learned from previous CFS and other
monitoring attempts. Comments by all CFS stakeholders will have
to be taken into account and new mechanisms will build on
existing structures.
iii. Develop a Global Strategic Framework. A prerequisite to
facilitate the work of the
Committee for improved coordination and synchronized action by a
wide range of stakeholders would be a global strategic framework
for food security and nutrition. The global strategic framework
will aim at providing the analytical underpinning for the CFS'
work and will be flexible so it can be adjusted as priorities
change. The starting point for such a process could be a review
of existing, related initiatives such as the UN's Comprehensive
Framework for Action (CFA),and the Voluntary Guidelines to
Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate
Food in the Context of National Food Security.
III. COMPOSITION, MODALITIES OF PARTICIPATION, AND
CONSULTATION / COORDINATION MECHANISMS
A. COMPOSITION AND MODALITIES OF PARTICIPATION
7. The CFS is and remains an intergovernmental Committee. It
will be composed of members, participants and observers and will
seek to achieve a balance between inclusiveness and
effectiveness. Its composition will ensure that the voices of
all relevant stakeholders - particularly those most affected by
food insecurity - are heard. It shall further take into account
UN ROME 00000059 005 OF 013
the fact that the overall CFS includes not only an annual global
meeting, but also a series of intersessional activities at
various levels.
B. MEMBERS
8. The membership of the Committee shall be open to all Members
of FAO, WFP or IFAD, or non-member States of FAO that are member
States of the United Nations.
9. Member States are encouraged to participate in Committee
sessions at the highest level possible (Ministerial or cabinet
level is desirable),insofar as possible representing a common,
inter-ministerial governmental position. In those countries
where there is a multistakeholder, inter-ministerial national
body or mechanism concerning food security and nutrition, Member
States are encouraged to include its representatives in their
delegations to the Committee.
10. Members take part fully in the work of the Committee with
the right to intervene in plenary and breakout discussions,
approve meeting documents and agendas, submit and present
documents and formal proposals, and interact with the Bureau
during the intersessional period. Voting and decision taking is
the exclusive prerogative of Members, including drafting the
final report of CFS Plenary sessions.
C. PARTICIPANTS
11. The Committee shall be open to participants from the
following categories of organizations and entities:
i. Representatives of UN agencies and bodies with a specific
mandate in the field of food security and nutrition such as FAO,
IFAD, WFP, the HLTF (as a coordinating mechanism of the UN-SG)
and representatives of other relevant UN System bodies
whose overall work is related to attaining food security,
nutrition, and the right to food such as the Special Rapporteur
on the Right to Food, the Office of the UN High Commissioner on
Human Rights, WHO, UNICEF, UNDP, Standing Committee on
Nutrition (SCN).
ii. Civil society and non-governmental organizations and their
networks with strong relevance to issues of food security and
nutrition with particular attention to organizations
representing smallholder family farmers, artisanal fisherfolk,
herders/pastoralists, landless, urban poor, agricultural and
food workers, women, youth, consumers, Indigenous Peoples, and
International NGOs whose mandates and activities are
concentrated in the areas of concern to the Committee. This
group will aim to achieve gender and geographic balance in their
representation.
iii. International agricultural research systems, such as
through representatives of the Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and others.
iv. International and regional Financial Institutions including
World Bank, International Monetary Fund, regional development
banks and WTO.
v. Representatives of private sector associations2 and private
philanthropic foundations active in the areas of concern to the
Committee.
12. Participants take part in the work of the Committee with the
right to intervene in plenary and breakout discussions to
contribute to preparation of meeting documents and agendas,
submit and present documents and formal proposals. They commit
to contribute regularly to inter-sessional activities of the
Committee at all levels and interact with the Bureau during the
inter-sessional period through the Advisory Group established by
UN ROME 00000059 006 OF 013
the Bureau.
D. OBSERVERS
13. The Committee or its Bureau may invite other interested
organizations relevant to its work to observe entire sessions or
on specific agenda items. Such organizations or bodies may also
apply to the Committee for Observer status to participate
regularly, periodically or exceptionally on specific issues
subject to the decision of the Committee or its Bureau. Such
organizations could include:
i. Regional associations of countries and regional
intergovernmental development institutions;
ii. Local, national, regional and global CSOs/NGOs, other than
those attending as participants, which are active in areas
related to food security, nutrition, and the right to food,
particularly organizations which are linked to a regional or
global
network;
iii. Other networks or associative organizations including local
authorities, foundations and research or technical institutions.
14. Observers at Committee sessions may be invited by the Chair
to intervene during discussions.
15. Mechanisms for enhancing the effectiveness of CFS Plenary
discussions will be explored, such as that of holding
preparatory consultations of regional groups and of Participant
constituencies (civil society, private sector, etc.) to define
positions and nominate spokespersons. Plenary sessions of the
Committee should be organized in a way that are manageable and
produce concrete outcomes. There is no limit to the
participation by Members. The Bureau will determine the
allocation of seats for Participants and Observers in
consultation with the CSO/NGO coordination mechanisms. The quota
assigned to civil society organizations and NGOs will be such as
to ensure their visible and effective participation, equitable
geographic representation, with particular attention to the
categories of organizations detailed in paragraph 11(ii).
E. CONSULTATION/COORDINATION MECHANISMS AND ACTIVITIES
16. Civil society organizations/NGOs and their networks will be
invited to autonomously establish a global mechanism for food
security and nutrition which will function as a facilitating
body for CSO/NGOs consultation and participation in the CFS.
Such mechanisms will also serve inter-sessional global, regional
and national actions in which organizations of those sectors of
the population most affected by food insecurity, would be
accorded priority representation. Civil society
organizations/NGOs will submit to the CFS Bureau a proposal
regarding how they intend to organize their participation in the
CFS in a way that ensures broad and balanced participation by
regions and types of organizations keeping in mind the
principles approved by the CFS at its Thirty-Fourth Session in
October 2008 (CFS: 2008/5; CL 135/10: paragraph 15). The
activities of the mechanism will include:
i. broad and regular exchange of information, analysis and
experience;
ii. developing common positions as appropriate;
iii. communicating to the CFS and, as appropriate, its Bureau
through representatives designated by an internal self-selection
process within each civil society category;
iv. convening a civil society forum as a preparatory event
UN ROME 00000059 007 OF 013
before CFS sessions if so decided by the civil society mechanism.
17. Private sector associations, private philanthropic
organizations and other CFS stakeholders active in areas related
to food security, nutrition, and the right to food are
encouraged to autonomously establish and maintain a permanent
coordination mechanism for participation in the CFS and for
actions derived from that participation at global, regional and
national levels. They are invited to communicate a proposal to
that effect to the CFS Bureau.
IV. MECHANISMS AND PROCEDURES
A. OVERALL PROCESS AND STRUCTURE
18. Bearing in mind that CFS will include a Plenary, as well as
intersessional activities at different levels, the process of
defining strategies and actions to be adopted by Members should
be transparent and take into consideration the views of all
participants and stakeholders to the fullest extent possible in
order to foster ownership and full participation during
implementation of these strategies and actions.
19. The CFS will include:
i. The Plenary of the CFS
ii. The CFS Bureau and its Advisory Group
iii. The High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) - a
multi-disciplinary scientific advisory body to the CFS
iv. The Secretariat serving the CFS (Plenary, Bureau and its
Advisory Group, and HLPE)
B. THE PLENARY
20. The Plenary is the central body for decision-taking, debate,
coordination, lesson- learning and convergence by all
stakeholders at global level on issues pertaining to food
security and nutrition and on the implementation of the
Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of
the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food
Security. It should focus on relevant and specific issues
related to food security and nutrition in order to provide
guidance and actionable recommendations to assist all
stakeholders in eradicating hunger.
21. Regular Plenary Sessions shall be held annually.
Extraordinary sessions may be requested by its Members and
approved by the Bureau after consultation with CFS Members. The
results of the CFS Plenary shall be reported to the FAO
Conference and to the UNGA through ECOSOC. The Chair of the CFS
should consult with ECOSOC and take all necessary actions so
that modalities for meaningful reporting be established and
implemented. CFS Participants, including UN and other
intergovernmental agencies, NGOs and CSOs are encouraged to
consider in their respective governing bodies the outcomes of
the CFS which are relevant to their own activities.
22. Any specific recommendations adopted by the Plenary of the
CFS which affect the
programme or finances and legal or constitutional aspects of
concerned UN entities shall be reported to their appropriate
bodies.
C. LINKAGES BETWEEN CFS AND THE REGIONAL AND COUNTRY LEVELS
23. It is crucial that the work of the CFS is based on the
reality on the ground. It will be fundamental for the CFS,
through its Bureau and Advisory Group, to nurture and maintain
linkages with different actors at regional, sub regional and
local levels to ensure ongoing, two-way exchange of information
among these stakeholders during intersessional periods. This
will ensure that at its annual sessions the Plenary is made
UN ROME 00000059 008 OF 013
aware of latest developments on the ground, and that,
conversely, results of the deliberations of the Plenary are
widely disseminated at regional, sub-regional and country as
well as global levels. Existing linkages should be strengthened,
such as through the FAO Regional Conferences, and other regional
and sub-regional bodies dealing with food security and nutrition
related issues.
24. CFS Members States are encouraged, at their discretion, to
constitute or strengthen multi-disciplinary national mechanisms
(e.g. food security networks, national alliances, national CFS)
including all key stakeholders dedicated to advance food
security at national and local levels. Through renewed
mobilization and coordination of key stakeholders, such
mechanisms will enable more effective identification and
implementation of food security and nutrition policies and
programs.
25. Existing structures should be used to ensure programs are
better integrated with each other and aligned with on-going
national and local food security and nutrition priorities. This
would take advantage of the field presence of stakeholders
involved in the CFS. Key partners will include United Nations
Country Teams, the United Nation's High Level Task Force (HLTF),
the International Alliance against Hunger and its National
Alliances, national and regional food security thematic groups,
and a large number of civil society networks and private sector
associations operating at the regional and national levels.
26. Such mechanisms could contribute to the elaboration of
national plans against hunger and assist with the monitoring and
evaluation of agreed actions and outcomes designed to combat
hunger and food insecurity. They could also be instrumental in
informing regional bodies and the CFS Plenary about successes
achieved as well as remaining challenges and needs with a view
to soliciting guidance and assistance in this regard.
27. Establishing linkages with the country level is likely to be
more challenging in countries with weak capacity or in those
without a central organization to address food security and
nutrition in a multisectoral manner. Nevertheless, it is
precisely in such cases that the CFS Plenary should ensure that
consultation with and input from the national level takes place.
Ways of enabling such linkages need to be found.
28. FAO Regional Conferences and regional meetings of WFP, IFAD
and other concerned organizations are encouraged to devote part
of their agendas to disseminate CFS conclusions and
recommendations and to provide inputs to the CFS. Such regional
bodies should, in coordination with the CFS Bureau and Advisory
Group, open themselves to the participation of regional
representatives of CFS participants and observers, including
active participation by relevant regional intergovernmental and
CSO organizations and networks, and to regional development
institutions. The possibility of the CFS establishing and
maintaining contacts through its Bureau to other regional
organizations, such as NEPAD/CAADP, MERCOSUR, Arab Organization
for Agriculture Development, Community of Independent States,
and others, including regional CSO networks, should also be kept
open.
D. BUREAU
29. The CFS Bureau represents the broader membership of the CFS
between plenary sessions. It ensures coordination among all
actors and levels and advances tasks in preparation for CFS
plenary sessions.
30. The Bureau will perform tasks delegated to it by the Plenary
including the preparation of documents and proposals such as
setting the agenda and sending requests to and receiving inputs
from the High Level Panel of Experts. It will facilitate
UN ROME 00000059 009 OF 013
coordination among relevant actors and levels to advance
intersessional tasks entrusted to it. The Bureau should also
deal with matters related to the implementation of the reform
proposed in this document.
31. The Bureau shall be composed of the Chairperson and
[seven]/[twelve]/[thirteen] members, [one]/[two] coming from
each of the following geographic regions: Africa, Asia, Europe,
Latin America and the Caribbean, Near East, and [one]/[two] from
each North America and South-West Pacific3 The CFS Chairperson,
on a rotational basis among regions, and other members of the
Bureau shall be elected in CFS Plenary for a term of two years.
32. The Bureau, immediately following its election, will
establish an Advisory Group composed of representatives of FAO,
WFP and IFAD and other non-Member CFS Participants (see para
11). The Advisory Group will have the same tenure as the Bureau.
The Bureau will invite the different constituencies of CFS
Participants to designate their representatives to this Group,
which normally will not exceed that of the CFS Bureau in
numbers. The function of the Advisory Group is to provide input
to the Bureau regarding the range of tasks which the CFS Plenary
has instructed it to perform. Decision making will be in the
hands of the member States. It is expected that members of the
Advisory Group should be able to contribute substantive work and
provide advice to the CFS Bureau.
E. CFS SECRETARIAT
33. There should be a small, permanent CFS Secretariat located
in FAO Rome. Its task will be to assist the Plenary, the Bureau
and Advisory Group, and the High Level Panel of Experts in their
work.
34. [For the biennium 2009-2010, the Secretariat will be headed
by a Secretary from FAO and include staff from the other
Rome-based agencies (WFP and IFAD). Further arrangements
regarding the rotation of the Secretary among the Rome based
agencies and the inclusion in the Secretariat of other UN
entities directly concerned with food security and nutrition
should be decided by the CFS plenary in 2011.] OR [The
Secretariat will be headed by a Secretary from FAO and include
staff from the other Rome-based agencies (WFP and IFAD). Further
arrangements regarding the inclusion in the Secretariat of other
UN entities directly concerned with food security and nutrition
should be decided by the CFS plenary.]
35. The present CFS Secretariat will continue to perform its
functions until final decisions of CFS Plenary as per paragraph
34 are adopted and implemented.
V. EXPERT INPUT TOWARD REVITALIZED CFS
A. HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF EXPERTS ON FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION
(HLPE)
36. In line with efforts to revitalize the Committee on World
Food Security, members called for regular inclusion of
structured food security and nutrition-related expertise to
better inform its sessions. This effort should help create
synergies between world class academic/scientific knowledge,
field experience, knowledge from social actors and practical
application in various settings. Given the multidisciplinary
complexity of food security, the effort is aimed at improving
communication and information-sharing among the different
stakeholders in food security and nutrition. Its products will
focus on better understanding current food insecurity situations
and will also look forward toward emerging issues. The expert
process will, through Plenary and the Bureau, aim to support CFS
members and other stakeholders in designing strategies and
programs for addressing food insecurity. Participants in this
expert process will utilize and synthesize available
research/analyses and add value to the work performed already by
UN ROME 00000059 010 OF 013
numerous agencies, organizations, and academic institutions,
among others.
B. KEY FUNCTIONS OF HLPE
37. As directed by the CFS Plenary and Bureau, the HLPE will:
i. Assess and analyze the current state of food security and
nutrition and its underlying causes.
ii. Provide scientific and knowledge-based analysis and advice
on specific policy relevant issues, utilizing existing high
quality research, data and technical studies.
iii. Identify emerging issues, and help members prioritize
future actions and attentions on key focal areas.
C. STRUCTURE AND MODUS OPERANDI OF HLPE
38. The HLPE will have two main components:
i. A Steering Committee composed of at least 10 and not
exceeding 15 internationally recognized experts in a variety of
food security and nutrition-related fields.
ii. Ad hoc project teams constituting a larger subsidiary
network of food security and nutrition experts acting on a
project-specific basis, selected and managed by the HLPE
Steering Committee to analyze/report on specific issues.
39. Led by a Chair and Vice-Chair, elected among the members of
the Steering
Committee, the HLPE will:
i. Ensure state-of-the-art studies/analyses for consideration by
CFS sessions on a variety of food security and nutrition issues.
ii. Assemble expert "project teams" to prepare studies/analyses
for CFS sessions.
iii. Determine working methodologies and terms of reference for
project teams, and manage their work.
iv. Normally meet two times per year in Rome and possibly more
in extraordinary circumstances, to review work methodologies and
prepare work plans/products.
40. Led by a team leader, the time-bound expert "project teams"
will be responsible for drafting of studies/analyses under the
HLPE Steering Committee direction and oversight.
D. OUTPUT OF HLPE
41. By request of the CFS Plenary or Bureau, the Steering
Committee will provide scientifically sound, clear and concise
written reports/analyses for Plenary or inter-sessional purposes.
42. Following its introduction as an item on the agenda by the
Bureau and according to the nature and purpose of a project, a
report, its conclusions and recommendations could be introduced
in CFS Plenary by the Chair of the HLPE Steering Committee in
possible conjunction with the head of a specific project team.
E. COMPOSITION / SELECTION OF THE HLPE
43. The CFS Bureau, in close cooperation with FAO management and
drawing from applicable FAO legal texts, will solicit
nominations for the HLPE Steering Committee.
UN ROME 00000059 011 OF 013
i. The Steering Committee should reflect an assortment of
technical disciplines, and regional expertise and origin. Ideal
candidates will have relevant experience working with
cross-disciplinary expert processes.
ii. Members of the Steering Committee will participate in their
individual capacities, and not as representatives of their
respective governments, institutions or organizations.
iii. Members of the Steering Committee will serve for a 2-year
period, renewable once.
44. The CFS Bureau will designate an ad hoc technical selection
committee comprised of representatives from among the Rome-based
food/agriculture agencies (FAO, WFP, IFAD, CGIAR/Bioversity, a
CSO/NGO rep) to choose the Steering Committee members. The ad
hoc technical selection committee will submit its
recommendations to the CFS Bureau for approval.
45. Early in 2010, the first 10 members of the HLPE Steering
Committee will be selected. The HLPE Steering Committee will
then designate its Chair and Co-Chair to begin its work in
anticipation of the CFS October 2010 Session, based on explicit
instructions from the CFS Bureau. Additional members could be
chosen shortly after October 2010 Plenary.
46. Members of the HLPE ad-hoc project teams will be chosen by
the HLPE Steering Committee notably drawn from a database of
experts to which CFS stakeholders can nominate experts at any
time.
F. SECRETARIAL SERVICES
47. The joint CFS Secretariat, will assist the work of the HLPE
Steering Committee and its Chair. Its functions will include,
though are not limited to:
i. Maintain a roster of experts.
ii. Organize meetings of the HLPE Steering Committee and assist
project teams, as needed.
iii. Maintain system of communications, including posting of
relevant reports/analyses.
iv. Assist with preparation of working budget and other support
documentation.
G. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS TO THE HLPE STEERING COMMITTEE
48. Immediately following adoption of this agreement during the
October 2009 CFS Plenary, a letter co-signed by the CFS Chair
and FAO Director General will be sent to CFS members and others,
soliciting nominations for the HLPE Steering Committee. This
letter would explain the structure of the new process, and
contain the agreed Terms of Reference.
VI. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
A. LEGAL MATTERS
49. The extent to which CFS reform proposals would require
changes to the Genera Rules and Regulations of FAO governance
aspects such as CFS membership, composition of the Bureau and
Secretariat, and reporting arrangements, would require
adjustments to legal dimensions of the CFS will be addressed by
FAO Legal Counsel once the nature of the proposed changes is
established.
B. COST AND FUNDING
50. The cost of a reformed CFS will be influenced by the nature
UN ROME 00000059 012 OF 013
and extent of functions and activities ascribed to it,
particularly to its Bureau and Secretariat. Funding implications
include considerations such as whether the costs of the new CFS
would be shared by the main agencies involved, and to what
extent (as per paragraphs 32-34). A preliminary budget and
modalities of funding for the next biennium, including the use
of voluntary contributions and trust funds for the HLPE, will be
prepared by the Bureau and will be presented to the October
plenary session for consideration by Members with a view to gain
approval by FAO Conference. Resource mobilization strategies to
cover the costs of participation by NGOs/CSOs from developing
countries will also need to be addressed, as agreed by the CFS
at its Thirty-Fourth Session.
C. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
51. Bearing in mind the complexity of the tasks ahead and with a
view to improving the effectiveness of CFS, the Committee should
focus on tangible outputs and outcomes as well as a roadmap for
the progressive attainment of the renewed vision. More specific
outcomes will have to be defined by the revitalized CFS in its
forthcoming Sessions. It is proposed that, at its next Session,
the CFS agrees on a phased and results-based plan to implement
reform as outlined in this document. With this in mind, it is
suggested that at its 35th Session, the CFS be invited to:
Task Proposed deadline
October 2009:
- Approve CFS Reform document
- Election of CFS Bureau (paras 29-32)
- Bureau to present a draft budget and financing strategy for
the reformed CFS including the HLPE(para 49)
- Call for nominations to the HLPE Steering Committee
November 2009:
- Legal Office to finalize changes to the General Rules of FAO
and the Rules of Procedure of the CFS (para 48)
- Bureau to designate the ad-hoc technical selection committee
for HLPE Steering Committee members (para 46)
January 2010
- Bureau to establish an Advisory Group (para 32)
- Make arrangements to establish a Secretariat (paras 33-35)
- Designate the HLPE Steering Committee members (para 44)
February 2010
- First joint meeting of the HLPE Steering Committee and CFS
Bureau and Secretariat to discuss areas requiring advice from
the HLPE and agree on a timetable for delivery (para 45)
April 2010
- Bureau to develop a work programme through a consultative
process
October 2010
- Bureau to submit a proposal for a work programme including
implementation of (some parts of) Phase II, to the 36th Session
of CFS.
UN ROME 00000059 013 OF 013
52. The Committee may wish to endorse this document and entrust
the Bureau to proceed with implementation as outlined above.
NOTES
Concept of Food Security
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have
physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious
food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an
active and healthy life. The four pillars of food security are
availability, stability of supply, access and utilization. The
nutritional dimension is integral to the concept of food
security and to the work
of CFS.
Reform process
The reform proposals made in this document are the results of
deliberations between the CFS Bureau and an open Contact Group
established to advise the Bureau on all aspects of CFS reform.
This participatory process included representatives from FAO
Membership, WFP, IFAD, Bioversity International, the UN-High
Level Task Force on the Global Food Security
Crisis (HLTF),the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, and
NGOs/CSOs/private sector.
Next steps
In order to complete this process, the Committee is invited to
first focus its attention on bracketed text.
End Text
CousinE
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
NSC FOR PRATT, USDA FOR DOUVELIS, USUN NY FOR SNOWDEN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAGR EAID PREL UN FAO
SUBJECT: COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY: FINAL DRAFT TEXT FOR
NEGOTIATIONS IN OCTOBER 14-17 PLENARY SESSION
REF: A. USUN Rome 55
B. USUN Rome 49
C. USUN Rome 41 and previous
1. This message is sensitive but unclassified. Please handle
accordingly.
2. (SBU) Summary and Action Request. Pursuant to an agreement
of the 34th Session of the Committee on World Food Security
(CFS),members have been engaged in a year-long process to
reform the CFS. The focus of the October 14-17 35th Session of
the CFS will be a discussion of the document resulting from this
process. The below text, "Reform of the Committee on World Food
Security," (see paragraph 11),is a near final draft document
leading into the CFS meeting. While considerable progress has
been achieved, substantial disagreement remains on the exact
role and status of the CFS and the Rome-based agencies in
general, and FAO in particular, versus other entities concerned
with food security. Mission offers suggestions on text and
strategy below, and welcomes guidance for the October 14-17
session by October 13. End Summary and Action Request.
3. (U) The General Rules of FAO (GRO, XXXIII, para 6) designate
the CFS as "a forum in the United Nations system for review and
follow-up of policies concerning world food security." The
reform document seeks to upgrade this role, designating it as
"the cornerstone for international coordination" (paragraph 2 of
the Context section) and "the foremost inclusive international
and intergovernmental platform for a broad range of committed
stakeholders to work together in support of country led
processes" ( paragraph 4 in the Vision and Role section).
4. (SBU) There is considerable support for a central position
for Rome and the CFS not only among the G-77, but also among a
number of European countries (Netherlands, France, Germany,
Russia) and other signatories of the L'Aquila G-8 declaration
(Brazil). While it is likely that compromise can be reached on
individual phrases, such as replacing "cornerstone" with the
less ambitious "vital role" (paragraph 2 of CFS text),the
description of the "role" of the CFS under Phase 1 of the reform
(paragraph 5) could be interpreted too broadly and therefore
lead to activities that should only be considered during Phase 2
of the reform. Mission therefore recommends:
- paragraph 5i be entitled "Discussion at the National and
Global Level" rather than "Coordination at the Global Level" and
the phrase "coordination, alignment and collaborative action" be
deleted from the paragraph.
- Similarly, in paragraph 5ii the following language be deleted:
"and coordination through the development and approval of
international strategies or guidelines."
- The entire paragraph 5iii be moved to paragraph 6 as it
involves activities that should only be considered as part of
the second phase of reform and that the beginning of the
paragraph be worded: "At country request, promote and seek to
support and guide, where appropriate, the development and
implementation of nationally and regionally owned plans of
action~"
5. (SBU) The roles under Phase II of the CFS Vision and Role
(paragraph 6) go further in prescribing a more top-down role for
the CFS than preferable. Disagreement among members also
remains on introductory wording of Phase II and whether the
additional roles for CFS "would" or "could" include the areas
outlined in paragraph 6. Mission recommends strong advocacy for
"could" so that the roles outlined in Phase II are conditional
upon demonstrated reform. We also see value in stressing at
least two or three years before Phase II commences.
UN ROME 00000059 002 OF 013
6. (SBU) Coordination at national and regional levels (
paragraph 6, i): Mission suggests moving up within the
paragraph the final line noting the work of the Secretary's High
Level Task Force (HLTF) and the possibility for the CFS to build
upon this role. In addition, we propose to emphasize that
FAO/CFS coordinating role must be at the request of individual
countries and regions and in accordance with national food
security strategy and plans.
7. (SBU) Promote accountability and share best practices
(paragraph 6, ii): A number of developing countries,
particularly Egypt and China, have expressed unease with the
concept of monitoring. Mission believes we can build upon their
reservations to redirect CFS to focus more on a sharing and
analysis of best practices and that efforts should be made to
reassess what type of monitoring would support the new process.
8. (SBU) There appears to be strong support and poor
understanding of what is meant by "Develop a Global Strategic
Framework" (paragraph 6, iii). Such a Framework could be
anything from a general outline of the range of options
available in the development of a country plan to a prescriptive
listing of how a plan must be articulated and implemented.
Mission believes the first option, with an analysis of the
effectiveness of certain programs under a range of
circumstances, could be helpful to countries as they develop and
fine-tune their country strategies. Other outstanding issues
include the size of the Bureau and the possibility of rotating
the Secretary position among the three Rome-based agencies.
9. (SBU) There are also a number of structural changes to the
CFS that, unchecked, could have management and budget
implications. The new CFS anticipates an enlarged Bureau, a
Secretariat, and a High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) comprised
of a Steering Committee and project teams. Mission supports
expanding the Bureau from the current five members to eight or
fourteen, allowing for representation from all regions. Members
have also been assured the Secretariat will remain essentially
the same in size and cost and that this Secretariat could also
serve as the Secretariat for the HLPE. A draft budget presented
by the Secretariat shows a flat budget in nominal terms for the
CFS bureau and Secretariat for next year and establishes a trust
fund to support activities of the HLPE. Thus far, only France
has contributed to the trust fund with USD 700,000.
10. (SBU) Our in-depth discussions with some supporters of a
stronger role for the CFS indicates there may be room for
movement toward our objectives. A clear statement from the U.S.
at the CFS on how to operationalize the Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security, and the role we envision for Rome
and the CFS within that partnership, will help persuade others.
11. (U) Begin text of draft CFS reform document (internal
numbering):
I. CONTEXT
1. The rise in food prices in 2007-08, followed by the financial
and economic crisis in
2009, has highlighted the unacceptable levels of structural
poverty and hunger around the world. The food and financial
crisis threatens global food security and nutrition and the
achievement of the 1996 World Food Summit target and the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for reducing hunger and
malnutrition. It is now estimated that more than a billion
people, one in every six human beings may be suffering from
under-nourishment. These are mainly small holder food producers,
particularly women, and other rural inhabitants.
2. Faced with rising hunger and a weak performing Committee on
World Food Security
UN ROME 00000059 003 OF 013
(CFS),Member nations agreed at the 34th Session of CFS in
October 2008 to embark on a reform of the CFS so that it can
fully play its [vital role/as the cornerstone] for international
coordination in the area of food security and nutrition. The
reforms are designed to redefine the CFS' vision and role to
focus on the key challenges of eradicating hunger; expanding
participation in CFS to ensure that voices of all relevant
stakeholders are heard in the policy debate on food and
agriculture; adapt its rules and procedures with the aim to
become the central United Nations political platform dealing
with food security and nutrition; strengthening its linkages
with regional, national and local levels; and supporting CFS
discussions with structured expertise through the creation of a
High Level Panel of Experts so that decisions taken by the CFS
are based on hard evidence and state of the art knowledge. FAO
Council considered "the CFS reform to be crucial to the
governance of world food security, with a view toward exploring
synergies with the emerging Global Partnership for Agriculture,
Food Security and Nutrition" (CL 136/REP, paragraph 29). CFS
reform has been a topic of discussion in several fora including
G8, G20 and the UN General Assembly and is on the agenda for the
World Summit on Food Security 2009.
3. In order to realize this goal and ensure better coordination,
CFS Members agreed on
three key guiding principles for the reform - inclusiveness,
strong linkages to the field to
ensure the process is based on the reality on the ground and
flexibility in implementation so that CFS can respond to a
changing external environment and membership needs. Members
agreed that effective implementation of CFS' new roles will be
carried out in phases. Starting after the Committee's meeting in
mid-October 2009, CFS' global activities, particularly in areas
of coordination, policy convergence, support and guidance to
countries will be the first to be implemented. While
implementing Phase I, CFS will work on better defining the
implementation details of other activities. In Phase II CFS will
gradually carry out those additional activities which are
related to coordination at national and regional levels,
promoting accountability and sharing best practices at all
levels, and developing a global strategic framework for food
security and nutrition (see Section V for proposed
implementation plan).
II. VISION AND ROLE
A. VISION
4. The CFS is and remains an intergovernmental Committee. The
CFS [as an important element of the Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security/as the Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security] will constitute the foremost
inclusive international and intergovernmental platform for a
broad range of committed stakeholders to work together in a
coordinated manner and in support of country-led processes
towards the elimination of hunger and ensuring food security and
nutrition for all human beings. The CFS will strive for a world
free from hunger where countries implement the voluntary
guidelines for the progressive realization of the right to
adequate food in the context of national food security.
B. ROLE
5. The roles of the CFS will be:
i. Coordination at global level. Provide a platform for
discussion, coordination, alignment and collaborative action
among governments, regional organizations, international
associations and agencies, NGOs, CSOs, food producers'
organizations, private sector organizations, philanthropic
organizations, and other relevant stakeholders, in a manner that
meets each country's specific context and needs.
UN ROME 00000059 004 OF 013
ii. Policy convergence. Promote greater policy convergence and
coordination through the development and approval of
international strategies or guidelines on food security and
nutrition on the basis of the lessons learned from local
experience,
inputs received from the national and regional levels, and
expert advice and opinions from different stakeholders.
iii. Support and guidance to countries. Promote and seek to
support and guide the development, implementation, monitoring
and evaluation of nationally and regionally owned plans of
action for the elimination of hunger, the achievement of
food security and the practical application of the "Voluntary
Guidelines for the Right to Food" that shall be based on the
principles of participation, transparency and accountability.
6. In Phase II, the CFS will gradually take on additional roles
that would/could include:
i. Coordination at national and regional levels. Serve as a
platform to promote greater coordination and alignment of
actions in the field, encourage more efficient use of resources
and identify resource gaps. One guiding principle to support
this role will be to build on and strengthen existing structures
and linkages with key partners at all levels. Key partners
include national mechanisms and networks for food security and
nutrition, the UN country teams and other coordination
mechanisms such as the International Alliance Against Hunger and
its National Alliances, food security thematic groups, regional
intergovernmental bodies and a large number of civil society
networks and private sector associations operating at the
regional and national levels. In each case, the functional
contributions they could make, as well as how the CFS could
strengthen linkages and enhance synergy with such partners would
have to be established. As the reform progresses, the CFS will
build, as appropriate, on the coordination work of the United
Nation's High Level Task Force (HLTF).
ii. Promote accountability and share best practices at all
levels. One of the main functions of the current CFS is to
"monitor actively the implementation of the 1996 World Food
Summit Plan of Action (WFS-PoA)". However, although countries
are taking measures to address food insecurity, the specific
programs as they are presented do not necessarily help to report
quantitatively on progress towards realizing the WFS PoA
objectives. This role thus needs to be further discussed and
developed in order to address the questions of whether we are
achieving our objectives and how food insecurity and
malnutrition can be reduced more quickly and effectively. This
will entail developing an innovative mechanism to monitor
progress towards these agreed upon objectives and actions taking
into account lessons learned from previous CFS and other
monitoring attempts. Comments by all CFS stakeholders will have
to be taken into account and new mechanisms will build on
existing structures.
iii. Develop a Global Strategic Framework. A prerequisite to
facilitate the work of the
Committee for improved coordination and synchronized action by a
wide range of stakeholders would be a global strategic framework
for food security and nutrition. The global strategic framework
will aim at providing the analytical underpinning for the CFS'
work and will be flexible so it can be adjusted as priorities
change. The starting point for such a process could be a review
of existing, related initiatives such as the UN's Comprehensive
Framework for Action (CFA),and the Voluntary Guidelines to
Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate
Food in the Context of National Food Security.
III. COMPOSITION, MODALITIES OF PARTICIPATION, AND
CONSULTATION / COORDINATION MECHANISMS
A. COMPOSITION AND MODALITIES OF PARTICIPATION
7. The CFS is and remains an intergovernmental Committee. It
will be composed of members, participants and observers and will
seek to achieve a balance between inclusiveness and
effectiveness. Its composition will ensure that the voices of
all relevant stakeholders - particularly those most affected by
food insecurity - are heard. It shall further take into account
UN ROME 00000059 005 OF 013
the fact that the overall CFS includes not only an annual global
meeting, but also a series of intersessional activities at
various levels.
B. MEMBERS
8. The membership of the Committee shall be open to all Members
of FAO, WFP or IFAD, or non-member States of FAO that are member
States of the United Nations.
9. Member States are encouraged to participate in Committee
sessions at the highest level possible (Ministerial or cabinet
level is desirable),insofar as possible representing a common,
inter-ministerial governmental position. In those countries
where there is a multistakeholder, inter-ministerial national
body or mechanism concerning food security and nutrition, Member
States are encouraged to include its representatives in their
delegations to the Committee.
10. Members take part fully in the work of the Committee with
the right to intervene in plenary and breakout discussions,
approve meeting documents and agendas, submit and present
documents and formal proposals, and interact with the Bureau
during the intersessional period. Voting and decision taking is
the exclusive prerogative of Members, including drafting the
final report of CFS Plenary sessions.
C. PARTICIPANTS
11. The Committee shall be open to participants from the
following categories of organizations and entities:
i. Representatives of UN agencies and bodies with a specific
mandate in the field of food security and nutrition such as FAO,
IFAD, WFP, the HLTF (as a coordinating mechanism of the UN-SG)
and representatives of other relevant UN System bodies
whose overall work is related to attaining food security,
nutrition, and the right to food such as the Special Rapporteur
on the Right to Food, the Office of the UN High Commissioner on
Human Rights, WHO, UNICEF, UNDP, Standing Committee on
Nutrition (SCN).
ii. Civil society and non-governmental organizations and their
networks with strong relevance to issues of food security and
nutrition with particular attention to organizations
representing smallholder family farmers, artisanal fisherfolk,
herders/pastoralists, landless, urban poor, agricultural and
food workers, women, youth, consumers, Indigenous Peoples, and
International NGOs whose mandates and activities are
concentrated in the areas of concern to the Committee. This
group will aim to achieve gender and geographic balance in their
representation.
iii. International agricultural research systems, such as
through representatives of the Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and others.
iv. International and regional Financial Institutions including
World Bank, International Monetary Fund, regional development
banks and WTO.
v. Representatives of private sector associations2 and private
philanthropic foundations active in the areas of concern to the
Committee.
12. Participants take part in the work of the Committee with the
right to intervene in plenary and breakout discussions to
contribute to preparation of meeting documents and agendas,
submit and present documents and formal proposals. They commit
to contribute regularly to inter-sessional activities of the
Committee at all levels and interact with the Bureau during the
inter-sessional period through the Advisory Group established by
UN ROME 00000059 006 OF 013
the Bureau.
D. OBSERVERS
13. The Committee or its Bureau may invite other interested
organizations relevant to its work to observe entire sessions or
on specific agenda items. Such organizations or bodies may also
apply to the Committee for Observer status to participate
regularly, periodically or exceptionally on specific issues
subject to the decision of the Committee or its Bureau. Such
organizations could include:
i. Regional associations of countries and regional
intergovernmental development institutions;
ii. Local, national, regional and global CSOs/NGOs, other than
those attending as participants, which are active in areas
related to food security, nutrition, and the right to food,
particularly organizations which are linked to a regional or
global
network;
iii. Other networks or associative organizations including local
authorities, foundations and research or technical institutions.
14. Observers at Committee sessions may be invited by the Chair
to intervene during discussions.
15. Mechanisms for enhancing the effectiveness of CFS Plenary
discussions will be explored, such as that of holding
preparatory consultations of regional groups and of Participant
constituencies (civil society, private sector, etc.) to define
positions and nominate spokespersons. Plenary sessions of the
Committee should be organized in a way that are manageable and
produce concrete outcomes. There is no limit to the
participation by Members. The Bureau will determine the
allocation of seats for Participants and Observers in
consultation with the CSO/NGO coordination mechanisms. The quota
assigned to civil society organizations and NGOs will be such as
to ensure their visible and effective participation, equitable
geographic representation, with particular attention to the
categories of organizations detailed in paragraph 11(ii).
E. CONSULTATION/COORDINATION MECHANISMS AND ACTIVITIES
16. Civil society organizations/NGOs and their networks will be
invited to autonomously establish a global mechanism for food
security and nutrition which will function as a facilitating
body for CSO/NGOs consultation and participation in the CFS.
Such mechanisms will also serve inter-sessional global, regional
and national actions in which organizations of those sectors of
the population most affected by food insecurity, would be
accorded priority representation. Civil society
organizations/NGOs will submit to the CFS Bureau a proposal
regarding how they intend to organize their participation in the
CFS in a way that ensures broad and balanced participation by
regions and types of organizations keeping in mind the
principles approved by the CFS at its Thirty-Fourth Session in
October 2008 (CFS: 2008/5; CL 135/10: paragraph 15). The
activities of the mechanism will include:
i. broad and regular exchange of information, analysis and
experience;
ii. developing common positions as appropriate;
iii. communicating to the CFS and, as appropriate, its Bureau
through representatives designated by an internal self-selection
process within each civil society category;
iv. convening a civil society forum as a preparatory event
UN ROME 00000059 007 OF 013
before CFS sessions if so decided by the civil society mechanism.
17. Private sector associations, private philanthropic
organizations and other CFS stakeholders active in areas related
to food security, nutrition, and the right to food are
encouraged to autonomously establish and maintain a permanent
coordination mechanism for participation in the CFS and for
actions derived from that participation at global, regional and
national levels. They are invited to communicate a proposal to
that effect to the CFS Bureau.
IV. MECHANISMS AND PROCEDURES
A. OVERALL PROCESS AND STRUCTURE
18. Bearing in mind that CFS will include a Plenary, as well as
intersessional activities at different levels, the process of
defining strategies and actions to be adopted by Members should
be transparent and take into consideration the views of all
participants and stakeholders to the fullest extent possible in
order to foster ownership and full participation during
implementation of these strategies and actions.
19. The CFS will include:
i. The Plenary of the CFS
ii. The CFS Bureau and its Advisory Group
iii. The High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) - a
multi-disciplinary scientific advisory body to the CFS
iv. The Secretariat serving the CFS (Plenary, Bureau and its
Advisory Group, and HLPE)
B. THE PLENARY
20. The Plenary is the central body for decision-taking, debate,
coordination, lesson- learning and convergence by all
stakeholders at global level on issues pertaining to food
security and nutrition and on the implementation of the
Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of
the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food
Security. It should focus on relevant and specific issues
related to food security and nutrition in order to provide
guidance and actionable recommendations to assist all
stakeholders in eradicating hunger.
21. Regular Plenary Sessions shall be held annually.
Extraordinary sessions may be requested by its Members and
approved by the Bureau after consultation with CFS Members. The
results of the CFS Plenary shall be reported to the FAO
Conference and to the UNGA through ECOSOC. The Chair of the CFS
should consult with ECOSOC and take all necessary actions so
that modalities for meaningful reporting be established and
implemented. CFS Participants, including UN and other
intergovernmental agencies, NGOs and CSOs are encouraged to
consider in their respective governing bodies the outcomes of
the CFS which are relevant to their own activities.
22. Any specific recommendations adopted by the Plenary of the
CFS which affect the
programme or finances and legal or constitutional aspects of
concerned UN entities shall be reported to their appropriate
bodies.
C. LINKAGES BETWEEN CFS AND THE REGIONAL AND COUNTRY LEVELS
23. It is crucial that the work of the CFS is based on the
reality on the ground. It will be fundamental for the CFS,
through its Bureau and Advisory Group, to nurture and maintain
linkages with different actors at regional, sub regional and
local levels to ensure ongoing, two-way exchange of information
among these stakeholders during intersessional periods. This
will ensure that at its annual sessions the Plenary is made
UN ROME 00000059 008 OF 013
aware of latest developments on the ground, and that,
conversely, results of the deliberations of the Plenary are
widely disseminated at regional, sub-regional and country as
well as global levels. Existing linkages should be strengthened,
such as through the FAO Regional Conferences, and other regional
and sub-regional bodies dealing with food security and nutrition
related issues.
24. CFS Members States are encouraged, at their discretion, to
constitute or strengthen multi-disciplinary national mechanisms
(e.g. food security networks, national alliances, national CFS)
including all key stakeholders dedicated to advance food
security at national and local levels. Through renewed
mobilization and coordination of key stakeholders, such
mechanisms will enable more effective identification and
implementation of food security and nutrition policies and
programs.
25. Existing structures should be used to ensure programs are
better integrated with each other and aligned with on-going
national and local food security and nutrition priorities. This
would take advantage of the field presence of stakeholders
involved in the CFS. Key partners will include United Nations
Country Teams, the United Nation's High Level Task Force (HLTF),
the International Alliance against Hunger and its National
Alliances, national and regional food security thematic groups,
and a large number of civil society networks and private sector
associations operating at the regional and national levels.
26. Such mechanisms could contribute to the elaboration of
national plans against hunger and assist with the monitoring and
evaluation of agreed actions and outcomes designed to combat
hunger and food insecurity. They could also be instrumental in
informing regional bodies and the CFS Plenary about successes
achieved as well as remaining challenges and needs with a view
to soliciting guidance and assistance in this regard.
27. Establishing linkages with the country level is likely to be
more challenging in countries with weak capacity or in those
without a central organization to address food security and
nutrition in a multisectoral manner. Nevertheless, it is
precisely in such cases that the CFS Plenary should ensure that
consultation with and input from the national level takes place.
Ways of enabling such linkages need to be found.
28. FAO Regional Conferences and regional meetings of WFP, IFAD
and other concerned organizations are encouraged to devote part
of their agendas to disseminate CFS conclusions and
recommendations and to provide inputs to the CFS. Such regional
bodies should, in coordination with the CFS Bureau and Advisory
Group, open themselves to the participation of regional
representatives of CFS participants and observers, including
active participation by relevant regional intergovernmental and
CSO organizations and networks, and to regional development
institutions. The possibility of the CFS establishing and
maintaining contacts through its Bureau to other regional
organizations, such as NEPAD/CAADP, MERCOSUR, Arab Organization
for Agriculture Development, Community of Independent States,
and others, including regional CSO networks, should also be kept
open.
D. BUREAU
29. The CFS Bureau represents the broader membership of the CFS
between plenary sessions. It ensures coordination among all
actors and levels and advances tasks in preparation for CFS
plenary sessions.
30. The Bureau will perform tasks delegated to it by the Plenary
including the preparation of documents and proposals such as
setting the agenda and sending requests to and receiving inputs
from the High Level Panel of Experts. It will facilitate
UN ROME 00000059 009 OF 013
coordination among relevant actors and levels to advance
intersessional tasks entrusted to it. The Bureau should also
deal with matters related to the implementation of the reform
proposed in this document.
31. The Bureau shall be composed of the Chairperson and
[seven]/[twelve]/[thirteen] members, [one]/[two] coming from
each of the following geographic regions: Africa, Asia, Europe,
Latin America and the Caribbean, Near East, and [one]/[two] from
each North America and South-West Pacific3 The CFS Chairperson,
on a rotational basis among regions, and other members of the
Bureau shall be elected in CFS Plenary for a term of two years.
32. The Bureau, immediately following its election, will
establish an Advisory Group composed of representatives of FAO,
WFP and IFAD and other non-Member CFS Participants (see para
11). The Advisory Group will have the same tenure as the Bureau.
The Bureau will invite the different constituencies of CFS
Participants to designate their representatives to this Group,
which normally will not exceed that of the CFS Bureau in
numbers. The function of the Advisory Group is to provide input
to the Bureau regarding the range of tasks which the CFS Plenary
has instructed it to perform. Decision making will be in the
hands of the member States. It is expected that members of the
Advisory Group should be able to contribute substantive work and
provide advice to the CFS Bureau.
E. CFS SECRETARIAT
33. There should be a small, permanent CFS Secretariat located
in FAO Rome. Its task will be to assist the Plenary, the Bureau
and Advisory Group, and the High Level Panel of Experts in their
work.
34. [For the biennium 2009-2010, the Secretariat will be headed
by a Secretary from FAO and include staff from the other
Rome-based agencies (WFP and IFAD). Further arrangements
regarding the rotation of the Secretary among the Rome based
agencies and the inclusion in the Secretariat of other UN
entities directly concerned with food security and nutrition
should be decided by the CFS plenary in 2011.] OR [The
Secretariat will be headed by a Secretary from FAO and include
staff from the other Rome-based agencies (WFP and IFAD). Further
arrangements regarding the inclusion in the Secretariat of other
UN entities directly concerned with food security and nutrition
should be decided by the CFS plenary.]
35. The present CFS Secretariat will continue to perform its
functions until final decisions of CFS Plenary as per paragraph
34 are adopted and implemented.
V. EXPERT INPUT TOWARD REVITALIZED CFS
A. HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF EXPERTS ON FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION
(HLPE)
36. In line with efforts to revitalize the Committee on World
Food Security, members called for regular inclusion of
structured food security and nutrition-related expertise to
better inform its sessions. This effort should help create
synergies between world class academic/scientific knowledge,
field experience, knowledge from social actors and practical
application in various settings. Given the multidisciplinary
complexity of food security, the effort is aimed at improving
communication and information-sharing among the different
stakeholders in food security and nutrition. Its products will
focus on better understanding current food insecurity situations
and will also look forward toward emerging issues. The expert
process will, through Plenary and the Bureau, aim to support CFS
members and other stakeholders in designing strategies and
programs for addressing food insecurity. Participants in this
expert process will utilize and synthesize available
research/analyses and add value to the work performed already by
UN ROME 00000059 010 OF 013
numerous agencies, organizations, and academic institutions,
among others.
B. KEY FUNCTIONS OF HLPE
37. As directed by the CFS Plenary and Bureau, the HLPE will:
i. Assess and analyze the current state of food security and
nutrition and its underlying causes.
ii. Provide scientific and knowledge-based analysis and advice
on specific policy relevant issues, utilizing existing high
quality research, data and technical studies.
iii. Identify emerging issues, and help members prioritize
future actions and attentions on key focal areas.
C. STRUCTURE AND MODUS OPERANDI OF HLPE
38. The HLPE will have two main components:
i. A Steering Committee composed of at least 10 and not
exceeding 15 internationally recognized experts in a variety of
food security and nutrition-related fields.
ii. Ad hoc project teams constituting a larger subsidiary
network of food security and nutrition experts acting on a
project-specific basis, selected and managed by the HLPE
Steering Committee to analyze/report on specific issues.
39. Led by a Chair and Vice-Chair, elected among the members of
the Steering
Committee, the HLPE will:
i. Ensure state-of-the-art studies/analyses for consideration by
CFS sessions on a variety of food security and nutrition issues.
ii. Assemble expert "project teams" to prepare studies/analyses
for CFS sessions.
iii. Determine working methodologies and terms of reference for
project teams, and manage their work.
iv. Normally meet two times per year in Rome and possibly more
in extraordinary circumstances, to review work methodologies and
prepare work plans/products.
40. Led by a team leader, the time-bound expert "project teams"
will be responsible for drafting of studies/analyses under the
HLPE Steering Committee direction and oversight.
D. OUTPUT OF HLPE
41. By request of the CFS Plenary or Bureau, the Steering
Committee will provide scientifically sound, clear and concise
written reports/analyses for Plenary or inter-sessional purposes.
42. Following its introduction as an item on the agenda by the
Bureau and according to the nature and purpose of a project, a
report, its conclusions and recommendations could be introduced
in CFS Plenary by the Chair of the HLPE Steering Committee in
possible conjunction with the head of a specific project team.
E. COMPOSITION / SELECTION OF THE HLPE
43. The CFS Bureau, in close cooperation with FAO management and
drawing from applicable FAO legal texts, will solicit
nominations for the HLPE Steering Committee.
UN ROME 00000059 011 OF 013
i. The Steering Committee should reflect an assortment of
technical disciplines, and regional expertise and origin. Ideal
candidates will have relevant experience working with
cross-disciplinary expert processes.
ii. Members of the Steering Committee will participate in their
individual capacities, and not as representatives of their
respective governments, institutions or organizations.
iii. Members of the Steering Committee will serve for a 2-year
period, renewable once.
44. The CFS Bureau will designate an ad hoc technical selection
committee comprised of representatives from among the Rome-based
food/agriculture agencies (FAO, WFP, IFAD, CGIAR/Bioversity, a
CSO/NGO rep) to choose the Steering Committee members. The ad
hoc technical selection committee will submit its
recommendations to the CFS Bureau for approval.
45. Early in 2010, the first 10 members of the HLPE Steering
Committee will be selected. The HLPE Steering Committee will
then designate its Chair and Co-Chair to begin its work in
anticipation of the CFS October 2010 Session, based on explicit
instructions from the CFS Bureau. Additional members could be
chosen shortly after October 2010 Plenary.
46. Members of the HLPE ad-hoc project teams will be chosen by
the HLPE Steering Committee notably drawn from a database of
experts to which CFS stakeholders can nominate experts at any
time.
F. SECRETARIAL SERVICES
47. The joint CFS Secretariat, will assist the work of the HLPE
Steering Committee and its Chair. Its functions will include,
though are not limited to:
i. Maintain a roster of experts.
ii. Organize meetings of the HLPE Steering Committee and assist
project teams, as needed.
iii. Maintain system of communications, including posting of
relevant reports/analyses.
iv. Assist with preparation of working budget and other support
documentation.
G. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS TO THE HLPE STEERING COMMITTEE
48. Immediately following adoption of this agreement during the
October 2009 CFS Plenary, a letter co-signed by the CFS Chair
and FAO Director General will be sent to CFS members and others,
soliciting nominations for the HLPE Steering Committee. This
letter would explain the structure of the new process, and
contain the agreed Terms of Reference.
VI. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
A. LEGAL MATTERS
49. The extent to which CFS reform proposals would require
changes to the Genera Rules and Regulations of FAO governance
aspects such as CFS membership, composition of the Bureau and
Secretariat, and reporting arrangements, would require
adjustments to legal dimensions of the CFS will be addressed by
FAO Legal Counsel once the nature of the proposed changes is
established.
B. COST AND FUNDING
50. The cost of a reformed CFS will be influenced by the nature
UN ROME 00000059 012 OF 013
and extent of functions and activities ascribed to it,
particularly to its Bureau and Secretariat. Funding implications
include considerations such as whether the costs of the new CFS
would be shared by the main agencies involved, and to what
extent (as per paragraphs 32-34). A preliminary budget and
modalities of funding for the next biennium, including the use
of voluntary contributions and trust funds for the HLPE, will be
prepared by the Bureau and will be presented to the October
plenary session for consideration by Members with a view to gain
approval by FAO Conference. Resource mobilization strategies to
cover the costs of participation by NGOs/CSOs from developing
countries will also need to be addressed, as agreed by the CFS
at its Thirty-Fourth Session.
C. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
51. Bearing in mind the complexity of the tasks ahead and with a
view to improving the effectiveness of CFS, the Committee should
focus on tangible outputs and outcomes as well as a roadmap for
the progressive attainment of the renewed vision. More specific
outcomes will have to be defined by the revitalized CFS in its
forthcoming Sessions. It is proposed that, at its next Session,
the CFS agrees on a phased and results-based plan to implement
reform as outlined in this document. With this in mind, it is
suggested that at its 35th Session, the CFS be invited to:
Task Proposed deadline
October 2009:
- Approve CFS Reform document
- Election of CFS Bureau (paras 29-32)
- Bureau to present a draft budget and financing strategy for
the reformed CFS including the HLPE(para 49)
- Call for nominations to the HLPE Steering Committee
November 2009:
- Legal Office to finalize changes to the General Rules of FAO
and the Rules of Procedure of the CFS (para 48)
- Bureau to designate the ad-hoc technical selection committee
for HLPE Steering Committee members (para 46)
January 2010
- Bureau to establish an Advisory Group (para 32)
- Make arrangements to establish a Secretariat (paras 33-35)
- Designate the HLPE Steering Committee members (para 44)
February 2010
- First joint meeting of the HLPE Steering Committee and CFS
Bureau and Secretariat to discuss areas requiring advice from
the HLPE and agree on a timetable for delivery (para 45)
April 2010
- Bureau to develop a work programme through a consultative
process
October 2010
- Bureau to submit a proposal for a work programme including
implementation of (some parts of) Phase II, to the 36th Session
of CFS.
UN ROME 00000059 013 OF 013
52. The Committee may wish to endorse this document and entrust
the Bureau to proceed with implementation as outlined above.
NOTES
Concept of Food Security
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have
physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious
food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an
active and healthy life. The four pillars of food security are
availability, stability of supply, access and utilization. The
nutritional dimension is integral to the concept of food
security and to the work
of CFS.
Reform process
The reform proposals made in this document are the results of
deliberations between the CFS Bureau and an open Contact Group
established to advise the Bureau on all aspects of CFS reform.
This participatory process included representatives from FAO
Membership, WFP, IFAD, Bioversity International, the UN-High
Level Task Force on the Global Food Security
Crisis (HLTF),the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, and
NGOs/CSOs/private sector.
Next steps
In order to complete this process, the Committee is invited to
first focus its attention on bracketed text.
End Text
CousinE